Evaluation of my finished product

Appeal to Audience USP/Place in Conventions Use of Improvements

Market Technology
Audience According to my fellow mates, As per BBC’s This documentary has Appropriate • Especially, editing could
(Class) I have received no regulations, it number of different media have been better, as the
Now coming controversial comments about clearly appeals conventions used, which equipments sound levels should have
to the stage the appeal to audience. The the target is enough for a short were used in been balanced.
where I can first substantial of their audience (16- documentary. However this
find out statement was that, my 24), where this the music that I have documentary.
• During the UCAS scene,
publics product is well effective to the documentary chosen isn't really a However they
there should have been
opinion about target audience. This is covers their good choice, as it thought the
voice-over while the
my because the topic doesn’t entire ethos, doesn't help the feeling editing could
graphics were going on.
documentary actually look at just one angle. which is to: of the documentary. have been
. I wanted to When talking about the inform, Nevertheless, few better as i
know how importance of HE, it has all educate and people assume that the noticed
effective my sorts of angles such as: Job entertain. It song adds some sort of mistakes, • Music should have been cut
product is to wise, going to HE etc. As a was different Humour in the mainly with the in some parts, for e.g. in
my class result, this documentary looks that the documentary. The sound, and i one of the interview or
audience. at different side, it does not documentary motive to their think different should have lowered down.
Therefore, I concentrate on just a point of was looking at statement is that even transitions • I could have chosen a
asked my view. It examines about 2 perspectives, though the idea is quite should have better choice of music.
class education in general and it educative and serious, this music been used to • Voice over could have been
audience does look at social life at social point of prevents the tone of make it flow a little bit clear and loud
kindly to give University. They seem to like views, which seriousness away from better. They enough to hear.
me some this idea, because it keeps the was shown to people’s mind, but it particularly
solid audience more engaged, as it the audience. should have cut down to liked the shots
feedback talks at some parts about To conclude a certain extend, for used in the
about my social life as well, this can be this section, example in interview with
finished seen in Vox pop’s, where my audience conversations. They the lecturer
product. To students are giving their thought that also determine that from
do this, I personal opinions about my voice over needs a bit Westminster,
created a education and the amusing documentary more work as the but they
chart like this side of University life. This would be a audience can't hear suggest that it
for myself, so makes it more believable suitable style what the voice-over should've
when they when these kinds of for the BBC, artist is saying at some shorten it to
orally tell me informations are given by they also parts of the maintain a fast
the feedback, students, which is seductive though that it documentary. I totally pace or
I’ll be able to towards the target audience. met the brief of agree of what they are included some
write them Furthermore, this the BBC. They saying. The class really cutaways as
down in documentary has all the pointed out likes the interviews, they assume
relevant necessary people; it has that this piece where they think they the audience
section. females and males is very suitable were all very may begin to
contributing, such as; in vox to the society, informative, and if lose interest. I
pop, Interview. To conclude as it’s one of shown to the right age partly agree
this section, the class the most group where they think it with this,
believes that this piece does substantial would be very effective. however,
captivate the target audience, matters in our The sign on and off, was during the
as most young people want to world. I am used, which gives a editing, I tried
go to University, as they want happy with clear statement of the so hard to cut
to achieve very high in their their response, presenter what they are the interview
future. because they trying to find out, this is down.
fit in the quite important for a Originally, the
category of 16- documentary, otherwise entire duration
24 years old, it may look as an of the interview
which is my unfinished work. The was around 12
target viewers quite like how I minutes and
audience and I used graphics, for from there I
agree with example when I’m had to reduce a
their talking about UCAS in big amount of
comments. On Bullet points, which it. This wasn’t
the other hand, makes it easier to easy for me,
I don’t think my understand for someone because if you
documentary is who watches this. This cut some
a BBC is quite effective elements
standard due because it doesn’t make down, it won’t
to how slow the viewer feel make any
pace it is, burdened with the sense,
Average, I am information that is given. therefore, I had
satisfied with I think your interviews to consider that
all the were very well chosen. issue as well.
response I To conclude this In terms of
have received. section, they admire camera shots,
the opening with Vox the camera
pop, which gives an operator has
idea, who the target kept the shots
audience is and relevant well framed,
interviews for the motif. especially in
the entire
interview. In
the opening
sequence, in
the study room,
there is
panning used,
while Voice-
over artist is
talking through
the education
systems.
Editing, it could
have been
better.
According to
their point of
view, they think
there has been
some technical
problems such
as; transitions.
They haven’t
given specific
area, where
this is but I
guess one of
the For
example.
 Appeal to USP/Place in Conventions Use of Improvements
Audience Market Technology
Client Regarding to According to When In this section, I • Should have
(Teachers) my Clients, I my clients, interviewing haven’t really focused on one
have been there isn’t any head of 6th received concept rather
given an oral Unique selling form the music enough than looking at
feedback. point in the should have information. different angles,
Firstly, the market. This is been lowered However, which seemed
documentary because; they or completely talking about quite confusing
has an appeal have seen turned off. vox pops, they for the viewer.
to target similar There should said that there
audience. It documentaries have been a were same
has both male highlighting voice over for camera shots
• More cut-aways
needed
and female higher the graphics, in used
throughout all
contributors education places like throughout the
the stages.
that are in part before. Also where I was Vox pops. This
Especially, there
of the they speculate showing the is something I
is a lack of cut-
documentary that, there isn’t simple stages didn’t realise,
aways in the
and the target any focus to of UCAS so this could be
Interview with
audience is this topic, as Application. as part of my
Geoffrey Davies
clear, as the it’s very There was a improvement.
at University of
title suggests confusing. I few technical
Westminster and
that is for a dispute back to errors mainly
with the head of
certain age this statement; with the sound,
sixth form.
group. I think I know as the
However, when where they are background
it comes to coming from. music was • I could have
main concept, The reason for louder then chosen a better
they don’t think this is because needed and choice of music.
it has any sorts my topic also sound
of appeal to the actually overlapped. • The entire
target generalises One of the documentary
audience. about the technical errors needs more
importance of is, when there conventions to
HE, but it still was a random make it attractive
gives out fade outs at the to the public.
necessary on Sign off. I
informations to have to agree • During the
the topic. In with this, the UCAS scene,
General, there fad out should there should
should be have started as have been
always a main I finished voice-over while
focus the motif, talking, that the graphics
but in this case, would be more were going on.
I had different appropriate.
angle looking Seemingly,
at. Now, I am they find the
not sure graphics quite
whether I am awkward at
right or wrong, some point. I
but I though if I have to
only had one disagree with
focus, then the this statement.
audience might I have been
have felt that told by my
the colleges that
documentary the graphics
hasn’t were utilised
answered all appropriately
their important and used in the
questions to right place and
the topic of I think this is
‘Importance of absolutely
HE’. Therefore, correct. The
I thought, I transitions
might as well were
generalise all unconventional
the substantial for the entire
matters within documentary.
the topic of Frankly, there
Importance of some random
HE. transitions,
which shouldn’t
have been
there.
However, they
didn’t give me
any specific
area, where
this problem
occurred.
Appeal to USP/Place in Conventions Use of Improvements
Audience Market Technology
Own Feedback I personally think This piece of In terms of the In terms of • The production value was
that the work was a Story narration, camera use, I average, as there were
documentary is challenge to the sound level have used it some technical errors,
good in terms of take it forward, wasn’t high quite well such as the balance of
its appeal as as the topic is enough to enough, sound level.
further education very big, hear. As I was appropriate
is a popular because there the voice-over framing and
• Should have used more
issue amongst are so many artist and the different range
psychographics in my
young people. angles in HE presenter, I of shots for
documentary, which
Tackling this that you can should have appropriate
shows a sophisticated
issue of further look at. I asked scenes.
form such as attitudes in
education was looked at someone else However, I think
HE, norms and values
quite difficult as different to do the voice- there should
etc…
there were perspectives, over, because I have been
similar educational have a low some Cut-
documentaries and social side peek voice and aways, in order • I thought the subtitles
that also focus of Higher is very soft, to keep the were hard to read and it
on it. I believe education. As didn’t really audience feel changed quickly.
there's no my class sound engaged and
significant audience have professional. keep the tone • I could have chosen a
competitive noticed it that I Coming to down, as the better choice of music.
advantage. The looked at those interviews, I topic is quite
concept can be angles, it have sued it serious. • I think I should have used
accepted by the seems that well enough for To conclude a different presenter, as I
public as it gives there is a USP, the this section, was the presenter, I
out significant even though documentary; I In my opinion, I looked not confident doing
information about the teacher had two thought I utilised that role.
higher education. thinks there is interviews, one the equipments
To conclude none. I mean with (camera for
this section, my this Westminster instance) to a
• I think there should be a
slight faster pace.
documentary documentary is Lecturer and good standard
does appeal to based on with Head of but not to my
its chosen target younger Sixth form. best, as I could • There was some random
audience aged audience (16- These were have used more fade outs
between 16-24 24) and my two interviews various shots
and both gender. class audience were such as
Also there is no are in these necessary for tracking, which I • During the UCAS scene,
specific Ethnic categories and my really wanted to there should have been
group that is agree that documentary. do in my work, voice-over while the
specified, it is there is a place The reason but I seemed to graphics were going on.
open to in market. To why I had an forget to use it, •
everyone. This conclude this interview with but it was okay I
documentary is section, the head of thought. Editing
represented in a Therefore, with Sixth form, skills could have
simple manner, my personal because that is been better with
where the opinion and the stage more
storyline has no plus with the where people expositions.
complicated influence of decide whether
language used, class they want to go
so that everyone audience, I to HE. That
will be able to think there is a gives a chance
understand this. place in the for students to
Moreover, the Market, know how and
title ‘The because my when to apply
importance of documentary for HE. Even
Higher gives a quick though there
Education’ overview of the are other
denotes that importance of institutions like
there is going to HE. Colleges, but I
be important chose Sixth
information given form. The
out to those who process of HE
don’t know much application is
about HE and to same in most
those who are of the
considering to go educational
to HE. institution.
I think the
questions
during the vox
pop and the
interviews
were
appropriate to
the main motif.