Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Independent Auditor
A certified public accountant who examines the financial records and business
transactions of a company that he or she is not affiliated with an independent
auditor is typically used to avoid conflicts of interest and to ensure the integrity of
the auditing process. Independent auditor is sometimes called external auditors. Are
often used or even mandated to protect shareholders and potential investors from
the fraudulent activities or misrepresented financial statements made by public
companies.
3. Adverse Audit Report: The worst type of financial report that can be issued to
a business is an adverse opinion. This indicates that the firms financial records do
not conform to GAAP. In addition, the financial records provided by the business
have been grossly misrepresented. Although this may occur by error, it is often an
indication of fraud. When this type of report is issued a company must correct its
financial statement and have it re audited as investors lenders and other users of
financial reports will generally not accept it. The auditor shall express an adverse
opinion when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence,
concludes that misstatements individually or in the aggregate, are both material
and pervasive to the financial statements. In most cases, before punishing an
adverse opinion, the auditor advises the organizations accountants and officers of
the problems and works with them to correct the financial reporting situation, so
that an opinion can be published that is unqualified or qualified rather than adverse.
4. Disclaimer of opinion: On some occasions, an auditor is unable to complete an
accurate audit report. This may occur for a variety of reasons, such as an absence
of appropriate financial records. When this happens the auditor issues a disclaimer
of opinion, stating that an opinion of the firms financial status could not be
determined. The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the
auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any could be both material and pervasive. The auditor
may issue a disclaimer of opinion that is publicly report that the auditor has chosen
not to issue an opinion. This may occur when;
1. The auditor has significant uncertainties regarding financial reports,
2. When auditor is not independent or when there is conflict of interest,
3. When limitation of scope is imposed by client.
Going Concern
Going concern is a term which means that an entity will continue to operate in the
near future which is generally more than next 12 months. So long as it generates or
obtains enough resource to operate. If the audit is not a going concern, it means
that the entity might not be able to sustain itself within the next twelve months.
Auditors are required to consider the going concern of an audit before issuing a
report. If the audit is a going concern, the auditor does not modify his/her report in
any way. However, if the auditor considers that the audit is not a going concern, or
will not be a going concern in the near future, and then the auditor is required to
include an explanatory paragraph before the opinion paragraph or following the
opinion paragraph in the audit report explaining the situation, state, the auditors
determination, and state the audits plan to correct the situation. The disclosure
paragraph should immediately follow the opinion paragraph. Which is commonly
referred to as the going concern disclosure? Such an opinion is called an unqualified
modified opinion.
Unfortunately, many auditors are increasingly reluctant to include this disclosure in
their opinions, since it is considered a self fulfilling prophecy by some. This is
Opinion Shopping
Refer to audits who contract or reject auditors based on the type of opinion they
will issue on the audit. The underlying principles of this concept are:
1. Audit determines the compensation to auditors for their work as well as
awarding future audit engagements.
2. Such fees are the auditors main source of income.
3. Audits may try to contract auditors that will issue audit opinions based on the
audits needs, and
4. Auditors are willing to comply with such demands so long as they are assured
future audit engagements.
The most common example is an audit that knows that the current auditor is going
to issue a qualified, adverse, or disclaimer of opinion report, who then rescinds or
terminate the audit engagement before the opinion is issued and subsequently
shops for another auditor who is willing to issue an unqualified opinion regardless of
any qualifying situations mentioned in the previous sections. However, opinion
shopping is not limited to audits contracting auditors based on issuing opinions. It
also includes auditors who are over pleasing to audits by issuing unqualified reports
without properly auditing or by simply overlooking material issues affecting the
audit. These auditors objectives are to appear much more attractive and easy
going than other auditors in order to secure future audit engagements and fees.
Although the great majority of auditors are not willing to jeopardize their profession
and reputation form guaranteed audit fees, there are some that will issue opinions
solely based on obtaining or maintaining audit engagements. This includes auditors
who knowingly emit unmodified unqualified opinions for audits who are engaged in
illegal activities, audits who have caused a material limitation of scope, audits that
have a lack of going concern, or audits who present fraudulent financial statements
(e.g. Enron and Arthur Andersen). This situation is a clear conflict of interest which
should hinder an auditors independence and the ability to audit but some auditors
willingly ignore this statute.