p r i m y over alS. crw&d t h w .

In him every-

on

'

-.

whole univeme hab been created through him and

for him. And he exists before everything, and all
things arct held together in him. . . . He is its origin,
.. . In aI1 thtngs done supreme. For in him the
mrnpletr khg of God, by God's own choice,
to dw@n,401w~iam
1 :15-19 N w E q d t

Bible
A;CI;YIRATE ~~E~

Thc unlearned aad unstable m twisting these

words of h u l ar they da the other scriptures ta
their awn destructkm.-2 EPater 3: 16 They are well
2 never able to come
&scribed as "ever
to an accurate
af the truth."whole2 %thy
317 Faithful
muled service ts Jehovah must
Mw
ing thb
t3ecei.we.d by these a m who are '
md of &~&"-2 cmhhhng 4:2 Careful cornparison o
II frvlnhticuari PL WWB as referring
m k text will bring out the true
to t
h or
mning of any lEs.assageto one dotrusts in
Jehov&
all his heart and does not lean hit
own p m ~ judgment.-Proverbs
l
3: 5
Ricad an, "with this m s t dearly u n b r s t d ,
that no prophetic Scripture can be
by
mgk sw mmerthl
pomn**-2 hter I
8e.y Vembn ThenPore p q , "Unkowr my
at 9.
thiw out

'

awn&

TED.'

n, N.J.,Professor
of New Tertame

Literature, says:

Tf Paul had wiiarhtd tcr expree r k l a t e r idea [that

war created], hg had
1 G m k word
'
m, the word P S ~ E O ~ E ~ H ~m
: S , h g 'first
bever,
hU1
She word
meaning ' h t w t t e n , " wM& dgim quite different, . .."
fit of Alexandria wrote Exwrpta Ex
m&ro wtrndy a humlrd years after the death
of the a p d e J o b . In it he eontrssts the words
potot&s
md p r & r & t ~ a Other ehrittian
writen of &JE~!
Emt mturS$~C.E. liLOO made this
distinction. Paul &$ net Ufir&=elrated:' but
"first-born," an C X ~ & Q mtanlne:
~
mmc~mgt
altogether different.
b o d i n g to Dr. W i i l h f' h
r* of the
Urrkeadty of British Culumbfmr: T h e @adfirstborn b d long rincs aarsd to
iiteml
just
3, fismtf with u& I"ht p
tlts first minister En&ad hnu R ' C ~had, kc is the
most preeminent. A, kbtsl ia the p f h e of hib life
has long since lef%
fir& pstt of fi life &hindSimilarly, ffrJflbcrmtarn$ 3io denote mt priority in
but preemineme in *nL'"
It,h0uH
mmb.ed
a ulrong qrs8
of action caused Reuben t a forfeit his
n ar
firstborn (2 Chr 5: 1-2) and it is well
that
Em .rtmlIy a l d his rank of firitborn to J&.
his lpeumr brother.-(;en 25:33
Carnmn.ting an the five books of M o m Rabbi
M d a& Jekovh "the Firstborn of the world."
Surely h deca not intend to imply thpt Jehvvah ,
was m t e d or that be 1% a part of the wrdd.

Neither did Paul intend to imply that Christ was

created nor tliat he is a part of all things.
Clearly the m p h b is on fIrJtborn rather than
firstborn. Hawever, regarding the words "born"
t", the not& English author
C.S. Lewis explains: "To beget is to k a m e the
father of: to create is to make. And the difference
is just tHis. When you beget, you b e t samething
of the pam kind as youmlf. A rnm W t s human
babies, a beaver begets little beawrr, a d r bird
k p t s eggs which turn into little bird& But when
you make, you make mmthing sf a diEsm~tkind
from yourself. A bird makes a nest, a kaver builds
a dam, and man makes. . .a statue."
"Now that's the first thing to p t clear. What
60d beg& b God; just as what man begets is

reads: "Firatborn over all creation." And the New

English Bi& says: '"hls is the primacy over a11
created things."
A footnote in N . givm "born before all
creation" as an aalternate mading. The m i n reading
then favora '%ugrmey9'(Lsgktfoot et al) and the
alternate favors "priority" (Abbott etal). An
Expad&
tion by Kenneth Wuert tries to
incorporate both Meas: "The Son has priority to
and m ~ e i g n t yover all creation."

No m m m

Doea Colossians 1 :15 teach Christ is e m u o r

'This interpretation is e x g e t i d l y and btmhEly
impossible; for verses 16-17 e m p h a W y &
tinpish between 'him' d the "11
of
m."
crttltion," wording to Baggot. (See hio h k , A
"'Whrt GA begets L God" - that is why thc
C~bssisns,p. 58.)
Father d a him Soin %d." "but to his f b n he
translation delibmtaly insstts
says: God, your throne &a11 W for ever and the w ~ r d"'other" four times in t k twa
~ W ~ M Sto
1:8 Jerusalem Bible
dter the thought to imply that Christ is the
creator of d l things exwpt Eane - himelf. This
reading would bring Pad fflta conflict with t
h
X@4OF ALL CREATION
apostle John who sa@: "All cration took glace
Marry &tile ~ h o l a r sunderstand this to be the through him, a d mm twk phce without him."
@ n i W of comparison. Abbott explains i t as -John 1 :3 MI@#
"priority in time and distinction from the g m . "
to sappy 'bfB%rnhe
Had the apacsth Paul
This maker Chrirt p r i ta
~ md -rate
f r m '*dl m l d he a i d ta slla; instead, kc
&z -1
aaUon." Therefore, Moffrtt -&*a:
"He is (the all) "words which are absolute a d msmpnthe liktnerc of the unseen God, h r n Brat, before hensive and will admit no except1an."-wtfmt?
all the creation - for it was by lzim h t all thinp p. 150 See any Greek text, rg. nhF K w m
InterJinem Translation.
wtre created. . ." J.B. Phillip tmalntion re.&:
"He was hbefore c m t i m w n . " hr&yos
BY HIM, THROUGH HIM, FOR 3NtPd
ttan &for6 dl m"En auto" mmno that Christ is th p
nr well as the inrtrumn
Berkeley Version readr:
nrtlon." See also C.B.
tion, The Living Bible, "by means of him.* Pls did
else's agent. Christ k tka
Creator (through), ajtd the herpaw [Fw)of aII
faGf
that
this
"unduly
strains
the
m
t
firmnmr."Th+y *hew t b phrase u a gedtfve of things,
%t oaa& did firkt a m bcS ita bring a b u t
Artion. W C o o t explains it u "Firatborn, tkt
bb wntinulsa bs &ct tb hold it together.
Lard of all cmticstt.'" -tian;
to dj, 4 rtl &m fn liun."-Mo,
tcd Heir of dl things" "He b
fa;T'BfWewrs
to
to exist for in Instant,
all c m t i m wm fiy spa.b m k y e x p u that
It is Wauso sf Qrrfrt ' Y b wfrerse hangs top&a,md d a r mt dirintqmtc in &us.

&wl

"So, then, the San h the

mb the end of etgUon,
ereation tagsther. & is
Cmat
md Me Finn1 eanl of the workt."
If ta k "the Origfn of

God's craatim."

7, KJV God, the Fntlmer llta

''faithful d true" anid '"the wnalng
"
l
' attv
21:56. Jurt t.t we understand the F I L ~ ~toB refer
T
to
f ar the. "Opiein and DOISiaatian,n M
&auld wa u n $ e m W the Son rr tb ""Oligin." Md
ha fiat my, 'I a d tlIIS Father am ~ n t ? " - J ~ h n
i0:m

x u m m m

L'-,

:y t"Far it wzw la h h that the d i W P u b s

wtlled kr
cut Umlt,w- Mo "For 9 the
ar*irit ftd
o dwell in him,"-AT
The
It the eoimg.1etenera or totality of
W.Ths Sea k not only the irmp (eikon) of the
rs ead; in him Iim the totality (pletvrna).
t rryr: UT%e
&Inas denotes the rwn-total

Bnrclay'says the Son "ia nat simply a. sketch of

God; He is not r wmmary of God; He ismore than
a lifeless portrait of Cod. In Him there is nothing
left out." "erefore, Barelay's New TkursJa&n
reads: "For in Hlm Cod in dl His fullnets wao
phased to trko up his r'bsde."
Phillip t r m h b s : "It was in him that the full
Rature c& Eod &ax to lin." T E T says: "It was
by W r awn d&an that the h has in M m l f
the full IUfSLrt of COd."
htor [2:9) Frul reitorat- tb
lhw all the fullness $f
D W t f 'ti3 was m
rmgw mnctpt; years k f o m he had written to the
Corinthians exhlniq that "W
p r s o d y r-ging
the world
Corinthians 5: 19
PCow to th
mys, "For in him all the f d l m s of Cad mz .., pleased to dwell, md through h i m to E ' E M I C ~ to : ,
h m e l f dl things,"-RSV Hal
au &m n e m - .-/-.
cdld to God?
$3 *.' -3":
Undoubtedly christians ham asked you %it it?'
quation before, in m e form or other. "Are you ,;,':-;;
avecl?'"Ham
you been barn again?'""Ba
you p--&
haw eternal He?" We w u l d like to talk to you
again. Look up the perton you t&ed to bfole or ;1
: ;%:

la tor^" b k d kt their religious traditions

and decided what they wanted the Bible t o
my; then they Ewkd far an excuse far
"tmndrrting" mrtain words incorrectly.
S o m a t l m ~aAer deciding on the "correct
t m d a t k n " these ones could not decide cm
. . the m m t excuse. John 8:58 is an exwl. ' lent example. Traditionally they do not
trelieve t@t Christ Jcsars fs &far%Absalzam
came to be: themfare, Skey d a e d on ths
"tr;nnslatisn" 1hawe Qwn.I"hs fmh0t~1$8
the 195Q sdltfon 9syst: ". .. pmpdy
denxi in tho parfsct Inldlefidnfte tern,"
. Cmk =hailan quickly' pintad out t b t na
- '

edition t o read: 'f , . pmperyY m n d e d in

the perfect tenm indisative," Six yearn later
in their interifnear trarislrtion they kept the
traditional I hare bean but &n &awed
the excuse in the fmtnote to: " , . . p@p%fly rendered in the perfeet Etne.'?
These '?tr'ansfatd3 elaim t o have usas-d
the Weartccrtt and Hart Gretk text. Says the
tt, eagMumt of the
md HorP text a f the
: ""fm
The phrase
&cnw. In t b me-

.-.

nd the eternal."
The "-&t9ssl" aqua that einm they
. have put the wrd ""atha" in bm&ets this
& o w that their nenddq af Cales~ans
1:1 6 17 is sat dihonwt but y w dane
merely for #he mko at' chrtfiieaticm. However, the insflion of the wad "~ther"
..

the first part of Jehovah's carnmmd: "You

must not add to it nar take ttmy from it,'*
But what a h u t the
nd put? See their
interlincar at J o h
14 for a aitical
axample. Notice that the G m k text has
the word "rne*Qbut the namw EnQlM
colurtla does ;st, "If you ark me anything
in my nam, I will do itsn Hen Jesus is
ttacbing his dieeipl~stu pray to him and
that h~ will aamtr. Later ht fathe3 them
kr pray to the Father and that the Father
wfH an-=.
'"lf you mk the Fathe- $or
nme."

--

Jkskn 26:23

WRy d a the. "tm&tr

' Imve out the
'ward "pnc9*et Joh* 14: i 4r "'Adm4tfy you
s f a ~ d ethe w m m a n d m e ~ tsf Cad in

srrdtr ta ktain your tradition." - Mark 7:9

What tradition? The tradition whieh pays:
'"ems did nat teach them to pray to
Rimslf, . ." - Tmth Book, p. 152
Not only did Jesus tea& them to pray to
him; they f o i l 0 4 hb instructions and
pmyd to him!
Pauf'r prayer to Chrjart (''Lard, what will
you haw: me da?'"- Acts 9:d) mrked the
,&art of his Life in Christ. %taph@n?a
prayqr
ta Christ fuLslcd Jaws, receive my spirit."
- Acts 7:59) marked tka end of his earthly
mum and echoed the prayer of our Lard
at kk death:- Luke 23:46
Throu&out the $ o ~ ks f the Act3
nd ta the Lord Jaus
(me 9:21222 md 22: 16 far elrrrmgleo). The
disciples duaizlg &is period wcfk-kn~wn
a
those w h W
' ca$Jon the name af (not
Jehavah - but) mr b
r
d Jesus Chti~t."
Acts 9: 14 and I Carintkhnr 1:2
The Epistles contain expm&ans mch
"I thank Christ: Jema our h r d " (ITimothy
I: 121, which am
be cla&fsed as
prayer. And tha
p~ends in that
mpiflmnt pmy
&urcih wki& is
sjosn t~ be m - d , "Amm, ~ ( j m
LOfd

brackets. Bmekcts were add& later in

order to retain this tsaditian rRer G ~ e k Jws." - RmhttjQn2%:20
scholars pointed out the cmr. Norim t h t
is, nat mly d m the htm Wslrld
brackets are not uwd when "atkrv7ia
add te the Ward of G d brr t it
added to Phillipians 2: 18.
fakes away fmm 9"9 'In rhhtion of the Bible's
Clearly the "translators"' have vialaad d i e d m m m d . Rtvelatisn 22 :19

f.

-. ,

HAVE COMPLETE UNITY?

EHOVAHS WITTIESSES hive been involved in many important court c a s s
a r o d the work!. One such c w t w k plsrm
in Scotknd in 1 954, The followiq is from
that case. The hesldinp identify the p m n
k i n g gueistiomd. Numbrri fellowing quotatbns indicate the page& of the tmmcript
where each tedimony i s mmrr2ed.

IttAmmC r n V V r t r n N

Questbn: Is it not vital to

on religious matters?
A n w e r : It certainly is. -

+
f!Q

..ye?@,c..:73.1>'
- +*-, .,- .
,.

Question: You have promulgated - forgive

the word - false prophesy? '
Answer: We have - I do not think &e have
promulgated false pmcagksy, there have
b a n statements that were e m m u & that
is the way 1 put it, aafll mhtakcn.

Q m s t b n : . . It WPS pmmulgt3M as a
matter which must be b l k d by 811
mmbm of fehovahVsW i t n e w that the
Lord" Semngl C o r n t i ~took g k a in 18747

Answer: That was the publimtion of a fahe

prophesy, it was a false statement or an
erroneous statement in fulfilhent of a
prophesy that was false or erroneous.
Qaestion: And that had to be believed by
the whob of JehovaKs Witnesses?
A m w e : Yes, because YOU must understand
we must have unity, we cannot have
digunity with, a.
ot of p p l e
going every
way, an army
is supposed to
:w2
rnareh in step.
.*-:q,gp~P.;-"l-"
..-.
, . .

--

JJ _

WATCH W T !

- JULY 6. 137S

&&s#bn: Back to the point w w't". ,YU&.

A fak
prophesy was prornukpted? &-$siL;L
Amwer: 1 agrm to that.
Question: It had to be aceepted by Jehovah" Wgnems?
,.,$LZ
:==q+
A m @ : That is correct,
T: ;.PL. Questfan: kt a member of' Jehovah% Witness$ Pmk the dew himslf that that
p m p h q was wrong and said m k would
be disfellow&ipped?
Amwer: Yes, if he said so and kept
persisting in creating trouble, because if the
whob organization believes one thing, even
though it be erroneous, and somebody elsestarts on his own trying to put his ideas
across then there is disunity and trouble,
there cannot be harmony, there cannot be
marching together. . . Our purpose is to
have unity.
~ w m t i o nUnity
;
at all msf~?, rgcg:
d*:.~
'
A ~ c I " Unity
:
atl all oosts, h a m we
bdievz and am a r e that Jehovah God is
w d ~ gour o r g k t l u o n , the governh b d y
of mr omnlsatian to direct it, even
t h ~ q hmistakes ari%m d e from time to
time.
Qvestion: A unity based upon an enforad
acceptance of false prophesy?
Answer: That is cx>ncededto be bus.
Question: And the person who expremsd
his view, as you ay, that it was wrong, m d
was disfelbwshipped, would be in breach
of the Cavenant, if he was bbaptisd?
' Answer: That is correct.
- *-$ $ ..\-*
Qumtfon: And efs you stid yesterdsf'gg:
p e d y , would be warthy of death?
..
Amwer: I think - - - '.."3
Quesrbn: Would you say ym or no? . %
>-..

,I-

,*.,,I+.,

'

I...,

.=?

Answer: 1 will answer yes, unhaitating~y. wplswer: l r mn r necessary ror urn t o read
Quation: Do yau call that rekion?
that Judge Rutherford is in error on that
point, What he is inteasted in is in the
A m m : It certainly i%.
Qwstfon: Die you all it Christianity?
presnt truth, the up-to-date truth.
Answer: I certainly do. - pp. 343-343
@&tion: Yareday's e n o n cease to be
publhhed
do they?
FRED W. FWZ
we
Our
Questfors: But it was a calculation which is
bnger accept* by
Dimc- Question: So that what it published sr the
t m of the Society7
truth today by the Society may have to b%
Answm: That is oarrect.
admitted to & wrong in a few years'!
A
-nxious to -ma the pordtion; it k a m e m w e : We have to wait and .see.
mesfion: hd in
the body
bunden duty
of
Jchovrh'g
Witneaa
have
h
e
n
follouriw
a-t
this m b k u h t h a ?
emr?
APJJWCT;
Yes.
A
: They have k n fallowing rnircon? m f & n : In what form ru this m h l c w itructions
on
sdpturn.
tio on cam&&?
h ~ f h p rEmr?
:
Awer: Wlnn we mched the
I9l4 Anme: Well,
- pp. 112-114
and the work4 develspments went faward,
"lcnwe
that we
pucJtbn: ~ u It &ink you hrve told ut
of
. -. - pp.undemwd
lwl'S- already that an acceptance of the beliefs
rn I right that it was at one and facts is
t that in 1925 Abraham and Answer: Yesother Prophets would come back to earth? Que!tion: And there is no possibility of
Answcr: They were expected to come back picking and choosing amongst those facts
which you will accept, and those which you
approximately then.
will
reject. It must be taken as a whole?
Question: But they did not mme?
Answer:
That is right, . . . - p. 3.8.
,
Answer: NO.
Question: It was published, was it not, to
the body of Jehovah's Witnesses that that Queztforr: . . . Jehovah's Witnesses accept
without question doctrines: and Biblical
was to be expected in 1925?
interpretations
as expounded by the Watch
Amwer: Yes.
Tract Society through itr
Tower
Bible
and
Question: But that was wrong?
Directors?
Answer: Yes,. . . - p. 120.
Answer: Yes.
Questton: Sa that once again Judge Ruther- Question: In publications both g.erioBiGltl
and in book form?
ford preached error?
Answer: He didn't preach the full rounded -Answer: Yes. - p. 25
out truth af the matter.
Questdon: In that particular, not putting Amwm: T k s c W h give an expoaithm On
the whole-Scriptws.
too fine s paint on it, he was in error?
Question: But an autheritatiwdti expolritbsl?
Answer: He was in cmr,
Amwer: They mbm# the Bibb on the
Question: Haw does one- OW joining statements that arr: tkrein made, and the
and d i n g this erro- individual e m m h r t the statement and then
neous view of Judge Rutharfard's, know,it the Scripture to rn that the statement is
is now regarded as erroneous?
Scripturally supported.
Ymp

%*

',

.
Question: He what?
Answer: He examines the Scripture to 9ee
whether the statement is supported by the
Scripture. As the Apostle says: "Rave all
things; hold fast that which is gso8.'"
Question: I understood the g o G t i ~ nts be
- do please m m c t rn if I am wrong that a member of the Jehovah's Witnems
., mwt awept as a true Scripture and inttrpmtatbn what is given in the boob I
F~TGW
you to?
Anwcr: But ha b a s mt mmpubrily do
- so, he k even kb Christian right sf
za loon6"m that
examining tbc r5T
this is Scriptural
Question: And if he finds t b t $he Scripturn is not s u s t a h d b he ttroilsk.% s r dee
versa, what does he d I

Answer: You will have to w a r n me I

man who does find that, then I can answer,
or he will answer.
Question: Did you imply that the indiv l d 4 member has the right of reading the
books and the Bible and forming his own
vkkv as to the p m p r intupretetion of
Holy Writ?
s
i
.
< ~ A ~WE
w CQR~(?%
~ : --.;? "
- Qolesrfaa:WouM you s y yes sr no,.
5% A m @ : No*.

..

P.

Question: A witness has no alternative, h

he, to r m p t as authoritative and t o be
@begredinatmdions iswed in 'The Watchtow@'"
'"TbI d o m m t " or "Awake"?
Answw: He must accept tho=. pp. 122-123
. . .
<i-- ,..-*' ,. . .
2

r-

*-

--A>.:

-;;I&
;

-.

->

"

"

Question: Am I right that the

Disectors of the Society, in issuing t h f
authoritative interpretation of Scripture .
seek to apply the interpretafio~snqt only .
to countries but to dates?
. -A m m : YBR.
Questdtm: An$ that J d g e Rutherford took
the Priew t b t mm =;me zapn tbir earth in ,
4025 B.C.?
,
.

$g$$$'~*..

-">I

:<$)

I,,

-,:

Quesrtopa: Can you tell me this; are the=

~eol+csll pubfic(%Gamand wmi-montMy
phdiicala;uwd for diwwion of gutcments
of doctrine: .. . .* .
-.
Answer: Yes;- '.
@es*n: Are these stitements of doctrine
held to be authoritative within the W c t y ?
A w e r : YBS.
~IBSPIBR&
: their acceptosnm a miter of
~ b o ior
~ is
~ it, obligatory on all the nha
M fo be md m r n h . m e ; m b r s o f the
?
: h 0bf@f8m. - pp. 4-

.<:#

tL

-..A

;3,.
.'<

:i

.!kc
b?:

.. <.' -

.,

MmE:
Them tertitssoniea are from the
Pursuers Prmf of Dsugbr WalsR
'
rs. The Right Hanoumble Jmmes
Latham Clyde, M.B., B.C., ar
senting the Minister of h ? w w and
NationalService. Copies of tfre corn.plete transcript may be @t~ieg;dby
writing, The Scottish Record OMm, H.M.General Register House, Edinburgh, Scotknd.

-3 i
.
-. :c-~+*3
s%g"..
, .
.y ,.4 '
. :.-Fs. +-:---.- --. -- .,( ,
.

-.

, * , I . . A n .

-)

Answer: 4124 BC
.
A n w e : He is dependent upon the Bible.
Question: Will he be able to interpret it
Questbn: What is L I L ~present view?
Answer: One hundred years have been truly?
Amwer: No. - p. 133
taken. off.
Qrrsstbn: What was Pa'stor Russell%view?
GRANT SUWER
Answer: Pastor Russell had an extra one
Q
u
c
~
f
b
n
:
Indeed
ean he in the rkw of
hundred years in there.
Jehovah"
W
Witnesses
have an understanding
Questbn: So that date has been altered
of
the
Ssiptures
apart
from the gublieathree t i m a , has it?
tions
of
Jehovah's
WItm*s?
A m w e : The date h
s been eo-estcd.
&%~estiola:
But once the dote was published Answer: No.
:
by the pubtiations can he
by the Society aU Jehovah's Wit%=% were Q u e b i o ~Only
h a the right understanding of the
bound to accept it as scriptmlly true'!
Scriptures?
Answer: Yes.
Qucstbapt: A& 1hbk to
dkfe'ellow- Answer: That is right.
Qb~estion:ISthat not arrogance?
shipped if they d m m d t o the date?
, Answer: If they c a u d trouble over it, Amwer: No.
because the Scriptures say that if anyone is Question: You heard the evidence about
a disturber inside the wngregation he is 1874 having been found to be wrong as a
hindering the growth of the congregation material and crucial date, and a h u t 1925
and its activities and should be disfellow- being a wrong date. On these two items,
acceptance and abmlute accepmm as
shipped.
upan al! Jehomhss
Questbn: Even though h~ prehrsnce were 'fmt2-1 was imp&
at f k t h e ?
supporting the date m w taken by the Wit
Society, when the Society was p u b B ~ n gAMWW: T h t k *bt, - pp. 499-500
t h wrong date?
mwmm
Answer: One who may have tp difference of
d is the am,is it not,
Questbn:
undershndiw like that will wait upon
that on occa;sions you haw not swken what
Jehovah W tn 9&e: if he is correct, 3rd he is true? [SeeMs first anmEr above.]
will abide I
t is published for the time
A m w : 1 have agreed to that many times,
being,
and I will agree to it many times mom, that
Question: But if he m a w i b and under- we have made mSgfakes and pmchimd
stands that he is correct what is he to do? error afld have had to correct oumkw
A n ~ w e r :He gets a blessing because of his many times.. . .
submission and with upon Jehovah and Question: Have you studied oampsrzztivt
not leaning to his own ufldentandhg.
religion?
Q w s t b n : In fib respect dm,namely the Answer: I have to a certain txbnt, not wry
date of the a m k g of mankind upon the extensively I must confess.
earth, two e m ham b.c&f;lpubl*d as Question: h you know of ditrgr telbbn of
authgritative Scriptwe?
Answer: Yes, as azlthQrjtative c*
'0p:ical the world, as you wauM put it set awlled
which has as its set up of publlshiq what is
dates. . . . - pp. 118-119
later proven ta be untrue but requiring of
Question: Is there any h a p s f salvation for its members that under p i n of rpitituotl
a man who depends ulpion Ris Bibb alone death they must zlcmpt that untruth?
when he is in a situation in the world whe* Amwtrr: I do not knaw of any. other
he a n n e t get the tracts and pubuations of organisation except Jehovah's Witn
-p.351
your inctrmration?
',

WATCH OUT1

JULY B, IFF3