Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Review
Emerging Prognostic Factors in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
N. A. Iacovelli1,3, P. Bossi2, C. Fallai1, G. Gardani3, E. Orlandi1
Radiotherapy Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
Head and Neck Cancer Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
Citation: Iacovelli N A, Bossi P, Fallai C, Gardani G, Orlandi E. Emerging prognostic factors in Nasopharyngeal
carcinoma. J Nasopharyng Carcinoma, 2014, 1(8): e8. doi:10.15383/jnpc.8.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conflict of interest: None.
Copyright:
access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Abstract: Identification and validation of prognostic factors in NPC has been mainly performed in areas where the
disease is endemic. It is matter of debate if the same variables will retain their impact when applied to non-endemic
areas, with prevalence of other histological subtypes and with a different genetic background.
Keywords: Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Prognostic Factors
Introduction
6).
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
the
same
authors
retrospectively
analyzed
749
sufficient (18).
prolongation (20).
Emerging Factors
(10).
treated with IMRT has been evaluated in many studies. Guo et al.
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
rates for NPC patients with GTV-P <19 vs. >19 ml were 94.9%
vs. 64.8%, 97.0% vs. 76.4%, 98.2% vs. 92.5% and 97.1% vs.
fibrosis (28). The trials by Pow et al. and Kam et al. confirmed
with Stage III irradiated by IMRT (29-30). Pow et al. and Fang et
Also Feng and colleagues found that large GTV-P was an adverse
prognostic factor for the 5-year local regional control (LRC) rate
(QoL)(29-31).
the 2DRT, to 81% in the 3DRT, and 85% in the IMRT era, while
studied (33).
system (25).
Increase of the viral DNA load along with clinical stage (from
(27).
and PPV are 83% and 87%, respectively (38). Consensus lack on
EBV DNA loads to detect DM) and local recurrence (LR) or loco-
86% to 96% and that for LR/LRR ranged from 51 to 67%. (42-
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
of
EBV-negative
NPC
among
North
Americans,
one
suggesting that viral status may be the driving factor behind WHO
2-[Fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose
with
tomography/computed
tomography
(PET/CT)
technical
intrinsically
aligned
tumors, may reflect the aggressiveness of local tumor and the risk
NPC.
basis
Dual-modality
for
(FDG)
positron
positron
emission
provides
functional
the
and
lower 3-year disease free survival (DFS) rate than patients with
treated NPC and a high FDG uptake may be useful for identifying
relapse among patients with NPC. The study identifies two subsets
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
results suggest that a cut off pSUVmax of the primary tumor at 7.5
the study may be too short to fully assess DFS. Also the study
nodes larger than that at the primary tumor site (SUVmax-N >
suggesting
(76).
neck lymph nodes in 196 patients with primary stage III-IVb NPC.
(73).
of long-term survival than MTV and SUV alone. The authors also
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
that
high
18F-FDG
uptake
was
valuable
factor in stage IVab NPC patients that may inform the clinical
response. The results of the 3-month post therapy PET and total
for stage IVab patients who achieve a CMR after definitive CRT
value before therapy and two weeks after the start of IMRT
effect of IMRT. This indicates that, two weeks after the start of
disruption. But this study has some limitations: the ADC values
randomized studies.
Biomarkers
NPC. For the vast majority only single reports could be found in
integrity and cell density and can also detect local microscopic
hereafter cited.
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
analysis with poor OS, DFS and LRC, but not DMFS (118).
clinical
NPC patients.
638) were inversely associated with OS, and the level of miR-
application
for
selecting
different
treatments,
Quality of Life
Future Perspectives
factors (113).
patients with the same cancer stage have been reported, which
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
(127). In only one paper Luo et al. created a prognostic model for
16:1310-1317, 1998.
nasopharyngeal
Oncol23:6730-6738, 2005.
study, is warranted.
cancer
of
the
endemic
variety.
Clin
9 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Carducci MA, Compton CC, Fritz AG,
References
of
advanced
chemotherapy
to
radiotherapy
in
locally
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
20 Kwong DL, Sham JS, Chua DT, Choy DT, Au GK, Wu PM.
treated
radiation
nasopharyngeal
with
reduced-volume
intensity-modulated
carcinoma
using
intensity-modulated
Oncol 1998;47:167-74.
23 Mei Feng, Weidong Wang, Zixuan Fan, Binyu Fu, Jie Li,
16 H. Chang, J. Gao, B.Q. Xu, S.P. Guo, R.B. Lu, G. Li, S.M.
Huang, F. Han, Z.G. Liu, Y.L. Tao, Z.W. Tu, C. Chen, X.H. Li,
(2014) 140:69-76.
System
and
18 X Liu, L-Z Liu, Y-P Mao, L Chen, L-L Tang, G-Q Zhou, Y
260.
487.
in
Nasopharyngeal
Carcinoma:
Development
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
10
t 2012; 104:286-93.
conventional
nasopharyngeal
94(21): 1614-9.
31 Fang FM, Chien CY, Tsai WL, et al. Quality of life and
32 Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan LL, Hung WM, Chan CC, Sze HC,
42 Lin JC, Wang WY, Chen KY, Wei YH, Liang WM, Jan JS, et
33 Lo YM, Chan LY, Lo KW, Leung SF, Zhang J, Chan AT, et al.
43 Chan AT, Ma BB, Lo YM, Leung SF, Kwan WH, Hui EP, et
44 Chan AT, Lo YM, Zee B, Chan LY, Ma BB, Leung SF, et al.
quantitation
carcinoma.
101.
36 Lin JC, Wang WY, Chen KY, Wei YH, Liang WM, Jan JS, et
45 Lin JC, Wang WY, Liang WM, Chou HY, Jan JS, Jiang RS, et
350: 2461-2470.
nasopharyngeal
37 Leung SF, Chan AT, Zee B, Ma B, Chan LY, Johnson PJ, et al.
1342-8.
radiotherapy
in
patients
for
with
earlystage
nasopharyngeal
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
carcinoma
patients
receiving
concurrent
11
Detecting
diagnose
31(3): 142-9.
2014; 127.
1997.
50 Wang WY, Twu CW, Lin WY, Jiang RS, Liang KL, Chen
carcinoma
262.
Cancer 2011;117(19):4452-9.
51 Lin JC, Wang WY, Chen KY, Wei YH, Liang WM, Jan JS, et
Lett 1995;89:177-181.
52 Hong RL, Lin CY, Ting LL, Ko JY, Hsu MM. Comparison of
1994;104:99-102.
B,
et al.
plasma
Epstein-Barr
Molecular
pathology
virus
DNA
parameters
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
to
in
human
e-ISSN 2312-0398
12
papillomavirus
prognostic stratification.
associated
nasopharyngeal
carcinoma:
An
Liu, Jui-Hung Weng, Yueh-Chun Li, and Jong-Kang Lee; The role
2013;8:30.
Microbiol 1993;31:53-56.
78 Chan SC, Ng SH, Chang JT, Lin CY, Chen YC, Chang YC, et
J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 580e588, 2014.
40.
71 Lee SW, Nam SY, Im KC, Kim JS, Choi EK, Ahn SD, et al.
79 Chan SC, Yen TC, Ng SH, Lin CY, Wang HM, Liao CT, et al.
Med. 2006;47:1447-54.
73 Chan SC, Chang JT, Lin CY, Ng SH, Wang HM, Liao CT,
Chang CJ, Lin SY, Yen TC. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
13
serum
2003;56:958-965.
Maa, Pei-yu Huang, Jing-yun Wen, Xing Li, Jie Chen, Dan-yun
prognosis
2010;6(3):395-404.
Oncol 2012;29(2):742-9.
local
with
2011;81:339-345.
level
antiangiogenic
failure
in
head-and-neck
therapy.
Int
cancer
Radiat
treated
Oncol
Biol
Phys.
LDH
of
and
of
ALP
as
poor
prognostic
nasopharyngeal
cytokeratin
fraction
carcinoma.
21-1
in
factors
for
Autophagy
undifferentiated
2013;85:805-812.
correlated
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
with
the
progression
and
poor
prognosis
of
14
100 Lee SW, Lin CY, Tian YF, Sun DP, Lin LC, Chen LT, Hsing
CH, Huang CT, Hsu HP, Huang HY, Wu LC, Li CF, Shiue YL
109 Hao-Yuan Mo, Dong-Hua Luo, Hui-Zhi Qiu, Huai Liu, Qiu-
carcinoma.
APMIS.
2014
Mar;122(3):206-14.
doi:
101 Jie Yanga, Lei Lia, Yanxin Rena, Xiaojiang Li, Yanling Tu,
110 Si-Wei Li, MD, Hua Wang, MD, Yan-Qun Xiang, Hai-Bo
Onkologie 2013;36:629-634.
102 Shi-Sheng Li, Jia-Jia Liu, Shuang Wang, Qing- Lai Tang,
665-672, 2014.
(2014) 35:1703-1712.
112 Jianbo Zhou, Xuping Xiao, Hongmei Yi, Jihua Wang, Xiaoan
106 Jian Wang, Jing Yang, Bin-Bin Li, Zhi-Wei He; High
Carcinoma.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089220.
114 Yan Fei Deng, Dong Ni Zhou, Chun Sheng Ye, Liang Zeng,
Nasopharyngeal
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
PLoS
ONE
Carcinoma:
Association
9(2):
With
e89220.
Metastasis,
15
He, William C.S. Cho, Li-Zhi Liu, Li Li and Jun Ma; A four-
122 Fang FM, Tsai WL, Chien CY, Chen HC, Hsu HC, Huang
116 Zhen Liu, Yufei Long, Yajie Zhang, Wei Huang, Xiaobin
TL, Lee TF, Huang HY, Lee CH; Pretreatment quality of life as a
123 Jin Y, Cai XY, Cai YC, et al. To build a prognostic score
Shaoyan Liu, Jie Long, Yajie Zhang, Weiyi Fang and Zhen Liu;
2012;48(6):882-8.
Cancer 2003;39(11):1535-41.
125 Toh CK, Heng D, Ong YK, Leong SS, Wee J, Tan EH.
Systematic
Review.
PLoS
ONE
8(9):
e75094.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075094.
120 Wang HY, Sun BY, Zhu ZH, Chang ET, To KF, Hwang JS,
Jiang H, Kam MK, Chen G, Cheah SL, Lee M, Liu ZW, Chen J,
127 Y-M Tian, Y-H Tian, L Zeng, S Liu, Y Guan, T-X Lu and F
Zhang JX, Zhang HZ, He JH, Chen FL, Zhu XD, Huang MY, Liao
Han;
Wee JT, Qian CN, Liu Q, Ernberg I, Ye W, Adami HO, Chan AT,
2013.715.
128 Xiao-Lin Luo, Wang He, Hui Huang, Qiu-Yan Chen, Ying
121 Na Liu, Rui-Xue Cui, Ying Sun, Rui Guo, Yan-Ping Mao,
JNPC http://www.journalofnasopharyngealcarcinoma.org/
e-ISSN 2312-0398
Prognostic
model
for
survival
of
local
recurrent