Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Search
Collections
Journals
About
Contact us
My IOPscience
Repair of rat cranial bone defect by using bone morphogenetic protein-2-related peptide
combined with microspheres composed of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymer and
chitosan
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
2015 Biomed. Mater. 10 045004
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-605X/10/4/045004)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 148.204.163.81
This content was downloaded on 19/01/2016 at 19:58
doi:10.1088/1748-6041/10/4/045004
Paper
received
13 January 2015
re vised
16 May 2015
21 May 2015
published
8 July 2015
Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Peoples Republic of China
Department of Orthopedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, Peoples Republic of China
3
Key Laboratory of Biomedical Materials and Implants, Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057,
Peoples Republic of China
4
Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Peoples Republic of China
2
Abstract
The effects of the transplanted bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) -related peptide P24 and
rhBMP2 combined with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/chitosan (CS) microspheres were
investigated in promoting the repair of rat cranial bone defect. Forty white rats were selected and
equally divided into four groups (group A: 1g of rhBMP2/PLGA/CS composite; group B: 3mg
of P24/PLGA/CS composite; group C: 0.5g of rhBMP2 + 1.5mg of P24/PLGA/CS composite;
group D: blank PLGA/CS material), and rat cranial bone defect models with a diameter of 5mm
were established. The materials were transplanted to the cranial bone defects. The animals were
sacrificed on weeks 6 and 12 post-operation. Radiographic examinations (x-ray imaging and 3D
CT scanning) and histological evaluations were performed. The repaired areas of cranial bone
defects were measured, and the osteogenetic abilities of various materials were compared. Cranial
histology, imaging, and repaired area measurements showed that the osteogenetic effects at two time
points (weeks 6 and 12) in group C were better than those in groups A and B. The effects in groups
A and B were similar. Group D achieved the worst repair effect of cranial bone defects, where a large
number of fibrous connective tissues were observed. The PLGA/CS composite microspheres loaded
with rhBMP2 and P24 had optimal concrescence and could mutually increase their osteogenesis
capability. rhBMP2 + P24/PLGA/CS composite is a novel material for bone defect repair with stable
activity to induce bone formation.
1.Introduction
Bone-tissue engineering mainly consists of three
aspects, namely bone biomaterial, seed cells, and
active factors [1]. Polylactic acid (PLA) material is
currently the most frequently investigated and utilized
synthetic material because of its biodegradability
and biocompatibility [2]. Synthetic macromolecule
materials, such as PLA, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB),
poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), and polylactic
acid polyethylene glycol (PLA-PEG), can release the
drug loaded on the surface and inner layers at a slow
rate [3]. Furthermore, these materials have almost
5
J Li et al
J Li et al
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of PLGA microspheres (a) and PLGA/CS microspheres (b) (original magnification10000).
3.Results
3.1. Microsphere morphology
The PLGA microspheres were regular spheres that
exhibited smooth surfaces without cavities (figure
1(a)). The PLGA/CS composite microspheres had
wrinkled surfaces and were dense without cavities. Most
microspheres were spherical, while a small proportion
were spheroidal. The cross-section profiles of PLGA/
CS composite microspheres showed multinucleate
and solid duplex spheres embedded with numerous
J Li et al
Figure 2. (a), (e) Photo macrograph of Group A (rhBMP2/PLGA/CS); (b), (f) photo macrograph of Group B (P24/PLGA/CS); (c),
(g) photo macrograph of Group C (rhBMP2 + P24/PLGA/CS); (d), (h) photo macrograph of Group D (PLGA/CS) in the defect sites
at 6weeks and 12weeks post-surgery, respectively. The black arrows indicate the areas of the implants.
J Li et al
Figure 3. Radiographs of the implants in four groups at each time-point: (a) group A (rhBMP2/PLGA/CS), (b) group B (P24/PLGA/
CS), (c) group C (rhBMP2 + P24/PLGA/CS), (d) group D (PLGA/CS) at 6weeks post-surgery; (e) group A, (f) group B, (g) group C,
(h) group D at 12weeks post-surgery. The white arrows indicated the areas of the implants.
160
140
120
rhBMP2/PLGA/CS
100
P24/PLGA/CS
80
rhBMP2+P24/PLGA/CS
60
PLGA/CS
40
20
0
6
12
Implantation time(weeks)
Figure 4. The gray values of x-ray images in groups A, B and C were statistically significantly higher than those in group D
(p<0.05). The values in groups A and B had no significant difference (p>0.05). The gray values of group C were significantly
higher than those of groups A and B (p<0.05) at 6weeks and 12weeks post-surgery.
J Li et al
Figure 5. 3D CT scan photos of the rat cranial bone defect in four groups at each time-point: (a) group A (rhBMP2/PLGA/CS),
(b) group B (P24/PLGA/CS), (c) group C (rhBMP2 + P24/PLGA/CS), (d) group D (PLGA/CS) at 6weeks post-surgery; (e) group A,
(f) group B, (g) group C, (h) group D at 12weeks post-surgery. The black arrows indicate the areas of the implants.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
rhBMP2/PLGA/CS
P24/PLGA/CS
rhBMP2+P24/PLGA/CS
PLGA/CS
12
Implantation time(weeks)
Figure 6. On week 6 and week 12 post-operation, the percentages of the area of high-density shadows under 3D CT in total area of
defect cavities in groups A, B, and C were significantly higher than those in group D (p<0.05). On week 12 the percentage of area in
group C was significantly higher those that in groups A and B (p<0.05). The values represent meanS.D.(n = 5).
J Li et al
Figure 7. The histological images of the bone defect sites at each time-point: (a) group A (rhBMP2/PLGA/CS), (b) group B (P24/
PLGA/CS), (c) group C (rhBMP2 + P24/PLGA/CS), (d) Group D (PLGA/CS) at 6weeks post-surgery; (e) group A, (f) group B,
(g) group C, (h) froup D at 12weeks post-surgery (original magnification200).
100
90
80
70
rhBMP2/PLGA/CS
60
50
40
P24/PLGA/CS
rhBMP2+P24/PLGA/CS
PLGA/CS
30
20
10
0
6
12
Implantation time(weeks)
Figure 8. On week 6, the percentages of newly formed bone in the bone-defect cavities were significantly higher in groups A, B, and
C than in group D (p<0.05). On week 12, the percentages of newly formed bones in group C was higher than those in groups A and
B with significant differences (p<0.05).
J Li et al
4.Discussion
Scaffold materials play important roles in bone
tissue engineering. They provide a favorable
microenvironment for cell growth, functioning as
sustained-releasing carriers to increase the release
time of growth factors [21]. Moreover, they are capable
of cell recognition. The BMP-2-related peptide P24
independently designed by our research group can
be released slowly to induce bone formation using
an effective scaffold carrier [9, 17, 19, 22]. Recently,
microsphere functioning as a scaffold carrier in bone
tissue engineering has attracted considerable attention
[23]. A microsphere in this context is a spherical drugcarrying particle composed of polymer materials. This
carrier is degradable; thus, the loaded drug is slowly
released during microsphere degradation [24, 25].
Currently, scaffold-containing microspheres can be
divided into two types, namely artificially synthetic
polymer and ceramics [23]. In terms of application
types, microspheres can be divided into simplex and
composite microspheres, which are composed of
two types of materials. The main raw materials for
preparing synthetic polymeric material include PLA,
lactide, and glycolide copolymers. Because PLA has
lower degradation rate compared with PGA, these
two materials were mixed in several experiments to
prepare a material with controllable degradation rate.
Borden et al [26] speculated that when the ratio of PLA
and polyglycolic acid was 75:25, the scaffold material
exhibited an optimal degradability. Another type of
degradable microspheres originated from natural
materials, such as CS, alginate, and gelatin [27]. Active
groups in the CS can combine with scaffold-containing
microspheres, which is convenient for property control
and application [28]. Previous studies showed that
loaded drug in the microspheres is released in two
ways [12]: burst release after the drug is dissolved in
the solution and has become dispersed, and release of
the loaded drug after polymeric material degradation.
In our experiment, the microsphere drug controlledrelease system was used in bone repair. P24 and
rhBMP2 with the ability of inducing bone formation
was synthesized with microspheres with a sustained
releasing function. The synthesis was performed using
a chemical method to achieve the sustained release
of P24 and rhBMP2 in the cells. Thus, osteogenesis
was promoted in local tissues. In this experiment,
rhBMP2 and P24 were separately loaded in the inner
PLGA microspheres and chitosan crusts of PLGA/CS
microspheres to prepare tissue-engineered bone for
bone-defect repair. Previous studies indicated that
PLGA/CS microspheres (PC10, PC20, and PC50) from
three molecular weights of PLGA could be prepared
by the double-emulsion method [11]. The PC50
microspheres were better than the other two types of
microspheres in terms of drug loading capacity and the
time of controlled release. The PLGA/CS composite
PC50 microsphere adopted in this experiment had a
8
J Li et al
5.Conclusions
PLGA/CS composite microspheres loaded with
rhBMP2 and P24 had optimal concrescence and could
increase their mutual osteogenesis capability. rhBMP2
+ P24/PLGA/CS microspheres are a novel material for
bone defect repair with a stable activity to induce bone
formation.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos:
81301538, 81171684 and 51303094), the International
Science and Technology Cooperation Program of
China (Grant No: 2013DFG32690), and the Youth
Science and Technology Morning Program of Wuhan
(Grant No: 2014072704011256).
References
[1] HosseinkhaniM et al 2014Tissue engineered scaffolds in
regenerative medicine World J. Plast. Surg. 3 37
[2] ShueL, YufengZ and MonyU 2012 Biomaterials for
periodontal regeneration: a review of ceramics and polymers
Biomatter 2 2717
[3] StefanescuE A, StefanescuC and NegulescuI I 2011
Biodegradable polymeric capsules obtained via room
temperature spray drying: preparation and characterization
J. Biomater. Appl. 25 82549
[4] MatsumotoA et al 2005 Drug release characteristics of multireservoir type microspheres with poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide)
and poly(dl-lactide) J. Control. Release 106 17280
[5] ChenC et al 2006 Biodegradable nanoparticles of amphiphilic
triblock copolymers based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and
poly(ethylene glycol) as drug carriers Biomaterials
27 480414
[6] GreenwaldR B et al 2003 Effective drug delivery by PEGylated
drug conjugates Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55 21750
[7] VarshosazJ 2007 The promise of chitosan microspheres in
drug delivery systems Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 4 26373
J Li et al
10