Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The purpose of this paper is the formal analysis of the painting Orestes
return from Troy had not yet seen his son Orestes. Clytemnestra, his
opportunity to see his son. In the eighth year after his father's murder,
the Classical style even though the art world was on the cusp of the
figures in the foreground and the middle ground forward causing the
and the three Furies: Tisiphone, Alecto, and Megaera all clustered
the Furies: Tisiphone, Alecto, and Megaera painted in the center of the
male clad in only a stark white mantle draped around his left arm and
left thigh. He is clutching his ears violently to avoid hearing his crimes
and the Furies screams contorts Orestes’ face in pain and agony.
Clytemnestra, Orestes mother, is on the far left of the canvas with her
head thrown back, her long brown hair flowing down her back echoing
the long blood red mantle that drapes the lower half of her body and
continues to flow along the ground off the farthest right lower corner of
the canvas. The left most Fury supports the limp Clytemnestra’s upper
torso. Clytemnestra, not yet dead, is reaching with her right hand for
the dagger stabbed through her white night blouse and chest. Her
veil between life and death. All the Furies have anger, vengeance, and
the Furies bodies, with the exception of their upper torso, on the left of
The Fury furthest to the right of the canvas is half nude in a Classical
Jeniffer Harrison
3
style with a slate blue mantle flowing around the lower half of her
body, which also drapes her left arm. In addition, she is carrying a
journey. All the Furies have “Medusa like” hair with snakes echoing
light from the sun during a break in the clouds is pushed forward
Bouguereau utilized both actual line and implied line in this painting.
and arm create an implied line in the opposite direction of the Furies
pointing toward the dagger in her chest and therefore the crime. The
parallel lines created by the Furies’ arms pointing toward the dagger in
chaos. The red, orange, and yellow flames emanating from the far
Jeniffer Harrison
4
right Furies’ torch makes an implied diagonal line from the torch’s
flame downward toward the left and flows along the outside of
Clytemnestra’s red robe down and off the far left bottom of the canvas.
An implied diagonal line leading from Orethes’ covered ears, across his
chest. The effect of these implied lines redirects the sight of the
viewer in the direction of Orethes crime and of his victim. The horizon
boundary between earth and sky. All the actual and implied lines of
Clytemnestra and the three Furies creating the long line of the triangle
and the lower point of Orestes’ white robe creating the apex.
moment in the story via the stability in an arrested pose. The scene is
canvas.
Clytemnestra’s mantle, the snakes’ mouths, and the torch; slate blue
yellow and orange is used in the torch. The use an eerie gray bluish
the murdered mother serve to create a dramatic focal point and strong
emotion in the viewer as it flows down and off the right side of the
canvas much like the blood flowing down her chest caused by the
dagger plunged into her chest. The red is then repeated in a muted
Jeniffer Harrison
6
the Furies in the snakes’ mouths and their forked tongues. The red in
the torch held by the outstretched arm of the right most Fury creates a
canvas. The Fury holding the torch is draped in a slate blue mantle,
lower torso to cover her otherwise nude figure. The red, orange and
yellow of the torch are muted in comparison to the red of the blood
and robe of Clytemnestra on the far left of the canvas. The torch;
however, small and muted in color draws the eye back to the
torch to the red robe. It must be noted that the red, orange, and yellow
of the torch’s colors pale in comparison to the red of the blood and
The use of tone and value are also employed for both uniformity and
contrast. The stark white paint for Orestes’ robe surrounding his left
white night blouse on her upper torso and arms unifying the
the focal point of the figures in the painting, which dominate the
canvas and the figures larger than life. There are two plausible
reasons for the size of both the canvas and the figures. The painting
itself refers to a Classical theme, time, and style, which would have
made the size of the painting quite appropriate. Moreover, the moral
lessons themselves are larger than life and were thus reflected in the