Saint Louis College

City of San Fernando, La Union

College of Teacher Education
CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
Name: ____________________________________________
Course & Year:
__________________________
CRITERION
Creativity
(15 ts.)

Content &
Accuracy of
Information in
Material
(15 pts.)
Implementati
on
Maximizing of
IMs to teach
the lesson
(10 pts.)
Presentation
(10 pts.)

Cooperating Teacher: _______________________________

Laboratory School: __________________________________

RUBRIC FOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

GOOD
FAIR

POOR

- Shows proper
creativity and
resourcefulness in
preparing and
presenting the IMs
- Variety of materials is
excellent which captures
students attention and
interests (15 pts.)
- IMs are clearly related
to the subject matter.

- Shows proper creativity and

resourcefulness in preparing
and presenting the IMs

- Shows some creativity

in preparing and
presenting the IMs.

- Little creativity and

resourcefulness are
shown.

- Good variety and blending of

IMs which captures attention
of some of the students. (11
pts.)

- Little variety of IMs; few

students are interested.
(7 pts.)

- No variety of IMs.
(3 pts.)

- IMs are related to the subject

matter.

- Topics are clearly

explained and
understood using the
IMs (15 pts.)
- IMs are well developed
aid for implementation
(4 or more senses are
being used)
- IMs can be easily
utilized in other topics /
subject matter
- Clear articulation and
proper volume of voice
in presenting the
relevance of the IMs.
- Very smart and
rational on explaining
and answering
questions (10 pts.)

- Sufficient pieces of
information are gathered
through the use of IMs. (11
pts.)
- IMs are developed aid for
implementation (3 senses are
being used)

- IMs are a little bit

related to the subject
matter.
- There is a great deal of
information that is not
clearly connected to the
IMs. (7 pts.)
- IMs are for
implementation (2
senses are being used).

- IMs are not related to

the subject matter.
(Not applicable in the
subject)
(3 pts.)

VERY GOOD

- IMs can be utilized in other

topics / subject matter. (7
pts.)
- Clear articulation, but no
proper volume of voice in
presenting the relevance of
the IMs.
- Smart and rational in
explaining and answering
questions.
(7 pts.)

- IMs can be partly

utilized in other topics /
subject matter (5 pts.)
- Some mumbling and no
proper volume of voice
in presenting the
relevance of the IMs.
- Smart in explaining the
importance of the IMs,
but not good in
answering questions.
(5 pts.)

- IMs are not an aid for

implementation (1
sense is being used)
- IMs cannot be used in
other topics / subject
matter.
(3 pts.)
- No articulation and
with an audible voice
and the rate is too fast
or too slow.
- Cannot explain the
relevance of the IMs
and cannot answer
questions properly.
(3 pts.)

SCOR
E

Signature of the Cooperating Teacher:

___________

_______________________________________

Total: