Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Unit Title:
Unit Des cription: This unit introduces 5 es s ential ques tions to propos al writing. Students explore all as pects
of propos al writing including, writing problem s tatements , work plans , and preparing
budgets . Their unders tanding of how to res pond to the 5 es s ential ques tions will allow them
to adapt thes e propos al writing s kills to various donor expectations .
Unit Type:
Shared Unit
Start Date:
2013-12-20
End Date:
2014-02-14
Stage 1
Standards, Indicators and Learning Targets
Community Development
Strand: 3.1 Community Development
Standard: 3.1.2 Develop an unders tanding of the project cycle and develop important s kills and dis pos itions to
manage it
Indicator(s ): 3.1.2.3 Develop a project propos al that eectively communicates the true needs of a community
to an external donor and explains purpos e, plan, management, budget needs , capacity needs , s us tainability
s trategy, res pons es to community empowerment, gender is s ues , a participatory approach, and capacity
development.
Dene the purpos e of propos al writing (C ommunity Development (HE))
Write a project propos al containing all neces s ary elements for a donor audience
Write a problem s tatement containing all neces s ary elements (C ommunity Development
Dene goals and develop a goal s tatement for their target community (C ommunity
Dene objectives and develop objectives that meet the SMART criteria (C ommunity
Create a 4-level res ults framework, including impact, objectives , outputs , and activities
Development (HE))
Development (HE))
Soft Skills
Strand: 2.5 Critical Thinking
Standard: 2.5.2 Plan
Indicator(s ): 2.5.2.2 Develop an organized approach of activities and objectives
Create a project implementation plan us ing a Gantt chart (C ritical Thinking Skills)
Identify and as s es s available res ources in carrying out the s ugges ted project (C ritical
Identify organizations , groups , and individuals whos e eorts need to be coordinated for
the s ucces s ful implementation of the project (C ritical Thinking Skills)
Skills)
Identify project activities needed to reach project goals and objectives (C ritical Thinking
Plan a s ys tematic monitoring s ys tem for the project (C ritical Thinking Skills)
Thinking Skills)
Indicator(s ): 2.6.1.1 Demons trate unders tanding of key components of cooperation neces s ary to complete a
tas k: contributing to group cons ens us , maintaining awarenes s of needs of others , balancing pers onal
as s ertivenes s with res pect of the pos itions of others
Practice working collaboratively in a group (C ritical Thinking Skills)
Essential Questions
What are the 5 ques tions to propos al writing?
How does my awarenes s of thes e ques tions allow me to be exible when writing a propos al for dierent
donors ?
(Teacher EQ)
Cross-curriculum Links
WoU Unit 6: Take pers pective (thinking of the potential donor's pers pective when writing a propos al)
Reading Unit 6: Integrating Information (integrating many parts of the project planning into one propos al)
Writing Unit 4, 5, & 6: Summary Writing, Pers uas ive Writing, Report Writing (all combined into one)
Computer Class: MS Excel & Word for Graphs , Charts & formulas & Photos hop
Key Terms
Proposal writing vocabulary
Uploaded File: Propos al Writing Vocabulary.doc
Stage 2
Assessment Evidence
Individual Proposal
After learners have had practice writing propos als in groups , it is important to give them the chance to
practice this s kill individually s o that they are able to do all of the s teps thems elves . Learners can write
individual propos als for their hos t organization, which is a great chance for them to do more res earch into
the needs and as s ets of their own organization, as well as give them an opportunity to potentially contribute
s omething tangible to their organization when they return. This project could potentially be the nal project
for the cours e. See WH Sample Proposals in Res ources s ection for s amples of s tudents ' individual
propos als .
As s es s ment Type: Portfolio (cumulative)
As s es s ment Tas k: Performance tas k/Project
As s es s ment Tas k: Writing tas k
Uploaded File: Individual propos al rubric.docx
Uploaded File: Individual Propos al Writing Project (As s es s ment tool).docx
Stage 3
Learning Activities
Note : For WH s tudents , this will be review of CD Unit 5: Problem Statements, Goals & Objectives.
Ongoing As s es s ment
Technical Specialization: Community Development
Type of Activity: Proces s
Type of Activity: Input
Uploaded File: Statement of Need.doc
Ongoing As s es s ment
Technical Specialization: Community Development
Type of Activity: Input
Type of Activity: Proces s
Type of Activity: Output
Resources
Proposal Writing Manuals
Uploaded File: Civicus - Writing a funding propos al.pdf
Uploaded File: Propos alWriting.pdf
Student Sample Proposals
Uploaded File: EIP Sample propos als .zip
Uploaded File: GBS Sample Propos al 2012 (Environmental Education).pdf
Uploaded File: WH Sample Group & Individual Propos als .zip
World Education Sample Proposals
Uploaded File: Sample Propos al 2009 (UXO in Laos ).doc
Uploaded File: Sample Propos al 2010-11 (Computers ).pdf
Uploaded File: Sample Propos al 2013 (Computer Lab).pdf
Proposal Application Samples
Uploaded File: PLE Innovation Fund - Program Des cription Format.docx
Uploaded File: PLE RFA Propos al Format.docx
Uploaded File: Project Propos al Form 2012-13_Aus tralian Government.docx
UPLIFT Project Summary (Room to Grow)
Uploaded File: UPLift Project s ummary.rtf
Web link: http://5minutes tochangetheworld.org/blog/
Unit Reections
Please comment on any of the following:
WH 2012-13
The "ve ques tions of propos al writing" is a good s tarting point for this unit. However, the document with
the ve ques tions is very confus ing and too wordy for the s tudents . Ins tead, I s implied it and us ed the ve
ques tions as the bas is for the week (which actually turned into two weeks ).
In addition to the four levels of res ults , I als o s pent quite a lot of time on Indicators and As s umptions (for
s ucces s and ris k), in cas e any of them end up writing higher level/technical development propos als . We tried
to focus on formulating meas urable/quantiable indicators , but not all of the s tudents were able to do it. All
in all, it was incredibly challenging (for them and me, both) and in retros pect, I'm not s ure I would have done
it.
For a day-by-day break down of how I conducted this training, s ee the attachment.