Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Julia Kristeva
Born
24 June 1941 (age 74)
Sliven, Bulgaria
Residence
France
Nationality
French / Bulgarian
Alma mater
University of Sofia
(and others)
Awards
VIZE 97 Prize
Website
kristeva.fr
Era
Contemporary philosophy
Region
Western philosophy
School
Psychoanalysis
Structuralism
Poststructuralism
Main interests
Philosophy of language
Semiotics
Literary criticism
Philosophy of literature
Psychoanalysis
Feminism
Notable ideas
The "semiotic" of the pre-mirror stage
Nature of abjection
Influences[show]
Part of a series of articles on
Psychoanalysis
Concepts[show]
Important figures[show]
Important works[show]
Schools of thought[show]
Training[show]
Psychology portal
Julia Kristeva (French: [kisteva]; Bulgarian: ; born 24 June 1941) is a BulgarianFrench philosopher, literary critic, psychoanalyst, feminist, and, most recently, novelist, who has lived
in France since the mid-1960s. She is now a professor at the University Paris Diderot.
Kristeva became influential in international critical analysis, cultural theory and feminism after
publishing her first book, Semeiotik, in 1969. Her sizable body of work includes books and essays
which addressintertextuality, the semiotic, and abjection, in the fields of linguistics, literary theory
and criticism, psychoanalysis, biography and autobiography, political and cultural analysis, art and
art history. She is among the prominent figures in structuralist thought, while her works have also
been recognized as having an important place in post-structuralism.
She is also the founder and head of the Simone de Beauvoir Prize committee.[1]
Contents
[hide]
1Life
2Work
o
2.1The "semiotic"
3Feminist
o
4Novelist
5Honors
6Scholarly reception
7Selected writings
o
7.1Novels
8See also
9Notes
10External links
Life[edit]
Born in Sliven, Bulgaria, to Christian parents, Kristeva is the daughter of a church accountant.
Kristeva and her sister were enrolled in a Francophone school run by Dominican nuns. Kristeva
became acquainted with the work of Mikhail Bakhtin at this time in Bulgaria. Kristeva went on to
study at the University of Sofia, and while a postgraduate there obtained a research fellowship that
enabled her to move to France in December 1965, when she was 24.[2] She continued her education
at several French universities, studying under Goldmann and Barthes, among other scholars. [3] On
August 2, 1967, Kristeva married the novelist Philippe Sollers,[4] nPhilippe Joyaux.
Kristeva taught at Columbia University in the early 1970s, and remains a Visiting Professor.[5] She
has also published under the married name Julia Joyaux. [6][7][8]
Work[edit]
After joining the 'Tel Quel group' founded by Sollers, Kristeva focused on the politics of language and
became an active member of the group. She trained in psychoanalysis, and earned her degree in
1979. In some ways, her work can be seen as trying to adapt a psychoanalytic approach to
the poststructuralist criticism. For example, her view of the subject, and its construction, shares
similarities with Sigmund Freud and Lacan. However, Kristeva rejects any understanding of the
subject in a structuralist sense; instead, she favors a subject always "in process" or "on trial".[9] In this
way, she contributes to the poststructuralist critique of essentialized structures, whilst preserving the
teachings of psychoanalysis. She travelled to China in the 1970s and later wrote About Chinese
Women (1977).[10][11][12][13][14][15]
The "semiotic"[edit]
One of Kristeva's most important propositions is the semiotic, as distinct from the discipline
of semiotics founded by Ferdinand de Saussure. As explained in The History of Women in
Philosophy by Augustine Perumalil, Kristeva's "semiotic is closely related to the infantile preOedipal referred to in the works of Freud, Otto Rank, Melanie Klein, British Object
Relation psychoanalysis, and Lacan's pre-mirror stage. It is an emotional field, tied to the instincts,
which dwells in the fissures and prosody of language rather than in the denotative meanings of
words." Furthermore, according to Birgit Schippers' 2011 book Julia Kristeva and Feminist Thought,
the semiotic is a realm associated with the musical, the poetic, the rhythmic, and that which lacks
structure and meaning. It is closely tied to the "feminine", and represents the undifferentiated state of
the pre-Mirror Stage infant.
Upon entering the Mirror Stage, the child learns to distinguish between self and other, and enters the
realm of shared cultural meaning, known as the symbolic. In Desire in Language (1980), Kristeva
describes the symbolic as the space in which the development of language allows the child to
become a "speaking subject," and to develop a sense of identity separate from the mother. This
process of separation is known as abjection, whereby the child must reject and move away from the
mother in order to enter into the world of language, culture, meaning, and the social. This realm of
language is called the symbolic and is contrasted with the semiotic in that it is associated with the
masculine, the law, and structure. Kristeva departs from Lacan in the idea that even after entering
the symbolic, the subject continues to oscillate between the semiotic and the symbolic. Therefore,
rather than arriving at a fixed identity, the subject is permanently "in process". Because female
children continue to identify to some degree with the mother figure, they are especially likely to retain
a close connection to the semiotic. This continued identification with the mother may result in what
Kristeva refers to in Black Sun (1989) as melancholia (depression), given that female children
simultaneously reject and identify with the mother figure. It has also been suggested (e.g., Creed,
1993) that the degradation of women and women's bodies in popular culture (and particularly, for
example, in slasher films) emerges because of the threat to identity that the mother's body poses: it
is a reminder of time spent in the undifferentiated state of the semiotic, where one has no concept of
self or identity. After abjecting the mother, subjects retain an unconsciousfascination with the
semiotic, desiring to reunite with the mother, while at the same time fearing the loss of identity that
accompanies it. Slasher film thus provide a way for audience members to safely reenact the process
of abjection by vicariously expelling and destroying the mother figure.
Kristeva is also known for her adoption of Platos idea of the chora, meaning a nourishing maternal
space (Schippers, 2011). Kristevas idea of the chora has been interpreted in several ways: as a
reference to the uterus, as a metaphor for the relationship between the mother and child, and as the
temporal period preceding the Mirror Stage. In her essay "Motherhood According to Giovanni Bellini"
from Desire in Language (1980), Kristeva refers to the chora as a non-expressive totality formed by
drives and their stases in a motility that is full of movement as it is regulated. She goes on to
suggest that it is the mother's body that mediates between the chora and the symbolic realm: the
mother has access to culture and meaning, yet also forms a totalizing bond with the child.
Kristeva is also noted for her work on the concept of intertextuality.
Feminist[edit]
Kristeva was regarded as a key proponent of French feminism together with Simone de
Beauvoir, Hlne Cixous, and Luce Irigaray.[16][17] Kristeva had a remarkable influence on feminism
and feminist literary studies[18][19] in the US and the UK, as well as on readings into contemporary art [20]
[21]
although her relation to feminist circles and movements in France was quite controversial.
Kristeva made a famous disambiguation of three types of feminism in "Women's Time" in New
Maladies of the Soul (1993); while rejecting the first two types, including that of Beauvoir, her stands
are sometimes considered to reject feminism altogether. Kristeva proposed the idea of multiple
sexual identities against the joined code [clarification needed] of "unified feminine language".
Novelist[edit]
Kristeva wrote a number of novels that resemble detective stories. While the books maintain
narrative suspense and develop a stylized surface, her readers also encounter ideas intrinsic to her
theoretical projects. Her characters reveal themselves mainly through psychological devices, making
her type of fiction mostly resemble the later work of Dostoevsky. Her fictional oeuvre, which
includes The Old Man and the Wolves, Murder in Byzantium, and Possessions, while often
allegorical, also approaches the autobiographical in some passages, especially with one of the
protagonists of Possessions, Stephanie Delacoura French journalistwho can be seen as
Kristeva's alter ego. Murder in Byzantium deals with themes from orthodox Christianity and politics;
she referred to it as "a kind of anti-Da Vinci Code".[23]
Honors[edit]
For her "innovative explorations of questions on the intersection of language, culture and literature",
Kristeva was awarded the Holberg International Memorial Prize in 2004. She won the 2006 Hannah
Arendt Prize for Political Thought.
Scholarly reception[edit]
Roman Jakobson said that "Both readers and listeners, whether agreeing or in stubborn
disagreement with Julia Kristeva, feel indeed attracted to her contagious voice and to her genuine
gift of questioning generally adopted 'axioms,' and her contrary gift of releasing various 'damned
questions' from their traditional question marks."[24]
Roland Barthes comments that "Julia Kristeva changes the place of things: she always destroys the
last prejudice, the one you thought you could be reassured by, could be take pride in; what she
displaces is the already-said, the dja-dit, i.e., the instance of the signified, i.e., stupidity; what she
subverts is authority -the authority of monologic science, of filiation."[25]
Ian Almond criticizes Kristeva's ethnocentrism. He cites Gayatri Spivak's conclusion that Kristeva's
book About Chinese Women "belongs to that very eighteenth century [that] Kristeva scorns" after
pinpointing "the brief, expansive, often completely ungrounded way in which she writes about two
thousand years of a culture she is unfamiliar with". [26] Ian Almond notes the absence of sophistication
in Kristeva's remarks concerning the Muslim world and the dismissive terminology she uses to
describe its culture and believers. He criticizes Kristeva's opposition which juxtaposes "Islamic
societies" against "democracies where life is still fairly pleasant" by pointing out that Kristeva
displays no awareness of the complex and nuanced debate ongoing among women theorists in the
Muslim world, and that she does not refer to anything other than the Rushdie fatwa in dismissing the
entire Muslim faith as "reactionary and persecutory".[27]
In Intellectual Impostures (1997), physics professors Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont devote a chapter
to Kristeva's use of mathematics in her writings. They conclude "the main problem summarized by
these texts is that she makes no effort to justify the reference of these mathematical concepts to the
fields she is purporting to study - linguistics, literary criticism, political philosophy, psychoanalysis and this in our opinion, is for the very good reason that there is none. Her sentences are more
meaningful than those of Lacan, but she surpasses even him for the superficiality of her erudition." [28]
A feminist criticism is directed toward Kristeva's idea that the mother of early childhood must be
abjected and rejected (footnote 12).
Selected writings[edit]
The Kristeva Reader. (ed. Toril Moi) Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Reading the Bible. In: David Jobling, Tina Pippin & Ronald Schleifer
(eds). The Postmodern Bible Reader. (pp. 92101). Oxford:
Blackwell, 2001.
Griselda Pollock (Guest Editor) Julia Kristeva 19661996, Parallax Issue 8, 1998.
The Old Man and the Wolves. New York: Columbia University
Press, 1994.
Capacity to be alone
criture fminine
Khra
Novels[edit]
See also[edit]
Notes[edit]
1.
Jump up^ Simone de Beauvoir Prize 2009 goes to the One Million
Signatures Campaign in Iran, Change for Equality
2.
3.
4.
5.
Jump up^ Riding, Alan, Correcting Her Idea of Politically Correct. New
York Times. 14 June 2001.
6.
7.
8.
9.
External links[edit]
Holberg Prize
[sho
Feminist
[sho
The VIZE 97 P
WorldCat
VIAF: 108172648
LCCN: n50045983
ISNI: 0000 0001 2283 9200
Authority control
GND: 118778056
SUDOC: 026954192
BNF: cb11910116q (data)
NDL: 00446365
NKC: jn20010309077
Categories:
1941 births
Living people
Bulgarian communists
Bulgarian novelists
Bulgarian philosophers
French Maoists
French psychoanalysts
French feminists
Bulgarian feminists
Poststructuralists
French semioticians
Feminist theorists
Feminist writers
Philosophers of sexuality
Postmodern feminists
Psychoanalytic theory
Continental philosophers
Women sociologists
21st-century philosophers
Bulgarian writers
20th-century philosophers
French philosophers
Women critics
Women philosophers
Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Read
Edit
View history
Go
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Create a book
Download as PDF
Article
Talk
Printable version
Other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
Asturianu
Catal
etina
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Espaol
Euskara
Franais
Galego
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
Basa Jawa
Limburgs
Malagasy
Nederlands
Norsk bokml
Polski
Portugus
Slovenina
Srpskohrvatski /
Suomi
Svenska
Trke
Winaray
Edit links
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view