Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FrP2A1.26
I. INTRODUCTION
3220
Divide the training patterns according to the class label (left and right
hand movement)
3221
90
Classification accuraccy
F1
0.15
0.57
0.15
0.63
0.31
F2
0.11
0.23
0.15
0.17
0.15
F3
0.31
0.16
0.58
0.08
0.34
F4
0.05
0.11
0.23
0.17
0.15
F5
0.70
0.30
0.09
0.45
0.10
F6
0.22
0.04
0.08
0.22
0.19
F7
0.17
0.69
0.44
0.14
0.40
F8
0.15
0.23
0.01
0.10
0.17
80
75
TABLE 1.
CENTERS OF CLUSTERS WITH RESPECT TO FEATURES AND CLASSES
Cluster
1
2
3
4
5
85
70
65
Class
1
2
2
1
2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Radius of clusters
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
95
Classification accuracy
90
85
Testing
Training
80
75
70
65
0
10
20
30
40
50
No. of rules
60
70
80
90
100
TABLE 2
CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY OF SVM
Class. Acc. Training
Class. Acc. Testing
2 timing windows
81.90
77.14
8 timing windows
86.19
81.43
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
V. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we presented the incorporation of
Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) based feature
extraction and Adaptive Neuron Fuzzy Inference System
(ANFIS) classifier. An ANFIS classifier can provide useful
information about the interaction between input features and
their relationship with the class labels. The ANFIS classifier
that is implemented using fuzzy subtractive clustering and
trained to adjust the membership parameters of the inputs
and output has been carefully examined. Various values of
cluster radius and number of rules have been tested to
maximize the classification accuracy. The obtained results
have found to be slightly better than those obtained using a
linear support vector machine.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Authors would like to thank the institute of HumanComputer Interfaces, University of Technology, Graz,
Austria, for providing the EEG data.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
3223