Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PRESENTATION THESIS
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools facilitate the
collection, management, display and analysis of
geographic information useful in regional hydrologic
analysis and watershed planning
Benefits include:
Increased Efficiency of Hydrologic Analysis
More Comprehensive Watershed Planning Capacity
March 2, 2011
Page 2
OUTLINE
Hydrologic Analysis
Watershed Delineation
Watershed Characteristics
Hydrologic Analysis Example
Benefits of GIS-Based Hydrologic Analysis
March 2, 2011
Page 3
March 2, 2011
Page 4
March 2, 2011
Page 5
March 2, 2011
Page 6
March 2, 2011
Page 7
ANALYSIS EXAMPLE
Example Site
#948
March 2, 2011
Page 8
EXAMPLE AREA
Culvert site
Catchment #
March 2, 2011
Page 9
L:W ratio
Catchment
Slope = 0.22%
March 2, 2011
Page 10
Forage
Wet lands
Woody
Vegetation
March 2, 2011
Page 11
March 2, 2011
Page 12
ANALYSIS EXAMPLE
March 2, 2011
Page 13
ANALYSIS EXAMPLE
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
GIS in Hydrology and Watershed
Planning
March 2, 2011
Page 14
WATERSHED
DELINEATION BY
HEC-GEOHMS &
LIDAR
Lake
Winnipeg
Demonstration
region
March 2, 2011
Page 15
Level 1 text
24pt Arial
elevation data
Streams
Level 2 bullet
20pt Arial
added for
clarity
Presentation Title
March 2, 2011
Page 16
Fill Grid
Stream is
burned into
elevation
model
Presentation Title
March 2, 2011
Page 17
Flow Grid
Shows
direction of
raindrop flow
Presentation Title
March 2, 2011
Page 18
Sub-catchments
Dark shades
are higher
elevation than
light
Presentation Title
March 2, 2011
Page 19
West Fisher
Sub-catchments
Manual
delineation of
watersheds
shown for
comparison
Presentation Title
March 2, 2011
Page 20
348 crossings
312 culverts
34 bridges
22 fords
Fisher River
Koostatak
Dallas
Hodgson
Peguis
PR325
Fisher Branch
March 2, 2011
Page 21
North 37%
Ineffective
West 49%
Ineffective
East 11%
Ineffective
GIS in Hydrology and Watershed
Planning
March 2, 2011
Page 22
March 2, 2011
Page 23
March 2, 2011
Page 24
Land
Land
Use
Use
Data
Data
-1966
2002
5 classes
16 classes
March 2, 2011
Page 25
March 2, 2011
Page 26
AECOM Analysis
AECOM
March 2, 2011
Page 27
6
2006 Network Blue
4
5
1
GIS in Hydrology and Watershed
Planning
March 2, 2011
2
Page 28
1966 - No main
stem network
defined
Q: 1%
WL: 0.0m
Q: 5%
WL: 0.03m (1 in)
Q: 27%
WL: 0.08m (3 in)
Q: 595%
WL: 0.6m (22 in)
Q: 7%
WL: 0.08m (3 in)
Q: 12%
WL: 0.5m (19 in)
Q: 8%
WL: 0.09m (4 in)
March 2, 2011
Page 29
100 Yr Flood
2006 Flood
March 2, 2011
Page 30
March 2, 2011
Page 31
March 2, 2011
Page 32
March 2, 2011
Page 33
March 2, 2011
Page 34
March 2, 2011
Page 35
March 2, 2011
Page 36
March 2, 2011
Page 37
March 2, 2011
Page 38
Local
Flood
History
March 2, 2011
Page 39
March 2, 2011
Page 40
March 2, 2011
Page 41
March 2, 2011
Page 42
CONCLUSION
GIS-Based Hydrology and Watershed Planning
Multiple site studies
Aids catchment data collection and spatial analysis
Provides empirical justification of hydrologic analysis assumptions
Infrastructure inventory management
Birds eye view of watershed system
Impact of development
Analysis of flood zone mitigation
March 2, 2011
Page 43
Thank You
Questions?