Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Subhasish Mitra
M.Tech
Department of Chemical Engg, IIT Kanpur
Combined power cycle: Brief Recap
Rankine cycle
Brayton cycle
Steam condenser
Steam boiler
Flue gas disposed to
Gas Turbine Block stack – GHGs emission.
CO2 Emission – A Known Nuisance
1. CO2 is the ubiquitous Green House Gas and liable for global
warming.
2. Fossil fuel powered power plants are the epicenters for CO2
emission due to voluminous flue gas disposal beside other
industries, automobiles and residential release.
Void oil/gas
well for
storage
NG to
Power Plant
Amine To Oil/Gas
absorption reservoir for EOR
plant
Oil out
Amine absorption plant – simplified PFD:
CCS Project Feasibility Analysis:
• A Hysys simulation is made to study the feasibility of
integrating proposed CCS process with the existing plant.
Stripper reboiler
steam is supplied
from the partially
derated LP steam
turbine.
CO2 absorption unit:
Steam to stripper
reboiler supplied
from LP steam
turbine O/L.
CO2 Transportation Unit:
Transport
compressor Transport pump
Energy Efficiency Before Implementing CCS:
GT output 400 MW
ST-1 output 65.31 MW
ST-2 output 16.63 MW
Compressor 136.2 MW
Boiler heat input 283 MW
Condensate pump 1.585 MW
Heat input by NG@LHV 1072.65 MW
Overall efficiency 0.45
Gas turbine cycle efficiency 0.37
Rankine cycle efficiency 0.284
Combined cycle efficiency 0.55
Energy Efficiency After Implementing CCS:
GT output 400 MW
ST-1 output 65.31 MW
ST-2 output 9.869 MW
Compressor 136.2 MW
Condensate pump 1.585 MW
Boiler heat input 283 MW
Flue gas blower 47.94 MW
Rich amine pump 0.067 MW
Lean amine pump 0.102 MW
Transport compressor 18.42 MW
Transport pump 1.432 MW
Heat input by NG@LHV 1072.65 MW
efficiency 0.38
Efficiency reduction 15.56 %
Assumptions Behind the Economic Analysis:
• The existing Power Plant is paid-off.
Equipment
Total cooling
cooling duty Cost $/ton of CW flow
cost ($/yr)
Cooling cost (MW) CW rate (t/hr)
Flue gas blower
aftercooler 164.6 0.021 17169.68 2884506.259
Stripper column
condenser 17.96 0.021 1873.44 314737.135
Precooler 18.87 0.021 1968.36 330684.284
Compressor stage-1
cooler 6.578 0.021 686.18 115275.104
Compressor stage-2
cooler 5.834 0.021 608.55 102236.996
Compressor stage-3
cooler 5.83 0.021 608.14 102166.898
Compressor stage-4
cooler 10 0.021 1043.12 175243.394
Electricity cost
Total cost ($)/yr
Equipment Capacity (MW) ($) / kwh
10 min
(assumed)
Investment cost
143.6 million $
Loan repayment duration (Year) 10
Bank loan interest rate 15 %
Annual loan installment 14.36 million $
Annual Carbon reduction cost 69.54 million $
Plant life 30 years
Salvage value 0 million $
Depreciation/yr 4.79 million $
Electricity generation reduced 6.76 Mwhr
Revenue lost/yr 4.87 million $
Hike in electricity price 5 % pa
Revenue/yr through electricty 14.4 million $
Taxable revenue 9.61 million $
Tax deduction 10 %
Revenue after Tax deduction 13.44 million $
Carbon credit earned/yr 18.62 million $
Payback period 6.14 yrs
Project cash flow for first 10 yrs:
Revenue Taxable
Revised Loan
after tax Revised revenue
Productio electricit Revenue interest Princip Net ROI Cost
Year including revenue from after
n cost y charge after tax repaymen al amt profit (%) Delta
carbon electricity depreciati
($/kwh) t
credit on
1 110.31 32.06 0.095 14.40 9.61 13.44 35.9 14.36 -78.25 -54.49 78.25
2 108.16 45.66 0.099 29.52 24.73 27.05 33.746 28.72 -62.49 -43.52 62.49
3 106.00 59.95 0.104 45.40 40.61 41.34 31.592 43.08 -46.05 -32.07 46.05
4 103.85 74.96 0.109 62.07 57.28 56.34 29.438 57.44 -28.89 -20.12 28.89
5 101.70 90.71 0.115 79.57 74.78 72.09 27.284 71.80 -10.99 -7.65 10.99
6 99.54 107.25 0.121 97.95 93.16 88.63 25.13 86.16 7.71 5.37 -7.71
7 97.39 108.38 0.121 99.20 94.41 89.76 22.976 100.52 10.99 7.65 -10.99
8 95.23 108.38 0.121 99.20 94.41 89.76 20.822 114.88 13.14 9.15 -13.14
9 93.08 108.38 0.121 99.20 94.41 89.76 18.668 129.24 15.30 10.65 -15.30
10 90.93 108.38 0.121 99.20 94.41 89.76 16.514 143.60 17.45 12.15 -17.45
80
60
40 Production cost
20 Revenue after tax
0 ROI
-20
-40
-60 Break even
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 point at ~ 6 yrs
In Nutshell:
• A case study involving techno economic analysis is carried out
reflect impact of CCS incorporation in an existing power plant
unit.