Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AbstractThis paper investigates power splitting for fullduplex relay networks with wireless information and energy
transfer. By applying power splitting as a relay transceiver
architecture, the full duplex information relaying can be powered
by energy harvested from the source-emitted radio frequency
signal. In order to minimize outage probability, power splitting
ratios have been dynamically optimized according to full channel
state information (CSI) and partial CSI, respectively. Under
strong loop interference, the proposed full CSI-based and partial
CSI-based power splitting schemes achieve the better outage
performance than the fixed power splitting scheme, whereas the
partial CSI-based power splitting scheme can ensure competitive
outage performance without requiring CSI of the second-hop
link. It is also observed that the worst outage performance is
achieved when the relay is located midway between the source
and destination, whereas the outage performance of partial CSIbased power splitting scheme approaches that of full CSI-based
scheme when the relay is placed close to the destination.
I.
I NTRODUCTION
Energy harvesting (EH) has emerged as a promising enabling technology for wireless cooperative or sensor networks
to function in environment with physical or economic limitations [1][3]. Through EH from ambient radio-frequency
(RF) signals, periodic battery replacement or recharging can be
alleviated for energy-constrained sensor or relay nodes. Since
RF signals can carry both information and energy, simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) has
been proposed [3][8] and two practical receiver architectures,
namely, time switching (TS) and power splitting (PS) [9], have
been widely adopted in various SWIPT systems [6], [10], [11].
By employing TS-based relaying (TSR) and PS-based
relaying (PSR) protocols for amplify-and-forward (AF) systems [3], SWIPT can not only keep energy-constrained relay
nodes active through RF EH, but also enable information
relaying across barriers or over long distance. The outage and
diversity performances of SWIPT for cooperative networks
with spatially random relays were investigated in [12] and
the distributed PS-based SWIPT was designed for interference relay systems [13]. Several power allocation schemes
for EH relay systems with multiple source-destination pairs
were investigated in [14]. Furthermore, antenna switching and
antenna selection have also been applied for SWIPT relaying
systems [15], [16]. Dynamic power splitting with full channel
state information (CSI) and partial CSI has been investigated
for AF half-duplex relaying networks [17]. Since full-duplex
relay (FDR) can improve spectral efficiency significantly over
half-duplex relay, wireless information and power transfer for
"
! !
#
nr "k #
Fig. 1.
II.
S YSTEM M ODEL
Ps
f xr (t),
(1)
dm hs(t) +
1
A. End-to-End SINR
In the following, we derive the end-to-end signal power
under the condition of employing non-oscillatory relay. By
assuming that all the signal and noise samples are mutually
independent, we calculate the relay transmission power Pr =
E{|xr (k)|2 } from (5) as
X
j1
1
(dm
(1 )Ps |h|2 + 2
((1 )|f |2 )
Pr =
1 )
j=1
(dm
(1 )Ps |h|2 + 2
1 )
.
1 (1 )|f |2
(8)
1
(1 )|f |2
(9)
Given the relay-harvested energy, the maximum relay transmission power is expressed as
2
Eh
(10)
+ |f |2 Pr .
Pmax =
= Psd|h|
m
1
T
The actual relay transmission power should be less than or
equal to the maximum relay transmit power, i.e.,
Pr Pmax .
p
p X
j1
( (1 )f )
j=1
q
(1)Ps
hs(k
dm
1
j ) + nr (k j ) . (5)
(6)
q
+
(1)Ps
gh
m
dm
1 d2
g
dm
2
p
X
j1
( (1 )f ) s(k j )
j=1
p
X
j1
( (1 )f ) nr (k j )+nd(k).(7)
j=1
(11)
When (8) and (10) are substituted into (11), the relay gain
under the maximum relay transmission power is limited by
SR
,
(12)
(1 )SR |f |2 + 1
1
1
(1)|f |2
2
2
(dm
|g|2 1(1)|f
+ (dm
)
(1
)P
|h|
+
s
2 )
1
|2
|
{z
}
loop interference power
1
+ ((dm
|g|2
2 )
{z
+ 1) 2
}
(13)
noise power
(1 )SR RD
(1)|f |
SR / + RD + ((1 )SR + 1)RD 1/(1)|f
|2
, (14)
III.
IV.
0<
,
SR
(1)SR |f |2 +1
(15)
SR
.
(1 )SR |f |2 + 1
(16)
(1 )SR RD
,
2
(1 )( +
RD |f | )SR + ( + RD )
2 2
(17)
be obtained by solving
= 0. Furthermore, = 0 can be
simplified as Q1 () = 0, where
Q1 () , a4 4 + a3 3 + a2 2 + a1 + a0
WITH
PARTIAL CSI
(21)
0<<1
P OWER S PLITTING
(18)
=
=
=
=
m 2
2
Ps dm
1 d2 0 (1 )(1 |f | ),
2m m 4
2 2
d1 d2 0 (1 |f | ) ,
Ps2 (1 )(1 (1 + 0 )|f |2 ),
2
2
Ps dm
1 0 (|f | 1).
(23a)
(23b)
(23c)
(23d)
1 ()
Therefore, by observing the sign of G
G2 () under the constraints
of 0 < < 1 and 0 < < 1, Pout can be simplified as
1 ()
h,
f
, |f |2 < F1 and |h|2 > H1
Pr |g|2 < G
G2 ()
|f |2 > F2 and
Pr |g|2 < G1 () h, f ,
2
G2 ()
(|h|
< H1 or |h|2 > H2 ) ,
Pout=
2
1,
|f | < F1 and |h|2 < H1
1,
F1 < |f |2 < F2 and |h|2 > 0
1,
|f |2 > F2 and H1 < |h|2 < H2
(24)
dm 2 (1|f |2 )
2
2
dm
1 (1|f | )
,
Ps (1)
0
1
where H1 , Ps (1)(1|f
|2 (1+0 )) , H2 ,
1
1
.
F1 , (1+0 ) , and F2 ,
< 1 and C1 ,
(25)
2
SR 0 |f |2
2SR |f |2 (1+0 )
1
(1+0 ) and SR > 0 }.
constraint C1 , we should
<
Thus, when the CSI satisfies the
find the optimized power splitting
ratio in the set 1 = {|0 < < 1 }. Similarly, when the
CSI satisfies the constraints C2 : {|f |2 > 1 and SR < 0 }
or C3 : {|f |2 > 1 and SR > |f |2 1}, we should find the
optimized power splitting ratio in the set 2 = {|1 < < 1}
1
=
g
G1 ()
G2 ()
xg
10
dx
1 ()
= 1 exp GG2 ()
.
(26)
g
1 ()
is equivalent to maxSince minimizing 1 exp GG2 ()
g
2 ()
imize G() , G
G1 () , the optimized power splitting ratio can
be obtained by solving
Maximize G().
i
Full CSI
Partial CSI
Fixed = 0.3
Fixed = 0.5
Fixed = 0.7
Pout
1+SR
or 3 = {| |f1 |2 < < SR
+|f |2 }. Based on these
observations, when the CSI satisfies the constraint Ci (i = 1, 2,
and 3), the conditioned outage probability can be computed by
G1 ()
h,
f
Pr ( max () < 0 | h, f )|i = Pr |g|2 < G
()
2
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
LI (dB)
Fig. 2.
(27)
0
10
where Q2 () = c4 4 + c3 3 + c2 2 + c1 + c0 is a quartic
function and
c0
c1
c2
c3
c4
=
=
=
=
=
SR 0 ,
(29a)
2
2
20 |f | 2SR (1 + |f | (1 + 0 )),
(29b)
SR (1 + |f |2 (4 + |f |2 (1 + 0 )) 2 0 |f |4, (29c)
2SR |f |2 (1 + |f |2 )(1 + 0 ),
(29d)
2 SR |f |4 (1 + 0 ).
(29e)
S IMULATION R ESULTS
Full CSI
Partial CSI
Fixed = 0.3
Fixed = 0.5
Fixed = 0.7
10
Pout
G()
for = 0, a closed-form solution is difficult to obtain.
However, at the high SINRs, G() has an approximation as
2
G()
= c|h|a +d , so that an approximation of the optimized
=
power splitting ratio can be obtained by solving G()
G()
= 0 is given by
(
the 1st root of Q2 () = 0, 1 and C1
= the 2nd root of Q2 () = 0, 2 and C2 , (28)
the 3rd root of Q2 () = 0, 3 and C3
10
10
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
SNR (dB)
Fig. 3.
Fig. 2 illustrates the impact of INR on the outage probability. In Fig. 2, the source transmission SNR is as 35
dB. In the practical FDR systems, the relay suffers from
serious loop interference and the system performance degrades
dramatically. As a result, the outage probability of the fixed
power splitting scheme increases very quickly in the region of
high INR. The proposed two power splitting schemes achieve
the better performances than all the schemes with fixed .
For example, at the outage level of 101 , the full CSI-based
power splitting scheme achieves about 5.5 dB INR gain than
the scheme with fixed = 0.7, about 4.5 dB INR gain than
the scheme with fixed = 0.5, and about 3.5 dB INR gain
than the scheme with fixed = 0.3. Although the full CSIbased power splitting scheme outperforms the partial CSIbased power splitting scheme in the region of middle and low
INR, the performance gap is slight. This indicates that the
partial CSI-based power splitting scheme, which incurs less
overhead, approaches the full CSI-based scheme closely.
Fig. 3 shows the outage probability versus the source transmission SNR. In the evaluation of Fig. 3, we set LI = 40 dB.
The proposed full CSI-based power splitting scheme achieves
the best outage performance. For example, at the outage
probability level of 102 , the full CSI-based power splitting
scheme obtains about 4.5 dB gain than the scheme with fixed
= 0.7, 3 dB gain than the scheme with fixed = 0.5, and 1.8
scheme approaches the outage performance of the full CSIbased scheme when the relay is placed close to the destination.
2
10
Pout
R EFERENCES
10
Full CSI
Partial CSI
Fixed = 0.3
Fixed = 0.5
Fixed = 0.7
10
0.5
1.5
d1
Fig. 4.
C ONCLUSION