Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 13 April 2013
Received in revised form
4 September 2013
Accepted 23 September 2013
Available online 3 October 2013
This paper presents the use of elastic metamaterials for impact attenuation and blast-wave mitigation.
Metamaterials represent a novel and emerging research area where materials exhibit exceptional
properties not commonly found in natural materials. These unique properties are enacted by specically
designed microstructures. In this study, a single-resonator model and a dual-resonator microstructural
design are proposed to exhibit negative effective mass density. The effect of negative effective mass
density is explicitly conrmed by analysis of wave propagation using numerical simulations. Results
evidently show that impact stress wave attenuation occurs over a wider frequency spectrum for the dualresonator model as compared to the narrow band gap of a single-resonator design. Parametric studies of
blast-wave simulation reveal that the mass and number of internal resonators have signicant inuence
over the frequency range of blast-wave attenuation. The effectiveness and performance of the singleresonator and dual-resonator models on blast-wave mitigation are examined and discussed. Finally,
practical ways to design and manufacture elastic metamaterials with negative effective mass density are
presented and explored.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Blast-wave
Negative effective mass density
Elastic metamaterials
Wave propagation
Wave attenuation
1. Introduction
As advanced body armor and head protection gears greatly
reduced soldier fatalities from explosive and ballistic attacks, the
problem of blast-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the attack
survivors has become a more severe issue [1]. The impact of blastwave propagation is so lethal to human health that although no
external physical injuries are detected in the affected soldiers,
serious damages are inicted internally, particularly to the brain
where neurological effects can be slow to appear [2]. It has been
postulated that blast waves ripple through the victims torso up
into the brain through major blood vessels [3]. The increasing use of
improvised explosive devices (IEDs) poses a very serious threat in
military conicts. Moreover, in recent times, the exposure to blast
threat extends beyond war zones. Civilians now encounter the
increased risk to terrorist attack by the use of explosive bombs,
dangerous detonation, as well as IEDs. As such, it is important to
develop materials that would absorb or reect the full range of
blast-wave frequencies generated by an explosion. It is critical to
nd ways for a material, not only to stop projectiles like shrapnel or
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 765 494 6237; fax: 1 765 494 0307.
E-mail addresses: kttan@purdue.edu, kwektze@hotmail.com (K.T. Tan).
0734-743X/$ e see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.09.003
21
1 F k2 u2 u1
m1 u
(1)
2 k2 u1 u2
m2 u
(2)
Ft FO eiut
(3)
b g eiut
ug x; t u
(4)
u2 m2
b1
0 FO m1 2 2 2 u2 u
u2 u
p
where u2
k2 =m2 is the local resonance frequency of the internal resonator mass m2.
To obtain an effective mass behavior of the microstructure, the
following equation must be satised.
b1
FO meff u2 u
(6)
u1
u1
meff
m1
k2
F (t )
(5)
u2
m2
FO e
i t
F (t )
FO e
i t
Fig. 1. Microstructure of single-resonator spring-mass system and its effective mass; the motion of outer mass m1 equals to that of the effective mass meff.
22
Fig. 2. Plot of normalized effective mass meff/mst against normalized operating frequency u/u2.
meff m1
u22 m2
u22 u2
(7)
"
#
meff
q
u=u2 2
1
mst
1 q 1 u=u2 2
(8)
u3
u3
k1 k2
F (t )
mEFF
m3
u1
u 2 m1
m2
FO e
i t
F (t )
FO e
i t
Fig. 3. Microstructure of dual-resonator spring-mass system and its effective mass; the model resembles that of mass-in-(mass-in-mass) system.
23
negative effective mass density arises from the negative total momentum of the unit cell with positive velocity elds due to local
resonance, which has been conrmed by experimental study [19]. It
has been shown that such system is capable of attenuating wave
propagation. However, one major limitation of the single-resonator
model is that the negative effective mass exhibits only within a very
narrow band gap region, specically near the resonance frequency
of the internal resonator. This limits the use of such system in applications where broad band gap is required, like wide frequency
range in blast/shock wave.
2.2. Dual-resonator model
A dual-resonator microstructure model is recently proposed
[20]. The dual-resonator model is basically a mass-in-(mass-inmass) unit, having two coupled internal resonators, as depicted in
Fig. 3. The internal resonator is mass m2, the middle mass is m1 and
the outer mass is m3. The analytical model of this microstructure
can be similarly derived by considering the equations of motions
for the three masses and equating the behavior of the entire
microstructure as an effective mass mEFF (Fig. 3). The equations of
forces considering the free body diagrams of the masses give the
following equations
3 F k1 u1 u3
m3 u
(9)
1 k2 u2 u1 k1 u3 u1
m1 u
(10)
2 k2 u1 u2
m2 u
(11)
q1
mEFF
mST q1 q3 q1 q3
(
q3
q1 q3 q1 q3
1 q1 u=u2 2
h
ih
i
1u=u2 2 1 d1 d1 =q1 u=u2 2 d1
(12)
where mST m1 m2 m3 is the static mass of the microstructure,
p
u2 k2 =m2 is the local resonance frequency of internal mass
m2, q1 m2/m1 is the ratio of internal mass m2 to that of the middle
mass m1, q3 m2/m3 is the ratio of internal mass m2 to that of the
outer mass m3, and d1 k2/k1 is the ratio of spring stiffness connecting the internal mass k2 to that of the middle mass k1. It is clear
from Equation (12) that the function of mEFF/mST against u/u2 is
dependent on three parameters, namely: q1, q3 and d1, and their
effects are shown in Fig. 4(a)e(c). The graphs clearly show that a
dual-resonator microstructure generates negative effective mass
over a larger frequency spectrum, particularly at two distinctive
asymptotic regions. From Fig. 4(a), we can see that the second band
gap increases drastically with decreasing d1. Too large d1 value
results in a single band gap system when m1 and m2 are coupled
with a very high k2 stiffness. Increasing q1 values shifts the second
band gap to higher frequency range (Fig. 4(b)). Depending on
application, larger q1 values provide broader and further band
gaps. Small q1 values result in larger band gap region and closer
band gap differences. Too small q1 values again result in a single
band gap system. Fig. 4(c) demonstrates that the inuence of q3
resembles that of q in the single-resonator model. Basically, the
asymptotic regions are not affected by q3 and large q3 values increases both band gap regions. By combining the effects of all 3
Fig. 4. Plot of mEFF/mST against u/u2, with varying (a) d1, (b) q1, (c) q3 values.
24
3. Numerical simulation
o
tt
t
F Fmax e
F 0
t to
t < to
(13)
Fig. 5. (a) One-dimensional spring-mass lattice system, (b) impact pulse used in simulation.
25
Fig. 6. (a) Blast pulse used in simulation, (b) Frequency domain of blast simulation calculated by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
it is clear that the impact wave passes through the material without
any inuence and attenuation, as depicted in Fig. 7. In this study,
the material properties (unit cell mass and spring stiffness)
throughout various sections of the model, like Medium 1, Metamaterial and Medium 2 (Fig. 5(a)), are kept the same, so as to
neglect the effect of impedance mismatch of different materials,
focusing the study only on the effect of negative effective mass
density due to internal resonator design.
Fig. 8 shows the wave propagation results when the metamaterial is made up of the single resonator design, with a target
frequency of 100 rad/s. This means that each of the unit cell #21 to
#30 has
an internal resonator mass (m2 0.03 kg and
p
u2 k=m 100 rad=s). It is observed that the wave propagation snap-shots at time t 0.0290 s and t 0.0374 s (Fig. 8(a) and
(b)) are the same as that of Fig. 7(a) and (b) of the non-metamaterial
design. However, when the impact stress wave passes through the
metamaterial, there is a slight decrease in the displacement
amplitude of the wave form, thus implying a slight attenuation of
stress wave (Fig. 8(c)). Reection away from the metamaterial can
be seen particularly at t 0.0674 s (Fig. 8(e)). As the impact pulse is
composed of two different harmonic frequencies (Fig. 5(b)), a
single-resonator design is insufcient to have signicant effect on
stress wave attenuation. In reality, an impact pulse will consist of
more than one basic harmonic frequency, thus the narrow negative
effective mass density band gap of a single-resonator design is seen
to be ineffective.
26
Fig. 8. Time snap shot of impact wave propagation through a single-resonator metamaterial.
This means that waves at these frequency ranges (1 < u/u2 1.3,
when q 1) are unable to propagate through the material. As such,
from the analytical model (Fig. 2), the negative mass region when
q 1 and u2 500 Hz is 500 Hz < u 650 Hz. This corresponds
very well with the case 10-500 Hz-q 1. However, for the case of 1500 Hz-q 1, we can only observe a very sharp dip near 500 Hz,
where the mass negativity is most paramount. This reveals that
having more internal resonators can effectively broaden the frequency range of the wave attenuation, due to more kinetic energy
absorbed by more internal resonators. Study made earlier has
pointed to the same conclusion [18]. For the cases at higher
designed local frequency of the internal resonators (1500 Hz), there
seems to be wave attenuation over a wider frequency range. This is
because when q 1, the condition that 1 < u/u2 1.3 remains, thus
when u2 1500 Hz, the negative mass region naturally extends
over 1500 Hz < u 1950 Hz. As such this leads to a wider band gap
region at high frequency domain when mass ratio q is kept the
same.
The results from Fig. 11 show the effect of increasing the mass of
internal resonators. In this case, m2 is increased to 0.09 kg, resulting
in a higher mass ratio of q 3. From Fig. 2, we can see that negative
mass occurs over 1 < u/u2 2 when q 3. This analytical result
Fig. 9. Time snap shot of impact wave propagation through a dual-resonator metamaterial.
Fig. 10. Frequency domain (by FFT) showing the effect of frequency range and number
of internal resonators.
agrees very well with the blast simulation results in Fig. 11. For
q 3, the negative mass region when u2 500 Hz and u2 1500 Hz
is 500 Hz < u 1000 Hz and 1500 Hz < u 3000 Hz respectively.
This implies that a greater mass ratio is more effective in attenuating stress wave propagation. The effect of frequency range and
number of internal resonators are similarly observed in Fig. 11, as in
Fig. 10.
Due to the linearity of this study, we can achieve broader frequency range of wave attenuation by simply adding layers of internal resonators with different designed local frequencies. Fig. 12
demonstrates how the performance of a model with two layers of
internal resonators (10 resonators in each layer: rst layer designed
at 500 Hz and second layer at 1500 Hz) is effectively the same as
summing up the performance of 2 models with single layer of internal resonators. There is also no apparent difference when the
two layers are in reversed order; meaning whether the 500 Hz layer
rst received the impact wave or the 1500 Hz layer rst received
the impact wave.
Fig. 13 evaluates the wave attenuation performance between the
dual-resonator model and a double-layered single-resonator
model. The detailed parameters of the internal resonators are
presented in Table 2. It is clear that wave attenuation frequency
ranges of these two models are comparable. This implies that the
dual-resonator model is more effective, as it requires fewer unit
cells (outer mass) to achieve similar efciency as a double-layered
single-resonator model. This also means that by using a dualresonator model, the metamaterial will be resultantly thinner and
thus lighter. The mass saving is primarily due to the use of lesser
outer unit cells. If we try to further reduce the mass of outer unit
cells in the double-layered single-resonator model by half
(m1 0.015 kg), so that the total mass is the same as that of the
dual-resonator model, it is observed that a broader frequency range
27
Fig. 11. Frequency domain (by FFT) showing the effect of mass of internal resonators.
Table 1
Parameters of internal resonators used in blast-simulation.
Simulation case
notation
m2 (kg)
k2 (N/m)
u2 (Hz)
Number of
resonators
10-500 Hz-q 1
10-1500 Hz-q 1
1-500 Hz-q 1
1-1500 Hz-q 1
10-500 Hz-q 3
10-1500 Hz-q 3
1-500 Hz-q 3
1-1500 Hz-q 3
500 Hz 1500 Hz
1500 Hz 500 Hz
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.03, 0.03
0.03, 0.03
296,088
2,664,793
296,088
2,664,793
888,264
7,994,380
888,264
7,994,380
296,088, 2,664,793
2,664,793, 296,088
500
1500
500
1500
500
1500
500
1500
500, 1500
1500, 500
10
10
1
1
10
10
1
1
10 10
10 10
Fig. 12. Frequency domain (by FFT) showing the effect of double-layer of internal
resonators.
28
Fig. 13. Frequency domain (by FFT) showing the effect of dual-resonator and reduced
outer-mass.
Table 2
Parameters of internal resonators used in dual-resonator and double-layered singleresonator model.
Simulation case
m2, m1 (kg)
Dual-resonator
0.03, 0.03
Double-layered
0.03, 0.03
single-resonator
k2, k1 (N/m)
u2 (Hz)
296,088, 1,184,352
391,577, 1,566,306
500e1500 10
575, 1150 10 10
Number of
resonators
29
[18] Huang HH, Sun CT. Wave attenuation mechanism in an acoustic metamaterial
with negative effective mass density. New J Phys 2009;11:013003.
[19] Yao S, Zhou X, Hu G. Experimental study on negative effective mass in a 1D
mass-spring system. New J Phys 2008;10:043020.
[20] Tan KT, Huang HH, Sun CT. Optimizing the band gap of effective mass negativity in acoustic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 2012;101:241902.
[21] Liu Z, Zhang X, Mao Y, Zhu YY, Yang Z, Chan CT, et al. Locally resonant sonic
materials. Science 2000;289:1734e6.
[22] Lai Y, Wu Y, Sheng P, Zhang ZQ. Hybrid elastic solids. Nat Mater 2011;10:
620e4.
[23] Chen JS, Sharma B, Sun CT. Dynamic behaviour of sandwich structure containing spring-mass resonators. Compos Struct 2011;93:2120e5.
[24] Sun CT, Manimala JM, Huang HH. Development of negative effective mass
structures. Final technical report submitted as part of the NextGen Aeronautics Inc. prime contract for the DARPA Structural-Logic program; Mar
2013. p. 1e70.