Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Emma Stephens
Theory- Into- Practice Article- deal with the practical implications of
theories
CitationUnion, C., Union, L., & Green, T. (2015). The use of ereaders in the
classroom and at home to help third-grade students improve their
reading and english/
language arts standardized test scores.
Techtrends: Linking Research &
Practice To Improve Learning,
59(5), 71-84.
Identification- Research Article
SummaryThe purpose of this study was to investigate and discovers the effects
of portable technology tools on student performance, specifically on
the use of Nook Simple Touch eReaders and how they affect English
Language Arts performance. The researchers focused on 25 third
grade elementary students and utilized their 2012 OAS scores and
then their end of year CRCT scores as primary data sources. The
researchers compared the students results and performance with 3rd
grade classes that were not using the eReaders. For the study each of
the 30 students were given a Nook Simple Touch eReader and various
eBooks to complete ELA lessons and assignment that were centered on
Common Core Standards. In the end, the researchers simply wanted to
discover if these eReaders improved student performance. They found
that those students who utilized the eReaders had increased reading
performance, however they could not conclude that the eReaders lead
to higher performance in their ELA classes.
CritiqueWhen I initially read the abstract for this article I was immediately
attracted to the research and I was expecting the results to be
extremely positive as far as student performance. I thought that the
chosen age of the students, as well as the methods of comparison
between classes with and without the eReaders would lead to a
positive result. I think in the end, this research and article was
somewhat useful. It concluded that when students have access to
eReaders, their reading performance increases. While that is a positive
result, I found it to be somewhat obvious but still useful. I think one
problem that this paper had was that the test group was too small. The
researchers only focused on one class. These 25 students had the
same teacher at the same school and the same circumstances. I wish
that the researchers had expanded the test subjects to three 3rd grade