Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
and detailed
(BS 8110: 1997)
OFC
contains 32 pages
BQ7I
All advice or information from the British Cement Association is intended for those who will evaluate the signiticance
and limitations ol its
contents and take responsibility
resulting from such advice
for its use and application. No liability (including that for negligence) for any loss
IFC
Contents Foreword
of Designed and detailed has been revised to BS 8110 : Part I:
1997, and the amendment dated 15 September 1998. Although there have been
3 BS 8110 and limit state design several amendments to the code since 1985, the latest and most significant
change
2 Introduction This third edition
has been the reduction in the partial safety factor for reinforcement m from 1.15
6 Design information . . to 1 .05. With higher stresses, less steel is required. However, the total saving may
7 Structural summary sheet not be fully realised because there are other considerations such as choosing a
practical arrangement of bars, and the deflection in the case of shallower
8 Floor slab members.
10 First-floor main beam The calculations have also been revised for the loading requirements of BS 6399
Part 1: 1996 and Part 2: 1995.
16 Edge beam .
Design charts in BS 8110 : Part 3: 1985 may still be used to provide a
18 Columns conservative solution, and one of these charts has been included for the design of
columns. Lap lengths for these members have also been taken from BS 8110,
22 Foundation Table 3.27, but adjusted for the design stress of 087f.
24 Shear wall The tie reinforcement for robustness is designed at its characteristic strength. If the
characteristic bond stress is used for calculating laps and anchorage lengths, then
26 Staircase the values in Table 3.27 may be multiplied by I 05/l4. This publication takes a
conservative practical approach and uses directly the values given in Table 3.27.
28 Column design chart
Observant users of previous editions will appreciate the skill that is evident in the
29 Further information setting out of the calculations and the drawings. This is the work of the late Jim
Higgins, whose care in the production of the original artwork was meticulous.
Sadly, he never saw the second edition in print. I hope that my amendments to
this third edition will not detract from his fine workmanship.
Special thanks are due to Tony Threlfall for his advice and suggestions for this
edition.
Railton Rogers
Introduction
The purpose of this publication is to apply the principles of limit stale design given
in BS 8110 by means of a simple worked example for a reinforced concrete
building frame. The calculations and details arc presented in a form suitable for
design office purposes and are generally in accordance with the following
pLihI ications.
Part I: 1997.
H M STATIONERY OFFICE. Building and buildings. The Building Regnlation.v 1991
(Amended 1994). HMSO, London. 21 pp. Statutory Instruments No. 2768.
BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION Loading/or buildings. Part I . Code 0/practice
1996.
BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. Loading/or
Jiir
state design
c:)bjective To serve its purpose, a structure must be safe against collapse and be
serviceable in use. Calculations alone do not produce safe, serviceable and
durable structures. Equally important are the suitability of the materials,
quality control and supervision of the workmanship.
Limit state design admits that a structure may become unsatisfactory
through a number of ways which all have to be considered independently
against defined limits of satisfactory behaviour. It admits that there is an
inherent variability in loads, materials and methods of design and
construction which makes it impossible to achieve complete safety against
any possible shortcoming. By providing sufficient margins of safety, the aim
of limit state design is to provide an acceptable probability that the structure
will perform satisfactorily during its intended life.
Limit states can he classified into two main groups:
(I) the ultimate limit state, which is concerned with the provision of
adequate safety;
(2) the serviceability limit states, which are essentially concerned with
durability.
Generally, in practice, there are three limit states which are normally
considered for reinforced concrete and these are given in the Table below.
Serviceability limit states
Ultimate
Provision of
adequate safety
Structure should
not deflect so as
to impair use
of structure
Cracking should
not be such as
to damage finishes
or otherwise .
impair usage
Loading regime Design ultimate
loads Design service load
Performance limit Structure should
not fail
Deflection should
not exceed
specified
limits
Crack width
should not
exceed 03 mm
generally
Characteristic values For the testing of materials, a statistical approach can be applied to the
variations within materials which occur in practice. A normal or Gaussian
distribution curve is assumed to represent the results of the tests and a value
known as the characteristic value can be chosen below which not more than
5% of the test results may be expected to lie.
The characteristic strength is given by the equation:
Characteristic strength = Mean or Average strength L64 X Standard deviation
Ideally, a characteristic load should be similarly defined, as a load with a 5%
probability of being exceeded during the lifetime of the structure. Flowever, it
is not yet possible to-express loading in statistical terms, so the Code uses the
loads defined in BS 6399: Parts 1, 2 and 3.
3
10
12
16
12
1)
12
14
12
Reinforcement I .05
(oncrete
Flexure or axial load IS
Shear strength without shear reinforcement 125
Bond strength 14
Others (e.g. bearing stress) 15
iOLisiuest In addition to providing a structure that is capable of carrying the design
loads, the layout should be such that damage to small areas of a structure or
failure of single elements will not lead to a major collapse.
The Code requires that in all buildings the structural members should be
linked together in the following manner:
(a) by effectively continuous peripheral ties at each floor and roof level:
4
Durabflty and re resislance At the commencement of the design, the following should be
considered:
the climate and environmental conditions to which the concrete will be
exposed;
the concrete quality;
the cover to the reinforcement.
It should also be noted that the quality of the construction process and the
Iirst hours after casting of the concrete have a major influence upon the
subsequent durability of the structure.
The cover for protection against corrosion may not be sufficient for fire
protection, so this should be considered at the onset of the design, and also
the dimensions of the members.
The Code gives maximum water/cement ratios, minimum cement contents
and minimum characteristic strengths for concretes suitable for use in
various environments with specified covers and using 20 mm nominal
maximum size aggregate. The minimum grades will generally ensure that the
limits on free water/cement ratio and cement content will be met without
further checking.
Appflcation Durability and fire resistance requirements are considered at the onset of the
design process because this determines the grade of concrete, the cover, and
the size of the members. Usually, for most structures, Part 1 of the Code will
be used in which it is assumed that the ultimate limit state will be the most
critical limit state. Design will therefore be carried out at this limit state,
followed by checks to ensure that the serviceability limit states of deflection
and cracking are not reached. In special circumstances, other limit states,
such as vibration or the effects of fatigue, may require consideration. Should
it be necessary to calculate deflections and crack widths, methods are given
in Part 2 of the Code. The serviceability limit state of deflection may be the
limiting requirement for floor slabs with large span/effective-depth ratios.
This can he checked before the reinforcement is determined, although some
engineers may prefer to follow the procedure where the check is made after
the reinforcement has been found.
Simplified detailing requirements for the curtailment of the reinforcement
may be used for beams and slabs which fulfil certain design conditions.
Nowever, for other situations, the curtailments should be taken from a
bending moment envelope and be in accordance with the general
recommendations of the Code.
5
Design information
Client W
Co#.ai Architect
Engineer responsible
BRJZers
/j,
Date of submission
TLe.
'a,
LIL14
5SiO
Pout
tnj L
2 IO5)ckr
PCU B8
Relevant Building
Regulations and
Design Codes
Lbon
Intended use
of structure
Roof 5
2 a/ec (basic
Factors
= 1 O
e.'Jere.
Exposure conditions
R1c
fs
k4 ov wcik
Foundation type
,r-A4e. 4o
wt '20.
Material data
L. strek fL
4o
- 1iJ'c
'
Sdf wet
AU S-oir,.
4'ok4/
ov ore
a (IIOTcIb3.)
Mbean ,
-l
bW4w
wall
W1 t5-rAI4cE.
i, IiP
.L
e4A
prviAed.
or.
orce r4 eA
ka
b ctrc
r4 /ui, o4 r4 /"44 -3
CC
Ft C2o4\0) = 2Q+lG
P-
3G(Ok,
Perpcc ;te
It.
ter e
aw
wc
G 5ooO=4oooO
0
0-I
11
175
fl5
SSS0
T"{P1CALLOOR PLA4
oox3oO
OOx'oO
SO OO
3
cPc
><
Ir. rEt,
w
CCC
Tia
cc
CC
PRVSi -
Floor slab
interior-span solid slab
175
5000
BS 8110
ref.
CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
3.?,
T c3
34
DugPB%t.vr'
W.L4S4
ct
FR.E
REITA4C
ov hr U4 CovCt.ov of <pare
Mo.xre
Tb(3,12
LoA
O.17E x 24 4.2
(G4t
0.
toc.d = 4.7kt{/
Cpa.ge
c) = 4. okN/
3.r.2,4
2o
44.70kN1/2
cover ..
'2o si.
32.4
Iable3i2
/Vs
Iraror r.spo. o.oC,3F =0.OCx,43x5O
ULXIMATE
4.44
Tb(e8
FCEfrT
t4 ppor. k 42oo-.41 ox4S2 0 0Th
= oc'23 i4s(o.S+J(o.Z
)=
(buto.x1494s:
A5-- PA 204x1&
O.95 O.9546Ox14l5
Cdr5cear
o.S4.91O3' 0.22 M/w
lc?x 14S
Top&otow
T12. 0o
(iiJ)
ok.
TQ6k
Tok3IO
DLaC.T(oi.4
PA
6k /4faeq rio =
I4')
3 x 317
cr or WOr
re.L.'.ft. 1
2U.27 CR.Acl(ii
447
. Atlte 5 '21.5
p-cj
k 11
.
bt.twee. bo.r OC
, (2
oO .,
12
34
rttQ. cJck.4
c.*j k.
ak..
3.12.3.4
TAbteZ7
Torce 4t(
( 4t)_
4r.Lw>Ft
4S.x lo
44,0 -'fl'
(377
:#3oo. T12.e3oo
tso.l.
5T10.-41 2)00
i1loo
T
"
'
C3*'Z)
5T10-41r2 It,
I
S-rto--3GO'r2
I
(2+3) I
.J
Commentary on bar arrangement
BS 8110 ref Bar marks Notes
All bars are labelled in the form described in the Standard method of detailing structural concrete,
e.g. 45T12-l-300B1 means that in the bottom outer layer there are45 Grade 460 Fype 2 deformed
12 mm nominal size bars at 300 mm centres and the bar mark is -I-.
The bars are numbered in the likely sequence ot fixing; the positions of the first and last bars in a string are
indicated in plan and section. Intermediate bars have been omitted for clarity.
Table 3.25 Minimum area of tension reinforcement = 00013 X 1000 >< 175 = 228 mm2/m.
3.12.11.2.7 Maximum clear spacing of tension bars = lesser of 750 mm or 3d, i.e. 3d = 3 )< 149 = 447 mm.
If curtailed, A = 377/2 = 189 mm2 < minimum 228 mm2/m not OK.
3.12.3.4 Bars lapped 300 mm at bottom support to provide continuous tie.
Table 3.25 2,3 Secondary bars use T10 @ 300 (262 mm2/m).
3.12.8.11 4,5 Minimum lap = 300mm > IS )< 10 = 150 mm. Lapping reduces bar lengths for easier handling on
site.
7 Laps are shown staggered for effective crack control.
3.4.1.5 6 Minimum transverse reinforcement is placed across the full flange width of the edge beam (minimum
Al
1.
)
5Tt0-5JT' Mt.
B
I
II
U'2 .1
L
ST tO -51
1oo
1
30O
I
L%o
'1
8T1O-2.00
'7T1O-3)2 Mt.
4
1
@_Th F
i_
(2) _i
T10- 1300
7 TI
0- 'z) e2 AlL
4T'2-1- 300
P LA.1 (r4
'2 ovfte4
r c[ti)
A It
AR. = alecY4J_ &r5
.45s Att
A-A
,z tt.
.2.I.21 Su.FR.P1ME.
A taa.r
AL'-t'5
ett. Ljs
forces. F-or
-1oo
&iiiwecL to be xed.
1ve. Ti.
t'i.ov,.
Lart* 1L4
3
To.bk6
3,34
e.LLa.r ro4kcgd
e' b er rMrv
be co(s.bosje
4 tse
be(oi c
to
a-re. takcr
b sc-ur wcAk.
SC
tD
'
ov1
Ri
COVW
for
STA CG
cover Ii4K5
20
.2122 LAPD4G
(o.o.r7s)o.3 x 24 = '23
oGa.w 2B.kW/,
Mv ce o4 i4 (.B)
103K 2S&k4/.
uie.4:
BA 1'
cZUIL4 rowv AvJ
------
w p
Ctk I
1o o4
LtperCowC.
Scur
(k)
CASEJ1
CM IS%t
2o.Ok4/, +
Oc 2OOk/t.
+t.4t .i2k/M Bi
Lower II
= x4
12
Moie.m
()
.O ve4tl.Q%
Lij*- Cokiv v#
ower
sc-0- (1)
CDiLAI stf,
sLeer (-!)
- 17$ 2O + 4o2 - 348k + Qc
+ ba
ii
24 oo 22
(8't'2
-19 2.7( 4- 4$
2So 28
-4
4-it 7 + 'a-
34 #1's
2$2 i'2o
iii -
.54 e4
+ 2o4 -
1- 33
+ 2'
+ 17
1%
-- 542
10
=460
tto
........ ... ..
CALCULATIONS
MDN-E'JT ..NvLOPE
Rrnto
V
FogcE E1LOPE
40 r CASE I 17S o .5S
402 2&L
( O')
(2o'J')
II
34 S2
II
(I)
{1 eatA.
wecoc L 32S
-UI
La6t
I trbut&i
2? I
22 I
EveLop.
3511
oao
00 m.
1
2BBR I
3001
L
= 282
i55 k1
0.4
0.s
46o
vw1
=
0
&s
2
s'. t&or
(. .3 a
4T25
1
. . I,
III
(SQ..e
ii')
440
Lj4co
J__
2 T 2B
Co
:vta.-vt Supor:
BS 8110
ref. CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
bd2
4oxooi4.4
42O
0.02'3
Mu
3EAM.,
322t
/ct
3.4.4.4
= o.io4
t.FLOof
E')
efoe O > O7
50
/O.4,):. /c i-0o4<O.
-- Co
---
C'tgck A1
0104
. 4o x oo 442.
o5
S%
Frot M
Ef. f[ae wtL = 6
1O =
(Q.2 x
O7
+ Q. t4 .'< 9000
4Z0x4So
4d =(o,s+Jo,2-oo.7> os ______ -
so
A5
t756
- 32. < 10
0.5x4Ox0.9Sx4SO
FroM
tO
04S
44O
40 x
OOx 45O
--As
(O.So.
')
D2
:.-
cl
.4)
2 x 4o,( '25
M
13x 10
4 T 2
(tO
tc...o ".
= O.O,4
657 MAM
So
2T25
__
j nPoo
a.6
)25,,
1t40
12
4o 4So
Ce4c Abt9e4
we.b
TLc
2 T 2S
(8lr.
t&4%SLO
BS 8110
ref CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
34.G
T.6te3'B
TIe7
or-.oVe.r Spport,0.002fx3Q0oO=
2 45.5
Tbe37
Tobe7
SkEAR REll4PORcMEJT
Ccve. tior,
re.L,, 2T2
(82 w2)
\!c
'
' 00TrR2oo
.(vO7O04' .o59/2
OSS(2O = 075
Sv 3oo
4B0
d.4SO
Skct
LR1k2 2 A/ oo io o.7s 2
j
T6137
4StO
Loao
8LM
V.f.d
2t V/N/
j(oo
vv
0%
Ay
tlS
Lks
R'l2C. 175
R.
2 3-
12
R 1 300
.50 j 1t
R..t'2. @ 3oo
,,
L.H
25
2M
'32
jsc O.o
tSS
j.14
R.L
V1G875 k..N
.o3
2S
37
O.'9
p.51
O.7
34..1
3.4,
T.bIe9
bkto
FLECTION1
b-Lo= b
M 2x 4(oOic I75i27
'2.t1.2.
Tk32g
3ViII2
3 I2124
C AC
2i2
:c-.k
J
1V\
ct;
rk ba pa
T'VLOY. \'L4.
0/
T 2o
+ 18
I.e.raS $..4por-t T 30
0
e,<tLrroj
sro T 0
40 < 203
100
< 10
1 <4
o0 < 55
--
0I5
35 <
-35 <
92
3t2.3
2 &t6
Tcb3'27
3123.i
TIE PRO\,
Si0 F 3k/ (e
0. Tv\.trJ
=F
(K)
( 4.+4.O 7
tLC forCe or
aae 7)
po
15 7.
'. G'&x S = I
xe-r
(J) 3,%
Co
( -sF
ca
< 7QkJ L5
Coa carKe
coLw
ioo<
2S)
04
S2
L'e oc;
D2rS
0r.a4L,
0L (va.4Q,
'
0O 3
t xteJ
II
cL450.
2) 300. (.
t.Lo. ct. 5 =
a.
b=
40 breadth
'
25 mm
OK.
'4
f 5 mm).
c,2R12
- 11
i4eoO
A 'ZTi6-
t '12 t
2
4
A-A ___
-
:O
'2T2,-2
ELE VAI
For o ba.c
/4o.9i2)MJ7
Bt,n: b 1420> = 0., M13'5km. 4LY Mo Ev.ve1opii.
& 1o ____ _____
1s
CURTA1LMT DIAGRAM.
Top: b=300,
l_o.I_
'75
bOO
M A1P4
cer
EAM
LNK DARAIY\
3.12.3.6
3.12.8.14
3.12.8.3
10
3.12.8.3
6.9
3.12.9.1
3.12.4.1
7.8
Bottom lcts lap minimum 00)) mm with span bars to provide continuity for the internal tie.
5+
450 1315 mm
' 55 br
each radius
to simplify bending.
4-
II ('hosed links, shape code hi. are arranged to suit the link diagram above. Open top links, shape code 77.
arc not suitable for the sites shown.
3.12.8.12 Note that links it laps are spiLed at ilot greater than 200 mm since cover I'S bar size.
15
Edge beam
interior-span flanged beam
tf
1=
'350
5000 300
BS 8110
ref. CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
To.bIe
33,34
DL,RAILITY FIRE. 'S1iCE
LoAi
Ie44 CooA 4!rov
6-3
25.0
2x2 294
.' o-7kL
k= QO.7kJ
k= 2Ok.
F =i'zsok.
TAb(e..35
2.sokM.
ULTtMATE .M'S
4S
444
3.415
Ta'5
4;,Io
Tcbk7
M4-Ltcuy; e.fewi4t
- 43.9x
4ox oox'2So
SrorceO5SF*12S6875kN,
o5,46OxO'S7x2&D
=
A
fc'ot reforea.rc2T20
Oi &C2OOMs'
Sv '200
2w ob0 2T2O
fj 1 jio. J L.
.LJ4O
2C)o
vri
' M.
- O.7>
(4o2
R.io200
tLccgct.
4.'(.1
1ce3
Te,g
D,FL.CT%O,.J 44L.C
M-
ooo 17.2 2O
.'.
rto = 22 x
k.
l2cI.2A
Tcbe
3.12 (.2.4
2 ar5o chkC
= 41000
rdtsre O0
,1
I
ok
oiIc27
-eLF4. A5j .
U'L'Tt2,
4t= .
x74 45 3oc
To
'ZTVZ.
Bar marks Notes
Horizontal bars in this member provide the peripheral tie. Minimum lap = 300 mm.
I The two tension bars are stopped 50 mm from the column lace to avoid clashing with the column
bars shown in section A-A.
Separate splice hars are fixed inside vertical column bars.
Minimum area = 30% A = 03 x 364 = 109 rnm. Use 2'T 12 = 226 mrn.
I ap = 35 >< 12 >< 109/226 = 203 mm > 15 x 12 = 180 mm < 300 nim. Use 300 mm lap.
3 Link hanger bars also provide support for slab top reinorcenienI.
'23R405-200
A1
je- co
2 T '2O 4
n
EL EV Ar iot
-75
ScaL1e1tO 44 3
COVE o
U
ks =40
t 21 i
Commentary on bar arrangement
ItS 8110 ref
3.12.8.11
A-A
Sc4, t:"ZO
3.12.10.2
Figure 3.24
Table 3.27
3.12.10.2
Figure 3.24
3.12.10.2
Figure 3.24
17
Columns
21) =
900 mm
slender and
EW
short columns
=
O.S
(E4o:
4.5
AD TcP
4.oboov)
or O tv\
=
I52> iS
= 40 = 460
lst
14000 15000 1j
300
300
8000 6000
BS 8110
ref
CALCULATIONS ouTPur
UR(L4Tt c4 RsTca
cover-
o' r
o U4o o4oro4 ot
Co
Ikreroj 2o w...
T3k '
4
cover 4 -..k',
x r
e xpo're 420o
ifrow. ANALX
EAML$
k.N
COLUM
Ic
LoADS CGLM
E2
aa t
2 1. 2. d 2 1 2
12
oa 49
210
244
%33
S4
4 5
53
i4
133
34
J 32. sa 9
100 53
3 3 3aFL 2
249
29o
117
140
U7
t3 SB
32
1B4
ivj
32 s&
.,
3'
37 I9 6G,7
24.F-(. 298
249
aM JTS IMP0cED
M*1P'T$
2o
117
140
17
i3 i5
32
i54
117
5
SS
99
14 32 b93 1
FL 3oo
252
292
120
14
liB
37 ts
134
ics
120
g 34
5. i4 14
I 8000
I ooo
LOAD
CA1
1oo1='
LoA CASE 2
(PoLr -,
atfecti.ve
= j3
3&
TabI 319
8l '3
N-IS
(3 D.9 E4co
c2.SxA.5 =
4 ,0,
1N1RNAL COLL4Mt.J Ld
o.d z. tOO *
beo4 i27
M1, 0,
(oo-
Q' 773 7
M2 S,
04 M -
Ca
O.(DW\2 =
O.4M.
O+0x
7.k
fI4 > 7.
"T ( e'y
2ooo
DOS3oO
qreLe..s o
U23x S44 2.3S <
22
L.
(-' b")
M=
42> 29k,
_____
oe 1. bove
oor, cvv.t
a2 od,
C'
L76
M 4 1c,
oc4
oJ:
t'255
cN.
0-
0. x .34 = 2o.4kNr.,
_______ -- __________
Mow..t 204 + OM
t)ot.4
2 0/460 (1 0
9O w
BS 8110
ref.
CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
t4 + 544
Po_,t t
324
33.. t
Ei 3
S 3'3
Prt I
3. 2.7
2
(b M+M 658 = x
2'2 L =
si
o8xoi0_
-- 5'
2''9
'2-44
a 3O-4o-i3 = 247.
2.47
__ -
Q32O
t- 4T'S (%oi)
K - _______ = O2 23-741
=
.4
ioox%O -
cb
fr\ cLa.-,
Ce.ck , _______
=
= _____
1v1 0,
k.
Mt.
k.
;5o
CcLrt 9t.2B')
3
k.
c247
4T'25
(tOGOIvw)
ok,
ok.
" 51.
M
23.9-7
-ectLie
O9x
=
2ZI
0.9 (evct
0.9 x
Y= 'L15
b
CoAcLo;
=
=
usiv.43
oac
BS 8110
ref.
CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
EXTRJAL COLUMt4
(Foo
R..ooF)
AtAL LoA1 cd
MME,.iT
AL
TOTAL
u-AM
L OADS CoLuMtt
b$1QN
L0A CLMk0M. T$
t '1 i
2 2.
'
1 212
t. C
i92 i.7
4?
4 i0 5
S4 9
SW.
rt
247 25S
k2.o
S
25B
i1
S
2a
15 95
SW.
24.
eti3e
r.o-v
c4e
1!5
247
1J2!
26
25
il5
it & 13
120
25
S
5Th 125
t25
G1
L5
L2$
S 105
95 joS
U 42 4
98 oS
ti7
SW
t.
245 2S3
ii
V74 2&.
U9
7&&
10
E'oO
'
SW.
24e t'25 2S
25
oor)
c
Ft (t)LCLA1)
SOT CoLM
e
(.rt PSQc S
4T2B
C
i90
P%
I3\)
CD4Ov top.,
boo3)
EO
S399
Por
1.
PrI I
N Osx
oO+44-cY924O O5S k,
fr\ z
237
- 079 -k-- oo
'i
(4T' i%D2)
20
154, ;
iS 7 k1L
kN.
b
I(4TEiNAL COLL..U1M F'2 ExTR.AL COLUMN Fl
LLv,k,
J
VertcaS it.rs
c
(1
.
Y9J
COV.R
.
;4
4 4.
t0k'= 40
:
-4 i
coR t,
.
c-I
L -,
;1
SCALES
i: 5O j 'ZO
The presentation shown above is schematic. This tabular method adapts readily to element repetition.
The sections are shown in their relative positions adjacent to the vertical reinforcement.
Main bars, area> minimum 04% bh.
Slope of crank at lower end = 1:10 maximum. Crank offset = 50 + 10% =55 mm.
Minimum crank length = 350 mm (140).
Length of short projection beyond crank = compression lap +. say, 75 mm for tolerance.
Reinforcement area at laps < 10% bh.
Bars project above first-floor slab level to provide a compression lap above the kicker.
Bar projection = 35 x 087/095 x 25 mm + 75 mm for kicker = 875 mm, i.e. compression lap = 800 mm.
2 A single link is provided, since each vertical bar is restrained by a corner.
Minimum size = 25/4, use 8 mm. Maximum spacing = 12 x 25 = 300 mm. (R8 @ 300.)
Cover to vertical bar = 40 mm> 15 x 25 = 375 mm. Linkse xtendt o undersideo f floor slab.
Normally, starter bars are detailed with the footing, as column F2. It can be economic to detail starters
with the column above as shown. In this case it is advisable to schedule the starter bars so that they can be
processed together with the footing. Note with this detail that the section at mid-height also applies to the
starter bar arrangement. The starter bars would be shown dotted on the footing detail together with a
suitable cross-reference. Bars project above the top of the base to provide a compression lap above the kicker
= 35 x 087/095 x 25 + 75 = 875 mm, i.e. lap = 800 mm.
As bar mark 1, but bars provide a tension lap above 1st floor kicker. Cover = 50 mm.
Clear distance between adjacent laps = 100mm <6 x 25 mm; i.e. use factor 1.4
Projection = 14 x 35 x 087/095 x 25 + 75 = 1195 mm, say 1200 mm, i.e. tension lap = 1125 mm.
Sum of bar sizes at tension lap = 4 x 25 = 100mm. 100/300 x 100 = 33% <40% OK.
This detail provides the maximum lever arm and is the preferred detail for column/beam intersections.
5 Similar to mark 2 links, but extending to underside of main beam. Cover to vertical bars = 50 mm.
- 6 These U-bars are provided to restrain the vertical bars in the external face of the column.
Commentary on bar arrangement
BS 8110 ref Bar marks Notes
3.12.5.3 1
3.12.6.2
3.12.8.15
Table 3.27
3.12.7.2
3.12.7.1
3.12.8.12
Table 3.27
4
3. 12.8.13b
Table 3.27
3.12.8.14
21
Foundation
reinforced pad footing
BS 8110
ref.
CALCULATIONS ourPuT
Tob{e33
U se. ow.sat
4o
cover
No..sd cover
40M,l.r4$
LOADI.JC
ICxr CIu-ec
ov
5YC2OO -10) = 7. s
Avers c
fr\ =
- c,o-4o-z5 =
3x 0' 0.017
P,.4 r9uw4
4o,27S0xS52
o.954xO.9SS35 (Q5122)
44
3.
i.3.4(' )
3 113 4(2)
3L7.2
ULTIP.4ATh
SAR
Co4.or I
Sk
- V4f
t91
2 fI3751317s5o %s) :ookM
V.
SO'IO' i5o
's.3S
force V 4n coLa.=
f37s-a'so-2xS3S}
k4
2 1375
12.
V
't "
27SOcS3S
cka) V 1O SI - 4xoox5S
Crtt ,Q.rqk.r 4 (3oo + 3 x S5) 7., 20 ArwL (0.1x0.')
Baror. 2(75.G) V = 034. .'( O
Co4.or 2 p L4.v S\Qr) *.e ore.
<soHJ
u
ii
7G'20 x 535
LI J
Jr .,L
54
3'12U27
.II. .2
AC.W4
cL
2750< 535
3O< 7SOr
317 O.3
soc SOcrs,eo.cA
C.riK wiftk ok,,
22
1
ground 600 pressure
AAAAAAAA
= 200
2750
.4
A
_J2O-t- &5OI
PLAN
4T25 -2
Cover =40
Mn,.
2aB--3oo
COVER.
BI 4O
2\4
-is A
Scak, i:SO
It
rnark 1\oles
pa
23
460
ist 175
4000
250
14300 900
Shear waD
external plain concrete wall
BS 8110
ref. CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
.94.3
4o
, lc.rt stc ck..
2Ow.wt.
ye
C.
O.S(3Z3+8.S) 49.5k/
c4 1t4.kJM
(99 CLf 2
0<1 Dt4
k
ktO
VSbS22/ec. V: V5S
- O C (CpQr (kc
WIND
O85'< + 3)'>Q. J
tA O.5x4234'O
() LL4 . '20
+49.7k4/ -
l42j
T\.21
.4
e43
44
V.RTCA.L LOA1G
Locu.
coaj.
4< 2O
3,
IEN11'( (U.L,S. sg
1.4 114.G
Lcc1;')
# x B 204SkN/M.
x(44+27S447) oskJ4J
C e3
eoo. = (1.3/)
2o.ik\ (
0,tL
\<
144L/ /tA4
,1
L)L.
4 \5
x4.G14-3 13
'- 24 0./Av
7( 14300
ok
y3
,i2.3.4.2
3, 2 .4.
3.1'Z.3..1
ThE PRovtso
14.3
40 ;x3f(4.7+4.o)x
;o r
DQ.rt.t vU
(78.SA)
T1O2oo4R,
C
u4jc4: rca4
FOOTIUC Mox.
cue. dcat # + w4
oDwt.ck)
4 '(a- 27 S#497 .
resr = 2I kf3
'1
ZSJQ
4 ev
tLte.
pA 72E,
;.i_io
OKO' 2So
tLc.k) cL = 2oo
ccec 01 lox'2Q.
oo4 1, 2.4
ottd".
)S
Tv e co
(3-772/1...C)
24
3.9.4.19
Table 3.27
3
4,5,6
3.12.3.4 7,8
9
Wall starters match vertical reinforcement. Minimum projection of horizontal legs beyond the
wall face is a design tension bond length = 35 x 182/377 < 12 = 203 mm < 287 mm. This provides
the footing reinforcement. Minimum projection above top of base is a compression lap + kicker
= 35 x 2 + 75 = 495 mm, say 525 mm, i.e. lap = 450 mm.
Underside of footing is concrete blinded, cover = 4(1 mm.
Minimum longitudal reinforcement provided.
Minimum vertical reinforcement. Area = 254
T 12 bars provide reasonable rigidity for handling and help stabilize the cage during erection.
Minimum projection above top of firstfloor level is a compression lap + kicker = say 25 mm.
Lap = 450 mm.
Minimum horiiontal reinforcement. Area = 438 mni7m. (T10 @ 200 EF = 786 mm'/m.)
Provide at least a tension lap = 35 x 0 = 350 mm. say 450 mm to satisfy shrinkage and thermal
requirements.
Bars are placed outside vertical reinfircenient to provide maximum control against shrinkage and
thermal cracking. Those bars in the wall 05 in below firstfloor slab act also as interna] ties.
Tension lap 6)r tie = 35 >< 10 = 350 mm, say 450 mm.
Peripheral tie at first floor. 1,bars at either end provide continuity with edge beams.
Laps. say 450 mm.
Wall spacers maintain location of each face of reinforcement.
25
Staircase
3500
end-span continuous slab
175
5060
BS 8110
ref.
CALCULATIONS OUTPUT
3?
T.$ Ie 3
.toor
4 RLVrt 4
RE.1STAI4C.
c'-
ri )
o. z
LoA4
Ave.rMe ctb
L c.e.cc
o.k...
= 2so
.0
05
k/ = 4.OkJ3/
k Q, S kN/ k
4.Okt/
T3S
.4'I
1tivtor SLLr= o.itFL= Q'11x77.5x'O 43.
TI1AT .Ms
eo r4et
O =
3$. 3Id/M.
E L2Q
w*st
44
To.bte.38
4FOR.CMeNT 1\
43.1<o
A5 -
0.049 =
04
0 77-Sx 10
C&.Jc
SLto.r: V = O.31/n<v
d=
ToP
C o t2/
e
0TTOM
Tt2. i'.O
C7s4z/p.)
.
ok
344
T.b\3'tO
= .3>cO
4O 57t =
3
Mod s,cvce. strec.c. 232 a =
I.
- 0k.
3VZIt 27
CACK
<K2 oa.
ok,
r.t ttL
M. co
re 4 = (s
c.
o1TOM
4-T2
(4 t)
Ie.r'a T.e.
ooc
Pre srase. -
91
3-
73 2T%2
26
Table 3.27 1,5,6
Table 3.25 2,,9
34 Tio-E
Main tension reinlorcemcnt. Lap lengths and anchorage bond lengths = 35 x 12 = 420 mm, say 450 mm.
Laps arc located to facilitate likely constructions equencesS.i milarf
both measured from lace of support. Similar for bar mark 14.
libars provide 50% midspan reinforcement in both top and bottom at end support =
= 286 mmlrn.
Use 110 @ 15(1 = 524 mill/ni to match spacing of span bars. 1.ap, say 450 mm.
Optional ruinfoi cLnlent Minimum ULd = 228 mm Simil u for h
ii mai k
27
Cove.r
FUCHT '5'
CCVE
Commentary on bar arrangement
BS 8110 ref Bar marks Notes
E
E
z
0
z
Rectangular columns
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
01
23 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
16
05 >< 571
2 44
4 :3
M/bh 2 N/mm2
fcu 40
460
d/h 080
concrete
design now being developed by the Reinforced Concrete Council. Versions for both BS 8110 and EC2
are in
preparation. For details write to
6YS.
With increasing emphasis on the cost in use of buildings, there is a trend towards the use of exposed
soffits for
passive cooling. This move to whole life costs will modify the optimum solution, and deep ribbed or
coffereci slabs
are a favoured option to meet daylighting, thermal mass, ventilation and acoustic requirements.
*C oncept - a computepr rogramth ata llows the rapid semi-automated choice of concrete frame while
considering
whole building costs. Produced by the Reinforced Concrete Council. Available from the RCC on 01344
725733.
** Economic concrete frame elements - a pre-scheme design handbook, based on BS 8110, that helps
designers
choose the most viable concrete options. Produced by the Reinforced Concrete Council. Available from the
ECA on
01344 7257U4.
IBC
Cl/Sf B
(28) q4 (K)
UDC 624.073.33.012.45:
624.04.001.3
(Ofl@rete