Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
W H AT D O W E M E A N BY A N A LY Z I N G DATA ?
W H Y S H O U L D YO U C O L L E C T A N D A N A LY Z E DATA F O R
YO U R E VA LU AT I O N ?
W H E N A N D BY W H O M S H O U L D DATA B E C O L L E C T E D
A N D A N A LY Z E D ?
H O W D O YO U C O L L E C T A N D A N A LY Z E DATA ?
In previous sections of this chapter, weve discussed studying the issue,
deciding on a research design, and creating an observational system for
gathering information for your evaluation. Now its time to collect your data
and analyze it figuring out what it means so that you can use it to draw
some conclusions about your work. In this section, well examine how to do
just that.
Organizing data in ways that make them easier to work with. How you
do this will depend on your research design and your evaluation
questions. You might group observations by the dependent variable
(indicator of success) they relate to, by individuals or groups of
participants, by time, by activity, etc. You might also want to group
observations in several different ways, so that you can study
interactions among different variables.
Q U A N T I TAT I V E DATA
Quantitative data are typically collected directly as numbers. Some
examples include:
Data can also be collected in forms other than numbers, and turned into
quantitative data for analysis. Researchers can count the number of times
an event is documented in interviews or records, for instance, or assign
Q U A L I TAT I V E DATA
Unlike numbers or hard data, qualitative information tends to be soft,
meaning it cant always be reduced to something definite. That is in some
ways a weakness, but its also a strength. A number may tell you how well a
student did on a test; the look on her face after seeing her grade, however,
may tell you even more about the effect of that result on her. That look cant
be translated to a number, nor can a teachers knowledge of that students
history, progress, and experience, all of which go into the teachers
interpretation of that look. And that interpretation may be far more valuable
in helping that student succeed than knowing her grade or numerical score
on the test.
Qualitative data can sometimes be changed into numbers, usually by
counting the number of times specific things occur in the course of
observations or interviews, or by assigning numbers or ratings to dimensions
(e.g., importance, satisfaction, ease of use).
The challenges of translating qualitative into quantitative data have to do
with the human factor. Even if most people agree on what 1 (lowest) or 5
The data can show whether there was any significant change in
the dependent variable(s) you hoped to influence. Collecting and
analyzing data helps you see whether your intervention brought about
the desired results
They can help shed light on the reasons that your work was
effective or, perhaps, less effective than youd hoped. By
combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, you can often
determine not only what worked or didnt, but why. The effect of
cultural issues, how well methods are used, the appropriateness of
your approach for the population these as well as other factors that
influence success can be highlighted by careful data collection and
analysis. This knowledge gives you a basis for adapting and changing
what you do to make it more likely youll achieve the desired outcomes
in the future.
They can show the field what youre learning, and thus pave
the way for others to implement successful methods and
approaches. In that way, youll be helping to improve community
efforts and, ultimately, quality of life for people who benefit.
You can conduct a less formal evaluation. Your results may not be as
sophisticated as if you subjected them to rigorous statistical
procedures, but they can still tell you a lot about your program. Just
the numbers the number of dropouts (and when most dropped out),
for instance, or the characteristics of the people you serve can give
you important and usable information.
You can try to learn enough about statistics and statistical software to
conduct a formal evaluation yourself. (Take a course, for example.)
You can collect the data and then send it off to someone a university
program, a friendly statistician or researcher, or someone you hire to
process it for you.
You can collect and rely largely on qualitative data. Whether this is an
option depends to a large extent on what your program is about. You
wouldnt want to conduct a formal evaluation of effectiveness of a new
medication using only qualitative data, but you might be able to draw
some reasonable conclusions about use or compliance patterns from
qualitative information.
Who should actually collect and analyze data also depends on the form of
your evaluation. If youre doing a participatory evaluation, much of the data
collection - and analyzing - will be done by community members or program
participants themselves. If youre conducting an evaluation in which the
I M P L E M E N T YO U R M E A S U R E M E N T S Y S T E M
We've previously discussed designing an observational system to
gather information. Now its time to put that system in place.
Record data in the agreed-upon ways. These may include pencil and
paper, computer (using a laptop or handheld device in the field,
entering numbers into a program, etc.), audio or video, journals, etc.
O R G A N I Z E T H E DATA YO U V E C O L L E C T E D
How you do this depends on what youre planning to do with it, and
on what youre interested in.
Enter any necessary data into the computer. This may mean simply
typing comments, descriptions, etc., into a word processing program,
or entering various kinds of information (possibly including audio and
video) into a database, spreadsheet, a GIS (Geographic Information
Systems) program, or some other type of software or file.
C O N D U C T DATA G RA P H I N G , V I S U A L I N S P E C T I O N ,
S TAT I S T I C A L A N A LY S I S , O R O T H E R O P E RAT I O N S O N T H E
DATA A S A P P R O P R I AT E
Weve referred several times to statistical procedures that you can apply to
quantitative data. If you have the right numbers, you can find out a great
deal about whether your program is causing or contributing to change and
improvement, what that change is, whether there are any expected or
unexpected connections among variables, how your group compares to
another youre measuring, etc.
There are other excellent possibilities for analysis besides statistical
procedures, however. A few include:
TA K E N O T E O F A N Y S I G N I F I C A N T O R I N T E R E S T I N G R E S U LT S
Depending on the nature of your research, results may be statistically
significant (the 95% or better certainty that we discussed earlier), or simply
important or unusual. They may or may not be socially significant (i.e., large
enough to solve the problem).
There are a number of different kinds of results you might be
looking for.
When the effects are seen when and only when the intervention is
introduced and if the intervention is staggered (delayed) across
people or groups this increases our confidence that the intervention,
and not something else, is producing the observed effects.
Correlation between variables doesnt tell you that one necessarily causes
the other, but simply that changes in one have a relationship to changes in
the other. Among American teenagers, for instance, there is probably a fairly
high correlation between an increase in body size and an understanding of
algebra. This is not because one causes the other, but rather the result of
the fact that American schools tend to begin teaching algebra in the seventh,
eighth, or ninth grades, a time when many 12-, 13-, and 14-year-olds are
naturally experiencing a growth spurt.
Not all important findings will necessarily tell you whether your program
worked, or what is the most effective method. It might be obvious from your
data collection, for instance, that, while violence or roadway injuries may not
be seen as a problem citywide, they are much higher in one or more
particular areas, or that the rates of diabetes are markedly higher for
particular groups or those living in areas with greater disparities of income. If
you have the resources, its wise to look at the results of your research in a
number of different ways, both to find out how to improve your program, and
to learn what else you might do to affect the issue.
I N T E R P R E T T H E R E S U LT S
Once youve organized your results and run them through whatever
statistical or other analysis youve planned for, its time to figure out what
they mean for your evaluation. Probably the most common question that
evaluation research is directed toward is whether the program being
evaluated works or makes a difference. In research terms, that often
translates to What were the effects of the independent variable (the
program, intervention, etc.) on the dependent variable(s) (the behavior,
conditions, or other factors it was meant to change)? There are a number of
possible answers to this question:
Your program had exactly the effects on the dependent variable(s) you
expected and hoped it would. Statistics or other analysis showed clear
positive effects at a high level of significance for the people in your
program and if you used a multiple-group design none, or far fewer,
of the same effects for a similar control group and/or for a group that
received a different intervention with the same purpose. Your early
childhood education program, for instance, greatly increased
development outcomes for children in the community, and also
contributed to an increase in the percentage of children succeeding in
school.
Your program had the effects you hoped for and other effects as well.
o These effects might be positive. Your youth violence prevention
program, for instance, might have resulted in greatly reduced
violence among teens, and might also have resulted in
make your program more effective, or should you start again from scratch?
What should you address to make a good program better?
Careful and insightful interpretation of your data may allow you to answer
questions like these. You may be able to use correlations, for instance, to
generate hypotheses about your results. If positive or negative changes in
particular variables are consistently associated with positive or negative
changes in other variables, the two may be connected. (The word may is
important here. The two may be connected, but they may not, or both may
be related to a third variable that youre not aware of or that you consider
trivial.) Such a connection can point the way toward a factor (e.g., access to
support) that is causing the changes in both variables, and that must be
addressed to make your program successful. Correlations may also indicate
patterns in your data, or may lead to an unexpected way of looking at the
issue youre addressing.
You can often use qualitative data to understand the meaning of an
intervention, and peoples reactions to the results.The observation that
participants are continually suffering from a variety of health problems may
be traced, through qualitative data, to nutrition problems (due either to
poverty or ignorance) or to lack of access to health services, or to cultural
restrictions (some Muslim women may be unwilling or unable because of
family prohibition to accept care and treatment from male doctors, for
example).
Once you have organized your data, both statistical results and anything that
cant be analyzed statistically need to be analyzed logically. This may not
give you convincing information but it will almost undoubtedly give you some
ideas to follow up on, and some indications of connections and avenues you
might not yet have considered. It will also show you some additional results
people reacting differently than before to the program, for example. The
numbers can tell you whether there is change, but they cant always tell you
what causes it or why (although they sometimes can), or why some people
benefit while others dont. Those are often matters for logical analysis, or
critical thinking.
Analyzing and interpreting the data youve collected brings you, in a sense,
back to the beginning. You can use the information youve gained to adjust
and improve your program or intervention, evaluate it again, and use that
information to adjust and improve it further, for as long as it runs. You have
to keep up the process to ensure that youre doing the best work you can
and encouraging changes in individuals, systems, and policies that make for
a better and healthier community.
You have to become a cultural detective to understand your initiative, and, in
some ways, every evaluation is an anthropological study.
IN SUMMARY
The heart of evaluation research is gathering information about the program
or intervention youre evaluating and analyzing it to determine what it tells
you about the effectiveness of what youre doing, as well as about how you
can maintain and improve that effectiveness.
Collecting quantitative data information expressed in numbers and
subjecting it to a visual inspection or formal statistical analysis can tell you
whether your work is having the desired effect, and may be able to tell you
why or why not as well. It can also highlight connections (correlations)
among variables, and call attention to factors you may not have considered.
Collecting and analyzing qualitative data interviews, descriptions of
environmental factors, or events, and circumstances can provide insight
into how participants experience the issue youre addressing, what barriers
and advantages they experience, and what you might change or add to
improve what you do.
Once youve gained the knowledge that your information provides, its time
to start the process again. Use what youve learned to continue to evaluate
what you do by collecting and analyzing data, and continually improve your
program.