Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN: 2395-7549
Yamini M. Parmar
Assistant Professor
Department of Mathematics
Government Engineering College, Gandhi nagar (Guj),
India
Abstract
All physical subjects, involving random phenomena, something depending upon chance, naturally find their own way to theory
of Statistics. Hence there arise relations between the results derived for hose random phenomena in different physical subjects
and the concepts of Statistics. Convolution theorem has a variety of applications in field of Fourier transforms and many other
situations, but it bears beautiful applications in field of statistics also .Here in this paper authors want to discuss some notions of
Electrical Engineering in terms of convolution of some probability distributions.
Keywords: A Probability Distribution, An Uniform Probability Distribution, Central Limit Theorem, Convolution, Mean
And Variance of a Probability Distribution, Triangular Function, Unit Rectangle Function
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION
Occurrence of resistance of a resistor, with its tolerance can be expressed as a probability distribution. In those circumstances,
what would be the resultant distribution describing occurrence of resistances of resistors having different resistance and different
tolerances, when combined in series? How means and variances are interrelated with that resultant distribution, is main focus of
this paper. In other words, to obtain probability distribution of sum of two random variables is main objective of this paper.
(3)
() () = ()( )
(4)
One can easily check that the operation of convolution is commutative, associative and also distributive over addition.
Convolution has additive property also. That is
58
1 (1 ) 1 = 1, that is 1 (1 ) = {(11090) 20
0
1
100
Expressing 1 (1 ) in terms of rectangle function, 1 (1 ) = ( 1
), where the rectangle function, denoted by (),
20
20
is defined as
|| < 12
|| > 12
1
() = {
0
(1 100)2 (1 )1 =
110
(1 100)2 1 = 20 [
20 90
20
110
110
90 1 1 = 20 [ 21 ]
(1 100)3 110
90
90
100
3
Similarly for a stock of 50-ohm resisters, with 5-ohm tolerance, another probability distribution2 (2 ), defined, as 2 (2 ) =
1
1
=
45 2 55
{(5545) 10
will describe the frequency of occurrence of resisters.
0
1
50
Expressing 2 (2 ) also, in terms of rectangle function, 2 (2 ) = ( 2 ) and the mean of 2 (2 ), will be 2 = 50
10
25
10
and variance 22 =
3
If an electronic circuit, combining two of these stock resistors in series[2], and suppose the resulting distribution describing the
probability of occurrence of resistances, is denoted by (), then here problem is to know, what mathematical relation, ()
bears with 1 (1 ) and 2 (2 ) when = 1 + 2 . It is clear that = 1 + 2 will vary from 90 + 45 = 135 to 110 +
55 = 165, with mean equal to 150. It is also clear that the probability that assumes a value less than or equal to135, that is
( 135) = 0 and the probability that assumes a value greater than or equal to 165 , that is ( 165) = 0.
Probability that assumes a particular value between 135 and 165, say, = 140, that is 1 + 2 = 140, denoted by (140)
will be that area where this sum assumes value 140.That is 2 should remain 140 1 . Required area will be
1 110
1 =50
1 =50 1
1
(140) = 90 2 (140 1 )1 = 2=30 2 (2 ) 2 = 2=45 2 =
,
20
20
20
10
40
This is an instance of the basic convolution relation between the probability distribution describing the sum of two quantities
and the probability distributions of the given quantities. Now taking in general, let resistor 1 have greater resistance 1 with
tolerance 1 , and resistor 2 have smaller resistance 2 with tolerance 2 . As 1 > 2 and, as 1 > 1 , 2 > 2 , there is
no loss of generality any, if we assume 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 0.
In terms of rectangle functions 1 =
It is quite obvious that 1 =
1
21
1 1
21
1 1 (1 )1
) and 2 =
1
22
1 +1
1
21 1 1 1
1
2 +2
2 2
22
41 1
41
)
= 1
1
42 2
=
= 2
22 22 2 2
42
1 1+1
1 (1 1 )3 1+1 12
(1 1 )2 1 =
12 = (1 1 )2 1 ()1 =
[
]11 =
21 11
21
3
3
2 +2
2
3
(
)
1
1
2
2
2
+
( 2 2 )2 =
22 = ( 2 2 )2 2 () =
[
]22 22 =
22 22
22
3
3
2 = 2 2 (2 )2 =
1 + 1
(1 1 )
1
1
() = 1 (1 )2 ( 1 )1 =
2 ( 1 )1 =
( + ) 2 (2 )2 =
21
21
(1 1 )
1
2
41 2 2 2
59
(1 1 ) < 2 + 2
( (1 1 ) (2 2 )) as (1 > 2 < 1 + 2 1 + 2 ) {
(1 + 1 ) < 2 2
If (1 + 2 ) 1 + 2 ( 1 + 2 ) + 1 2
1 + 1
(1 1 )
1
1
() = 1 (1 )2 ( 1 )1 =
2 ( 1 )1 =
( + ) 2 (2 )2
=
41 2
1
41 2
2 +2
2
2 2
22
41 2
21
1
21
2 +2
1
2
41 2 (1 + 1 )
1
41 2
21
If 1 + 2 + 1 2 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 ,
1 + 1
1
() = 1 (1 )2 ( 1 )1 =
2 ( 1 )1 =
2
=
(1 1 )
1
(2 )2
21 (1 + 1 ) 2
(2 + 2 + 1 + 1 ),
(1 1 ) > 2 + 2
(1 + 1 ) > 2 2
Thus the resulting distribution (), describing the probability of resistances in the electronic circuit, combining two of these
stock resistors in series, = 1 + 2 will be obtained as
as (1 + 2 + 1 2 1 > 2 ) {
1 + 2 1 2
1
41 2
() =
41 2
(1 + 2 + 1 + 2 )
{ 0
()
41 2
{2
22
(5)
1 + 2 +1 2 1 + 2 + 1 + 2
1 + 2 +1 + 2
2 (1 + 2 1 + 2 )
( (1 1 + 2 2 ))
1
=
{ [
]
41 2
2
1
1 + 2 1 2 1 + 2 1 + 2
1 + 2 1 + 2 1 + 2 + 1 2
21
1
Now
((1 +2 1 2 ))
( + + + )
( + + )
+ 22 (21 22 ) +
222
}=
(1 + 2 + 1 + 2 )2 1 2 1 2
]
}
2
( + + )
41 2
This result shows that composite resistance can be readily found using convolution. The composite resistance is distributed
trapezoid ally as described in the expression (5).
= () = (1 2 )() = ( 1 (1 )2 ( 1 ) 1 )
= 1 (1 )( 2 ( 1 ) ) 1 = 1 (1 )( (1 + 1 )2 ( 1 ) ) 1
= 1 (1 ) ( (1 )2 ( 1 ) + 1 2 ( 1 ) ) 1
= 1 (1 ) ( (1 )2 ( 1 )( 1 ) + 1 2 ( 1 )( 1 )] 1
= 1 (1 ) {2 + 1 }1 = 2 1 (1 ) 1 + 1 1 (1 ) 1 = 2 + 1
(6)
2 = ( )2 () = 2 () 2 = { 2 (1 2 )() } 2
= { 2 ( 1 (1 )2 ( 1 )1 ) } 2
= {
1 (1 ) (
2 2 ( 1 )) 1 } 2
(( 1 ) + 1 ) 2 2 ( 1 )) 1 2
1 (1 ) (
1 (1 ) (
{( 1 ) 2 + 2 1 ( 1 ) + 12 } 2 ( 1 ) ) 1 2
1 (1 ) ( {
( 1 )2 2 ( 1 )( 1 )} + 21 2 + 12 ) 1 2
60
1 (1 )(22 + 22 + 21 2 + 12 ) 1 2
= (22 + 22 ) + 21 2 + (12 + 12 ) (1 + 2 )2 = 12 + 22
(7)
The mean = () =
(1 + 2 1 + 2 )
(2
=
41 2 (1 + 2 1 2 )
1 + 2 ) 2 }
1
(1 + 2 1 + 2 )
1
(2
41 2 (1 + 2 1 2 )
(1 + 2 1 2 ) )
(1 + 2 1 2 ) ) +
(1 + 2 +1 2 )
1
21 (1 + 2 1 + 2 )
(1 + 2 + 1 + 2 )
1
41 2 (1 + 2 + 1 2 )
( + + )
{ (1 + 2 +
( + + )
1
2
1
2
1
3 2
2 1 2 1 2
(1 + 2 1 2 )]
{ [
+ 22 [ ]
}
41 2
3
2
2 ( + + )
( + )
1
( + + + )
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
+
{ [ (1 + 2 + 1 + 2 )
]
}
41 2
2
3 ( + + )
1
1
(1 + 2 1 + 2 )2 (1 + 52 1 2 ) (1 + 2 1 2 )3
=
{
+
+ 42 (1 + 2 )(1 2 )}
41 2
6
6
3
2
(1 + 2 + 1 + 2 )
1
(1 + 2 + 1 2 ) (1 + 2 + 1 + 52 )
+
{
}
41 2
6
6
2(1 + 2 )
{ (1 + 2 )2 + 3(1 + 2 )2 ) + 122 (1 2 ) 2(1 2 )(1 + 52 ) (1 + 2 )2 + (1 2 )2 }
=
241 2
2(1 +2 )
{3(1 + 2 )2 + 122 (1 2 ) 2(1 2 )(1 + 52 ) (1 2 )2 } = (1 + 2 ) = 1 + 2 . The variance
=
241 2
1 +2 1 +2
2 = ( (1 + 2 ))2 ()
1 +2 1 2
={
1 +2 +1 2
1
1
( (1 + 2 1 2 )) +
( (1 + 2 ))2
41 2
21
1 +2 1 +2
1 +2 + 1 +2
1
+
( (1 + 2 ))2
((1 + 2 + 1 + 2 ) )
41 2
1 +2 + 1 2
( (1 + 2 ))2
1 +2 1 +2
1
((
41 2 1 +2 1 2
( (1 + 2 )) + ( (1 + 2 )) (1 + 2 )) +
1 +2 + 1 +2
1
41 2 1 +2 + 1 2
4 1 +2 1 +2
((1 +2 ))
1
{[
]
+ (1 +
41 2
4
1 +2 1 2
3
1 +2 +1 2
(
1 +2 1 +2
(1 + 2 ))2 +
( ((1 + 2 ) )3 + ( (1 + 2 ))2 ( 1 + 2 )) }
2 ) [
((1 +2 ))
3
3 1 +2 1 +2
}+
1 +2 1 2
3 1 +2 +1 +2
((1 +2 ))
2 ) [
1
21
21
((1 +2 ))
3
3 1 +2 +1 2
1 +2 1 + 2
4 1 +2 +1 +2
((1 +2 ))
1 +2 + 1 2
1
41 2
{( 1 +
1 +2 + 1 2
(1 + 2 )3
(2 1 )4 (1 + 2 )4
(2 1 )3
1
1 2(1 2 )3
{
+ (1 + 2 ) (
+
)} +
{
}
41 2
4
4
3
3
21
3
(1 + 2 )3 (1 2 )3
1
(1 + 2 )4 (2 1 )4
+
{( 1 + 2 ) {
}
+
}
41 2
3
3
4
4
(2 1 )3
1
(1 + 2 )4
82 (2 1 )3
(1 + 72 )
=
{
+
}
41 2
6
6
6
(12 + 22 )
1
=
{(1 + 2 )4 (2 1 )4 } =
= 12 + 22
241 2
3
Thus the results (6) and (7) hold true.
What happens if both the resistors are having same resistance as well as same tolerance?
That is if 1 = 2 = and 1 = 2 = then () will be defined as follows:
=
() = {
That is, () =
1
2
1
(2( ))
42
1
(2(+)
)
42
0
2
2
2()
2() 2
(8)
2 2( +)
2( +)
61
() = {
2(+) 1
= 2() 2 ( 2( )) + 2
4
(2(+))2
2
|| > 1
|| 1
1 = 2 , 1 = 2 and
In this case,
()
0
1 ||
2(+)
}=
1
4 2
4 2
2 2(+)
2 2
2(+) 1
3 2(+)
[ ]
3 2
1
4 2
2 2
{[
(2())
2
+
2()
{ 2 2 + 2 2 } = 1.
= () = { 2() 2 ( 2( )) + 2
4
2( + ) [ ]
(2( + ) )
}=
1
42
163
3
8()3
3
42
(2( + ) ) } =
+ 4( )3 + 4( + )3
8(+)3
3
1
42
3 2
{[ ]
3 2()
2 2
2( ) [ ]
2 2()
83 }
1 8 3 4( )3 4( + )3
1
{
+
+
} = 2 {23 + 23 + 6 2 } = 2 = 21
4 2
3
3
3
3
2 = ( 2)2 ()
2(+)
1
1
2 (2(
( 2)
(
=
(
2(
))
+
+ ) )
2
2 2)
4
4
2()
2
2
2(+)
1
((2 )3 + 2(2 )2 ) }
=
{
(( 2)3 + 2( 2)2 ) +
2
4
2()
2
2
( 2)4
1
{ [
]
2
4
4
2()
=
+ 2 [
2(+)
( 2)3
(2 )4
]
[
]
3
4
2()
2
2(+)
2 [
1
4
4
8 2
{4 4 + 16 4 4 + 16 } =
= 2 12
2
4
3
3
3
(2 )3
]
3
2
By (5) and (8), it can be observed that the original distributions had been more rounded by convolution. If more elements were
connected in series then the tendency toward smoothness would be more advanced. If a large number of functions are convolved
together, the resultant may be very smooth and as the number increases indefinitely, the resultant may approach Gaussian
form.[2] In Statistics Gaussian distribution is referred to as normal distribution with zero mean and standard deviation one,
where the normal distribution is defined as
1 2
1
( ) =
2( ) ,
2
Where is a continuous random variable. The rigorous statement of the above stated tendency of protracted convolution is
nothing but the theorem known as the central-limit theorem.[1].
If is the mean of a sample of size taken from a population having the mean and the finite variance 2 , then =
is
a random variable whose distribution function approaches that of the standard normal distribution as . [1]
From the central limit theorem, it follows that if several, n functions are convolved together or a function is self-convolved n
times, the result approaches Gaussian distribution.[3] Therefore it follows that if several random quantities are added, then the
frequency distribution of the sum will approach a Gaussian distribution.
VIII. CONCLUSION
Distribution of sum of two random variables is convolution of distributions of those random variables. Composite
resistance of two resistors, combined in series, is obtained by convolution of distributions of those resistors.
Convolution has additive property of means of the components. The mean value of the composite resistance of two
resistors, combined in series, is the sum of the means of those two resistors.
Variances are also additive under convolution. Variance of composite resistance of two resistors, combined in series,
is addition of variances of those two resistors.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
Richard A. Johnson, Miller & Freunds Probability and Statistics for Engineers, Sixth edition
Ronald N. Bracewell, The Fourier transform and its applications, International edition 2000, McGrow-Hill Education.
Rashmi R. Keshvani, Yamini M Parmar, An approach to various Probability Distributions through Convolution., international journal of Physical,
Chemical & Mathematical Sciences. Vol-3, pp-1-8, July-Dec- 2014
62