Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Research Methods
Dr Bikramjit Rishi
Survey Research
Survey in Action
Assume you are planning to interview
shoppers in a shopping mall about their
views on increased food prices and what
the government should do about them. In
what different ways might you try to
motivate shoppers to cooperate in your
survey?
Survey in Action
A survey of the residents of a new subdivision
on why they happened to select that area in
which to live. You also wish to secure some
information about what they like and do not
like about life in the subdivision.
Survey in Action
A poll of students at a University on their
preferences among three candidates who
are running for president of the student
union.
Survey in Action
A survey of 58 wholesale grocery
companies scattered over India, on their
personnel
management
policies
for
warehouse personnel.
Surveys
Surveys ask respondents for information
using verbal or written questioning
Respondents
Respondents are a
representative
sample of people
Quick
Inexpensive
Efficient
Accurate
Flexible
Problems
Poor Design
Improper Execution
Systematic Error
Systematic error results from some
imperfect aspect of the research design or
from a mistake in the execution of the
research
Sample Bias
Sample bias - when the results of a sample
show a persistent tendency to deviate in one
direction from the true value of the
population parameter
Respondent Error
A classification of sample bias resulting
from some respondent action or inaction
Nonresponse bias
Response bias
Nonresponse Error
Nonrespondents - people who refuse to
cooperate
Not-at-homes
Self-selection bias
Over-represents extreme positions
Under-represents indifference
Response Bias
A bias that occurs when respondents
tend to answer questions with a certain
slant that consciously or unconsciously
misrepresents the truth
Acquiescence Bias
A category of response bias that results
because some individuals tend to agree with
all questions or to concur with a particular
position.
Extremity Bias
A category of response bias that results
because response styles vary from person to
person; some individuals tend to use
extremes when responding to questions.
Interviewer Bias
A response bias that occurs because the
presence of the interviewer influences
answers.
Auspices Bias
Bias in the responses of subjects caused by
the respondents being influenced by the
organization conducting the study.
Administrative Error
Improper administration of the research task
Blunders
Confusion
Neglect
Omission
Administrative Error
Interviewer cheating - filling in fake
answers or falsifying interviewers
Data processing error - incorrect data entry,
computer programming, or other procedural
errors during the analysis stage.
Sample selection error -improper sample
design or sampling procedure execution.
Interviewer error - field mistakes
Cross-Sectional Study
A study in which various segments of a
population are sampled
Data are collected at a single moment in
time.
Longitudinal Study
A survey of respondents at different times,
thus allowing analysis of changes over time.
Tracking study - compare trends and
identify changes
consumer satisfaction
Consumer Panel
A longitudinal survey of the same sample of
individuals or households to record (in a
diary) their attitudes, behavior, or
purchasing habits over time.
Emerging Methods
CAPI Computer Assisted Personal
Interview
CATI Computer Assisted Telephonic
Interview
Measurement Scales
Dr. Bikramjit Rishi
Numbers
Assigned
to Runners
Finish
7
Finish
Ordinal
Interval
Ratio
Rank Order
of Winners
Performance
Rating on a
0 to 10 Scale
Time to
Finish, in
Seconds
Third
place
Second
place
First
place
8.2
9.1
9.6
15.2
14.1
13.4
Product
Category
Dept.
Wise
Centralized
Store
Single
Warehouse
Daily Turnover
100-200
200-300
Above
300
Total:
Dr. Bikramjit Rishi
100
Milk
Respondents
Age
Below
30
years
Above
30
years
Total
Tea /
Coffee
Fruit
Juice
Total
13
10
30
14
20
17
24
50
Ordinal Scale
(Illustration)
Rank order the following attributes
on their importance in a microwave
oven (from 1 to 5, 1 for most
important and 5 for least important).
A. Company Name
B. Price
C. Functions
D. Comfort
E. Design
Company Name
Less Known 1
Function
Price
Design
Few
Low
Poor
1
1
1
Overall satisfaction Highly Dis-Satis.1
Well Known
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
Many
5
High
5 Good
5 Highly Satisfied
The data obtained from the interval scales can be used to calculate the mean scores of each attribute over all the
respondents.
Primary Scales of
Measurement
Scale
Nominal
Ordinal
Interval
Ratio
Basic
Characteristics
Numbers identify
& classify objects
Common
Examples
Social Security
nos., numbering
of football players
Nos. indicate the Quality rankings,
relative positions rankings of teams
of objects but not in a tournament
the magnitude of
differences
between them
Differences
Temperature
between objects (Fahrenheit)
Zero point is fixed, Length, weight
ratios of scale
values can be
compared
Marketing
Permissible
Descriptive
Examples
Brand nos., store Percentages,
types
mode
Statistics
Inferential
Chi-square,
binomial test
Preference
Percentile,
rankings, market median
position, social
class
Rank-order
correlation,
ANOVA
Attitudes,
opinions, index
Age, sales,
income, costs
Factor
analysis,
Coefficient of
variation
Range, mean,
standard
Geometric
mean, harmonic
mean
Rank Order
1. Pepsodent
_________
2. Colgate
_________
3. Anchor
_________
4. Babool
_________
5. Close up
_________
6. Meswak
_________
7. Vicco
_________
8. Cibaca
_________
_________
Instructions
On the next slide, there are eight attributes of
bathing soaps. Please allocate 100 points among the
attributes so that your allocation reflects the
relative importance you attach to each attribute.
The more points an attribute receives, the more
important the attribute is. If an attribute is not at all
important, assign it zero points. If an attribute is
twice as important as some other attribute, it should
receive twice as many points.
Form
Average Responses of Three Segments
Attribute
1. Mildness
2. Lather
3. Colour
4. Price
5. Fragrance
6. Packaging
7. Moisturizing
8. Cleaning Power
Sum
Dr. Bikramjit Rishi
Segment I
8
2
3
53
9
7
5
13
100
Segment II
Segment III
2
4
9
17
0
5
3
60
100
4
17
7
9
19
9
20
15
100
Measurement and
Scaling:
Non-comparative
Scaling
Techniques
Dr. Bikramjit Rishi
Non-comparative Scaling
Techniques
Respondents evaluate only
one object at a time, and for
this reason non-comparative
scales are often referred to
as monadic scales.
Non-comparative techniques
consist of continuous and
itemized rating scales.
Dr. Bikramjit Rishi
Very bad
Neither good
Very good
nor bad
Probably the worst - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - Probably the best
0 10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Likert Scale
The Likert scale requires the respondents to indicate a degree of
agreement or disagreement with each of a series of
statements about the stimulus objects.
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Neither
agree nor
Agree
Strongly
agree
disagree
A Semantic Differential Scale for Measuring SelfConcepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts
1) Rugged
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Delicate
2) Excitable
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Calm
3) Uncomfortable
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Comfortable
4) Dominating
5) Thrifty
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Submissive
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Indulgent
6) Pleasant
7) Contemporary
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Unpleasant
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Obsolete
8) Organized
9) Rational
10) Youthful
11) Formal
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Unorganized
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Emotional
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Mature
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Informal
12) Orthodox
13) Complex
14) Colorless
15) Modest
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Liberal
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Simple
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Colorful
:---:---:---:---:---:---:---: Vain
Stapel Scale
The Stapel scale is a unipolar rating scale with ten
categories numbered from -5 to +5, without a
neutral point (zero). This scale is usually
presented vertically.
SEARS
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1
HIGH QUALITY
-1
-2
-3
-4X
-5
+5
+4
+3
+2X
+1
POOR SERVICE
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
Basic Non-comparative
Scales
Scale
Basic
Characteristics
Examples
Advantages
Disadvantages
Continuous
Rating
Scale
Place a mark on a
continuous line
Reaction to
TV
commercials
Easy to construct
Scoring can be
cumbersome
unless
computerized
Likert Scale
Degrees of
agreement on a 1
(strongly disagree)
to 5 (strongly agree)
scale
Measurement
of attitudes
Easy to construct,
administer, and
understand
More
time - consuming
Semantic
Differential
Brand,
product, and
company
images
Versatile
Controversy as
to whether the
data are interval
Stapel
Scale
Unipolar ten
- point
scale, - 5 to +5,
witho ut a neutral
point (zero)
Measurement
of attitudes
and images
Easy to construct,
administer over
telephone
Confusing and
difficult to apply
Itemized Rating
Scales
Extremely good
Very good
Good
Bad
Very bad
Extremely bad
Extremely good
Very good
Good
Somewhat good
Bad
Very bad
---
2) Very harsh
--2
---
---
---
---
---
Very gentle
Very gentle
3) . Very harsh
.
.
Cheer
. Neither harsh nor gentle
.
.
. Very gentle
4) ____
____
____
____
Very
Harsh
Somewhat Neither harsh
harsh
Harsh
nor gentle
____
Somewhat
gentle
____
Gentle
____
Very
gentle
5)
-3
-2
Very
harsh
-1
0
Neither harsh
nor gentle
+1
+2
+3
Very
gentle
Form:
Like very
much
100
75
50
25
0
Dislike
very much
Form:
Dr. Bikramjit Rishi
Home Work
You are working on a consumer perception study of
four brands of bicycles. You will need to develop
measurement questions and scales to accomplish the
tasks listed below. Be sure to explain which data
levels (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio) are
appropriate and which quantitative techniques you
will use.
Provide a comparison of the brands for each of the
following dimensions:
Styling
Durability
Quality
Brand image