Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Bureau of
Business Research
Management problems in retail
grocery stores
HF
t2,o
MIN1STKAT1
310
HI II
MANAGEMENT
l'K<>!
RETAI1
1910
IN
2.
Harvard System
of
Price 50 cents
3.
Harvard System
of
Price 60 cents
4.
6.
6.
Harvard System
of
7.
Harvard System
of Stock-keeping for
Price 60 cents
Out
of Print
Shoe Retailers
Price 60 cents
8.
for
Wholesale Grocers
Price 50 cents
9.
10.
Management Problems
11.
System
of Operating
in Retail
Shoe Stores
Price 60 cents
12.
13.
Management Problems
In Retail
Grocery Stores
Price 50 cents
Price $1.00
BULLETIN NO
Id
Kl\i
(U
iti
si\i --
1:1
-i
\i:
MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS
HI
Ml i.KOCERY
<
II\H\
\MBRIDGE
\KD UNIVERSITY
mi
II
IN
STORES
COPYRIGHT,
1919
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
1093081
rs
c<
OrBM
KK*c
ill
KKTAIL
OaocMT Oiuam
10
10
MNtq
qMM
\:
N.T
PKi.KlT
-'
14
14
15
IhTHODtt
inkier
of
Curtoown
op mm
BA!H
i-r
Bbl
Raoonfa
>.i
I'-
10
20
.'"
Ji
--
Bipedal Btiei
CMEOIT
MKK<HA.SDI.HK
Buying
SoumsB of Supply
Bulk and Packap Goodi
36
37
II
..
ArranfMnent of Merrhandiw
Conduakm
Selling
42
44
44
Expense
44
Buying, M:m:ip -IIM -nt and Offirr
1
STOCK-TURN
I.",
'
i
Mi
M \M>I>I.
45
Brom
45
KKH
\<>
46
Sales
Purchases of Produce
46
46
-,
.17
47
MANAGEMENT
IS
HI-TAIL GROCI
\i\
IN
STORES
IN
last five
yean.
The
management problems
tiell
its field
bered
l.U'i. fniiu
in7<
to
Krooers.
January
um-
ation up
To briiiK tl.
between
be
made
to
enable
and
to
to date
prescomparisons
-nt r.mditiuiM and pre-war conditions, the Bureau has sefor tin- years
cured
l>y
l'l
mail i!:
:md
i,
I'M.'.
-p. .rt-
year 19!
1918nuiK'
information was received were located in forty-one states
and Canada. Some reports were also received incidentally
i
ami
inrliidfd in this
summary.
<h the utorai reporting for 1918 were identic*! only in part
hoi* rrportu.g in 1914-15, tcvtft hmvr ban made which indicate
that the fifura are at fan
&
Thr
retail
grocery business
is
following
ty|X58 of stores:
ordinary grocery stores that are owned and operated as mdividual units.
The chain store company generally maintains a central office
who wish
to
buy
their supplies
Few department
and,
among
profitable.
by the
by
as-
the ad-
and
rent
ment
tin-
is
department
lower than
in
stores,
depart-
stores.
those of the
avenge grocery
store.
Their poet
correspondingly higher.
The hulk of the rt'Uul grocery business
stores that are owned and operated a*
profit
u*
handled by the
idl-
this
<*ports.
OIM i:\ir
lowt-
KN8EB IN BKTAII.
reported to the Bureau for the business year 1918. The comr r.-u-h item is the one that is shown by the
largcM nuintter of stores. It is the one around which all nports tnul to mil.-!-; the most representative, the most
Owing
also because
<
.*
>
oompamons,
h comparisons as the Bureau has been able to make,
operating eipenses in retail grocery stores for
h< last five years indicate that the ratio of total expense to
sales has tended to decline. This means that the outgo for
expense, while it ha.- inrreased, has not increased as fast as
In this connection
th< receipts from sales have risen.
also to be pointed out that the ratio of gross profit to net sales
has declined at about the same rate that percentage of total
t
The items
1!M
Mild
Teased
:ts
iiiueh
:is
If salaries
at
same
the
sorts.
curtailment
Ml'l lt\|i
10
I'.'l
\I.
all
|uip-
SELLING EXPENSE
;ul vert isTotal selling expense includes wages of salesfon
and other selling expense. The lowest figure
-.
ing, wrappings,
figure
was
5.8
<
3%
8.7
% in
figure
was 4.7 %.
II
hay and
penditurea for
feed, gaaolinc
all ..tii.
tenance of
ilr!
the mini
i.
The
ra!l\
iil
',
.1.
co
\jn-iuie
waa
cut
or
appmxm
t>\
and
% in
grocers wboee
total
half
aU.jt
Thi* imi
in
wasgri"
M.-M
li\.
that
7', of
ill
uhirh
:n
tin- if
tin-
Itiirr.-iu
.h\.n.
a
\nltiiii
l.iLsincsfl
i.f
n--.
tlystores,
selling low-
mdiae.
<lnl
not
make
expense.
They
not
.ii.l
Intl.-
a<l<litional
eeonoiny
turn was pi
lrlivrrir>
inadi-
-.
gn.
ery storea
in fa-
oommon
wn
Th.-
of thrir sales
as.
The
mm
d.
retail
n stores that
sthat>
In
the
ami
he average
LI
tin-
higher tm
use in
tin-
VINO AND
MANAGEMENT EXPENSE
it
it
is
of the pro-
a part
buying and
in
large
spends
number of
retail grocers reported that they devoted little time to managing their business. Some of their other expenses and their
losses might be less if they did give more attention to manage-
The common figure for buying, managewas 1.6% in 1918. The common
buying and management expense was 1.7%
ment problems.
ment and office
figure for total
salaries
in 1918.
1'ixKi)
he interest
is paid on borrowed capital, and
on the proprietor's net investment in the business, exdunve
of real estate which is covered by the charge for rent. The
IS
intm* it charged
Mho assets
M he bunn
(not in
linn
for
lh*prn.
here, it
It.
rraliUU)lthcuiiio(thc
h.-ii-ilities
cash, merchanciim*
payable and accrued items such as unpaid taxes (not mortgage* on real estate). The net investment for a corporation
is determined in the same way as for a proprietorship or a
partnership, irrespective of the
issued.
Acharv
-r
lowest
,
If
the store
\\lu.-h
t
nt
fig*
was 0.9% of
stock
ware
capital
was substantially
here
<f
net sales.
leased or owned.
amount
was
1.1
This
is
an
In 1918 the
^hestwas
%.
aroun.l
however.
IiI
nt
*fiii to
14
It appears that
numerous
customers' accounts on
Otljy
DO hope Of
books
About
collection.
which then-
for
1
(ill
was
from
continue to
their
'.Ms varied
figure
ifl
of the retail
pi
gn
who reported
alive.
Only
3%
of the
year.
001008
In 1918, the highest figure fir gross profit was 26.04%; tinlowest figure was 10.5%; and the common figure lii. .)% of
(
net -ales.
ii'n.-s profit is the difference between the cost of the
merchandise sold and the amount of the net sales. Out of this
gross profit expenses are met and what remains is net profit.
(
The common
was 2.3%
of
tin
l>u-im
15
STOCK-Tl
The rap
Merchandise in a
retail
<>f
th- I>ii*ines8.
was
stores.
7.9 times.
1018
Over one-fourth
km than six
The com-
of the storei
a year.
the reports the Bureau has received from
n the stores
retail grocers during the last five years,
uith an annual rate of stock-turn higher than 10 was about
I
iniiiilM
-r
..f
MI
a year.
iMl. 01
In P.MS.
tii,-
\ESS
*1
sales of $55,000
16
as in smaller stores.
in
little larger,
common
less,
-
figure
0.8%.
Stork-turn wMsl.ut
Mow
the average.
volume
appears, therehe manages his business intelligently, can compete successfully with the large ston
.-ales
considerably
fore, that the small grocer,
.f
It
if
ACCOUNTING METHODS
Under present conditions competition is so strong in the
grocery trade, and there are so many opportunities for
unseen leaks and losses from waste, spoilage, and theft, that
the grocer who does not keep good records of his income and
outgo is fortunate indeed if he avoids bankruptcy. Yet a
retail
is
heavy
unsound from the business standpoint, and a heavy burden to
the public, which eventually pays the price of lax method-.
A majority of the retail grocers in the United States at he
present time undoubtedly have records that are inadequate
for their needs or none at all.
The Bureau has found many
cases of retailers who had no accurate information as to their
profits or expenses and who did not know even approximately
where they Stood financially. There are many who never take
an inventory of their merchandise OB hand. Profits cannot l>e
determined, of course, unless an actual inventory of stock
on hand is taken at least once a year. Numerous other merchants who do take an inventory fail to include in tin
t
penses some
5%
b frequently omitted
one-half
of the retail
Fully
do
account
an
of
not
the
merchangrocers, moreover,
keep
dise taken out .f the store for their family use. Thkboot
his busiiiess should bear.
An item
thai
ing method*. I., 'Mii, his sales were 121,000 a year. He did
not take any inventory of his stock on hand. He
his cost of merchandise sold by deducting a certain
age from his sales. This figure was subtracted from the sum
I
vted inventory
ane>
and
-'
f 'le
expenses of his business, and he included a
record of the
salary for himself. Imt lit* did not k
from
IMC.
the
for
He charged
takrn
store
goods
family
his twine,
rh;i>,->
,,f
He
felt
that this
made
and telephone to
i...f
in-'lu-i.-
lli.-in
his pur-
i!i
hi-
'
easier.
bookkeeping
he could have had a complete stateIn March, 1919, the
ment of his account* in full <1< tail
fnun him. This report
.in received another n-p-Tt
pense.
hiii
his inaccurate
methods.
ing the period of five years his business had been going
oonstjtMtlv <ln\vn-hill fr<>m the profit stantl;
-ales,
clur to competition, \\rn- -Imhtly less.
He had just discovered, perhaps too late, that he had lost a substantial sum
of money in the business, and he did not know where it had
life
insurance, tmt
:
18
The
occurring, he probul>ly could have stopped it.
time and effort that would have been required for taking an
annual inventory and keeping a few additional records would
was
profits.
He was
business, in securing
is
In
l'.M4,
in
With such a
drained
large
his profits.
retailer in the
away
19
The inventory
of stork
-I
on luuxl
in
In
m market price*
cxwsenraUve nianagBine&i
unsold stork
ves
at
ntory
considered auumi
pa|M-i
<
luinge,
.||
to avoid
retail
\\lu.-li
i:r.M.-i-
rlmiiulit
.1
loss.
In
the
expenses on the
thesale0.
sales.
.
fH|iialH
of the
nifililliK
artunlly o|Mratinf(
tin-
they
and
were
16| % of
xpenses
thcrcwtof thegoodssold,
WTlf
Koodii sold,
If
ml
pn.fit -jor; of
he wouli
nu thr x'llnm prire
.-Mir
ttiey
at
OVer-
liaml.
(he*
prrarnt.
especial care is necessary
^ork
the
nmr-
Under
lieen earned.
conditions such an
i
dealer'*
IB
riot
shows
any derlm.
HER Or CUSTOMBRS
'I'h.
families.
The hulk
of the sales of
are
to en
20
this average has increased in the last two years. In I'.Hs. the
average annual sales per regular customer for tlio grocers that
reported to the Bureau were $250 to $300. This represented
the average amount of sales made in a year by a grocer to
sell their
con-
this
The number
of stores soliciting orders at the residences of their customers declined somewhat in the last few
clusion.
Delivery expense was about the same in stores that did not
orders at residences as in other grocery stores.
solicit
'he
annual volume of sales by the number of salespersons, including an allowance for the proportion of tin proprietor's time
that is spent in selling. In 1918, the average annual sales per
fl
salesperson in the retail grocery atom from which
were received amounted to about $15,800.
There
in
probably oppor
an
The highest
ifirrnuci in
the
Hureau
has found WHM $43,000 in 1918; this waa a atore with eight
salesmen and an annual volume of aalea of over 13m
u from eompanica oprntting chain
Some scattered in
||,:il
Morr,
in,l|,-:if,-il
ll.. if
:i\, n-.u.h V &)
gnmTV
J-T
I
\JN n~,
A high volume
<
SAI.KS
A largr majority <f th, retail grocers did not keep records
wlm-h showed the amount of goods sold by each stkapcrsoo,
kept Home sort of a record of the sales
In stores operating branches, not
in.-lu. lnm chain stores, about one-third of the firms
kept sales
records of this sort. These were chiefly daily records. Not
..n,-
-..;.
in eight
over
sales records
difficult
of the
i.l'
Mta
it
records,
advantages that
IP
advantageously be
Stores employing more than tliree or four salespersons. Such
reenrds obviously would be only an added expense unless they
were utili/.ed by the manager as a guide for inerea-ini: the
In a retail grocery store with ten or
etiieieney of his force.
i 1 1
<
When
arises it is easy to
provided there
is
some
employed
is
accomplishing.
SPECIAL SALES
An
leaders.
branches.
<
than
Advert
\D\ HRTISING
Advertising
Many
is
a small
who
utili/.ed
this advertising
and display signs for the store were the most effective.
NejcttothesigM,inadvertii^
plays
were the samples supplied to the retailer to be dieVery few of the strictly eaah atom
ated a preference for aamplea. Doubtleaa this was doe
fn,t that cash stores leas frequently have the names
retailers,
<
and addraasea of
their customers, and therefore are not premail um h-t, or to mail the aamplea. The
furnish
a
to
pared
oih.-r forma of advertising most commonly used by retail
than
ig
by grocers
in citiea of leas
in larger cities.
Of the
The
LM'.- Unfa
A num-
stated that th.-y had di- -..nt inn. -.1 the practice,
used trading stamps showed about the same volume of business as other stores. Their advertising expense, however, was
higher. The common figure for advertising expense, which
accord inu' to the System of Accounts for Retail Grocers inrludi* trading stamps and premiums, waa 1 .3% of net arnica in
stores that gave trading stamp*, and 0.3% of net aalea in
24
same as
Stores using
\\hich u>ed
The
Some
tion, carefully
stores said that they gave this special attenplanning their display to fit seasonal demands,
cir-
These conclusions regarding the various forms of advertising are based entirely upon the statements made by the
grocers themselves. In some cases it is possible, of course,
that some forms of advertising may not have been adequately
tried out by the majority of those who furnished reports.
CREDIT PROBLEMS
Only 10.5
elu>ive of chain stores, did a strictly cash business. The average annual volume of sales in these cash stores in 1918 was
stated that about one-half of their sales were credit sales; and
of these stores the credit sales were two-thirds or more
62
in
of sales
Although a
M
somewhat larger number of these did a strictly cash
than waa the case in the fancy grocery trade,
large majority told partly for credit. Eighty-five per eent
<>f
the ii.r.iiuiii-price stores that granted credit usually rei
than
month
Store* that aold low-price merchandise gen.rally gave credit for an even ehotter time. Twenty-five per
hem allowed only one week's credit, and 38% ali
lowed only
wo week*' en
feren
;U
The expense
for total
interest
was
% of net sales.
slightly
less.
Office
(i<
In
iiandise,
and
this
was the
Mi-:i:ril
\\nisi:
l'knl',1
M>
BUYING
m average
ports, buys
hi*
retail grocer, according to the Bureau's remerchandise from not more than ten whole-
salers.
26
is
business becomes
whom
he buys.
more \vm-t h
From the
wholesaler's standpoint, furthermore, the credit risk is generally lessened through concentration of purchases by a
One
these until
n
SOURCES or SUPPLY
1
n the course of
it
in<|uiries
iistiiiiiia
merchandise wa^
regarding the sourcechased. The replies to this inquiry, of course, were estimates,
these seem to furnish some conclusions that are worth
In general, the methods of buying appear to have
u
-h
nun
been
the same in 1018 as in the preceding four years.
Unless otherwise indicated, the statements in the following
Some of the
large majority bought over one-half direct.
that was not In.imht dim from the manir
was
t
from Hour
jol>U-rs.
1 1
grocers.
the n-tailrrs reported that all their sugar was
that sourrr.
Less than
purchased sugar
r\rlu>i\vl\ from the mamr
ft Most of those who did
fifths of
.")
and many
<>f
made
salers
those
who
at least
did not l.uy inclusively from wholeof their purchases from that
a pan
ouree*
Two-thirds of the
u
li<
retail grocers
lessle grocers,
alfand:.
pn
and
in
28
About 4 % bought
grocers.
from manufacturers.
Over
the manufacturers.
The
in
<
-ontrast to the
in tin- articles
purchased a part of their supply direct. Only 8 % of the retailers purchased all their crackers from wholesale grocers.
In the case of bakery goods, which are largely of local produc-
tion
place.
of the retailers.
coffee
from wholesale grocers, 10% purchased over oneand 13% purchased less than one-half
from wholesale grocers. Forty-eight per cent, or almost onehalf of the retailers, purchased coffee exclusively from coffee
roasters
cc-nt
of the
retailers
15
that source.
their spices
About one-third
M
portal
hat
part, hut
not
of their
nll (
purrham
of these
article*
of
essences
(i
>
The proportion piirnhaaing mnlaam dimanufacturcni wan Miiall; 87% bought it only
uh..|,-a!.- LM.xvro.
wholesale
groct-t
fresh vegetables,
the
ami frwh
fruit
varic<i in different
parU of
<<
purchaaed mnrh
farmers than was poanhlc for he retailers in the larger cities.
per cent of the retailers purchased all their butter
<
toduoers,
Many
chases direct.
and
20% made
retail grocers
larg<
About
30%
groc<
dairy products
retailers pur-
makes
fr.nii
it
than
in
the case of
.utter, for
example.
Eggs were purchased either direct from the farmers or from
rommiion mrrrh:int-. juLU-r-. :md ..th.-r di-trihutrr* of
I
fo<
30
the commission merchants
aad jobbers
have
larger -hare
(lie
<>r
radeineggs.
tendency for
In
tl
ports received prior to I'.HS slightly over .">()', of the retailerpurchased all their meat direct from the butchers and packing
made some of their purchases
companies. In addition
'
.">
there.
About 40 %
com-
cated that fewer retailers were buying entirely from cummission merchants and jobbers and that a larger pro|>ortion were
shift
manufacturers.
Numerous
81
Mi IK
80%
<olliiiK
Before
tin
<>nly
in
(!
of
hulk.
h tin- r:irhrr |HTIM| furthermore, nnly
15 r c*)ld package sugar cut inly, hut
I IMS over one-half of
the stores n>i
sold
sugar only
they
jinrkigjM
This difference is so striking a* to in<limt< u law inrn-.
most parts
lurini: tht-
of the country
l.-i-t
tum
retail
about
p^^^gEt
tive years.
hi.-i!
v in
None of the
packages.
90%
hulk,
and
<
1918 over
fruit, coffee,
and tea
in pai-ksgas.
in
and
tea in parkigns
32
butter was sold in every store that furnished a report, ;m<l
over three-fourths of these stores sold butter only in packages.
BRANDS
Along with the increase in the quantity of package goods
an increase in the quantity of branded
merchandise carried. Most of the retailers stated in reply to
be.
ing tendency
customers when ordering goods to specify tinbrands that they preferred.
One of the problems facing the retail grocer is the .-election
of the brands that he is to carry on his shelves. Over one-half
among
their
The
who
good advertising
trade they are likely to retain. In some cases the retailer
obtains a larger gross profit on the private brands and prefers
them on that account. He also is not forced to mark down
his own brands to meet the price-cutting policy of his competitors. The reason most commonly given for he preference
t
for retailer's private brands, however, is that it strengthenthe hold of the retailer upon the trade of his customers. Yet
in
he stores that
a higher gross
sell
profit,
brands.
(,>i
vsim DISCOUNTS
Somewhat over one-half of all
were
main
n>
fa\.r of qua-
quantity cliiicount is a
given for a large order.
V
large retail'
Many
instil
The
rate of stock-turn
IVlKHKSK
v retail
of their stock
sales slips,
84
A suggest^! form (enlarged in size) for these purchase records 18 shown on the opposite page. Tin- form can readily
be varied, of course, to meet the special problems of each
individual store.
inches m <i/r are used.
For these records, cards 3 X
is made OUt for each brand of merchandise earned.
">
One card
first
actual inventory
i-
entered,
is
placed.
date
is
If a certain brand of cocoa were purtwo sixes, for example, one-pound and half-pound,
two of the columns would be used. At the head of the firM
column under "Size" would be written "1 Ib." At tin"
"
would be written
head of the second column under Size
Ib."
an
order
was
for
twelve
When
"|
given
one-pound
"
"
would be entered in the column
12
packages, the number
headed "Size 1 Ib." The total cost of the twelve one-pound
packages would be entered in the column headed "Total
If twenty-four half-pound packages of the same
Cost."
"
"
21
would he entered on the
brand cocoa were ordered.
second line in the column headed "Size \ Ib." The total
cost of the twenty-four half-pound packages would !>< entered similarly under" Total Cost." In the column headed
"
" Cost
the cost for each unit is entered. If the
per Package
total cost of the twelve one-pound packages were $3.60, this
would be divided by twelve and $0.30 entered in the " Cost
"
column. If the total cost of the twenty-four
per Package
half-pound packages were $5.20, $0.21$ would be entered in
"
"
the
Cost per Package column on that line.
chased
in
86
Th
column headed "Selling
of
package
The
is
entered in the
gross pn.fit
in
per-
each
If
If it
were a
ARRANGEMENT OF MERCHANDISE
An investigation has been made by an agent
of the
Bureau
57
\!
im< of business.
-lin.i:
and
11>ry incltided
-.nil
!..
in
top*
tttiiv
ajd
included storm
Thry
a medium grade
sJiio
-.
tort
erf
foods,
m<ii
fixed,
arranging
then
sanx
ores,
..i
it
b obvious
*tore
aad
tt><
observmn
tlirm.
inain
customers can
'ii
'
least
tin-
h
i
tit
uu#t satisf;
-mlu. There
have adopted intentionally a policy
sales counters at points which are not
appears to irm-
The purpose
their customers.
IIM.M
tin
som
are
vaks
b<
st<
passed
play-
is
of
-uiintn* will
be induced to purchase
sales expenses c
It is
doubtful, fur
by mak
MS convenirir
M
Another minor point, which may be
portance
Time
is
of considerable im-
unter
goods. In determining the location n f the mail;
and Mich accessories as scale-, however, the delivery pl:ms
also must lie taken into account
A store that delivers a large
.
portion of
finds
located
at
its
it
where
it
its
main
counter
-ale-
tin-
made up
Nocking
rapidly.
the approach to the main sales counter with merchandise or
with delivery baskets.
In arranging the merchandise,
it
is
primary rule
to
have
merchandise came
there
happened
of goods of the
different places,
and some
of this stock
The
in
result wa.-
three or four
was becoming
-tale.
In general, customers can be served more rapidly and satisfactorily and goods can be bought more intelligently if the
is kept in one place.
have given the most careful attention to
the problems of arrangement, the merchandise is located according to the frequency with which each article or brand is
sold. In one store, for example, on the -helve- directly back
of the main sales counter were breakfast foods.
Then atto
wencanned
the
of
store
front
the
milks, cocoa,
tending
extracts, and spices; to the rear, canned vegetable goods.
The shelves in the rear of the store at the end of the sales
counter were
filled
helves
an.l
CM
wrapped
salesmen to
nlrr-
th.
fill
the
fern*
n&andise carried
Thelocati'
AH- on the anif
possible steps.
ti
re
<
and
roes
and
ravel
frequri
wasted so much
man was small ami
i>
tin-
tin-
MI.H-
pla.-.-,l
tilling
111
where
their
di-
fn-!: trim and vegetables near the door where they could
-everal stores slow-movm
custom*
be s<
were displayed on a table or
and Heasonabli
<>f
'
o.untrr
i
tliat
thi-
d
!y
in
U-liind thr
stodo of
Another method of
advantage.
some stores was to use the shelves immeinerchanmain sales couir
wav thrv roukl dispose of
their
disc
hese
were changed frequc
arrangements for display, however, were not permitted to
uith th< plans for serving customers conveniently
and rapi.lly.
that th<- turn- >|x-nt in arranging the merIt is apparent
attrnii>n.
lays
han.liM syatemnt
means economy
in selling
in the
im-
40
pression given to customers of
of the merchandise sold.
In arranging
merchandise
in
tin-
cleanliness
the storeroom,
and chai
tin-
most suc-
each brand or of each ait le was kept in one place, and those
articles for which the demand was heaviest were located
wheiv they were most readily accessible, 00
to MWe time in
i<
itself.
No record was
and while the agent was in
the store the proprietor gave an order for a widely known
brand of crackers, stating that his stock was exhausted. A
promiscuously,
much
as in the store
had been
a typical
in the
a saving
in
ime by having
among those that are most successful, careful consideration has been given to the arrangement of the delivery basket <
are
according to routes.
n
and result* in much
and tower delivery expense. In a store where
or lew conf union now exists, an inexpensive rack
of handling the banket* several times
km
tiston
times be placed
I:I,-K
<..
in th.-.i. livery
.-.i.i,
mean a worthwhile
grocer*
Having.
ii- of the
fin
management problem
profitable
it
><m.
'
COWOLDI
of the Bureau have covered numerous quesmanagement in addition to those disru*.,1- u'page*.
The testa that h:t\r U^n applied tci th.not in.lt.howev r
uethods that are capein u-s
MM-
PI.
.!<
s,
<r
rrnnnniic:tl
ci:ill\
ihrn-t'on-.
n-a.-hc,!,
protit:tt
th:it
Th.- concluKion
>lr.
tin-
vital
pofoll
iiianageinent of a n-tail grocery store :i
(1
hi
<
has been
m fa
once a
:ir.
(2)
Toscctm-H
Avoiding ov
To
(3)
t*!<>iii
To
(5)
:i
a- tO
\\:i\
aexMirr
:i
'
we and
!.i<
'OCUSlOmeiB.
ill
iiiinununi
irli\-ry
r\|>ense,
Cfx
(6)
employing
xissible.
in-
heavy
lotwen
thr in>t
:in-
and
a ready
inCTH.
SUch
i*
ilfvrlopu^ an.!
In ion, lusion
it
M m:' li.-nini:
i
'h-
from
IMK!
-i
-iii-.-iwfill rrtHil
it
KP
bwiDMMi
few,
-tail
GENERAL
M1.IK
II
\\
USE STORES
The
the research.
so do-ely related to
i<
drawing any
justify
Bureau believes
final
conclusions.
at
Nevertheless,
tin-
enough significance to
this time.
The
in
business year 1918. Of these stores 48% were located in hein the Middle West, 23.5
in the East, 8.5
in
West, 14
the South, and
in the Pacific Coast States. The volume
t
6%
of sales of
nil
kinds of merchandise
$51,000.
higher in
in
MM!), than
in
was 14%
in these stores
January, 1918.
January.
accounted for chiefly by the higher range of
This
is
prices.
have been
The
summary
of
4*
TAW.
I!
HANI
<
\V:iK.-*f
T
J
Sulr.1,,1.-,-
Hbk-I00%
f"
Selling
DM
.
(i
Management and
Office
*
*,
" 17
(ls
Management
0.2
Kx|ieii.ie
and Management
;viiiK
JS
.
Inirn-M
Heat
l'n\\.
tii.l
.1
i.M^)
inrninr :iml
0.49
nni
n;i
0.09
DJO
0.0
OUT
-
oiil
piiH-nt
Repji
.pin.
j. -
:iri.l
Miacellaneoii
<
Total Expense
0.09
0.3
Jll
BJI
0.07
OJ8
IM.J
j,,|
!".*
>ss
n:;s
Q.05
I'pkeep
IV
Ha.l
iit
5.0
29.5
15.5
riT
.\\i
Lwl
Oiifi
S1J
(Jross Profit
Net
Profit (or
Lon).
IJ
1".,
All the
><
TOTAL
e<
corresponded closely to the common figure shown by the reports m-eived for the preceding years. Most of the Btoree
that maintained their
own
figure than this for total expense, but taking the stores as a
whole ">.5
was the standard figure. This includes not only
1
sueli
interest
investment, and
SELLING EXPENSE
The
which varied
figure
was 5.6 %.
1918 from
to 13.08%.
total
of salesforce
common
figure
was 6.4%
DKI.IVKKY KXPENSE
about one-half of the stores had any expense for delivery. In the stores that maintained their own delivery equipment the common figure for total delivery expense was 1.7%
<
>nly
own equipment.
M(
I*] MdKft
i-
partner*
and
The common
nmiianmn
ua-
..fhrr salanr..
.<>t
it, -in
II-KKH- KxiKNJI
rharge* and upkeep expense
o.'>\', to 1.05%. The comI'.HV
was 2.2% of net sales.
D
in h\..l
i
tiuurr
from
iip-d
t,,tal
f,.r
high as the
stores,
that thr
I,
tal
k-tum
-..,
and
also intn,-t
..n
fact
in
merchandise
inrhnlr- inirn-t on MT rowed capiI
t!
-hi.- t..
wasprobtihly
comnx
owing
m^.
pijx
CHMC,K- NM
the
This was
a difference that
general merchandise stores
rade,
Thr rnininon
pensc, whirh
inrlu.lr.s not
!il
r.juipinrn;
net sales.
JM. \\.-r.
and upkeep
5% of
nrt
STOCK
The
11
l:\
IN
.l
v
-
was
13.1 tiroes
year.
46
year. The common
stores in whichever
fiin ire
was
a year.
were groceries,
2.4 times
of the sales
;><!',
ili:m
n
times
hov,
year, li
the rate of stock-turn
1
;i
is
On
01
10%, men's clothing and furnishings 6%, hardware and cutlery 3 %, and crockery and kitchen-ware 1.5 %. In the s;
that carried furniture, the sales in this line amounted to about
In the
amounted
to
farm imple-
about 2.5
$300 a year.
is
13
% of the mere!
cash
m*7
ti
-n
weeks to a month
length nf r, -in ua>
t\\<.
IM<1
III
In ..nr-i.fth
..f
AVKUV..K SM.K-
SM
i-nc
|p|
MOM
high salesforce
in th<
eeononiy
.f
-luiiio
high
PURCHASES OP PRODUCE
In uni.
.i
[Mirrha>rf:mii
inline stores it is
pr<
ncral
the
common
istomenor to accept
in<
practice to
it in trade.
r<
^ut-l that
located.
eggs, 72
% butter, 55
jxMiltry.
7%cream,5 r
II
These
thr
fruit .<md
',
lumU-r.
lanl.
M^
bought
meat and
vegetables, 31
r
1
cot
c grain,
ton, 16.5%
4%
-hn-v
i.-alt in
by general merchandise stores,
woul.l
.i.-uhtleas
be changed if more
figures
rtain sections of the counbeen received
:
.-id
l>ut
48
Tin* amount of produce purchased l'n>m customers ranged
from 1200 to $130,000 in MM*. En th* atom thai purchased
such produce as eggS and butter,
large group reported th;it
the amount <>f their tnt:il purchases of produce wa< from
$1,000 to $8,000, another group fnm $4,000 to $8,000, Then:t
\\ere also
numerous
amount-
a year.
chandise stores.
OF
Scientific
1.
Manaferaent.
Minimum
lylor Hyitrcii of
IICKOI
Volume
2.
BEBTKAKD THOMPSON
An Approach
to
Price $4.00.
Business Problems.
PrkeSLOO.
VolumeS.
Business SutisUcs
.rcu*yt>, I'h
I>.
Prkc 0.76.
Volume
pal
4.
Owncrsh
Price $4.00.
BULLETINS
OF BUS!'
O1
1.
Both Leaded an
-
in 1014
rdual School
of
Bunnc*
Admin-
Publication of the
Harvard University
"
[EDtrl M.y
IT,
lu, at
Boston, MMI..
Harrmrd Uniwilty.
of Business Hetearch
6201
fenAfMmt problem
G72UJ4
in
PLEASE
CARDS OR
DO NOT REMOVE
SLIPS
UNIVERSITY
FROM
THIS
OF TORONTO
LIBRARY