Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Purpose of Packet: The purpose of this packet is to introduce you, the delegate, to a
different type of committee in Model United Nations: the Crisis Committee. The common
denominator of Crisis Committees is that there is an international crisis to be solved over the
course of the conference. The committees must work alone, or together with other
committees, to accomplish their goals. The level of debate is typically higher on a Crisis
Committee, and accordingly, these committees are also much more competitive in many
respects, frequently drawing schools best delegates. In light of this, it is important to note
that Crisis Committees are typically composed of members who already have solid
experience in the General Assembly and who have a working knowledge of the terms
presented in the previous Introductory Packet. As the proverb goes, You must walk
(participate in GAs) before you can run (participate in Crisis Committees). A thorough
knowledge of the first packet, combined with GA experience and an understanding of this
packet, will give you the tools that you need to be successful in the Crisis Committee. While
reading this packet, keep in mind that the policies given in examples may have changed since
publication.
Types of Crisis Committees: There are a few distinct types of Crisis Committees. The
following three are the most common, and the three upon which this packet will focus:
Cabinets: A cabinet is the leadership council of a nation. This council consists of the Head
of State/Government and his advisors. If a cabinet is at a conference, it will almost always
be involved in a crisis. The cabinet has at its disposal anything that its nation can do (this is
further explained in the How to Navigate the Three Types of Crisis Committee section).
Some common modern cabinet crises involve India/Pakistan, Israel/The Middle Eastern
Islamic Countries, and North Korea/South Korea. The United States and other major
powers can be involved in all of these. Cabinets can also simulate a historical event, such as
the Cuban Missile Crisis. Delegates on cabinets are typically some of the most experienced
delegates at the conference. The level of debate is extremely high, and awards are generally
very tight. The committees are usually not run very strictly in order to smooth the flow of
debate. (For more on this, see the Mechanics of the Crisis Committee section).
Regional Bodies: A regional body is an organization that represents a specific region of the
world. The most common regional bodies that have crises are the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC), and the European
Union (EU).
United Nations Security Council: This is often the flagship committee of a conference. The
Security Council is the only body of the UN that can mandate anything. As such, it is often
utilized in crises. The Security Council is unlike any other committee. It is unique unto itself
and is often very competitive, but it is also very fun and rewarding.
troop strengths in the Pacific region. (More about strategy later in the How to Navigate the
Three Types of Crisis Committee section.)
An Open Mind: Keep in mind that crises are often far-fetched and may seem unrealistic.
If you find yourself in this situation, do not be put off, and try to take the issues at hand
seriously. Offbeat crises are often done intentionally in order to make you think even more
and come up with more creative solutions. If you try to go with the crisis, you will learn
that much more in the end. Even if you think the crisis is a little wacky, you could soon
realize--often with a bit of a shock--that the crisis is in fact quite plausible, or at least
interesting.
For All Committees: At the start of the conference, the chair will either give the committee
a crisis briefing or ask for delegates to present topics of discussion. In the event of the
former, the delegates will read the briefing and then discuss it. Sometimes they will suggest
action, sometimes not. In the event that a crisis does not start at the very beginning,
delegates should suggest to the committee a topic to which they feel devoting time is
warranted. This is untrue in the UN Security Council or a regional body, where a speakers
list is the first priority. After committee proceeds for a time, the delegates will certainly
receive a briefing. This briefing generally suggests that the crisis has worsened (or may
introduce the crisis in the first place if you did not start with one). Sometimes, the delegates
will still feel that the crisis is not important enough to warrant devoting resources to it.
However, other delegates will feel the opposite. A debate will ensue in which each delegate
should voice his opinion. (For more on what to do, see the How to Navigate a Crisis
Committee section.)
Briefings: Briefings are presented in two ways. First, a hand-out may be passed out to each
delegate with a press release, news report, or internal governmental communication. The
other option is that a member of the crisis staff comes in and portrays a government official
or a member of the media. You may be able to ask questions of these live people. Doing so
is beneficial, provided that your questions are serious and relevant (obnoxious or pedantic
questions really frustrate a chair and the crisis briefer).
Intelligence Briefings: Intelligence is normally treated in one of three ways. The first is
that it may be shared with anyone in the room. The second is that it may be shared only
with allies--this is rated Secret. In a committee such as NATO, this means that it may be
shared with anyone in the room. The last is For Your Eyes Only, or Top Secret. This
means that on a regional body or the Security Council, no one else should read it.
Obviously, on a cabinet, intelligence is to be shared, though it may initially go to the minister
whose department received the intelligence.
The Rest of Committee: The way that the rest of committee unfolds completely depends
upon the conference and the crisis.
character. Although I normally would not be in favor of this sort of move, after
considering the situation, I have determined that it is indeed the needed course of action, for
these reasons would be a diplomatic way of prefacing a departure from your previous
policy that would sufficiently explain yourself to the committee and the chair. Looking at
quotes from, and news items about, your character is the best way to know the policy to
which you are trying to adhere.
Regional Bodies: In a regional body, you represent a country. As such, you must be true to the
policy of that nation. In a body such as the African Union, a country might hold much more
power than it does in the regular United Nations. If you are Nigeria, you might not have all
that much to say on DISEC, but you can be a major power in the African Union. As long as
you stay on your message, you can be a real power in committee.
United Nations Security Council: In the Security Council, you must stay on policy as well. You
are often confronted with unique situations, and you must evaluate what staying on policy
is. For example, if you are the Russian Federation, and Iran is threatening to make nuclear
weapons, you would know that you do not want the Security Council to talk about Iran.
This is because Russia has said that it will veto any resolution on Iranian nuclear arms. You
had to evaluate whether or not supporting this resolution contradicts your policy. To
research what said policy is, simply use the same methods of research outlined above.
Nationals: For every session at national conferences, you should remain serious and
industrious during committee. You should also always be working toward whatever goal the
chair has set for you. That being said, at some nationals, the last session of committee (the
Sunday session) will be more relaxed and will allow for some fun. Remember: if your chair
stays serious, stay serious, but if your chair wants to have fun, have fun! After all, you have
worked hard for the past two to three days!
serious and realistic. Do not suggest rash and unnecessary military action. On the other
hand, do not wait too long or your citizens being held hostage by terrorists could be dead.
Cabinets, like all Crisis Committees, are all about treading a fine line. If you have a particular
area of expertise, try to relate that to the committee, but feel free to comment on all
important issues.
Regional Bodies: These combine the committee atmosphere of a GA with the fast-paced
action of a crisis. It is important to stay on policy in regional bodies. However, in some
situations, the rules can be bent. For instance, if you are the United Kingdom on NATO,
your policy would frequently follow that of the United States. However, if the U.S. is very
off-policy, do not follow it. Be knowledgeable about the capabilities of your committee.
For instance, NATO has a strong military force at its disposal, while the Organization of
American States does not. These are important things to know before you start trying to
send in OAS Special Forces to shut down a Colombian drug operation!
United Nations Security Council: In many ways, the Security Council is the ultimate committee.
It is a hybrid of a global regional body and a cabinet with representatives from 15 nations.
Whenever the United Nations has a crisis, the Security Council is the body to respond. A
Security Council resolution is binding, which means that it compels member nations to
comply. The Security Council often handles issues between two nations who could
potentially come to blows. There are two types of nations on the Security Council: those
with a veto and those without a veto. If you have a veto, do not use it with reckless
abandon. In fact, only veto a resolution that is completely against your policy or that you
think would have detrimental effects. Using your veto otherwise could turn the committee
against you and opens you up for your resolution to be vetoed. If you do not have a veto,
fear not! Resolutions still need 3/5 support to pass, so form alliances and gain influence that
way. It is a myth that only veto powers win awards on the Security Council. In fact, if you
play your cards right, not having a veto can be an advantage.
Conclusion
It is my great hope that this guide has thoroughly introduced you to the Crisis Committee
and that it will serve you well in your Crisis Career. However, you must remember that there
is absolutely no substitute for experience. If crises intrigue you, try one out! They are very
rewarding and will introduce you to the upper echelon of Model United Nations. If you
have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to email me, Michael Romais, the Arbitrator,
at DEROMAIS@aol.com; I would be more than happy to answer them for you. With all
this in mind, I wish you the best of luck on your first Crisis Committee and beyond. Hope
to see you on committee in the future!