Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
the Workplace
Effect on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
by Karen White, MS, RD, LDN, and Paul H. Jacques, PhD
research Abstract
This study assessed the effectiveness of a 12-week pilot employee wellness program in reducing risk factors for coronary
heart disease. Fifty university employees with at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor participated in the program.
Interventions focused on diet, exercise, and monthly workshops. Pre- and post-intervention measurements included
weight, body composition, blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, triglycerides, and blood sugar. Twenty-five employees
had post-intervention measurements. A survey was administered to assess adherence. The correlation between adherence and improvement in cardiovascular disease risk factors was also tested. Significant differences were observed
between pre- and post-intervention measurements of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol
ratio, triglycerides, and weight. A significant correlation existed between self-reported level of participation in the diet
aspect of the program and improvement in LDL levels. This multi-component, 12-week pilot employee wellness program
was effective in reducing cardiovascular disease risk.
109
Recommended Ranges
Blood pressure
Total cholesterol
LDL cholesterol
Triglycerides
BMI
< 25
110
AAOHN Journal
Measures
Risk factors related to this study were measured using standard health care industry techniques. All participants were given written instructions to fast for at least
12 hours prior to both the pretest and the posttest protocol. Fasting was defined as no caloric intake for at least
12 hours. Individuals obtaining the measurements were
trained to use necessary equipment. Blood pressure was
measured with a Welch Allyn Vital Signs Monitor (Welch
Allyn, Beaverton, OR). Weight and body composition
were determined with the Tanita BF-350 Body Composition Analyzer Scale (Tanita Corporation of America, Inc.,
Arlington Heights, IL), which measures the impedance,
or resistance, of a small electrical current passing through
the body. The higher an individuals body fat percentage,
the greater the resistance. Each participants age, gender,
and height were entered into the body composition analyzer, which uses electrodes in each foot pad to send a
small electrical current throughout the body. Participants
removed their shoes and socks before stepping on the
analyzer, which was cleaned with a disinfectant wipe between participants.
BMI was calculated in accordance with procedures
defined by the National Institutes of Health (1998). BMI
is recommended when assessing overweight and obesity.
All plasma assessments used in this study (blood
glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides) were by a laboratory certified by
the College of American Pathologists. The laboratory follows the standards developed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2006), an independent nonprofit
organization developing and promoting the use of its
laboratory methods standards. The total cholesterol/HDL
cholesterol ratio was calculated using the method defined
by Kannel and Wilson (1992), whereby total cholesterol
is divided by HDL cholesterol. Assessments of normal
blood (plasma) glucose and levels diagnostic of diabetes mellitus followed guidelines from the ADA (2006).
The Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (2004)
defines optimal blood pressure as a systolic blood pressure of 120 mmHg or less and a diastolic blood pressure
of 80 mmHg or less.
The degree to which participants followed the wellness program was measured by their responses to two
survey items: I adhered to the Healthy Cats diet program and I adhered to the Healthy Cats exercise program. Participants responded to each item separately
using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Scores for these two items
were averaged, thereby resulting in an indication of the
participants overall adherence to the program.
Statistical Analysis
111
Table 1
LDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Total/HDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Triglycerides
(mg/dl)
Weight
(pounds)
Mean pretest
207
124
3.64
170
179.7
Range pretest
150
169
3.70
808
229.4
Median pretest
216
134
3.47
135
183
33.24
32.82
0.87
133
37.68
Mean pretest
201
118
3.41
160
176.4
Range pretest
128
169
3.70
808
120
Median pretest
202
123
3.20
104
177
50 participants pretest
SD pretest
25 participants pretest
SD pretest
35.42
37.49
0.95
173
31.6
Mean posttest
179*
103
3.11
132
173.3
Range posttest
141
138
3.70
558
114
Median posttest
178
107
3.07
99
176.7
31.03
31.69
0.82
112
28.2
SD posttest
p < .01.
p < .05.
112
AAOHN Journal
Table 2
Systolic
Blood
Pressure
(mmHg)
Diastolic
Blood
Pressure
(mmHg)
HDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Blood Sugar
(mg/dl)
Mean pretest
36.16
128
83
49
87.24
Range pretest
36.20
59
44
47
143
Median pretest
35.60
127
83
46
81
SD pretest
8.49
14.25
10.23
11.16
23.40
Mean pretest
36.40
127
82
51
86
Range pretest
27.8
48
41
46
94
Median pretest
38.10
126
82
53
83
50 participants pretest
25 participants pretest
SD pretest
9.05
13.12
9.58
12.22
17.69
Mean posttest
36.54
127
81
50
86
Range posttest
35.20
88
33
50
61
Median posttest
38.85
125
79
49
83
SD posttest
10.11
17.41
7.74
13.24
13.33
113
114
AAOHN Journal
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.