Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CORPORATION BY ESTOPPEL
Where a group of persons misrepresent themselves as a corporation, they are
subsequently estopped from claiming lack of corporate life in order to avoid liability. All
persons who assume to act as a corporation knowing it to be without authority to do so
shall be liable as general partners for all debts, liabilities and damages incurred or
arising as a result thereof.
Provided, however, That when any such ostensible corporation is sued on any
transaction entered by it as a corporation or on any tort committed by it as such, it shall
not be allowed to use as a defense its lack of corporate personality.
One who assumes an obligation to an ostensible corporation as such, cannot resist
performance thereof on the ground that there was in fact no corporation (Sec. 21).
The corporation is a national of the country under whose laws it is organized or
incorporated (Sec. 123).
Domestic corporations organized and governed under and by Philippine laws
Foreign Corporations organized under laws other than those of the Philippines and
can operate only in the territory of the state under whose laws it was formed. However,
they may be licensed to do business here (Campos).
GRANDFATHER RULE
Method used to determine the nationality of a corporation, in cases where corporate
shareholders are present in the situation, by which the percentage of Filipino equity in a
corporation engaged in nationalized and/or partly nationalized areas of activities, is
computed by attributing the nationality of second or even subsequent tier ownership to
determine the nationality of the corporate shareholder (Villanueva).
DOCTRINE OF PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL
Piercing the veil of corporate entity is merely an equitable remedy, and may be granted
only in cases when the corporate fiction is used to defeat public convenience, justify
wrong, protect fraud or defend crime (Yutivo Sons v. CTA, 1961) or where the
corporation is a mere alter ego or business conduit of a person. (Koppel Phil v. Yatco)
GROUNDS FOR APPLICATION OF DOCTRINE
(1) If done to defraud the government of taxes due it.
(2) If done to evade payment of civil liability.
(3) If done by a corporation which is merely a conduit or alter ego of another
corporation.
(4) If done to evade compliance with contractual obligations.
(5) If done to evade financial obligation to its employees.
Distinct disadvantages
1. Provides limited liability to investors
A. Corporation is a fiction of law. Without a law there will be no corporation.