Bhum Kumari Poudel

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE
BUILDING
OWNER:
Mrs. Bhum Kumari Poudel and Mr. Ganesh Prasad Sharma
Gaidakot-8, Nawalparasi
Submitted By:
Submitted To:
Expert Engineering Solution
Gaidakot Municipality
Bharatpur, Chitwan
Nawalparasi, Nepal
January 2016
CERTIFICATION
This Certificate is submitted with reference to the detail structural design of multi storied
building of the following detail.
Owner
: Mrs. Bhum Kumari Poudel and Mr. Ganesh Prasad Sharma
Address
: Gaidakot-8, Nawalparasi
No. of Storey
: G+3
Size of Column : (12"x12")
Size of Beam
: (12"x16")
Concrete Grade : M20
Rebar
: Fe 415
Other details are attached in the design documents.
All the designs are done as per the design criteria specified in NBC 000:1994 to 114:1994,
NBC 205:2012, IS 456:2000, IS:875 and relevant other Indian design codes.
The referenced calculations were prepared by us / under our supervision and comply with all
applicable structural provisions of the Construction Codes.
We hereby certify that the design is structurally adequate and economic. However, during
construction the use of construction materials and workmanship is to be carried out under the
supervision of qualified and certified technical person.
The designer is not responsible for the violence of the specifications provided.
Analysed By :
Checked By :
Er. Suraj Khatiwada
Er. Ashim Adhikari
NEC No. 6268 CIVIL 'A'

+977-9843069923
NEC No. 7464 CIVIL 'A'
On behalf of :
Expert Engineering Solution
Bharatpur, Chitwan
(Structure Engineer)
+977-9841547347
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE

BUILDING
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
3.0 LOADING AND LOAD COMBINATIONS
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
DEAD LOAD AND SIDL

LIVE LOADS
SEISMIC LOAD
LOAD COMBINATIONS
4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE

4.1 LOAD CALCULATIOS
4.2 SKETCHES SHOWING THE MODEL
5.0 DESIGN OF TYPICAL COLUMNS & FOOTINGS
6.0 DESIGN OF SLAB
7.0 DESIGN OF BEAM
8.0 DESIGN OF STAIR
9.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS
10.0 RESULT SUMMARY
11.0 DESIGN SPECIFICATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The analysed inbuilt/proposed reinforced concrete framed structure consists of
G+3 Storey
The structural system chosen is Moment Resisting RCC Frames. Columns and beams have been
laid out in plan in coordination with architectural and services planning that acts jointly support and
transmit to the ground those forces arising from earthquake motions, gravity and live load. The
structure is designed by carrying out the space frame analysis.
A three dimensional mathematical model of the physical structure represents the spatial distribution
of the mass and stiffness of the structure. Thus, the essential requirements for the analytical model
are the conclusion of sufficient details of geometry, material, loading and support such that it
reflects the near true behavior of the physical structure for the structural modelling of the present
building SAP 2000 V-14 software was used.
The analysed structure is found to be safe against the all the load combinations and designed for
the governing load combination. The load combinations considered for the designing of structure
using limit state method are listed in this report.
M20 grade concrete is used for all RC members of super-structure and sub structure. The steel
grade for all the structural elements is Fe415
2.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The Design of the total structure is based on the Limit State method of design as envisaged in Nepal
National Building Codes (NBC) and Indian Standard codes of practice. Structure is designed for
Dead loads, Imposed loads (floor finishes), service loads, taking into consideration of the relevant
codes and load combination specified in the codes.
The structure is designed using individual footings under the columns designed for a safe bearing of
2
175KN/m . The Strata is in general stiff clay having the above strength and is available at most of
the places at a depth of 2.0m below naturural ground level. In case such strata is not available at
this depth, foundations are taken deeper to required strata.
3.0 LOADINGS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

3.1 DEAD LOAD AND SIDL
3.1.1 Dead Load is the self weight of the slab.
Self weight of 125mm thick slab
0.125
x
=
25.00
3.125
KN/m
a) From 1st floor level to 3rd floor level

Floor Finishes
1.00
KN/m
b) Roof level
Floor Finishes
1.00
KN/m
a) From 1st floor level to 2nd floor level

Live Load in rooms
Live Load in Balconies & Corridors
=
=
2.00
3.00
KN/m
2
KN/m
b) Roof level
Live Load (accessible)
Live Load (Non-accessible)
=
=
1.50
1.00
KN/m
2
KN/m
3.00
KN/m
3.1.2 SIDL (Super Imposd Dead Load)
3.2 LIVE LOADS
c) Stair
Live Load
3.3 SEISMIC LOAD

3.3.1 Seismic Coefficient Method
Nepal National Building Code NBC105:1994 contains provisions for both the static
analysis and the dynamic analysis of buildings. Static analysis using equivalent lateral
force procedure is restricted to regular buildings having height up to 40 m. At the core of
seismic analysis is the use of response spectra plot as given in figure 8.1 of NBC
105:1994, in which the spectral acceleration is plotted for Wide range of fundamental
natural period of the structures. For the static analysis, the static forces in the structure
are derived from the design seismic base shear (V) given by;
Horizontal seismic base shear, V=Cd*Wt
Where,
Cd
Wt
= Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient

= Seismic Weight of the building
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Cd = CZIK

Where,
C
= Basic seismic coefficient as per figure 8.1, NBC 105:1994
Z
= Seismic zoning factor, figure 8.2
I
= Importance factor for the buildings, table 8.1
K
= Structural performance factor, table 8.2
Determining seismic Load based on NBC 105:1994
Seismic zoning factor, Z
Importance factor, I
Structural Performance Factor, K
Height of the Building
Dimension of the building along X, Dx
Dimension of the building along Y, Dy
Time preiod of the building along X, Tx
Time preiod of the building along Y, Ty
Soil Type
Basic Seismic coefficient along X, C
Basic Seismic coefficient along Y, C
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient, Cd
Seismic Weight of the Building (DL+0.25LL)
Base Shear
Distribution of Lateral Forces along different Storey
Storey
Storey
Wi
Height (Hi)
Level
Stair Cover
12.19
145.29
1086.16
9.14
3rd floor
1368.89
6.10
2nd floor
st
1368.89
3.05
1 floor
Total
3969.22
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
0.99
1.00
1.00
12.19m
9.75m
13.77m
0.35 sec
0.30 sec
II
0.08
0.08
0.08
3969.22
314.36
Wi*Hi
Fi=V*(WiHi/WiHi)
1771.33
9931.88
8344.74
4172.37
24220.31
22.99
128.91
108.31
54.15
314.36
3.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

The analysis & designs are done for the following load combinations using limit state method.
S.NO
Load Comb
Description
1)
Comb 1
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)
2)
Comb 2
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) - 1.25 (Eqx)
3)
Comb 3
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) + 1.25 (Eqy)
4)
Comb 4
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) - 1.25 (Eqy)
5)
Comb 5
0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)
6)
Comb 6
0.9 (Dead Load) - 1.25 (Eqx)
7)
Comb 7
0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqy)
8)
Comb 8
0.9 (Dead Load) - 1.25 (Eqy)
9)
Comb 9
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) + 1.25 (Eqx)
10 )
Comb 10
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) - 1.25 (Eqx)
11 )
Comb 11
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) + 1.25 (Eqy)
12 )
Comb 12
1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) - 1.25 (Eqy)
13 )
S. WT
1.0 ( Dead Load ) + 0.25 (Live Load)
Note:
SL
S. WT
Dead Load
=
=
=
Snow Load (Not Considered)

Seismic Weight
Selfweight of the structure + SIDL
4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE
4.1 LOAD CALCULATIONS
a) At Ground Floor level

230 mm thick brick wall load
(considering 400mm beam depth)
(Considering 30% opening)
115mm thick brick wall load
=
x
0.23
20
x
=
0.115
20
x
=
Say
=
Say
2.65
12.18
8.53
2.65
6.09
4.87
x
KN/m
KN/m
x
KN/m
KN/m
2
Live Load in rooms

=
=
2.00
3.00
KN/m
2
KN/m
b) At 1st to 3rd floor level

Dead load
=
Self weight of the Slab + SIDL
=
3.125
+
1.00
4.13
KN/m
2.65
6.09
4.26
2.65
6.09
4.87
x
KN/m
KN/m
x
KN/m
KN/m
=
=
2.00
3.00
KN/m
2
KN/m
=
=
=
4.13
1.50
1.00
KN/m
2
KN/m
2
KN/m
x
=
1.00
2.30
x
KN/m
115 mm thick brick wall load

(considering 30 % opening)
115mm thick brick wall load
=
x
0.12
20
x
=
0.115
20
x
=
Say
=
Say
Live Load in rooms

c) Roof level
Dead load
=
Self weight of the Slab + SIDL
=
3.125
+
1.00
Live Load (accessible)
Live Load (Non-accessible)
=
(considering 1000mm height)
0.115
20
For analysys of the structure,. The height of the structure is as per the approved architectural
drawings.
The total building height above ground level is 12.2m and below ground level is considered 2.0m
The floor heights are as follows.
Stair Cover
3.048
Third floor
3.048
Second floor
12.2m
3.048
First floor
3.048
Ground floor
The sketches showing the model created for the analysis are shown in the following pages.
4.2 SKETCHES SHOWING THE MODEL

4.2.1 3D Model
4.2.2 Column Joint Label
4.2.3 Deformed Shape
10
4.2.4 Axial Force Diagram
0.00
11
5.0 DESIGN OF COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS

5.1 DESIGN OF COLUMN AND FOOTING
5.1.1 Design of Column (C1) Member- 87, 89, 93, 95 (From SAP)
Size of the Column
300
300
) mm
M 20
Fy 415
Checking the slenderness of the column

Length of column,
Effective length of column
3.048
=
=
0.707
2.155
Effective lenth of column / least lateral dimension
2.155
/
0.3
7.2
<
12
Hence this is Short column
From the SAP results,

The governing condition for the design of column and footing is the case 3
Pu
My
Mz
=
=
=
Therefore for design,

Pu
=
Mu
=
=
900 KN
41.94 KNm
-10.25 KNm
900
KN ,
2
Sqrt ( My + Mz )
43
KNm
Minimum moment due to minimum eccentricity of column is

Min. Mu
=
0.020
x
900.14
Pu
fck.B.D
=
=
Mu
2
fck.B.D
20
900
x
x
300
43.17
x
x
300
0.16
18.00 KNm
10
300
0.500
20
0.0800
d'
D
48
300
p
fck
0.085
12
10
x
300
0.085
Ac
90000
1.7
Ast- req
Minimum % of reinforcement
Provide
4 nos.
20
1.7 %
x
100
90000
1530 mm
90000
mm
0.8/100
720
mm
Tor 16
Ast Provided
Maximum % of reinforcement
=
=
4/100
3600
4 nos.
Tor 16
1608 mm )
(=
x
90000
mm
Reinforcement Provided for the section is more than mimimum and less than maximum
Hence safe
Diameter of lateral Ties
Dia. of tie not less than
Spacing of ties required
Provide
Tor -
mm,
Provide
256
links
Tor -
mm
mm
150
c/c
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of longer dimension

e-min =
2154.936
500
e-min / lateral dimension
+
=
300
30
14.3
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of shorter dimension

e-min =
2154.936
500
+
=
300
30
14.3
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Hence the following formula can be used for calculating load carrying capacity of the column
Pu
0.4
+
1167 KN
x
0.67
20
x
x
415
>
1.000
x
900 KN
13
x
1608
Hence safe
90000
)
5.1.2 Design of Footing

The governing condition for the design of footing is the case 3
M 20
Fy 415
For the above case,

Pu =
900
900
1.5
43
1.5
Mu
0.020
43.17
1.5
S.B.C
175
Footing area
600.1
Min.
M
kN
Mu =
Providing footing size

Size of the column
43
kNm
600.1 KN
29 KNm
900
18 KNm
28.78 KNm
2
KN/m
x
175
1.88
0.30
1.00
x
x
1.88
0.30
3.43 m
m
m
3.53 m )
(
300
400
15 no.s Tor -
12
15 no. s Tor-
12
100
1880
1880
100
Pressure from soil
600.1
1.88 x 1.88
169.79
4.76
174.55
or
165.02
B
L
=
=
1880
1880
400
50
332
100
28.78
1.88
<
x
x
S.B.C of Soil
1.1
1.88
175 KN/m
Hence Safe
mm
mm
-
mm
14
12
12
2
In Long Span Direction

Max. BM
174.55
102
Check for Depth

dreq
= sqrt. {
Ast
1.88
KNm
1.5
0.133
x
x
175 mm
102
20
<
1.5
x
1880
0.79
2
( Bending Moment Consideration)
=
Mu/bd
x
x
1.00E+06 ) }
1880
Hence Safe
332 mm
102.40
x
1880
10
332
0.74
0.23
100
332
2
1436 mm
=
Provide
15
nos. Tor -
12
174.55
102
( =
1696 mm )
In Short Span Direction

Max. BM
Check for Depth

dreq
= sqrt. {
1.5
0.133
175 mm
Ast
1.88
KNm
1.5
x
x
102
20
<
x
1880
=
=
Mu/bd
0.79
2
x
x
1.00E+06 ) }
1880
Hence Safe
332 mm
102.40
x
1880
10
332
0.74
0.23
100
332
=
Provide
15
nos. Tor -
12
( =
15
1436 mm
1696 mm )
Check for One Way Shear
( Transverse shear check)

1880
Critical Section is at 'd' from

face of column.
300
332
300
1880
458
Vu
=
1.5
x
Overall Depth at critical section

Effective depth at critical section =
225.4
1880
x
x
Percentage of reinforcement
Shear Strength of Concrete,
Check for Two Way Shear
x
1.88
174.55
400
400
332
1.00E+03
332
0.361
1696
1880
x
x
100
332
0.458
225.4 KN
mm
62
12
2
mm
Mpa
0.272
8.54
c
0.372
>
0.361
Safe in shear
Mpa
( Punching Shear Check)

1880
Critical Section is at 'd/2' from

face of column/pedestal
632
300
632
16
300
1880

d
400
=
Vu
1.5
820.8 KN
2528 mm
where, ks
mm
62
12
2
174.55
x (
3.53
x
0.63
0.632
)
632
632
1.00E+03
332
820.8
2528
c =
0.25
=
x
x

cc
400
332 mm
sqrt
ks . cc
(
20
0.5
300
300
1.000
1.12
1.12
0.5
>
0.98 Mpa
0.98
=
+
Short side of column

Long side of column
=
Mpa
17
1.12 Mpa
1.50
Hence Safe
>
1.0

5.2.1 Design of Column (C2) Member- 84, 85, 91, 92, 97, 98, 100, 101 (From SAP)
Size of the Column
300
300
) mm
M 20
Fy 415

Length of column,
3.048
=
=
0.707
2.15
2.15
/
0.3
7.2
<
12

Pu
My
Mz
=
=
=

Pu
=
Mu
=
=
620.20 KN
51.35 KNm
0.26 KNm
620
KN ,
2
Sqrt ( My + Mz )
51
KNm

Min. Mu
=
0.020
x
620.20
Pu
fck.B.D
=
=
Mu
2
fck.B.D
620
x
x
300
51.35
x
x
300
0.16
20
20
12.40 KNm
10
300
0.345
20
0.0951
d'
D
48
300
p
fck
0.065
0.065
Ac
90000
mm
18
10
6
2
300
1.3 %
Ast- req
1.3
x
100
0.8/100
720
Provide
4 nos.
90000
mm
Tor 16
Ast Provided
=
=
1170 mm
90000
4/100
3600
4 nos.
Tor 12
1257 mm )
(=
mm
90000
Hence safe
Provide
Tor -
mm,
Provide
192
links
Tor -
mm
mm
150 mm
c/c

e-min =
2154.936
500
+
=
300
30
14.3
0.048
<
0.05
mm

e-min =
2154.936
500
+
=
300
30
14.3
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Pu
0.4
+
1069 KN
x
0.67
20
x
x
415
>
1.000
x
620 KN
19
x
1257
Hence safe
90000
)

M 20
Fy 415
For the above case,

Pu =
620
620
1.5
51
1.5
Mu
0.020
51.35
1.5
S.B.C
175
Footing area
413.5
Min.
M
kN
Mu =

Size of the column
51
kNm
413.5 KN
34 KNm
620
12 KNm
34 KNm
KN/m
x
175
1.60
0.30
x
x
1.00
1.60
0.30
2.36 m
m
m
2.56 m )
(
300
400
10 no.s Tor -
12
10 no. s Tor-
12
100
1600
1600
100
Pressure from soil
413.5
1.6 x 1.6
161.51
9.19
170.70
or
152.32
B
L
=
=
1600
1600
400
50
332
100
34.23
1.60
<
x
x
S.B.C of Soil
1.1
1.60
175 KN/m
Hence Safe
mm
mm
-
mm
20
12
12
2

Max. BM
170.70
58
Check for Depth

dreq
= sqrt. {
Ast
1.60
KNm
1.5
0.133
x
x
143 mm
58
20
<
1.5
x
1600
0.65
2
=
Mu/bd
x
x
1.00E+06 ) }
1600
Hence Safe
332 mm
57.70
x
1600
332
10
0.49
0.17
100
332
903 mm
=
Provide
10
nos. Tor -
12
170.70
58
( =
1131 mm )

Max. BM
Check for Depth

dreq
= sqrt. {
1.5
0.133
143 mm
Ast
1.60
KNm
1.5
x
x
58
20
<
x
1600
=
=
Mu/bd
0.65
2
x
x
1.00E+06 ) }
1600
Hence Safe
332 mm
57.70
x
1600
332
10
0.49
0.17
100
332
=
Provide
10
nos. Tor -
12
( =
21
903 mm
1131 mm )

1600

face of column.
300
332
300
1600
318
Vu
=
1.5
x

130.3
1600
x
x
x
1.60
170.70
400
400
332
1.00E+03
332
0.245
1131
1600
x
x
100
332
0.318
130.3 KN
mm
62
12
2
mm
Mpa
0.213
10.91
c
0.335
>
0.245
Safe in shear
Mpa

1600

632
300
632
22
300
1600

d
400
=
Vu
1.5
553.2 KN
2528 mm
where, k s
mm
62
12
2
170.70
x (
2.56
x
0.63
0.632
)
632
632
1.00E+03
332
553.2
2528
c =
0.25
=
x
x

cc
400
332 mm
sqrt
ks . cc
(
20
0.5
300
300
1.000
1.12
1.12
0.5
>
0.66 Mpa
0.66
=
+

Long side of column
=
Mpa
23
1.12 Mpa
1.50
Hence Safe
>
1.0

5.3.1 Design of Column (C2) Member- 83, 86, 99, 102, 103, 105 (From SAP)
Size of the Column
300
300
) mm
M 20
Fy 415

Length of column,
3.048
=
=
0.707
2.15
2.15
/
0.3
7.2
<
12

Pu
My
Mz
=
=
=

Pu
=
Mu
=
=
422.97 KN
45.51 KNm
0.85 KNm
423
KN ,
2
Sqrt ( My + Mz )
46
KNm

Min. Mu
=
0.020
x
422.97
Pu
fck.B.D
=
=
Mu
2
fck.B.D
423
x
x
300
45.52
x
x
300
0.15
20
20
8.46 KNm
10
300
0.235
20
0.0843
d'
D
46
300
p
fck
0.045
0.045
Ac
90000
mm
24
10
6
2
300
0.9 %
Ast- req
0.9
x
100
0.8/100
720
Provide
4 nos.
90000
mm
Tor 12
Ast Provided
=
=
810 mm
90000
4/100
3600
4 nos.
Tor 12
905 mm )
(=
mm
90000
Hence safe
Provide
Tor -
mm,
Provide
192
links
Tor -
mm
mm
150 mm
c/c

e-min =
2154.936
500
+
=
300
30
14.3
0.048
<
0.05
mm

e-min =
2154.936
500
+
=
300
30
14.3
0.048
<
0.05
mm
Pu
0.4
+
x
0.67
972 KN
20
x
x
415
>
1.000
x
423 KN
25
x
905
Hence safe
90000
)

M 20
Fy 415
For the above case,

Pu =
423
423
1.5
46
1.5
Mu
0.020
45.52
1.5
S.B.C
175
Footing area
282.0
Min.
M
kN
Mu =

Size of the column
46
kNm
282.0 KN
30 KNm
423
8 KNm
30 KNm
KN/m
x
175
1.33
0.30
x
x
1.00
1.33
0.30
1.61 m
m
m
1.77 m )
(
300
400
8 no.s Tor -
12
8 no. s Tor-
12
100
1330
1330
100
Pressure from soil
282.0
1.33 x 1.33
159.41
14.19
173.60
or
145.22
B
L
=
=
1330
1330
400
50
332
100
30.35
1.33
<
x
x
S.B.C of Soil
1.1
1.33
175 KN/m
Hence Safe
mm
mm
-
mm
26
12
12
2

Max. BM
173.60
31
Check for Depth

dreq
= sqrt. {
Ast
1.33
KNm
1.5
0.133
x
x
114 mm
31
20
<
1.5
x
1330
0.52
2
=
Mu/bd
x
x
1.00E+06 ) }
1330
Hence Safe
332 mm
30.62
x
1330
332
10
0.31
0.17
100
332
751 mm
=
Provide
nos. Tor -
12
173.60
31
( =
905 mm )

Max. BM
Check for Depth

dreq
= sqrt. {
1.5
0.133
114 mm
Ast
1.33
KNm
1.5
x
x
31
20
<
x
1330
=
=
Mu/bd
0.515
2
x
x
1.00E+06 ) }
1330
Hence Safe
332 mm
30.62
x
1330
332
10
0.31
0.17
100
332
=
Provide
nos. Tor -
12
( =
27
751 mm
905 mm )

1330

face of column.
300
332
300
1330
183
Vu
=
1.5
x

63.4
1330
x
x
x
1.33
173.60
400
400
332
1.00E+03
332
0.144
905
1330
x
x
100
332
0.183
63.4 KN
mm
62
12
2
mm
Mpa
0.205
11.33
c
0.330
>
0.144
Safe in shear
Mpa

1330

632
300
632
28
300
1330

d
400
=
Vu
1.5
356.6 KN
2528 mm
where, k s
mm
62
12
2
173.60
x (
1.77
x
0.63
0.632
)
632
632
1.00E+03
332
356.6
2528
c =
0.25
=
x
x

cc
400
332 mm
sqrt
ks . cc
(
20
0.5
300
300
1.000
1.12
1.12
0.5
>
0.42 Mpa
0.42
=
+

Long side of column
=
Mpa
29
1.12 Mpa
1.50
Hence Safe
>
1.0
6.0 DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB
6.1 Design of Slab
Span
Assuming
(In First Floors)
3.963
125
mm
4.421
thick slab &
M 20
Fe 415
15
mm
clear cover
loads
Self weight
0.125
25.00
3.13
KN/m
Live Load
2.00
KN/m
Floor Finishes
1.00
KN/m
6.13
KN/m
9.19
KN/m
1.12
Total load
Factored load
1.50
End condition :
6.13
Two adjacent edge discontineous
( From Table 26 of IS 456 - 2000 )
for ly/lx
At continuous edge
2
Maximum BM, Mu
=
( In short span direction )
0.0530
9.19
=
x
7.65
3.963
KNm
Maximum BM, Mu
( In long span direction )
0.047
9.19
=
x
6.78
3.963
KNm
Maximum BM, Mu
=
( In short span direction )
0.040
9.19
=
x
5.77
3.963
KNm
Maximum BM, Mu
( In long span direction )
0.035
9.19
=
x
5.05
3.963
KNm
125
15
8
98
mm
15
106
mm
At mid span
Provided
(for long span)
Provided
(for short span)
8 / 2
=
125
8 / 2
30
i). At Continuous edge

a). In short span direction
Mu
2
b.d
7.65
1000
x
x
0.264
pt
10
106
minimum steel to be provided in slabs
0.12
Ast
106
Provide
0.264
100
1000
150
6.78
1000
x
x
0.280
Tor -
0.68
280
mm
mm c/c
( =
335
mm )
at top in short span direction
b). In long span direction

Mu
2
b.d
pt
10
98
0.12
Ast
98
Provide
0.280
100
1000
150
5.77
1000
x
x
0.187
Tor -
0.71
274
mm
mm c/c
( =
335
mm )
at top in long span direction
ii). At mid span

a). In short span direction
Mu
2
b.d
pt
10
106
0.12
Ast
106
Provide
0.187
100
Tor -
0.51
1000
150
31
198
mm
mm c/c
( =
335
mm )
at bottom In short span direction
b). In long span direction

Mu
2
b.d
pt
5.05
1000
x
x
0.203
10
98
0.12
Ast
98
0.203
100
Provide
Tor -
0.53
1000
150
199
mm
mm c/c
( =
335
mm )
at bottom in long span direction
Check for depth provided

For,
3963.415
106
pt
0.280
(span)
(d)
37.4
1.3
dreq.
3963
48.61
81.5
<
98
32
mm
48.60792
Hence Safe
7.0 DESIGN OF BEAMS

7.1 Design of Beam - floor level @ Z=3.048m and 6.096m Grid ID-(2 A-B, 2 C-D, 3 A-B ,
4 A-B, A 2-3, D 4-5)
M 20
(
300
x
400
)
Fe 415
Factored bending moments obtained from SAP analysis are,
At mid span
19.35
KNm
At supports
=
54.52
( At face of the column )
KNm
i). At midspan
X
d
d
Mu
x
2
38.3
400
361.7
33.0
361.7
0.09
x
x
pt
0.452
Ast
0.452
Nos. Tor -
ii). At supports
X
10
361.7
300
100
16
( =
+
515
Nos. Tor -
300
100
16
( =
Mu
x
2
x
1
49
400
38.3
0.49
361.7
6
2
+
+
mm
19.35
300
Provide
KNm
33
Asc
19.35
Mu
2
bd
Provide
{ Member ID 1 From SAP}
+
515
54.52
33
1
Nos. Tor 12
2
mm ) ------- Bottom steel
x
33
361.7
0
mm
1
Nos. Tor 2
mm ) ------- Top steel
12
KNm
+
+
42.6
490
2
mm
x
3
49
=
=
400
357.4
54.52
300
33
d
d
33
357.4
pt
0.672
Ast
0.672
Nos. Tor -
Mu
2
bd
Provide
Asc
Provide
x
x
10
357.4
400
42.6
1.42
0.09
300
100
357.4
6
2
16
( =
mm
+
741
Nos. Tor -
3
Nos. Tor 2
300
100
16
( =
+
515
357.4
720
2
mm
12
0
mm
1
Nos. Tor 12
2
Shear Design
At effective depth d,
100 Ast
bd
Vu
100
300
( c from SP-16, Table-61 for
63.29
x
x
741
357.4
Pt
0.550
<
Vus
Vu -
c.b.d
63285
4.31
Spacing
0.69
c,max
KN
0.69
( Pt )
3.1
N/mm
)
2
( Vus = shear to be carried by stirrups )

0.550
KN
0.87 . fy . Asv . d
Vus
34
300
357.4
0.87
3007
Provide
2L
101
4.3
x
x
415
1000
150
357.4
mm
Tor -
Stirrups
c/c
7.2 Design of Beam - floor level @ Z=3.048m and 6.096m (Remaining Beam)
(
300
400
M 20
Fe 415

At mid span
13.82
KNm
At supports
=
46.40
KNm
i). At midspan
X
d
d
Mu
x
2
38.3
400
361.7
0.09
x
x
pt
0.452
Ast
0.452
Nos. Tor -
0.460
Nos. Tor -
Provide
+
+
33.0
361.7
13.82
300
KNm
33
Asc
13.82
Mu
2
bd
Provide
x
1
49
400
38.3
0.35
361.7
mm
10
361.7
6
2
;
x
16
( =
x
16
( =
300
100
+
515
300
100
+
515
35
490
2
mm
1
Nos. Tor 12
2
x
361.7
1
Nos. Tor 2
12
499
2
mm
ii). At supports
X
Mu
x
2
41.0
400
359.0
46.40
300
33
d
d
33
359.0
pt
0.482
Ast
0.482
Nos. Tor -
0.452
Nos. Tor -
Mu
2
bd
Provide
Asc
Provide
46.40
KNm
33
+
+
x
x
10
359.0
x
2
49
400
41.0
1.20
359.0
mm
0.09
300
100
6
2
16
( =
x
+
628
2
Nos. Tor 2
300
100
16
( =
+
515
359.0
519
2
mm
12
486
2
mm
1
Nos. Tor 12
2
Shear Design
100 Ast
bd
Vu
100
300
58.17
x
x
628
359.0
Pt
0.495
<
Vus
Vu -
c.b.d
58170
4.86
0.58
c,max
KN
0.58
( Pt )
3.1
N/mm
)
2

0.495
KN
36
300
359.0
Spacing
0.87 . fy . Asv . d
Vus
0.87
2682
Provide
2L
101
4.9
x
x
415
1000
150
359.0
mm
Tor -
Stirrups
c/c
7.3 Design of Beam - floor level @ Z=9.144m (All Beam)

(
300
400
M 20
Fe 415

At mid span
7.38
KNm
At supports
=
21.32
KNm
i). At midspan
X
d
d
Mu
x
2
38.3
400
361.7
0.09
x
x
pt
0.452
Ast
0.452
Nos. Tor -
0.452
Nos. Tor -
Provide
+
+
33.0
361.7
7.38
300
KNm
33
Asc
7.38
Mu
2
bd
Provide
x
1
49
400
38.3
0.19
361.7
mm
10
361.7
6
2
;
x
16
( =
x
16
( =
300
100
+
515
300
100
+
515
37
490
2
mm
1
Nos. Tor 12
2
x
361.7
1
Nos. Tor 2
12
490
2
mm
ii). At supports
X
Mu
x
2
41.0
400
359.0
21.32
300
33
d
d
33
359.0
pt
0.482
Ast
0.482
Nos. Tor -
0.452
Nos. Tor -
Mu
2
bd
Provide
Asc
Provide
21.32
KNm
33
+
+
x
x
10
359.0
x
2
49
400
41.0
0.55
359.0
mm
0.09
300
100
6
2
16
( =
x
+
628
2
Nos. Tor 2
300
100
16
( =
+
515
359.0
519
2
mm
12
486
2
mm
1
Nos. Tor 12
2
Shear Design
100 Ast
bd
Vu
100
300
48.90
x
x
628
359.0
Pt
0.495
<
Vus
Vu -
c.b.d
48900
0.10
0.58
c,max
KN
0.58
( Pt )
3.1
N/mm
)
2

0.495
KN
38
300
359.0
Spacing
0.87 . fy . Asv . d
Vus
=
Provide
0.87
101
0.1
x
x
415
1000
150
Adopt Nominal Spacing

2L
Tor -
Stirrups
39
c/c
359.0
8. DESIGN OF STAIR
M 20
Fe 415
Tread =
Riser =
260
180
Effective Horizontal Span

For AB and CD (L+F)
For BC (L+F+L)
mm
mm
=
=
4.570 m
2.846 m
8.1 Loading Calculation

Typical Stair Case (For Design Consideration)
Considering 1m stripe of slab
Assuming landing and waist slab thickness
Weight of slab on slope w' =

Weight on horizontal area w'' =
Dead Load of Steps w* =
Weight of Finishning w** =
Live Load Lv
=
2500
3041
1800
100
2500
N/m
2
N/m
2
N/m
2
N/m
2
N/m
9941
N/m
Dead Load
=
Weight of Finishning w** =
Live Load Lv
=
2500
100
2500
N/m
2
N/m
2
N/m
5100
N/m
Total Load WS
125
mm
For Landing Portion
Total Load WL
* Since each quarter space landing is common to both Flights so

only half of above loading is considered
8.2 Design Section
9941 N/m
2550 N/m
8.2.1 For Flight AB
L1
F1
=
=
1.067
2.17
3.24
B 1.067 m
2.17 m
Fig - 1 Loading
RA =
=
RB =
=
2
1
x [ ((0.5 x WL) x (0.5 x L1 ))+(WS x F1 x ((0.5 x L1)+ F1)))]
L
14789.257 N
2
1
x [ (0.5 X (WS x F1 ))+ ((0.5 x WL) x L1 x (L-(0.5 X L1)))]
L
9502.8066 N
40
SF is Zero at XA =
M max
1.5
[(RA x XA) - (WS x XA x 0.5)]
Depth d
m from A
1.10E+07 N-mm
=
=
Sqrt (M/(1000 x R))

113.8
mm
Provide Overall Depth D
Area of Steel Ast =
785
Using bars of
12
mm
144.00
mm
125
mm
Spacing
Adopt Spacing =
No of Bars Required
Area of Steel Provided
Distribution Reinforcement Asd =
130
115 mm
mm
2
mm
A =
1067
125
965
mm
1.5D
9
2
113.097
mm
Nos
OK
195
mm
Provide 10 mm @125 mm C/C

Shear Check
V
bd
Nominal Shear tv =
0.13
8.2.2 For Flight BC
<
0.51
Safe in Shear
9941 N/m
2550 N/m
L1 =
L2 =
F2 =
1.067
1.067
0.93
m
m
m
L =
3.06
RC=RB =
1.067 m
0.930 m
1.067 m
0.5 x (0.5 x WL x L1 + W S x F2 + W L x L2)

=
M max
2550 N/m
7343.253 N
=
=
[(RC x 0.5 x L)-(WL x L1 x (L1+F2) x 0.5)-0.5 x WS x (F2 x 0.5) )] x 1000

7.46E+06 N-mm
41
Depth d
=
=
Sqrt (M/(1000 x R))

93.7
mm
Provide Overall Depth D
Area of Steel Ast =
612
Using bars of
12
mm
184.69
mm
125
mm
Spacing
Adopt Spacing =
No of Bars Required
Area of Steel Provided
130
100 mm
mm
2
mm
A =
1067
125
965
mm
9
2
113.097
Nos
OK
Provide 10 mm @125 mm C/C

Distribution Reinforcement Asd =
1.5D
Provide 8mm @180 mm C/C
42
195
mm
mm
9.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS
1). NBC- 000-114 :1994
: All relevant design codes in Nepal
2). IS 456 - 2000
: Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
3). IS 875 - 1987
: Code of Practice for Design Loads ( other than Earth

Quake ) for Buildings and Structures.
4). IS 1893 ( Part 1) - 2002
: Code of Practice for Earth Quake resistant design of

Structures.
5). IS 13920 - 1993
: Code of Practice for Ductile Detailing of Reinforced

Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces.
6). SP : 16 - 1980
: Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS 456 - 1978.
7). SAP 2000 - V 14
: Proprietary program of Research Engineers.
43
10.0 RESULT SUMMARY

1.0 Column Detail
Column ID
Type
Size
83 Square
84 Square
85 Square
86 Square
87 Square
89 Square
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
91 Square
92 Square
93 Square
95 Square
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
105
Square
Square
Square
Square
Square
Square
Square
Square
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
12" x 12"
Ground floor
8-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-12
8-16
8-16
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-16
8-16
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
Reinforcement detail
1st and 2nd floor
8-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-12
8-16
8-16
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-16
8-16
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
2.0 Beam Detail
2-16 + 3-12
2-16 + 1-12
2-16 + 1-12
2-16 + 1-12
At Support
At Midspan
At Z= 3.048m and 6.096m (Grid ID-(2 A-B, 2 C-D, 3 A-B, 4 A-B, A 2-3, D 4-5)
2-16 + 2-12
2-16 + 1-12
2-16 + 1-12
2-16 + 1-12
At Support
At Midspan
At Z= 3.048m, 6.096m and Z=9.144m (All Remaining Beam)
44
3rd floor
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-12
8-12
4-16 + 4-12
4-16 + 4-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
11.0 CHECKLIST FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION

S.N. Description
As per submitted design
1. General:
Number of Storey
G+3
Total height of structure
12.19m
Structure system
Load Bearing .
If Computer Aided Design
(CAD) is used, please state the name
of the package
Frame
Others .
a) Provision for future extension

Yes
No .
b) If Yes - How many floors will be
G+3 Floors
extended?
c) Structural design consideration for
Yes
No .
future extension.
2. Requirements of NEPAL NATIONAL BUILDING CODE (NBC)
2.1 NBC-000-1994 Requirements for Professionally Enngineered Building : An Introduction
International State-of-the-art
.
Professionally Engineered Structures
Level of design:
Mandatory Rule of thumb
.
Guidelines to rural buildings
.
2.2 NBC 101:1994 Materials Specifications
Cement
Coarse Aggregates
Fine Aggregates (Sand) ........ Building Lime
Bricks
Tick the listed materials that
........ Natural building stones
will be used in the construction
Timber
........ Tiles
Structural steel
........ Metal frames
Other
In what manner / way have
you used NBC 101 ?
2.3 NBC 102-1994 Unit Weight of Materials
Where do you plan to apply
NBC 102 ?
Specify the design unit weight of
materials
Steel
Brick
RCC
Brick Masonry
Design Calculation
.. Specifications
.. Bill of Quantity
BOQ .
Design Calculation
.
3
25 KN/m
3
19 KN/m
3
25 KN/m
3
20 KN/m
2.4 NBC 103-1994 Occupancy load (Imposed Load)

Proposed occupancy type
Occupancy load
(Fill in only concerning occupancy
Uniformly Distributed load
Concentrated Load (kN)
2
type)
(kN/m )
For Residential/Apartment
Buildings
Rooms and Kitchen
2.00
Corridors, Staircase, store
3.00
Balcony
3.00
..
45
2.5 NBC 104-1994 Wind load

Wind zone
Basic wind velocity
.. m/s
2.6 NBC 105-1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal
Seismic coefficient method

Method of earthquake analysis:
Model Response Spectrum method ..
.
II
Subsoil category
0.35 sec
Fundamental transactions period
0.08
Basic seismic coefficient
0.99
Seismic zoning factor
1.00
Importance factor
1.00
Structural performance factor
2.7 NBC 106 : 1994 Snow load N/A
2.8 NBC 107: 1994 Provisional Recommendation on Fire Safety N/A
2.9 NBC 108: 1994 Site Consideration for Seismic Hazards
Distance from toe/beginning of
Distance from river bank
Medium soil
Soil type in footing
175 KN/m2
Adopted safe bearing capacity
Isolated
Type of foundation
2m
Depth of foundation
Soil test report available?
Yes ..
No
N/A
2.10 NBC 109 : 1994 Masonry : Unreinforced
2.11 NBC 110 : 1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete
Concrete grade
M15 .. M20 M25 .. Other ..
Fe 415
Reinforcement Steel Grade
13' x 14.5'
Critical size of slab panel
Calculated short span to effective depth
37.39
ratio (L/d) for corresponding slab
Permissible L/d ratio
Effective depth
Span correction factor
Tension reinforcement (Ast)Percent
Ast modification factor
Compression reinforcement
modification factor
Beam characteristics
Maximum span/depth ratio

Span of corresponding beam
Depth
of corresponding beam
Width of
corresponding beam
Maximum slenderness ratio of column
Lateral dimension of corresponding column
Design Philosophy:
40
106m
Condition of beams
CantiSimply
lever
supported
One side
Continuous
Both side
continuous
11.05
4419 mm
400 mm
300 mm
7.2
300 mm
Limit State method

Working stress method ..
Ultimate strength method ..
Load Combinations:
1:
2:
3:
4:
Mentioned in Design Sheets
46
2.12 NBC : 111-1994 Steel

Design assumption:
Yield Stress:
Least wall thickness
Exposed condition
For Exposed Section
For not exposed section
Have you used Truss?
What is the critical span of purlin
Purlin size
Have you used steel post?
Slenderness ratio of the critical post
2.13 NBC : 112 Timber
Name of structural wood:
Modulus of Elasticity:
Critical span of the beam element
Designed deflection
Slenderness ratio of the critical post
Joint type:
2.14 NBC : 113 : 1994 Aluminium
Have you used aluminium as structure
member?
If yes, please mention the name of
design code.
2.15 NBC : 114 : 1994 Construction safety
Are you sure that all safety measures
will be fulfilled in the construction site as per
this code ?
Safety wares use
Simple connection
Semi-rigid connection
Fully rigid connection
Pipe
Webs of
Standard size
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
..
Safety hard hat

Safety goggles
Safety boots
Safety belt
First aid facility
47
Composite
section

Bhum Kumari Poudel

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Bhum Kumari Poudel

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE

Expert Engineering Solution

Er. Suraj Khatiwada

Er. Ashim Adhikari

NEC No. 6268 CIVIL 'A'

NEC No. 7464 CIVIL 'A'

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT ON REINFORCED CONCRETE

DEAD LOAD AND SIDL

4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE

The analysed inbuilt/proposed reinforced concrete framed structure consists of

2.0 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

3.0 LOADINGS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

a) From 1st floor level to 3rd floor level

a) From 1st floor level to 2nd floor level

3.1.2 SIDL (Super Imposd Dead Load)

3.2 LIVE LOADS

3.3 SEISMIC LOAD

= Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient

Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Cd = CZIK

3.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) - 1.25 (Eqx)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) + 1.25 (Eqy)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (Live Load) - 1.25 (Eqy)

0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqx)

0.9 (Dead Load) - 1.25 (Eqx)

0.9 (Dead Load) + 1.25 (Eqy)

0.9 (Dead Load) - 1.25 (Eqy)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) + 1.25 (Eqx)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) - 1.25 (Eqx)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) + 1.25 (Eqy)

1.0 (Dead Load) + 1.3 (SL) - 1.25 (Eqy)

1.0 ( Dead Load ) + 0.25 (Live Load)

Snow Load (Not Considered)

4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE

4.1 LOAD CALCULATIONS

a) At Ground Floor level

Live Load in rooms

b) At 1st to 3rd floor level

115 mm thick brick wall load

Live Load in rooms

4.2 SKETCHES SHOWING THE MODEL

4.2.2 Column Joint Label

4.2.3 Deformed Shape

4.2.4 Axial Force Diagram

5.0 DESIGN OF COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS

Checking the slenderness of the column

Effective length of column

Effective lenth of column / least lateral dimension

From the SAP results,

Therefore for design,

Minimum moment due to minimum eccentricity of column is

Spacing of ties required

Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of longer dimension

e-min / lateral dimension

Check for minimum eccentricity In the direction of shorter dimension

e-min / lateral dimension

5.1.2 Design of Footing

For the above case,

Providing footing size

Pressure from soil

In Long Span Direction

Check for Depth

( Bending Moment Consideration)