Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Flow forming, one of the rotary-forming processes, is used mainly to produce thin-walled
high-precision tubular components. Due to its exibility and low tool load requirement,
the process has great potential to be extended to the forming of net-shape components for
22 October 2007
thin and intricate features from bulk raw materials, such as solid bar ingot, cast and forged
performs. In the work reported in this paper, a ow-forming facility was established to
investigate the feasibility of forming thin-walled cups from at-disc blanks by investigating
the effects of roller geometry, degree of material reduction and roller geometry on material
Keywords:
ow. In addition, a 3D Finite Element (FE) model was developed to simulate the bending
Rotary forming
Flow forming
The results showed that it is possible to adopt a two-step forming process, bending and
Incremental forming
ow forming to enable material ow along the mandrel in order to form a thin-wall cup
component using two different proles and adopting an axial roller movement. Quality of
the cups formed depends on the diameter reduction, starting disc thickness of the blank and
the number of pass in the ow-forming stage. The results predicted by the FE simulation was
compared with the experimental results and showed close agreement. This work illustrates
the possibility of adopting ow-forming processes for the production of thin section, which
would be difcult and expensive to produce by press forming. In addition, it also showed
that although FEM is an effective tool to optimize process parameters, computational time
remains as the main barrier for its prevalent usage especially for incremental processes
such as ow forming and spinning processes.
2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
54
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
2.
Experimentation
2.1.
Flow-forming equipment
2.2.
Workpiece
55
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
2.3.
The rotation of the workpiece was xed at 250 rpm and the
axial feed rate of the roller was set at 1 mm/s (0.24 mm/rev).
Cutting oil was used at the interface between the roller and
the workpiece as well as the interface between the workpiece
and mandrel. The initial thicknesses of the workpieces investigated were 5 mm and 10 mm.
The diameter reduction, red (%) of the blank was dened
as
Flow-forming sequence
2.4.
Flow-forming conditions
red (%) =
Diameter reduction
Initial diameter
100
56
3.
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
3.1.
Difculties in modelling and simulating
ow-forming process
The ow-forming process by nature, like other incremental
forming processes, is very difcult to model due to the following factors:
(i) As it involves only localized deformation, only a small portion of the workpiece is in contact with the roller at any
given time and due to the cyclic character in the application of forces, there is frequent and rapid change in the
contact condition.
(ii) As the workpiece rotates continuously and its transient
plastic deformation is very small, ne mesh discretisation is necessary in order to allow continuity of contact as
nodal forces transfer from one element to the next.
(iii) Large number of rotations of the workpiece may result in
volume change in FE analysis and also increases computational time.
(iv) For most incremental forming processes like rotary forging, cross wedge rolling, spinning and ow forming, good
representation of the actual process can be achieved only
by using 3D model.
As a result of the above factors, modelling of incremental forming processes is inherently very time consuming and
involves large computational resources. Thus, efcient Finite
Element software with robust and unique features to model
as well as simulate the ow-forming process is necessary.
Although, the author has proven in previous studies that the
explicit FE code is ideal to tackle some issues in simulating
ow-forming process, the main drawback has always been the
inherent existence of the dynamic effects which user has to
control if he/she were to increase the very small time step
required for explicit formulation.
3.2.
Proposed FE model
dened as follows:
= mk = m
3
where is the shear stress, k is the shear strength and is
the ow stress of the workpiece material. The constant shear
friction factor was chosen for this study because ow forming is a process which involves bulk material deformation.
Since constant lubricant was being fed between the interface
of the roller and workpiece during the actual ow-forming process, the friction is considered low and is assumed at a value
of m = 0.1 between them. For the interface between the mandrel and workpiece, a sticking friction was prescribed to best
simulate the experimental conditions as the workpiece is not
supposed to slide along the mandrel.
The material properties were determined using the uniaxial compression test and expressed in the form of a power law,
= Kn , where k is the strength coefcient and n is the strainhardening exponent. The workpiece was meshed using 3D
tetrahedral elements where the forming area has a higher density than the rest of the workpiece, which resulted in 45,000
elements. In order to ensure continuity of contact as nodal
forces transfer from one element to the next and to reduce
severe mesh deformation, a very small and appropriate time
step of 0.0025 s/step was chosen after several trials. The general conditions for the model are shown in Table 1, which are
similar to the experimental conditions.
Description
A6061 aluminum (annealed condition)
= Kn , K = 220 MPa, n = 0.211
70 mm
5 mm
Shear friction
0.1
45,000
0.24
0.0025
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
57
Fig. 5 Deformed shape with diameter reduction for starting thickness of 5 mm and 10 mm.
4.
4.1.
Fig. 5 shows the nal deformed shape of the disc blank after
the forming process for thicknesses of 5 mm and 10 mm at
different diameter reductions and Fig. 6 shows the metal ow
predicted by FE simulation as well as cross-section of a experimental prole for a thickness of 5 mm. For both starting
58
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
Fig. 7 Predicted metal ow at different roller strokes and comparison with experimental prole.
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
59
60
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
4.2.
In order to elongate the cup along the mandrel and to control the dimension of the formed cup in step 1, ow-forming
process was proposed as a second step to obtain the nal product. Attempts were made to conduct ow-forming operation
on cups with inner diameter larger than the mandrel diameter. However, it required an addition of 25 steps just to obtain
the same inner diameter as the mandrel, which is deemed
ineffective. In addition, attempts were also made on cups produced from starting disc thickness of 10 mm. However, due to
the bulging effect as mentioned in the previous section, which
resulted in uneven outer diameter, the excess material in the
bulging area ow over the material at the smaller diameter
which resulted in overlapping defects.
Figs. 16 and 17 show the percentage increase in internal
diameter with cup depth having 5-mm initial disc thickness
and diameter reduction of 20% and 22% during the rst step.
As this step is similar to the ow forming of cylindrical tubes,
the thickness reduction for the ow-forming operation was
recommended to be controlled at 2030% (Xu et al., 2001) so
as to prevent circumferential ow due to too low a reduction
and bell mouthing defects due to too high a reduction. From
both gures, it can be seen that after the rst pass, the internal
diameter of the cup was uneven and increases along the height
61
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
ter of the cup was largely due to the elastic deection of the
roller which was mainly caused by the increased hardness
along the wall thickness of the cup, as shown in Fig. 19 due
to work hardening during the rst forming step. The hardness
was measure at the cross-section of the cup in two areas, 1
and 2. In each area, the hardness readings at the top, center
and bottom portion of the cup wall were measured. It can be
seen from the readings (Table 2) that the portion of the cup
wall nearer to the roller deformation, i.e. the top portion, has
the highest hardness value due to the high deformation which
Top
Center
Bottom
69.4
63.4
54.7
Area 2 (HV)
81.6
64.9
57.5
62
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 5362
5.
Conclusions
FE modelling and simulation was used with success, to predict formed shapes as well as stresses and strain during the
forming process.
The potential of ow forming to form shapes difcult to be
formed by presses, has been demonstrated.
references