Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Outline
Exergy
Exergy and efficiency
Exergy and environment
Exergy and economics
Example: allocating cogeneration
emissions
Illustration: utility cogeneration in Ontario
Introduction
understanding of efficiency
efficiency
Objectives
Improve
understanding
and appreciation
of exergy
Show exergy can
improve nuclear
cogeneration
EXERGY
What is Exergy?
Maximum work obtainable in
reference environment
Potential to cause change
Measure of
quality
usefulness
value
Exergy Analysis
Helps analyse, design & improve
Clarifies:
Applications
Supply
Conversion
Illustration
Carnot engine
operating between
600 K and 300 K
Illustration
Illustration
Energy outputs
emissions
destructions
EXAMPLE: ALLOCATING
COGENERATION EMISSIONS
Cogeneration
Electricity
Fuel
Thermal
Power
Generation
Heat
Recovery
Winter
Heating
Load
Emissionallocation(%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Based on
exergy of
products
-20
Based on
energy of
products
Incremental
fuel to
electrical
production
Incremental
fuel to heat
production
Shared
emission
savings
Based on
economic
product
values
Trigeneration
Expanded Cogeneration
Electricity
Fuel
Thermal
Power
Generation
Heat
Recovery
Winter
Heating
Load
Absorption
Chiller
Summer
Cooling
Load
Extension to Economics
ILLUSTRATION: UTILITY
COGENERATION IN ONTARIO
Ontario, Canada
13.5 million
people
1 million km2
Industrial heart
of Canada
Large electric
utilities (nuclear,
hydro, fossil)
Residentialcommercial
sector
Industrial sector
Combination
Results I
Base-case annual energy use
Base-case
energy use (PJ)
Electricity
Gas &
NGL's
Oil &
Petrol.
Coal
Other
Utility sector
Prov. (no util.)
Province (total)
477
477
824
824
14
782
796
286
21
307
158
158
Uran- Total
ium
640
640
940
2260
3200
5.3
5.3
2.8
2.8
0
0.5
0.5
17
0
17
0.5
0.5
6.8
6.8
10
2.4
4.6
Results II
Base-case annual emissions to environment
Material emissions (kilotons)
Utility sector
Prov. (no utility)
Province (total)
SO2
NOX
CO2
(1000)
CO
Particulates
VOC
Spent
Uraniu
m
321
1060
1380
92
526
618
32
132
164
4
3500
3504
11
837
849
0.5
775
775
1.04
1.04
Thermal
Pollu
-tion
(PJ)
Radiation
(1015
Bq)
591
591
11
11
17
1.2
4.9
17
0.7
3.2
17
1.2
4.2
17
0.7
0.8
17
0.3
0.5
17
0.5
0.5
6.8
6.8
15
15
6.8
6.8
Results III
Heat demand satisfied
by cogeneration (PJ yr-1)
Scenario
A
B
C
D
E
F
% reductions in some
key utility parameters
% of fuel
cogenerating
for utility
0
0
26
54
26
54
46
206
26
54
72
260
17
41
13
16
20
47
7
30
3
5
9
35
5
24
3
6
8
30
12
77
6
13
22
100
8
49
4
2
12
49
Results IV
Annual reductions in health &
environmental effects/costs
Cogeneration
scenario
Base
A
Health effects
Mortality
Costs (million $)
165
286
Health and
environment
Environmental effects
Yield loss (%)
Fish
Crops
Lost
fishing
(1000
days)
42.2
122.3
0.046
0.378
43.9
8.4
17.9
0.008
0.065
7.5
Implications
Conclusions
Exergy Recognition