International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

A Class Of K-Quasi-Pnormal Operators

1

K.MANIKANDAN & 2M.ATHIYAMAN

Assistant professor & Hod, Department of Mathematics, Dr.SNS Rajalaksmi College of Arts &
Science
2
Research Scholar,Department of Mathematics, Dr.SNS Rajalaksmi College of Arts & Science

AbstractIn this paper we introduce a new class of k quasi-p normal operator as a generalization
of quasi -p normal operator. Let H be a non zero complex Hilbert space & let B(H) denote the
algebra of all bounded linear operators on H. an operator TB(H) is called k quasi p normal if
(T*T)k commutes with (T+T*) i.e..
(T*T)k (T+T*)=(T+T*) (T*T)k and it is denote [KQPN]. In this paper we investicate sum
properties of quasi p normal opertors & k quasi p normal operators are also characterized in
terms of commutativity with the multiplication operator induced by the Radon-Nikodyn
derivative of the measure (Tk)-1 with respect to .
Keywords: self-adjoint operators, unitary operators, binormal operator, composition operators
Introduction:
class of k-quasi-P-normal is introduced and
is defined as (T*T)k (T+T*) = (T+T*)
(T*T)k in the Hilbert space H for k 0 and
some characterisations are proved. This k1.1 k-quasi p- normal operator

quasi-P-normal operator is introduced as a

generalization of k-quasi normal operator
and quasi P -normal operators.
If k=1, then k-quasi P- normal operator
becomes quasi -P normal operator.

An operator () is said to be k-quasi

P- normal operator if (T*T)k commute with

1.2 Related Theorem to k-Quasi-P-

T+T*

Normal Operator

i.e. (T*T)k (T+T*)=

1.2.1 Proposition

(T+T*) (T*T)k for k 1

If T is k-quasi-P- normal operator, then the

equality ((T*T)k (T+T*))n
1

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

= ((T*T)k (T+T*))q (T*T)k(T+T*)

= (T+T*)n ((T*T)k)n holds true for all

.

= (T+T*)q ((T*T)k)q (T*T)k (T+T*)

Proof

Since T is k-quasi P-normal, applying

definition q+2 times

Let us prove the theorem by mathematical

induction method.

We can drive the derived result as

When n=1

( (T*T)k (T+T*) )q+1

(T*T)k (T+T*)

= (T+T*)q+1 ( (T*T)k )q+1

= (T+T*) (T*T)k

(1)

Hence the result is true for all n N.

In this case T is k-quasi-P-normal operator

1.2.2 Proposition

When n=2, LHS of the equality becomes

If is a k-quasi P normal operator

((T*T)k (T+T*))2

and is any scalar which is real,

then is also a k- quasi -P- normal

= (T*T)k (T+T*) (T*T)k (T+T*)

operator.
= (T+T*)(T*T)k (T*T)k (T+T*)
Proof
k

=(T+T*) (T*T) (T+T*)(T*T)

Since T is a quasi P normal operator

= (T+T*)(T+T*) (T*T)k (T*T)k

[T+T*, (T*T)k]=0

= (T*T)2 ((T*T)k)2

(T*T)k (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)k =0

When n=1 is true and n=2 is true also

(1)

If be any scalar which is real, then (T)*

Assume the theorem is true for n=q

=T*=T* (Where is real so = )

((T*T)k (T+T*))q = (T+T*)q ((T*T)k)q

Now

(2)

((T)*( T))k ( T+ ( T)*)

When n=q+1, we get

= ( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k
((T*T)k (T+T*))q+1
Take LHS
2

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

((T)*( T))k ( T+ ( T)*) = 2 (T*T)k

Therefore T*T = TT*

[T+T*]

(2)

Now substituting T* for T in (1) we have

= 2+1 (T*T)k [T+T*]

(2)

(T*+ (T*)*) ((T*)* T*)

And RHS

= (T*+T) (TT*) (3)

( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k

and ((T*)*T*) (T*+ (T*)*)

= [T+T*] 2 (T*T)k

= (TT*) (T*+T) (4)

( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k

By (2), (3) and (4)

=2+1 [T+T*] (T*T)k

We get (T*+ (T*)*) ((T*)*T*)

From (1), (2) and (3) we get that

= ( (T*)*T*) (T*+ (T*)*)

((T)*( T))k ( T+ ( T)*)

(T*+T**) (T**T*) = (T**T*) (T*+T**)

= ( T+ ( T)*) ((T)*( T))k

Hence T* is also k-quasi P normal operator.
Hence is a k quasi P- normal
1.2.4 Proposition

operator.

If T is a self ad-joint operator,

1.2.3 Proposition

Then T is a k quasiP normal operator.

If T is a k-quasi -P normal

Proof

operator which is a normal operator also,

Since T is a self-adjoint operator.

Then T* is also a k-quasi- P- normal

operator.

Therefore T* = T

Proof

(T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

Since T is a k-quasi P normal operator.

Now,Take LHS

We know that
(T+T*)(T*T) =(T*T) (T+T*)

(T*T) (T+T*) = (TT) (T+T)

(1)

= 2 2T

Since T is normal
3

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

= 2 2+1

Therefore [T+T*, (T*T) ] = 0

(1)

Take RHS (T+T*) (T*T) = (T+T) (TT)

i.e. (T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

= 2T ( 2 )
(T+T*) (T*T) = 2 2+1

Now putting ST for T we have

((ST)*(ST) ) (ST+ (ST)*)

(2)

= (T*S ST) (ST+T*S)

Hence (1) and (2)

(T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

= 2 (T*T) S (T+T*)

So T is a k-quasi P- normal operator.

= 2+1 (T*T) (T+T*)

1.2.5 Proposition

(ST+ (ST)*) ((ST)*(ST) ) = (ST+T*S)

(T*S ST)

Let T be a k quasi P normal

operator on a Hilbert Space H. Let S be a

= S (T+T*) 2 (T*T)

Self adjoint operator for which T and S

(ST+ (ST)*) ((ST)*(ST) )

Commute, and then ST is also a k quasi Pnormal operator.

= 2+1 (T+T*) (T*T)

Proof

(ST)*(ST) (ST+ (ST)*)

Since S is a Self adjoint operator.

= (ST + (ST)*) (ST)*ST

Therefore S* =S.

Hence ST is a k-quasi P normal operator.

Now S and T Commute.

1.2.6 Proposition

Therefore

ST = TS

Let T be a self adjoint operator on a Hilbert

(ST)* = (TS)*

Space H. and S be any operator on H, then

S*TS is a k-quasi- P- normal operator on H.

T*S* = S*T*
Proof
(or)

T*S

= ST*
Since T is self adjoint

Now Since T is a k quasi P normal operator.

We know that
4

T* = T

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

(T*T) (T+T*) = (T+T*) (T*T)

1.2.7 Proposition

Now putting S*TS for T

Let T= be the polar decomposition of

an operator T, then T= is a k-quasi P-

((S*TS)* S*TS ) (S*TS +(S*TS)*)

= (S*TS+(S*TS)*) ((S*TS)* S*TS )

normal if and only if =

(1)

Proof

((S*TS)*S*TS) (S*TS+(S*TS)*)

Assume

=((S*T*S**) S*TS ) (S*TS +(S*T*S**))

then

= ((S*T*S) S*TS ) (S*TS + (S*T*S))

(T+T*) (T*T) - (T*T) (T+T*)

((S*TS)*S*TS) (S*TS+(S*TS)*)

=( + *)( * ) - * )

=((S*TS) S*TS ) (S*TS +(S*TS))

(2)

( + *)=( + *)( )2 - )2
( + *) = ( )2 + *( )2

(S*TS +(S*TS)*) ((S*TS)* S*TS )

=(S*TS +(S*T*S**)) ((S*T*S**) S*TS )
=(S*TS +(S*T*S)) ((S*T*S) S*TS )

that

- ( )2 -( )2 *)

=( )2+1 + *( )2+1

- ( )2+1 -( )2+1 *

(S*TS +(S*TS)*) ((S*TS)* S*TS)

=0

=(S*TS +(S*TS)) ((S*TS) S*TS ) (3)

So T is k-quasi P- normal
Hence (2) and (3) we get
( )2+1 = ( )2

Which shows that S*TS is self adjoint,

= ( )21

and since every self adjoin operator is kquasi- P- normal operator

= ( )21

Hence S*TS is also k-quasi P- normal

= ( )2+1

operator.

If T is k-quasi P-normal, then

0 = (T+T*) (T*T) - (T*T) (T+T*)

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

=( + *)( * ) -

*( )2 - ( )2 * annihilates on H=

( * ) ( + *)

N ( ), that is *( )2
( )2 *

=( + *)( )2 -( )2 ( + *

= *hold since
= ( )2 + *( )2

*( )

-( )

1.2.8 Proposition

*)

A power of k-quasi P- normal

= ( )2 - ( )2 +

operator

*( )2 - ( )2 *
= (( )2 -

is approximated

constant terms.

= ( )2 - ( )2 +
2

uniformly by polynomials of ( )2 without

- ( )2 -( )2 *)

consequently

is

again

k-quasi-p-normal

operator.
( )2 ) +

Proof

( *( )2 - ( )2 *)

Let T be a k-quasi P-normal. We

prove

The first part of the equality means

the

assertion

by

mathematical

that (( )2 - ( )2 ) annihilates on

induction since T is k-quasi-P-normal, the

( ) by continuity of an operator and also

result is true for m=1,

( )2 - ( )2 annihilates on N ,

(T+T*) (T*T) = (T*T) (T+T*)

(1)

since ()= N , so that ( )2 Now assume that the result is true for m=n

( )2 annihilates on H= N ( ),
that is ( )2 = ( )2 consequently

[(T+T*)

( )=

(2)

( )

hold

since

is

approximated uniformly by polynomials of

(T*T) ] =[(T*T)

(T+T*)]

Now let us prove the result for m=n+1

( )2 without constant terms.

[(T+T*) (T*T) ]+1 =[(T*T) (T+T*)] +1

The second part of the equality
means that *( )2 -( )2 * annihilates

[(T+T*) (T*T) ]+1 = [(T+T*) (T*T) ]

on ( ) by continuity of an operator and

(T+T*) (T*T)

also *( )2 - ( )2 * annihilates on

= [(T*T) (T+T*)] (T*T) (T+T*)

N , since ( *)= N , so that

[(T+T*) (T*T) ]+1 = [(T*T) (T+T*)] +1
6

International Society for Research in Computer Science, Volume I, February 2016

ISSN: 2348-3040

Thus result is true for m=n+1

[5]

research and management (IJRM) volume 2

issue 12 page 1811-1814, 2014

Recently, lot of research work is

being carried out in the field of operator
theory particularly in area of general
operators.
The further work can be introduced
as k-quasi-P-normal composition operators
on L2 space
References
[1] Dipshikha Bhattacharya and Narendran
Prasad, quasi-P- normal operators linear
operators on Hilbert space for which T+T*
commute,

Ultra

Scientist

Vol.24(2)A, 269-272 (2012).

[2] Senthilkumar.D, Maheswari Naik.P,
Santhi.R,

Sivasathya.A

operators, International journal of scientific

Conclusion

T*T

Vimala.V, Some properties of quasi normal

is also a k-quasi P-normal for each n.

and

Vidhyaprapa.k

k-quasi

normal

operators,

International Journal of Mathematics and

Computation, Vol 15; Issue No.2; Year 2012
[3] Somasundaram.D, A First course in
Functional analysis Published by N.K Mehra
for narosa publishing house Pvt.Ltd NEW
DELHI 110002
[4] Sterling.K. Berberian state university of
lowa, Introduction to Hilbert space, NEW
YORK. OXFORD University PRESS1961
7