Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Submitted By:
Name : Minani Leodegard
Position : Researcher
Organization : Kampala International University.
Telephone: 256775048575
Email: mileodegard@yahoo.ca
March, 2015
Rwanda
Province
Southern
Capital
Gacurabwenge
Area
Total
340,501
Density
Project commencement
In Kamonyi District, Community Settlements as the housing policy in the
whole country of Rwanda locally known as Imidugudu or agglomeration plan
came as an idea of the Arusha peace agreement of 1993, between government
of Rwanda at the time and refugee representative party of RPF Inkotanyi, a
project that was aiming at finding homes to hundreds of thousands of refugees
who were being expected to return back in their home country after Arusha
peace agreement.
Implementation of this new policy started with the 1994 new government, with
extension of the list of beneficiaries to include genocide survivors whose houses
were demolished during the period of genocide against Tutsi in Rwanda. The
programme since 1997 has been modified and extended to target the entire
rural population: all scattered households in the country had to be regrouped
in villages. The programme was implemented with substantial support from
international organizations such as the UNHCR, UNDP, ECHO, LWF, USAID,
CARE-UK, World Vision, UNWFP, world bank and many others. What began as
a response to an emergency crisis became a massive scheme for the country
community transformation and innovative and practical low cost housing plan
for housing problem for the Rwandan community. Up to 2009, 876,623 houses
were constructed in 30 districts of the country.
Initiator of the project?
The project was initiated by Government of Rwanda and UN agencies (UNHCR,
UNWFP and UNDP), and European Union as a solution to finding shelters of
returning
refugees
at
the
time.
residential
areas
in
Rwanda.
and
vulnerable
widows,
orphans
and
persons
with
disabilities.
The new settlement policy also aims at bringing all the homes in settlements
programme to an acceptable level in terms of housing and access to social and
economic standards. The policy further aims at rationalizing the use of land to
avoid its fragmentation in small portions needed for both agriculture and
housing.
3
Project Description
Key features of the project for appropriate and affordable
building standards.
The issue of settlement in Rwanda should be understood within the framework
of the Arusha Accords (1992-93). The Protocol on repatriation of refugees
identified the type of settlement agreed upon as the village grouped type of
settlement to encourage the establishment of development centres in rural
areas and break with the traditional scattered housing. The current policy on
resettlement in rural areas is thus based on the Arusha agreement. The village
settlement type described in the agreement is now commonly known as
umudugudu.
Under the new Government, in 1994, the first effort at spelling out a national
policy was a Ministerial Decree released in January 1997 by the Ministry of
Public Works and Energy (MINITRAPE). The purpose of the Decree was to
regulate housing construction in both urban and rural areas, with the objective
of stopping unplanned settlements, and of promoting the development of
imidugudu as the only acceptable type of rural settlement.
The underlying rationale for imidugudu sought to address some of the
structural challenges of
Rwandan rural economic and social organization that had likewise been
fundamentally altered
by the war and massive displacement of so many people.
The Government of Rwanda in 1997 prepared a Thematic Consultation on
community settlements which should help to better define the country's
settlement needs and future strategies. This work was fully supported by the
UN's Joint Reintegration Programming Unit, a joint planning and co-ordination
4
scarcity
at
the
same
time.
extension
5
services.
Thus, more than one million people had been placed in the Imidugudu
settlements up to 1999.
When Imidugudu scheme was in its eighth year, many donors remain skeptical
about the programme; citing reports of "coerced" relocations, the lack of
popular participation in the process of home design, plot-size, decision-making
and other aspects of planning and resettlement-policy implementation, that the
government did not seek the opinion of the local population before embarking
on this project and as a result, many of the present occupants were forced into
these group settlements. In justification of this statement, government officials
said that the emergency phase called for the urgent resettlement of thousands
of the returnees and displaced persons that led to the development of many
sites by numerous organisations without adherence to clearly defined building
standards.
After all those accusations, the government immediately updated its settlement
policy, specifying where houses can be built, how many units they should
contain, the size of the houses, the location of recreational centres and other
social services in the Imidugudu. The new policy was in line with the
government's overall approach to structural reforms of human settlement
related to the land tenure system, community welfare standards and
environment.
Officials said the new policy aimed at the development of sustainable human
settlements through improved land management, measures for poverty
reduction, measures against hunger and measures to protect the environment.
A draft law on the land and housing policy was passed by parliament, focusing
on improving and redesigning settlement patterns in urban and rural areas
which are followed today. Officials declared that despite some shortcomings in
implementing the policy, the government still firmly believes that Imidugudu
represents the only feasible alternative to Rwanda's land population equation
for the foreseeable future. Thus, Based on the participation of the local
6
Urgent need for shelter; The practice of imidugudu started in 1995 with
the grouped settlement of old caseload returnees. Although the
Government had not yet articulated a formal decree concerning grouped
settlement, there was a general understanding among humanitarian and
development
assistance
actors
that
grouped
settlement
was
the
Security: personal and national; The broad rationale here was that
village settlements will enhance the security of people in rural areas. In
practice, this issue of security had two quite different dimensions. The
first was linked to genocide survivors, often widows, and old caseload
refugees who returned in 1994-95. These groups had genuine fear of
returning to, or building new, isolated homes, and preferred to live close
together for mutual support. The second dimension was linked to the
situation in the Northwest and the rise in insurgency during 1997-98. As
more and more people fled to communal centres and public places to
escape the fighting, the impact of imidugudu then has been an
alternative way of both protecting the population from the insurgents,
while depriving the infiltrators of hideouts and covert support.
with
ethnic
background
and
without
enough
clear
Health Facilities; Even though each settlement site does not have its
health centre, there has been an effort by government to locate a health
centre in each of 2150 cells (the lowest administrative institution) and
their technical analysis starts with the placement in community
settlements.
A new and good look of the country; After the construction of settled
houses, a look of estates brings an image of cities even in rural areas of
the country.
consideration
of
settlements
in
terms
of
financial
10
on providing 8 sheets of roofing materials per family for the first phase of the
project.
UNDP set up agglomeration sites, and 65 sites having 50 houses each were
fully constructed under the cost covered by UNDP.
ECHO worked through implementing partners only. They financed the building
of 6000 houses, costing 1.100 ECU each.
USAID had donated US$ 25 million for rehabilitation programs through
implementing partners.
To now, in case the need for having a house in umudugudu arises without
ability, the government or any other stakeholder
necessary costs such as availing sites for plots on public land, construction
master plan and authorizations, iron sheets, cement, engineering costs, doors
and windows to assist those who cannot afford the costs; orphans, widows,
returnees, people with disabilities, elders and poor communities. The selection
of these aided beneficiaries refers to the already existing categories of social
classes as determined by government guidelines known locally as Ubudehe,
where each person falls under a certain category depending on the property
and income level.
education
infrastructure
maintenance,
health
infrastructure
12
this context of the monthly community service that many settlements have
benefited the contribution of local communities.
Another important point is the contribution of the army forces in what is called
the Army week activities that take place every year where the plan of activities
also includes the assistance to settlement houses.
Beneficiaries have also actively participated in the construction works. Many
have been involved in land-clearing, brick-making, assisting masons to carry
construction material and cutting poles for the rooves.
Low cost housing system; An estimate of US$ 5,000 is the average cost
per household shelter. This low cost, compared to the normal cost of
building a house, is relatively low, being a result of contribution of
different factors, the key factor being the contribution of stakeholders
where government, donors, local community and beneficiaries each
contributes in either direct cost or indirect costs.
A new and good look of the country; After the construction of settled
houses, a look of estates brings an image of cities even in rural areas of
the country.
14
division. Thus, as early 2009, there were more than 6,000 sites across the
whole country with nearly 1,000,000 houses, managed under the government
administrative structure (from cells to sectors to districts to provinces and
lastly to national level), as a result of being the government initiative.
Therefore, the experience of this innovative and practical solution to housing in
Rwanda can be shared to other nations having housing problems.
Sample photos of Imidugudu in Kamonyi District.
15