Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 70

1. a.

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The Summer Project study A STUDY ON RATIO ANALYSIS AT VERSA LITES


AND LUMINARIES PVT. LTD. BANGLORE is done in partial fulfillment of the
requirement of the degree of Master of Business Administration course.
The Summer Project started on 24t

for a span of 6

weeks, under the guidance of Mr. B.D.Roy the vice president of Versa Lites and
Luminaries and Ms. A. SAHANA, M.Sc., MBA, M.Phil, faculty guide for Summer
Project.
A project is scientific and systematic study of real issue or a problem intended and
skills. The study can deal with a small or a big issue in an organization. The problem can
be from any discipline of Management. It can even be a case study where a problem has
been dealt with through the process of management. The essential requirement of a
project is that it should avail scientific collection analysis and interpretation of data
leading to valid conclusion.
Working on a particulars project is the best way to practice what we have learnt
theoretically. Project work provides us an opportunity to investigate a problem and apply
our knowledge in practical situation.
The chief objective of the summer project is to familiarize myself with functions of
firm & their performance, thereby exposed practically to understand the functions of the
organization.
Versa lites was started in the year 1985/86 with eight persons. It is basically a
knowledge-based company in lighting, which is a combination of, know how, know why,
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

and know what embedded into one entity. Versa lites is focused on designing and
manufacturing environmental friendly and energy conserving lighting products at the
economical prices. The hierarchy that present in the organization is horizontal. Versa lites
and luminaries offers wide range of products to its industrial customers, they are wide
range of ballasts, transformers for fluorescent lamps. Company products are about 25 in
number with some products done only to order. In spite of all the odds company face,
they believe in right service and value for money to their customers. Company
sincerely replaced all the chokes which have run bad within the warranty period.
Companys major products are Pattis and Chokes, Miniature fluorescent lamps,
Circular fluorescent lamps, 2 D lamps, parallel fluorescent lamps, High pressure
mercury vapour lamps, High pressure sodium vapour lamps. Versa lites manufacture/
fabricate original equipment products for GE, PHILIPS and WIPRO. These companies
i.e., GE, PHILIPS and WIPRO specify the products or approve/ accept Versalites
products with due testing. GE, PHILIPS and WIPRO sell Versalites products in their
respective brand name. Versalites also sell their products to people approved by GE like
Fluolite and Dhruv electricals. Also versalites sell their products under its brand name
versalites to wholesalers, retailers and local customers depending on demand.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

1. b. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A STUDY ON RATIO ANALYSIS AT VERSA LITES AND LUMINARIES
PVT. LTD. BANGLORE
Ratio Analysis is an important technique of analyzing the financial statement and
it helps the analyst to make quantitative judgment with regard to concerns financial
position and performance.
An efficient financial management is becoming inevitable for every manager in
todays corporate world. When initially the stress was on the internal analysis of the firm,
procurement of funds, management of assets and allocation of capital, the present
importance has shifted to decision making within the firm. With the modern aspect of
finance function the responsibilities of the finance manager has also increased. In the
process of making optional decision, he makes use of certain analytical tools in the
analysis, planning and control activities of the firm. Financial analysis is an essential
prerequisite for making sound financial decisions.
This report helps to understanding the volume of the profit and its reasonableness
and it also helps to understand the movement of profit over a period of time. It reveals the
reason for the variation in the profit and present position of the company.
Any one would like to know its position against its competitors. The ultimate
performance indicator of any company is the financial parameters, because invariably all
costs efficiencies; activities and solvency position of the company will be reflected in the
financial mirror.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

These ratios help to identifying the financial strength and weakness of the firm by
properly establishing relationship between the items of the balance sheet and the profit
and loss account and also knowing the profitability, efficiency and growth of the
company.
The sources of data is Versa Lites previous years balance sheet. The firm has
utilized its asset in the formal manner to yield maximum profit. The net income position
is fairly good. The earning power of the firm improved in the last 4 years. The cash
balance in the firm is very poor. The working capital level in the firm is very high. There
is a mismatch between debts to asset position. The interest coverage proportion is in
match with industry standard.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

2. DESIGN OF THE STUDY


2.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
Title of Study: A STUDY ON RATIO ANALYSIS AT VERSA LITES
AND LUMINARIES PVT. LTD. BANGLORE
The type of research used for the collection & analysis of the data is Descriptive
Research Method.
The main source of data for this study is the past records of the company that is its
balance sheet, profit & loss a/c, broachers. The focus of the study is to determine the
performance of the company, its allocation of assets & liabilities, and analysis of
companys profitability by finding various ratios of the company.
The data regarding company history & profile are collected through Descriptive
Research Design particularly through the study of secondary sources and discussions
with individuals.

2.2 Statement of Problem:


The statement of the problem under study is A study on Ratio Analysis with special
reference to Versalites and Luminaries Pvt. Ltd. Banglore.
This study is made in the light of different tools of financial management such as
comparative statements, common size statements, trend analysis and ratio analysis. The
study broadly makes an attempt to determine the overall financial performance of a firm
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

from last four years. Since finance is an important parameter of every business concern to
determine the growth and profitability the study of the topics sounds momentous.
Purpose of the Study
The study was conducted in Versalites and Luminaries for the purpose of
fulfillment of curriculum.
The main purpose is to make the thorough study on the growth and working of
the company from its inception till date.
The purpose is to assess the companys trend specifically for last four years
with regard to operational performance.
To examine the factors affecting the financial and operational performance of
a company.
The main focus is to identify the loopholes of the company and give suitable
solution to the problem based on analysis.
2.3 Objectives for the study:

To evaluate the financial position through Ratio Analysis.

To evaluate the performance of financial aspects of Versalites


(Financial Analysis) with Dupont Analysis.

To analyze and interpret the financial statements of Versalites and


Luminaries.

To know about the soundness of the financial performance of the firm.

To know the capital structure of the firm.

To study validity of tools of financial statements in real life situation.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

2.4 METHODOLOGY
This is a Descriptive Research Method that aims at studying the Ratio Analysis
followed at the Versalites and Luminaries Pvt. Ltd.
The quality of the project work depends on the methodology adopted for the
study. Methodology, in turn, depends on the nature of the project work. The use of proper
methodology is an essential part of any research. In order to conduct the study
scientifically, suitable methods & measures are to be followed.

In order to determine the essential features; the study has been designed to collect
the views and information about the Ratio techniques followed by the managers who are
party to the same and the various employees of the organization. The data has been
collected through the information provided by the managers and employees of the
organization.
Data Collection
The data collection is one of the important aspect in the research design purely
because, it is the way that how we can get answer to the research question.
Data Details: - Data relating to firm is required for the study i.e., about the profit and
loss Account, and Balance sheet for calculating various ratios.
The data is collected in two ways:

Primary Data

Secondary Data

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

Primary Data:The primary data collection is one of the key tools used by the researcher for data
collection. It is the first hand information collected by the researcher from the
respondents directly. Primary data is collected through observation and communication.
Secondary Data:The secondary data is another form of data collection, where the data is collected
from the existing records, company manual and form previously carried out research
work.
All the details are collected from secondary sources only. Secondary data includes
the annual reports, financial reports of the company etc., discussion with the concerned
officials has also helped to verify and evaluate the variations and results either to confirm
it.

2.5 Scope of the Study:


A study has been conducted for versalites and luminaries located at Bengaluru,
which mainly caters to the needs of the corporate sector. The focus of the study covers
fewer aspects of the Ratio Analysis of the firm.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

2.6 Limitations of the Study


The study has following Limitations.
1. The non-availability of a number of managers due to their busy schedule
also proved to be a constraint.
2. Confidential matters would not be easily revealed.
3. Due to time constraints the study was limited only to six weeks.
4. The study is fully evident and based on the monetary information provided
by the organization.
5. The data mainly has been collected from secondary sources and less
chances to gather primary information due to time constraints.
6. Again, due to lack of time, all the ratios are not calculated for the analysis
purpose.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

3. THEORETICAL OVERVIEW

INTRODUCTION TO FINANCE
Finance is lifeblood of the economy. It is one of the major components, which
activities and stimulates the overall growth of the economy. Finance is a body of
principles and theories, which deals with rising, and acquiring of funds on reasonable
terms, and use of money by the acquirer.
In the modern money oriented economy, finance is one of the basic foundations of
all kinds of economic activities. It is a master key, which provides access to all the
sources for being employed in manufacturing and merchandising activities. It is rightly
said that, Business needs money to make more money. Efficient management of every
business enterprise is closely linked with efficient management of finance. Hence, a wellknit financial system directly contributes to the growth of the economy.

Introduction to Business finance:


According to Guthmann and Dougall, Business finance can be broadly defined
as the activity concerned with the planning, raising, controlling and administering the
funds used in the business.
Business finance is that business activity which is concerned with acquisition and
conservation of capital funds in meeting financial needs and overall objectives of a
business enterprise.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

10

Finance is regarded as the life blood of a business enterprise. This is because of


modern money oriented economics; finance is one of the basic foundations of all kinds of
economic activity. It is the master key which provides access to all the sources for being
employed in the manufacturing and merchandising activities. It has been rightly said that
business needs money to make more money, however it is also true that money we got
more money is only when it is properly managed.
In general business finance may be defined as the provision of money at the time it is
needed. It is also defined as procurement of funds and their effective utilization.
It is clear that the terms business finance involves rising of funds and their effective
utilization, keeping in view that overall objective of the firm. This requires great caution
and wisdom on the part of management. The management makes use of various financial
techniques and devices for administering the financial affairs of the firm in the most
effective and efficient way.

Functions of business finance:

The functions of a financial manager are to plan cautiously, control and execute the
financial objectives with great care. He should review and control the financial decision
to commit or recommit the funds to new or outgoing uses. Thus, in addition to raising
funds, financial management is directly concerned with production, marketing and other
functions of an enterprise.
The main functions of business finance are:
1. Funds requirement decision.
2. Financing or capital-mix decision.
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

11

3. Investment or long-term asset-mix decision.


4. Liquidity or short term asset-mix decision.
5. Dividend or profit allocation decision.

Financial management:
Sound financial management is necessary in every organization. Collins Brooks has
remarked that, Bad production management and sales management have stain hundreds,
but, a faulty financial management have stain in thousands.
Financial management is managerial activity, which is concerned with the
anticipation of financial needs, acquiring financial resources, allocating funds in business,
administrating the allocating of funds and accounting and reporting to the management
over the financial matters.
Objectives of financial management:
The firms investment and financing decision are unavoidable and continuous. In
order to make them rational, the firm must have certain goals.

The main objectives of financial management are:


1. Profit maximization as a social obligation.
2. To ensure wealth maximization.
3. To have a balanced asset structure, that is, proper balance between fixed
assets and current assets.
4. To maintain liquidity to meet the upcoming obligations.
5. To ensure fair returns to share holders.
6. To have an efficient and disciplined financial structure.
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

12

7. To avail the creation of resources needed by the firm.


Finance and various departments:

Marketing
department
Research

Operations

department

department
Finance
department

Information

Purchase

department

department
Human
resource
department

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

13

Finance and accounts department:


The finance department is the controlling point of the organization. The finance
and accounts are interconnected to each other. The main objectives of these departments
are cost control, funds management, decision making.
Finance and purchase:
The purchase department is connected to finance department by forwarding delivery
challan and purchase order copy to it. Finance personnel will verify the DC and purchase
order and if it is satisfactory, then payment is made and recorded in the books of
accounts.
Finance and Human resources:
The human resources department will send the attendance recorded by the punch card
machines of the employees and according to the salary statement sent by the human
resource department, the salaries to the employees are made every month and recorded in
the account.
Finance and marketing:
Marketing budget of the business will be issued by the marketing department at the
beginning of the year as per the budget; finance department will issue money and records
the transactions in the book.
Finance and operations:

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

14

The funds required during the operations are planned and provided by the finance
department. All the expenses meet during the time of operations are recorded in the book.

Ratio analysis:
Ratio analysis is the most widely used method for the analysis of financial
statements. The item of figures found in the financial statements will be very useful only
when one item is compared with another item. Ratio is a term that establishes relationship
between two mathematical figures. In other words RATIO is an expression of
quantities relationship between two numbers. A relationship between two quantities,
normally expressed as the quotient of one dividend by the other.

Meaning of ratio analysis:


Ratio analysis is the technique of the calculation of a number of accounting ratio
from the data or figures found in the financial statements. The comparison of the
accounting ratio with those of the previous year or with those of other concerns engaged
in similar line of activities or with those standards or ideal ratio and the interpretation of
the comparison.

Nature of ratio analysis:


Ratio analysis is a power full tool of financial analysis. A ratio is defined as the
indicated quotient of two mathematical expression and as the relationship between two
or more thing. In financial analysis, a ratio is used as a bench mark for evaluating the
financial position and performance of a firm. The absolute accounting figures reported in
the financial statements do not provide a meaning full understanding of the performance

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

15

and a financial position of a firm. An accounting figure conveys meaning when it is


related to some other relevant information.

For example: Rs.5 crores net profits may look impressive, but the firms performance
can be said to be good or bad only when the net profit figure is related the firms
investment. The relationship between two accounting figures, expressed mathematically,
is known as financial ratio (or simply as ratio). Ratio helps to summaries large quantities
of financial data and to make qualitative judgment about the firms financial
performance.

Importance of the ratio analysis:


The importance of ratio analysis lies in the fact it preserves facts on a
comparative basis and enables the drawing of the inferences regarding the performance of
a firm. Ratio analysis is relevant in assessing the performance of a firm in respect of the
following aspect.

Liquidity position:

With the help of ratio analysis conclusions can be drawn regarding the liquidity
position of a firm the liquidity position of a firm would be satisfactory if it is able to meet
its current obligation when they become due. A firm can be said to have the ability to
meet its short term liabilities if it has sufficient liquid funds to pay the interest and its
short maturing debt usually with a year as well the principle.

Long term solvency:

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

16

Ratio analysis is equally useful for accessing the long term financial viability of a
firm this aspect of the financial position of a borrower us of concern to the long term
creditor security analysis and the present and potential owners of a business the long term
solvency is measured by leverage/capital structure and profitability ratios which focus on
earning power of a firm in the respect.

Operating efficiency:
Yet another dimension of the usefulness of the ratio analysis relevant from the view
point of management is it throws light on the degree of efficiency in the management and
utilization of its asset, it would be recalled that the various activity ratios measure this
kind of operation efficiency in the fact the solvency of the firm is in the ultimate analysis
dependence upon the sales revenues generated by the use of its assets total as well as its
components.

Over profitability:
Unlike the outside parties are interested in the financial position of a firm the
management is concerned about the overall profitability of the enterprises that is they are
concerned about the ability of the firm to meet its short term as well as long term
obligation to its owners and secure, optimum utilization of asset of a firm. This is
possible if integrated view is taken and all ratios considered together.

Inter-firm comparison:

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

17

Ratio analysis not only throws light on the financial position of a firm but also
serves as a stepping stone to remedial measures this is made possible due to inter-firm
comparison with industry averages and single figures of particular ratio is meaningless
unless it related to some standard or norm one, the popular techniques is to compare the
ratios of a firm with the industry averages it should be reasonable expected that the
performance of a firm should be broad conformity with the industry to which it belongs.
As inter-firm comparison would demonstrate the relative position vis--vis competitors.

Helps in decision-making:
Financial statements are prepared primarily for decision-making. But the information
provided in financial statement is not an end in itself and no meaningful conclusion can
be drawn from these statements alone. Ratio analysis helps in decisions from the
information provided in these financial statements.
Helps in financing forecasting and planning:
Ratio analysis is of much help in financing forecasting and planning. Planning is
looking ahead and the ratios calculated for a number of years work as a guide for the
future. Meaningful conclusion can be drawn for future from these ratios. Thus, ratio
analysis helps in forecasting and planning.
Utility to investors:
An investor will like to assess the financial position of the concern where he is going
to invest. His first interest will be the security of his investment and then return in the
form of dividend or interest. Ratio analysis will be useful to the investors in making up
his mind whether present financial position of the concern warrants future investment or
not.
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

18

Utility to creditors:
The creditors or suppliers extend short-term credit to the concern. Current and acid
test ratios will give an idea about the current financial position of the concern.
Benefits to employees:
The employees are also interested in the financial position of the concern especially
profitability. Various profitability ratios like gross profit, operating profit, net profit etc.,
enable employees to put forward their viewpoints for the increase of wage and other
benefits.

Advantages of ratio analysis:

1. Ratio analysis simplifies the understanding of the financial statement.


2. A financial analysis can diagnose the financial condition of an enterprise
and interpretation of accounting ratio tells the whole story of the changes
in the financial condition or position of the business, they evaluate the
important aspect of the conducts of the business like liquidity, solvency,
capital gearing profitability etc.
3. Ratio analysis is an invaluable aid to the management in the efficient
discharge of its basic functions of forecasting, planning, communication,
control, etc by and analytical study of the past performances of the
business trends in cost, sales, profit and other related facts can be
understood and on the basis of such trends that is the past ratios future
events can be forecasted.
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

19

4. Ratio facilitates sinter firm comparison that is it provides the necessary


data for inter firm comparison, that is it provides the relevant data for the
comparison of the performance of the different departments or division of
the same firm.
5. Ratios are very useful not only to the insider i.e. management but also to
outsiders like creditors, investors etc
6. Ratios are very useful in establishing standard costing system and
budgetary control.
7. Ratio analysis can also help us to check whether a business doing better
this year than it was last year: and it can tell us if our business is doing
better or worse than other businesses doing and selling the same things.
8. It measures profitability and solvency of a concern.
Disadvantages or limitations of ratio analysis:

1. Limited use of single ratios:


A single ratio usually does not convey much of the sense to make better
interpretation a number of ratios have to be calculated which is likely to be calculated
which is likely to confirm the analyst then help in making any meaningful conclusion.

2. Inherent limitations of accounting:


Like financial statement ratios also suffer from the inherent weakness of
accounting records such as their historical nature ratios of the past are not necessary to
indicators of the future.

3. Change of accounting procedure:

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

20

Change of accounting procedures by a firm often makes ratio analysis misleading.

4. Personal bias:
Ratios are only means of financial analysis and not an end itself. Ratios have to be
interpreted and different people interpret the same ratio in different way.
5. Incomparable:
Not only industries differ in their nature but also two firm of the similar business
widely differ in their size and accounting procedure, it makes compression of ratios
difficult and misleading due to various financial terms used in the ratio analysis.

6. Absolute figures destructive:


Ratios devoid of absolute figures may prove distractive as ratio analysis is
primarily a quantitative analysis and not a qualitative analysis.

7. Price level changes:


While making ratio analysis no consideration is made to the changes in price
levels and this makes the interpretation ratios invalid.

8. Ratios are not substitutes:

Ratio analysis is merely a tool of financial statement; hence ratios become useless
if separated from, the statement from which they are computed.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

21

1. It lacks standard values for the ratio. Therefore scientific analysis


is not possible.
2. There are no standards with to compare it fair to through light on
the activity of the business.
3. To indicate immediately where the mistake or error lies, it does not
take into the consideration of market and other changes.

4.

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA


Financial analysis depends primarily on the financial analysis to diagnose financial

performance. It is because of 3 main reasons. As long as accounting biases remain more


or less the same time, examining trends in the raw data and in financial ratio can draw
meaningful inferences. Since similar biases characterize various firms in the same
industry, inter firm comparisons are useful. Experience seems to suggest that financial
analysis proves if and only is the person handling it is aware of the accounting biases.
Proper analysis can be made on the ratios. The ratio so computed is compared to
the Industry standards. The comparison can also be done with the competing other SSIs
in the same industry or with the industry past performance itself. Both of them seem to be
incorrect. This is because; in Small Scale Industry each company formulates its own Core
business.
Ex- The Strategies adopted by Versalites and Luminaries will differ from that of other
Small Scale Industries. The reason may be attributed to various factors such as suppliers,
cost based profits, variations with fixed priced systems. Each of them (SSI) follows
different strategies with consent of external factors.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

22

So the Industry standards are considered to be the best in financial performance


evaluation of versalites and Luminaries.
The main purpose of financial analysis and interpretation is to render service to those
concerned with the firm. As stated, owners, creditors, Debenture Holders, Investors,
Government, Employees, Management, have their own purpose to be met with. The
objective of knowing the earning capacity of the firm, financial position of the firm,
solvency and term liquidity of the firm, borrowing capacity and future prospects of the
firm.
Study is detailed in the following manner. There is an extensive use of the financial
ratios. The Comparison is made easier and on comparison with the standard, the cause
and its effect is evaluated. The Solution to the above is also derived on consultation with
the Manager.
The Study is initialized by studying the following ratio analysis. The extensive use of
Liquidity ratios, Leverage ratio, Profitability ratios and valuation ratios in analyzing the
financial position. The next step is to evaluate the company from the point of the return
gained. The effective tool used is Du Pont analysis.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

23

LIQUIDITY RATIOS
These ratios are also called as working capital ratios or short term solvency ratio.
Liquidity means the firms ability to meet the short term obligations of the firm.
Therefore the relationships are drawn between the current assets (sources for meeting
short term obligations) and current liabilities. The firm should ensure that it does not
suffer from lack of liquidity, and also that it does not have excess liquidity. The failure of
a company to meet its obligations due to lack of sufficient liquidity, will result in a poor
credit worthiness, loss of creditors confidence and a very high degree of liquidity is also
bad because it results in blocking of funds or idle assets earn nothing. Therefore, it is
necessary to strike a proper balance between high liquidity and lack of liquidity.
Current ratio
The current ratio measures its short-term liquidity or solvency of a company that is
ability to meet short-term obligation. The higher the current ratio larger the amount of
rupees available per rupee of current liability, the more the firms availability to meet the
current obligations and the greater safety of funds of short term creditors.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

24

Current assets refer to all assets which change there form and substance and which
are ultimately converted into cash during normal operating cycle of business which is
normally 12 months. Current assets include cash in hand, cash at bank, sundry debtors,
bills receivables, short term investments, prepaid expenses, accrued incomes, inventory,
loans and advances.
Current liabilities refer to short term obligations or liabilities which are required to be
repaid within a period of one year they include sundry creditors, bills payable, provisions
for income tax proposed dividend, outstanding expenses.
Short-term creditors prefer a high current ratio since it reduces their risk.
Shareholders may prefer a lower current ratio so that more of the firms assets are
working to grow the business. Typical values for the current ratio vary by firm and
industry. For example, firms in cyclical industries may maintain a higher current ratio in
order to remain solvent during downturns and the standard current ratio (Ideal) is 2:1 i.e.,
for every one current liability their should be two current assets to be maintained.
Current Ratio= (Current Assets) / (Current Liabilities)

Table-1
Table showing analysis of Current Ratio
particulars
Current

As on 2005 As on2006
As on 2007 As on 2008
14886242.52 17752618.54 18678959.71 28413364.27

Assets
Current

12806248.01 12233056.94 11659227.22 19585208.23

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

25

liabilities
Current

1.16:1

1.45:1

1.60:1

1.45:1

Ratio

Interpretation
The current ratio from the above calculation is worth 1.16 in 2005. It has been
increased in 2006 to 1.45 and in the year 2007 it has increased to 1.60. In 2008, it
decreased to 1.45 for every 1current liability. Firm needs to maintain more current assets
in order to meet its short-term obligations. Even though the company is not maintaining
the current assets according to the standards i.e., 2:1 they are just managing to meet the
current liabilities. We can conclude that the ratio is favorable as the current asset is
slightly higher than the current liabilities, its liquidity position can be interpreted to be
satisfactory.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

26

Graph-1
Graph showing analysis of current ratio

1.6

1.6
1.45

1.4
1.2

1.45

1.16

1
0.8

current ratio

0.6
0.4
0.2
0

2005

2006

2007

2008

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

27

Acid Test Ratio


The quick ratio is given as (Quick current assets / Current Liabilities) and it is
expressed as a pure ratio or percent ratio. Quick assets are those assets which can be
converted to cash immediately or at a short notice without diminution of value. Included
in this category of current assets are: (other than inventories & prepaid expenses).

Cash and bank balances

Shot term marketable securities and

Debtors/receivables.

The Inventory is omitted to ascertain the intrinsic ability to realize the cash. It is true
that the inventories are the assets on which the largest losses occur in the event of
liquidation. The acid test helps in identifying the ability to command cash without
disposing inventory, because it is assumed that inventory will not supply cash as readily
as debtors or cash. The acid test is therefore, supposed to be improved, stringent, version
of the current ratio in measuring the liquidity of an enterprise and the standard ratio is 1:1
is considered to be satisfactory and this differs from firm to firm.
Quick Ratio = Quick assets (Current Assets Inventories) / Current Liabilities

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

28

Table-2
Table showing analysis of Acid Test Ratio

Particulars
Quick

As on 2005 As on 2006 As on 2007 As on 2008


11146722.52 10643846.54 11880326.71 15625730.27

Assets
Current

12806248.01 12233056.94 11659227.22 19585208.23

Liabilities
Quick Ratio 0.87:1

0.87:1

1.02:1

0.79:1

Interpretation
Quick ratio is calculated to work out the liquidity of a business. In the year 2005
and 2006 it is 0.87 and it increased in 2007 to 1.02and in the year 2008 it decreased to
0.79. The standard for Quick ratio is 1:1. In the year 2007 it had a good liquidity position
when compared to other years. The idea behind this is that the inventory forms 50% part
of Current Assets. Therefore there is a need to reduce the Quick ratio to 1:1. Since the
sundry debtor is more, the ratio always tends to be high. However, the Inventories cannot
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

29

be considered because, the Inventory in the balance sheet forms the closing stock and any
further computation based on the inventory will not yield realistic figure.

Graph-2
Graph showing analysis of Acid Test Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

30

Cash Ratio
Since cash is the most liquid asset and it is to be analyzed and it is equivalent to
current liabilities. Trade investment or marketable securities are equivalent of cash;
therefore, they may be included in the computation of cash ratio\

Cash Ratio = (cash & Bank balances) / (Current Liabilities)


Table-3
Table showing analysis of Cash Ratio
Particulars As on 2005
Cash
& 7552.15

As on 2006
11932.65

As on 2007
39800.65

As on 2008
9304.15

Bank Bal.
Current

12806248.01 12233056.94 11659227.22 19585208.23

Liabilities
Cash Ratio

0.00058:1

0.00097:1

0.0034:1

0.00047:1

Interpretation:

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

31

The Cash ratio is less than the standard ratio. The Cash ratio is not at all near to the
standard cash ratio. The reason behind this is that the Cash and Bank balances present in
the organization are very low when compared to other component of the current assets.
The Liquid funds will never yield benefit to the organization. The reason is that the Cash
in hand of the bank balances in the Current account will yield nothing over the period.
The standard for the cash ratio is 0.5:1. If Cash accumulates or is deficit in the
business, then the need will arise to analyze and necessary arrangements to be made for
the purpose of maintaining adequate liquidity.

Graph-3
Graph showing analysis of Cash Ratio

0.0035

0.0034

0.003
0.0025
0.002
Cash ratio

0.0015
0.00097

0.001
0.0005
0

0.00058

2005

0.00047
2006

2007

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

2008

32

Net Working Capital Ratio

The difference between current assets and current liabilities excluding short-term
bank borrowings is called Net Working capital. The Net Working capital is often used as
the measure of firms liquidity. It is considered that, between two firms, the one having
Net Working Capital has greater ability to meet its current obligations. This is not
necessarily so; the measure of liquidity is a relationship, rather than a difference between
current assets and current liabilities. Net Working Capital however measures the firms
potential reservoir of funds. It can be related to net assets (or net current assets).
Net Assets includes total of current assets and NWC is difference of current asset &
current liabilities.
NWC Ratio = Net Working Capital / Net Assets

Table-4
Table showing analysis of Net Working Capital Ratio

Particulars
Net

As on 2005
2079994.51

As on 2006
5519561.60

As on 2007
7019732.49

As on 2008
8828156.04

working
capital
Net Assets
NWC Ratio

14886242.52 17752618.54 18678959.71 28413364.27


0.14:1
0.31:1
0.38:1
0.31:1

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

33

Interpretation
Net Working Capital Ratio is significantly increasing over the years. Net working
capital ratio is also high because of different attributes.
o Normal increase in the Working Capital requirement will be present in each
financial year.
o As the amount of sundry debtors is more, it will in turn vary the Working
Capital Position.

Graph-4
Graph showing analysis of Net Working Capital Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

34

Leverage Ratios
The short-term creditors like bankers and suppliers of raw materials are more
concerned with the firms current debt-paying ability. On the other hand, long-term
creditors, like debenture holders, financial institution etc are more concerned with the
firms long-term financial strength.
Financial Leverage refers to the use of Debt finance. While Debt capital is a
cheaper source of finance, it is also a riskier source of finance. Leverage ratios help in
assessing the risk arising from the use of debt capital. Two types of ratios are commonly
used to analyze the financial leverage: Structural ratios and Coverage ratios. The
important structural ratios are Debt - Equity and Debt Assets ratio. Coverage ratios
show the relationship between debt servicing commitments and the sources for meeting
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

35

these burdens. The important Coverage ratios are: Interest coverage ratio, Fixed Charges
ratios Debt service Coverage ratio.

Debt Asset Ratio


Debt ratios may be used to analyze the long-term solvency of a firm. It may,
therefore, compute debt ratio by dividing total debt by total assets. Total debt includes
short and long-term borrowings from financial institutions, debentures/bonds, bank
borrowings, deposits and any other interest-bearing loan (secured & unsecured Debts).
Total assets includes equals net assets which consists of net fixed assets and net
current assets
The Debt asset ratio measure the extent to which borrowed funds supports the
financial assets.
Debt Assets Ratio = Debt / Assets.
Table-5
Table showing analysis of Debt Asset Ratio

Particulars
Debt

As on 2005
3089989.83

Capital
Assets

18725374.52 21351430.54 22097500.71 32041904.27

(Fixed

As on 2006
7547886.88

As on 2007
8353755.00

As on 2008
8969767.9

Current)
Debt
0.17:1

0.35:1

0.38:1

0.28:1

Asset Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

36

Interpretation
In the year 2005 the debt asset ratio was high as 0.17 and in the year 2007 it has
decreased to 0.28. The Leverage ratios are computed based on the fact that the short term
loans are also considered as the Debts for the firm. It is also taken into consideration that
the firms are liable to pay the interest to them.
The debt ratio of 0.17 in 2005 means that lenders have financed 17% of net assets
and correspondingly in the year 2006 it increases to 35%, in 2007 it is 38%, and in 2008
it is 28%.
It obviously implies that owners have provided the remaining finances. They have
financed: 1-0.54=0.83, 1-0.35=0.65, 1-0.38=0.62, 1-0.28=0.72, respectively in 2005, 06,
07 & 08 respectively.

Graph-5
Graph showing analysis of Debt Asset Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

37

Turn over Ratios


Turnover ratios are also referred to as Activity Ratios or Asset Management
Ratios, measure how effectively the assets are employed by the firm. These ratios are
based on the relationship between the level of activity, represented by the sales or cost of
goods sold, and levels of various assets. Funds of creditors and owners are invested in
various assets to generate sales and profit. Better the management of assets, the larger the

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

38

amount of sales. Activity ratios are employed to evaluate the efficiency with which the
firm manages and utilizes its assets.
The important Turn over ratio is: Inventory Turnover Ratio, average collection period,
Debtor Turnover Ratio, Fixed Asset Turnover, and Total Asset Turnover Ratio.

Inventory Turnover Ratio


The inventory turnover ratio, or stock turnover, measures how fast the Inventory
is moving through the firm and generating sales. The inventory turnover reflects the
efficiency of the management. The higher the ratio, more efficient the management is and
vice versa. However this may always not be true. A high inventory may be caused by a
low level of Inventory which may result in frequent stock outs and loss of sale and
customer goodwill.

Inventory Turnover Ratio = Cost of goods sold / Average Inventory


Cost of Goods Sold = Net sales Gross Profit
Average Inventory = (Opening Stock + Closing Stock) / 2

Table-6
Table showing analysis of Inventory Turn Over Ratio

Particulars
Sales

As on 2005 As on 2006 As on 2007 As on 2008


45998160.08 52798366.08 67598900.53 76004897.01

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

39

Gross Profit 2401057.23 2577289.52 3363986.02 5944041.31


Cost
of 43597102.85 50221076.56 64234914.51 70060855.70
Goods Sold
*
Average

3208985.00

5424146.00

6953702.5

9793133.5

Stock *
Inventory

13.58:1

9.26

9.42

7.15

Turnover
Ratio

Interpretation
Inventory turnover ratio so computed shows bad sign in the movement of stocks in the
company. The Inventory turnover ratio has decreased over the past four years. The
Inventory turnover ratio has decreased because of many reasons such as non sequential
orders from the customers, and inadequate supply of raw materials from the suppliers.

Graph-6
Graph showing analysis of Inventory Turn over Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

40

Debtor Turnover Ratio


Debtor turnover indicates the number of times debtors turnover each year.
Generally the higher the value of debtors turnover, the more efficient is the management
of credit. To an outsider analysis, information about credit sale and opening and closing
balance of debtors may not be available. Therefore, debtors turnover can be calculated
by dividing total sales by the year end balance of debtors. The liquidity position of the
firm depends on the quality of debtors to a great extent. Financial analysts apply three
ratios to judge the quality or liquidity of debtors:
Debtors turnover
Collection period, and
Aging schedule of debtors.
Debtors Turnover Ratio = Net credit sales / Average Accounts Receivables.
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

41

Table-7
Table showing analysis of Debtors Turnover Ratio
Particulars
Sales
Average

As on 2005 As on 2006 As on 2007 As on 20078


45998160.08 52798366.08 67598900.53 76004897.01
10278400.95 10316881.09 11087513.06 14549705.72

Account
Receivables
Debtor

4.47:1

5.12:1

6.10:1

5.22:1

turnover
ratio

Interpretation
As this ratio measures how rapidly debts are collected. Debtors turnover indicates
the number of times debtor turnover each year.

DTR is increasing from year to year as in the year 2005 it is 4.47 times, in 2006
increased to 5.12 times and in 2007 it is 6.1 times but in the year 2008 it has reduced to
5.22 times. The average accounts receivables in the year is also increasing, this results in
the increase in DTR.
Graph-7
Graph showing analysis of Debtors Turnover Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

42

Average collection Period


The Average Collection period represents the number of days worth of credit sales
that is locked in Debtors (Account Receivables). The credit limit sanctioned to the
debtors to repay the debt amount. The Average Collection Period indicates the number of
days taken to collect the debt amount from the debtors.
An excessively long collection period implies a very liberal and inefficient credit
and collection performance, on the other hand too low a collection period is not
necessarily favorable. Rather, it may indicate a very restrictive credit and collection
policy.
Average Collection Period = Average Debtors / Average Daily Credit Sales
Table-8
Table showing the Average Collection Period
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

43

Particulars
Average

As on 2005 As on 2006
10278400.95 10316881.09

As on 2007
11087513.06

As on 2008
14549705.72

Debtors
Average

126022.36

144653.06

185202.47

208232.59

71.32

59.87

69.87

Daily
Credit Sales
Average
81.56
Collection
Period

Interpretation
The average collection period measures the quality of debtors since it indicates
the speed of their collection
The Average Collection Period is nearly 69.87 days. The Collection Period is in
between when compared to that of past 4 years. This indicates the firms steady
performance in the collection of debt. The reason may be attributed to high Debtors
Turnover ratio, higher will be the Average collection period. Even though, the company
performance is with in the standard limits, it is necessary for the company to maintain the
collection period at the lowest level as maintained in the past years.

Graph-8
Graph showing the Average Collection Period
Average Collection Period for the Past 5 years

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

44

Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio


The relationship between sales and assets is called asset turnover
This ratio measures sale per rupee of Investment in fixed Investment in fixed assets. The
ratio is supposed to measure the efficiency with which fixed assets are employed- a high
ratio indicates a high degree of efficiency of asset utilization and a low ratio reflects
inefficient use of assets. However in interpreting this ratio, one caution should be taken
into consideration. When the fixed assets of the company are old and substantially
depreciated, the fixed assets turnover ratio tends to be high because the denominator of
the ratio is very low.
Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio = Net Sales / Average Fixed Assets

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

45

Table-9
Table showing the analysis of Fixed Assets Turn over Ratio

Particulars
Sales
Fixed assets
Fixed asset
turn

As on 2005
45998160.08
3839132.00
11.98:1

As on 2006
52798366.08
3598812.00
14.67:1

As on 2007
67598900.53
3418541.00
19.77:1

As on 2008
76004897.01
3628540.00
20.95:1

over

ratio

Interpretation
Fixed asset turnover ratio is increasing over the years. In the years 2005 it was
11.98 and in the year 2008 it is increased to 20.95. Fixed Asset Turnover ratio indicates
the efficiency in the utilization of fixed assets by the firm. But since the firm has got
older assets, it also needs to be viewed that the value derived out of Fixed Assets
Turnover ratio is high and gives indication that the assets are utilized to the best
maximum level.
Graph-9
Graph showing the analysis of Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio
Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio in comparison with previous year figures

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

46

Total Assets Turnover Ratio


The Total Turnover ratio indicates the Turnover of assets with that of the sales.
The total assets turnover ratio indicates the efficiency of the total assets utilized by the
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

47

company. The Total Assets indicate the Fixed Assets as well as Current Assets in the
organization. This ratio shows the firms ability in generating sales from all financial
resources committed to total assets
Total Asset Turnover Ratio = Net Sales / Total Assets

Table-10
Table showing the analysis of Total Assets Turnover Ratio

Particulars As on 2005 As on 2006 As on 2007 As on 2008


Sales
45998160.08 52798366.08 67598900.53 76004897.01
Total assets 18725374.52 21351430.54 22097500.71 32041904.27
(CA + FA)
Total asset 2.46:1

2.47:1

3.06:1

2.37:1

turnover
ratio

Interpretation
The Total asset turn over ratio form the above calculation is worth 2.46 in 2005. It
has been increased in 2006 to 2.47 and in the year 2007 it has increased to 3.06. But in
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

48

the year 2008 it has decreased to 2.37. It indicates that the total assets turnover of 2.46
times in 2004 implies that firm generates a sale of Rs 2.46 for one rupee investment in
fixed and current assets together, likewise sale of Rs 2.47, 3.06 and 2.37 in 2005, 2006,
2007and 2008 respectively for one rupee investment in assets.

Graph-10
Graph showing the analysis of Total Assets Turnover

Profitability ratios

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

49

The operating efficiency of a firm and its ability to ensure adequate returns to its
shareholders depends ultimately on the profits earned by it. The profitability of a firm can
be measured by its profitability ratios.
Profitability reflects the final result of business operations. There are two types of
profitability ratios (1) Profit margin ratios. (2) Rate of return ratios. Profit margin ratios
show relationship between profit and sales. The two popular profit margin ratios are:
Gross profit margin ratio and Net profit margin ratio. Rate of return ratios reflect the
relation between profit and Investment. The most important rate of return measure is
Earning Power.

Gross Profit margin Ratio


This ratio shows the margin left after meeting manufacturing costs. It measures
the efficiency of production as well as pricing. To analyze the factors underlying the
variation in the gross profit margin the production of various elements of the cost (labor,
material and manufacturing overheads) to sales can also be considered. The G.P margin
reflects the efficiency with which management produces each unit of product

Gross Profit margin Ratio = Gross profit / Net sales

Table-11
Table showing the analysis of Gross Profit Margin Ratio
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

50

Particulars
Gross Profit
Net Sales
Gross Profit

As on 2005
2401057.23
45998160.08
0.052

As on 2006
2577289.52
52798366.08
0.049

As on 2007
3363986.02
67598900.53
0.050

As on 2008
5944041.31
76004897.01
0.078

ratio

Interpretation
A high ratio of gross profits to sales is a sign of good management as it implies
that the cost of production of the firm is relatively low. As we can see in the year 2005 it
is 5.2% and in the year 2007 it is 5.0 %and in 2008 it is 7.8% where it is increasing from
years by reducing cost of production. Even though in the year 2006 there is slight
downfall in gross profit that is 4.9% it has increased to 7.8% in 2008 this shows there is
normal growth in gross profit for the company.
Therefore company needs to concentrate on the direct expense in order to see that the
gross profit margin is increased

Graph-11
Graph showing the analysis of Gross Profit Margin Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

51

Net Profit Margin Ratio


This ratio shows the earning left for shareholders (both equity and preferences) as
a percentage of net sales. It measures the overall efficiency of production, administration,
selling, financing, pricing and tax management. Jointly considered, the gross profit and
net profit margin ratios provide a valuable understanding of the cost and profit structure
of the firm and enable the analyst to identify the sources of business efficiency or
inefficiency.
This ratio also indicates the firms capacity to withstand adverse economic
condition as well as a high net profit margin would ensure adequate return to the owners,
a low net profit margin has opposite reactions. However, a firm with a low profit margin,
can earn a high rate of return on investments if it has a higher inventory turnover.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

52

Net Profit margin Ratio = Net profit / Net sales

Table-12
Table showing the analysis of Net Profit Margin Ratio

Particulars
Net Profit
Net Sales
Net Profit

As on 2005
627977.04
45998160.08
0.014

As on 2006
606086.52
52798366.08
0.011

As on 2007
764805.63
67598900.53
0.011

As on 2008
1102534.00
76004897.01
0.015

ratio

Interpretation
The net profit margin on sales had slightly increased in the year 2005 it was
0.014, but it reduced in 2006 and 2007 to 0.011 and again it increased to 0.015 in 2008
profitability of the business has increased. The reason may be better utilization of
resources and cutting down of indirect cost. This ratio is the overall measure of firms
ability to turn each rupee sales into net profit.

Graph-12
Graph showing the analysis of Net Profit Margin Ratio

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

53

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

54

Earning Power

A measure of operating profitability, earning power is defined as:


Earning Power = Profit before Interest & taxes / Average Total Assets
Table-13
Table showing the Earning Power

Particulars
Profit

As on 2005
2401057.23

As on 2006
2577289.52

As on 2007
3363986.02

As on 2008
5944041.31

before
Interest &
Taxes
Average

18725374.52 21351430.54 22097500.71 32041904.27

Total Assets
Earning

0.13

0.12

0.15

0.18

Power

Interpretation
The Earning Power ratio was high in the year 2008. The earning power of the
business also increased when compared to last year as in the year 2005 it is 0.13, in 2006
it is 0.12 and in 2007 it is 0.15, compared to this in 2008 it has increased to 0.18 the
reason behind is the proportionate increase in profit before interest and tax in compare to
assets..
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

55

Graph-13
Graph showing the Earning Power

DU-PONT ANALYSIS
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

56

The Du Pont Company of United States pioneered a system of financial


analysis, which has received widespread recognition and acceptance. A useful system of
analysis, which considers important interrelationships based on information found in
financial statements, many firms in some from or the other have adopted it.

Return on Total Assets = Net Profit Margin * Total assets Turnover Ratio
Net Profit / Total Assets = (Net Profit / Net sales) * (Net Sales / Total Assets)

Table-14
Table showing the Du-Pont Analysis

Particulars
Net Profit
Net Sales
Total Assets
Return on

As on 2005
627977.04
45998160.08
18725374.52
0.034

As on 2006
606086.52
52798366.08
21351430.54
0.028

As on 2007
764805.63
67598900.53
22097500.71
0.035

As on 2008
1102534.00
76004897.01
32041904.27
0.034

Total Assets

Interpretation

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

57

Du-Pont analysis also proved that the company is having a good net profit margin
when compared to previous years. The net profit is moving constant when compared to
years this shows the consistency. Company has maintained standard performance in the
year 2005, 2007 and in 2008 that is 0.034, 0.035 and 0.034 respectively. But it has
decreased in the financial year 2006. The increase in the sales position also contributes an
increase in the return on total asset.

Graph-14
Graph showing the Du-Pont Analysis

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

58

5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS & CONCLUSION.


1. The Cash balance in Versa Lites & Luminaries seems to be poor. It is important from
the financing aspect that the company should maintain a minimum cash balance that
equates the current liabilities. At any point of time, the company should be able to
meet all its Current Liabilities. The current cash level is poor compared to past 4
years. It would be better that the company should maintain high level of cash in its
asset category to meet the contingent liabilities.

2. The Working Capital level in the organization is also poor compared to previous years
that should increase as it affects the day-to- day transaction. The company should
make sure that proper Current Assets needs to be maintained to meet the Current
liabilities as already mentioned. It is therefore very much important from all aspects
that company should either adopt the policy of working on maintaining Current
liabilities. The strategy should be in tune with maximizing the profits for the
Company. Any deviation in its primary objective will affect its productivity level as
well as hamper its performance in Industrial level.

3. There is a mismatch in Debt to asset position in Versa Lites. It is very much important
for SSI to maintain Current assets; otherwise there will always be a problem of
liquidity for current assets to match the current liabilities. The Current Assets level
should at least match 50% of Current Liabilities in SSI.

4. The Interest coverage ratio is in tune with the Industry standards. The average 7%
will yield in positive results as the company is running under profit. The coverage of

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

59

Interest on the profit before Interest & Taxes will be very nominal & will have very
less influence on the companys profitability.
5. The Debtors Turnover ratio is an important one in analyzing the companys average
collection period. The Debtors Turnover has been good in the year 2006 as compared
to those other 4years. This needs to be improved in the future years also. Collection
agents need to be appointed so that the collection can be mobilized faster & the
improvement will be brought in the profitability position of the company. This is very
much important, as the collection from debtors will impact the profitability position
of the company.

6. The average collection period of the company is at its worst compared to the last 4
years. It needs to improve on the present position & make sure that there is some
form of benchmark needs to be fixed & the company tries to attain it in its each
financial year. This is very much important as the company will be having continuous
& regular cash inflows regularly & will reduce the level of liability on the company.

7. The Fixed Assets turnover depicts the utilization of fixed assets to the sales done by
the organization. This depicts the productive performance of the fixed assets when
compared to the sales done by the organization in the last 4-5 years. This is very
much important in case of manufacturing or production based companies.

8. However, when we analyze the profitability position of the Versa Lites, the company
is running under profit. The Profitability ratios are positive as the firm is running
under profit. The strategy should be base lined to achieve good results in different
phases outlined for small-scale industries.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

60

9. The Net Income of the Versa Lites is very large at nearly 15% in the financial year
2005. The Net Income needs to be stabilized to earn good profitability position for the
year. This is very important, as the good profitability will bring in better prospects for
the company. However the Total Income in comparison to the total assets has
performed better in comparison to all the 5 years is a good sign for the company.

10. The earning power of the company compared to the last five year this year it has
decreased. The company should strategize on improving its earning power to the core
maximum level.

11. As far as the Total Assets is concerned the importance of current assets is taken into
consideration when compared to the fixed assets for valuating the Total Assets
turnover ratio. The importance of current assets in the evaluation of turnover ratio is
considered for calculating the overall profitability position of the company with
respect to the total assets of the company. The significance of current assets in
evaluating the Total Assets turnover is more in Versa Lites when compared to the
other service based industry. This is because the production Industry will yield
significantly more in the current assets when compared to fixed assets. This is one of
the reasons for production companies to maintain the level of current assets at 80%
compared to current liabilities. The increased sales & depreciated assets will yield
good ratio. Versa Lites has utilized the assets in the formal manner to yield maximum
profits. It is therefore in the year 2008; the company is earning good position in the
profitability compared to last 4 years.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

61

6 SUGGESTIONS.

Versa Lites &Luminaries is a small scale industry engaged in manufacturing chokes and
Patti fittings.

It is important for the Versa Lites to maintain stability & Viability in its
operations. It is therefore very much important for Versa Lites to bring in productivity in
all its class of operations. The Creation of benchmark is very much important for setting
up a standard & ensuring the attainment of its objectives. The ratio analysis brings out
many aspects where the valuation ratios & profitability ratios are very much favor in the
case of Versa Lites. However, Versa Lites has made profits during last four financial
years.
They need focus on all the factors in order to reduce direct as well as in direct cost
in order to increase the Net profits of the company even though there is a normal growth
in the firm.
There is a still need for Versa Lites to analyze on key factors, which are
influencing the productivity levels for Versa Lites. Deep in-depth analysis on the Sundry
debtors, problems involved in financing the current liabilities steps to be taken to see to
that the sundry debtors are maintained to a standard level. Versa Lites should set up the
objectives, analyze the factors of production, and thereby maximize the profits for the
organization.

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

62

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2005
LIABILITES
CAPITAL ACCOUNT OF

Rs.

PROPRIETOR,

ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS:

Rs

Factory site & Building

1965245.00

Mrs. GAYATHRI(BAL.b/f)

1057548.33

Computers & accessory

151001.00

Add. Addl. Capital brought in

1500000.00

Furniture & fixtures

48165.00

2557548.33

Motor Cars

670854.00

627977.04

Plant & Machinery

1003867.00

Add: Net Profit for the year

3185525.37
Less: Drawings
Bal C/F\
Investment Allowance Reserve

204991.00
2980534.37
2773.00

LOANS & ADVANCES:

CURRENT ASSETS:

Term Loan from SBI

371510.36

Deposits

601936.82

Car Loan from ICICI Bank

326735.34

Loans & Advances

155625.40

Loan from SBI

1416319.13

Advances to suppliers

103207.20

Unsecured Loans

975425.00

Closing Stock

3739520.00

Sundry Debtors

10278400.95

Cash on hand
MISCELLANEOUS

7552.15

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

63

EXPENDITURE:
Profit & loss A/c(B/F)

154170.69

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Sundry Creditors(Trade)

12525698.11

Advances from customers

28490.00

Taxes & duties payable

58478.90

Outstanding expenses

193581.00

TOTAL

18879545.21 TOTAL

18879545.21

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31.3.2005
EXPENDITURE
Opening Stock

Rs
2678450.00

Purchases

35680361.81 Closing Stock

Wages

4971490.34

Sales

INCOME Rs
45998160.08
3739520.00

Manufacturing & other direct


expenses

4006320.70

G/P c/d.

2401057.23

TOTAL

49737680.08 TOTAL

49737680.08

Administration expenses

1791452.06

G/P b/d

2401057.23

Bank interest & charges

257700.35

Rebates & discounts

25300.65

Donations

6000.00

Interest received

22541.51

Depreciation

256161.00

Miscellaneous Income

492438.17

Miscellaneous expenses

2047.11

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

64

Net Profit for the year


TOTAL

627977.04
2941337.56

TOTAL

2941337.56

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Balance Sheet as on 31st March2006
LIABILITES Rs.
CAPITAL ACCOUNT
1118570.89
Add: Net Profit

ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS:

Rs
3598812.00

606086.52
1724657.41

LOANS & ADVANCES:


Loans

CURRENT ASSETS:
7547886.88

Closing Stock

7108772.00

Sundry Debtors

10316881.09

Cash & Bank balance

11932.65
315032.80

CURRENT LIABILITIES

MISCELLANEOUS
EXPENDITURE:
12233056.94

TOTAL

154170.69
21505601.23

21505601.23

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

65

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31.3.2006
EXPENDITURE Rs
Opening Stock
3739520.00

INCOME Rs
52798366.08

Sales

Purchases

47750735.77 Closing Stock

Wages

3604881.00

Manufacturing expenses

2234711.79

G/P c/d.
TOTAL

2577289.52
59907138.08 TOTAL

59907138.08

Administration expenses

1315605.38

G/P b/d

2577289.52

Bank interest & charges

542324.00

Rebates & discounts

20100.35

Depreciation

240320.00

Interest received

23400.00

Miscellaneous Income

83546.03

TOTAL

2704335.90

Net Profit for the year


TOTAL

606086.52
2704335.90

7108772.00

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2007
LIABILITES
CAPITAL ACCOUNT OF

Rs.

PROPRIETOR,

ASSETS Rs
FIXED ASSETS:
As per Schedule

Mrs. GAYATHRI(BAL.b/f)

1724657.41

Add. Addl. Capital brought in

96000.00

Add: Net Profit for the year

764805.63

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

3418541.00

66

2585463.04
Less: Drawings

408808.16

B/F Losses written off.

154170.69

Balance C/F

2022484.19

LOANS & ADVANCES:

CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash Credit from SBI

5642401.32

Deposits

443287.00

Term Loan from SBI

134373.00

Loans & Advances

309726.00

Demand Loan from SBI

189162.31

Closing Stock

6798633.00

Car Loan from ICICI Bank

60339.73

Sundry Debtors

11087513.06

Housing Loan from SBI

892053.64

Cash on hand

39800.65

Unsecured Loans
CURRENT LIABILITIES

1435425.00

Sundry Creditors(Trade)

11384663.22

Duties & Taxes (B/F from 200405)

62034.30

Duties & Taxes (current)

274564.00

TOTAL

22097500.71 TOTAL

22097500.71

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31.3.2007
EXPENDITURE Rs
Opening Stock
7108772.00

Sales

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

INCOME Rs
67598900.53

67

Purchases

51187819.47 Closing Stock

6798633.00

Wages

6842056.08

Manufacturing expenses

5894899.96

G/P c/d.

3363986.02

TOTAL

74397533.53 TOTAL

Administration expenses

1851629.73

Interest on Bank Loans

548871.77

G/P b/d

3363986.02

Interest on ICICI Loans

28324.39

Rebates & discounts

147432.70

Donations

17718.87

Interest received

14247.20

Depreciation

338474.00

Miscellaneous Income

24158.47

Net Profit for the year


TOTAL

764805.63
3549824.39

TOTAL

3549824.39

74397533.53

M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE


No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.
Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2008
LIABILITES
CAPITAL ACCOUNT OF

Rs.

PROPRIETOR,

ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS:

Rs

Factory site & Building

1827503.00

Mrs. GAYATHRI(BAL.b/f)

2022484.19

Computers & accessory

88484.00

Add. Addl. Capital brought in

2905917.31

Furniture & fixtures

40417.00

Add: Net Profit for the year

1102534.00

Motor Cars

497270.00

6030935.50

Plant & Machinery

1427626.73

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

68

Less: Drawings
Bal C/F\

2544007.36

TOTAL

3881300.73

3486928.14

Less: Deprecation

252760.73

WDV C/F.

3628540.00

LOANS & ADVANCES:

CURRENT ASSETS:

SECURED LOANS

Deposits

406640.00

Term Loan from SBI

1399.00

Loans & Advances

530080.40

Demand Loan from SBI

186189.00

Advances Income Tax

130000.00

Cash Credit from SBI

7346754.90

Closing Stock

12787634.00

Sundry Debtors

14549705.72

Cash on hand

9304.15

UNSECURED LOANS
Mr. H.R. Sreenatha Rao

735425.00

Mrs. Vijaya Chandrasekhar

400000.00

Mr. Vishwas Jamadagni


CURRENT LIABILITIES

300000.00

Sundry Creditors (Trade)

19274065.97 EXPENDITURE:

Taxes & duties payable

311142.26

MISCELLANEOUS

TOTAL
32041904.27 TOTAL
M/S VERSA LITES, BANGALORE

32041904.27

No. 2 & 3, HMS Layout, Arehalli, Bangalore 569061.


Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31.3.2008
EXPENDITURE
Opening Stock

Rs
6798633.00

Purchases

72906669.36 Closing Stock

12787634.00

Wages

5876114.96

18798799.17

Manufacturing and Direct exp.

16065871.55

G/P c/d.

5944041.31

TOTAL

107591330.2 TOTAL

Sales

INCOME Rs
76004897.01

Excise Duty collected

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

107591330.2
69

Administration expenses &

G/P b/d

5944041.31

other indirect cost

3765991.15

Rebates & discounts

32540.58

Interest on Bank Loans

802629.58

Interest received

13886.00

Interest on Private Loans

100000.00

Miscellaneous Income

49934.28

Donations

11852.00

Miscellaneous Expenses

4634.71

Depreciation

252760.73

Net Profit for the year


TOTAL

1102534.00
6040402.17

TOTAL

6040402.17

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

70

Вам также может понравиться