Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0031/ND
These Guidelines have been updated as part of the first stage of the harmonisation between the
GL Noble Denton and DNV heritage marine services requirements.
Refer also to DNVGL-SE-0080 Noble Denton marine services Marine Warranty Survey
for further details.
All references to GL Noble Denton apply to the legal entity trading under the DNV GL or GL Noble Denton
name which is contracted to carry out the scope of work and issues a Certificate of Approval, or provides a
marine related advisory or assurance service.
Once downloaded this document becomes UNCONTROLLED.
Please check the website below for the current version.
14 Dec 15
RJP
22 Jun 13
RJP
6 Dec 10
RJP
Date
Revision
Prepared by
Authorised by
http://www.dnvgl.com/
PREFACE
This document has been drawn with care to address what are considered to be the primary issues in relation to the
contents based on the experience of the GL Noble Denton Group of Companies (the Group). This should not,
however, be taken to mean that this document deals comprehensively with all of the issues which will need to be
addressed or even, where a particular matter is addressed, that this document sets out a definitive view for all
situations. In using this document, it should be treated as giving guidelines for sound and prudent practice, but
guidelines must be reviewed in each particular case by the responsible organisation in each project to ensure that
the particular circumstances of that project are addressed in a way which is adequate and appropriate to ensure that
the overall guidance given is sound and comprehensive.
Reasonable precaution has been taken in the preparation of this document to seek to ensure that the content is
correct and error free. However, no company in the Group
shall be liable for any loss or damage incurred resulting from the use of the information contained herein or
shall owe a duty of care to any party other than to its contracting customer entity (subject always to the terms
of contract between such Group company and subcontracting customer entity).
This document must be read in its entirety and is subject to any assumptions and qualifications expressed therein as
well as in any other relevant communications by the Group in connection with it. Elements of this document contain
detailed technical data which is intended for analysis only by persons possessing requisite expertise in its subject
matter.
2015 Noble Denton Group Limited. The content of this document is the copyright of Noble Denton Group Limited.
All rights reserved. Any reproduction in other material must have written permission. Extracts may be reproduced
provided that their origin is clearly referenced.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 2 of 37
CONTENTS
SECTION
1
SUMMARY
2
INTRODUCTION
2.1
General
2.2
Start and Completion of Operations
2.3
Other GL Noble Denton Guideline Documents & Feedback
2.5
Codes and Legislation
2.6
Revisions
3
DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
4
THE APPROVAL PROCESS & SAFETY
4.1
General
4.2
Scope of Work Leading to an Approval
4.3
Limitation of Approval
4.4
Health, Safety and Environment
5
LOAD-OUT, TRANSPORTATION & MOORING
5.1
Structure Load-out
5.2
Structure Transportation
5.3
In-field Mooring
6
DESIGN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
6.1
Principles
6.2
Operational Reference Period
6.3
Weather Restricted Operations
6.4
Weather Unrestricted Operations
6.5
Operational Feasibility
7
CONSIDERATIONS INFLUENCING BARGE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR LOAD-OUT,
TRANSPORTATION & FLOAT-OVER
8
FLOAT-OVER ENGINEERING
8.1
General
8.2
Weight & Dimensional Control
8.3
Barge Load Conditions
8.4
Stability During Installation / removal
8.5
Fenders and/or Tethers
8.6
Motions and Mating Stages
8.7
Draught and Freeboard
8.8
Clearances
8.9
Barge Mooring and Positioning Overview
8.10
Barge Mooring and Stand-off Moorings
8.11
Clearances around Mooring Lines and Anchors
8.12
Position Keeping during Mating /De-mating with Tethers
8.13
Barge Positioning Using Tug(s) with Mooring Lines
8.14
Barge Positioning Using a DP System
8.15
Host Structure Structural Considerations
8.16
Floating Host Structure Additional Structural Considerations
8.17
Floating Host Structure Freeboard, Stability and Reserve Buoyancy
8.18
Deck Removal
9
STRUCTURAL STRENGTH
9.1
Codes
9.2
Seafastenings
9.3
Fenders and Guides
10
PUMPING AND BALLASTING
10.1
Principles
10.2
Host Structure Ballasting Equipment
0031/ND REV 2
PAGE NO.
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
14
15
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
18
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
24
Page 3 of 37
24
24
27
28
28
28
28
28
29
30
30
30
30
31
31
31
31
33
33
33
34
35
TABLES
Table 10-1
Table 10-2
Table 10-2
Table 10-3
24
24
26
26
0031/ND REV 2
Page 4 of 37
SUMMARY
1.1
This document has been developed to provide guidelines for the float-over installation or removal of
structures onto or from a host structure which may be:
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
These guidelines are intended to lead to an approval by GL Noble Denton, which may be sought
where an operation is the subject of an insurance warranty, or where an independent third party review
is required.
A description of the Approval Process is included, for those projects which are the subject of an
insurance warranty.
The document includes the requirements for consideration, intended to represent good practice, for the
following phases:
Engineering
Barge selection
Set down
Barge removal
Operational considerations.
Check lists are appended, to act as a guide to information required.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 5 of 37
INTRODUCTION
2.1
GENERAL
2.1.1
This guideline refers to the offshore float-over of structures onto or off both fixed and floating
structures. It contains general recommendations and checklists of information required to allow
approval of such operations by GL Noble Denton.
Due to the range of float-over methods, this document does not cover all aspects of every scheme.
Alternative proposals and methods will be considered on their own merits, and can be approved if they
are shown to be in accordance with safe and good engineering and operational practices.
2.1.2
2.1.3
This document is intended to primarily address offshore operations and may be found to be too
conservative for inshore or sheltered water operations. In such cases reference may be made to DNVOS-H201, Ref. [7], which provides specific guidance for mating operations in sheltered waters.
2.2
2.2.1
The towage or transportation has arrived at the installation / removal location and authorisation
to start installation / removal operation has been received from relevant bodies, or
Installation / removal has started at the installation / removal site (typically within the 500m
exclusion zone).
2.2.2
2.2.3
Installation / removal is generally defined as being completed when the structure is lowered on the host
structure or removal barge according to agreed installation procedures and the transportation barge
has left the installation / removal site (e.g. the 500m exclusion zone).
2.3
2.3.1
This document refers to, and should be read in conjunction with other GL Noble Denton Guideline
documents, particularly:
0027/ND - Guidelines for Marine Lifting & Lowering Operations, Ref. [4]
2.3.2
Care should be taken when referring to any GL Noble Denton guideline document that the latest
revision is being referenced.
Electronic versions of GL Noble Denton Guidelines are available on:
https://www.dnvgl.com/rules-standards/noble-denton-maa-rules-and-guidelines.html
2.4
2.4.1
Please contact the Technical Standards Committee Secretary at TSC@dnvgl.com with any queries or
feedback.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 6 of 37
2.5.1
2.5.2
These guidelines are intended to lead to an approval of a specific operation by GL Noble Denton.
Such approval does not imply that approval by designers, regulatory bodies and/or any other party
would be given.
Care should be taken that the design and planning of an installation / removal operation comply with
relevant standards and national and international legislation, e.g. established offshore design codes
(API, NORSOK, ISO, DNV, etc.) suitably augmented as necessary for local conditions by project
specific design briefs.
2.6
REVISIONS
2.6.1
Revision 1 superseded Revision 0 of 6 December 2010. Main changes, marked with a vertical line in
the right hand margin, were:
Much of the Approval Process has been moved from Section 4 to 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
Extension of the use of Metocean Reduction Factors in Section 6.3 which now refers to Ref. [1].
Weight control has been moved from Section 7 to Section 8.2.1 and refers to Ref. [1].
Additional infortmation on fendering and DP for deck removal in Sections 8.5 and 8.14.
Additional information on Deck Support Units (DSU) in Sections 8.6.6 and 11.3.4.
Updates to Section 9.1 on Structural Strength which now refers to Ref. [1].
Changes for Barge Systems in Section 11.2, LMUs in Section 11.3.1 and DP vessels in Section
11.4.
Safety and Project Control have been moved from Section 15 to 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
2.6.2
This Revision 2 supersedes Revision 1 of 22 June 2013. Main changes, marked with a vertical line in
the right hand margin, are:
Application of document to inshore float-over operations has been removed and reference is
now made to DNV-OS-H201, Ref. [7], in Sections 1.1, 2.1.3 and 8.8.9.
Additional requirement to confirm that actual vessel draughts correspond to design draughts in
Section 8.8.8
Changes to the ballast pumping requirements and the addition of an example in Section 10.4
0031/ND REV 2
Page 7 of 37
3.1
Definition
50/50 weight
estimate
AHV
Approval
ASD
Barge
Certificate of
Approval
DP
DSU /
Deck Support Unit
Unit installed on the barge grillage to support the structure prior to and during
the floatover. It can be designed to either provide a rigid vertical support and
allow horizontal movement or utilise elastomers to absorb vertical and
horizontal installation motions and forces.
Float-Over
FMEA or
FMECA
Freeboard
GBS
GL Noble Denton
The legal entity trading under the DNV GL or GL Noble Denton name which
is contracted to carry out the scope of work and issues a Certificate of
Approval, or provides a marine related advisory or assurance service.
HAT
HAZID
HAZOP
Heave
Host Structure
The host structure (e.g. jacket, GBS, TLP) onto which the structure or
structure deck will be floated and supported, or from which it will be removed.
Insurance Warranty
LAT
0031/ND REV 2
Page 8 of 37
Definition
LMU /
Leg Mating Unit
Unit that is designed and installed between the structure and the host
structure in order to absorb vertical and horizontal installation motions and
forces. The units are normally either installed on the host structure legs to
receive the structure, or on the structure leg stubs in order to interface with
the host structure legs. LMUs can be also installed on the removal barge.
LRFD
LSF /
Load-out Support
Frame
Frame that spans between the underside of the structure and the barge /
vessel load spreading grillage
MRU
MSL
NDT / Non
Destructive Testing
NTE weight / Not To Sometimes used in projects to define the maximum allowable installation
Exceed weight
/ removal weight of a structure, excluding rigging.
Operation Duration
The planned duration of the operation from the forecast prior to the Point of
No Return to a condition when the operations /structures can safely
withstand a seasonal design storm (also termed safe to safe duration); this
excludes the contingency period.
Operational
reference period
PNR /
Point of No Return
RCS / Recognized
Classification
Society
Sand Jacks
A compartment filled with sand that is incorporated into the LMU to allow the
final controlled lowering of the structure onto the host structure
Seafastenings
Skidshoe
A bearing pad attached to the structure which engages in the skidway and
carries a share of the vertical load
Skidway
The lower continuous rails, either on the quay or on the barge, on which the
structure is loaded out, via the skidshoes
Structure
Surge
Survey
Surveyor
0031/ND REV 2
Page 9 of 37
Definition
Sway
Tether
A tether is a mooring line used for pulling and mooring the installation
/ removal barge into the required position
Tidal range
TLP
TMPS /
Tug Management
Positioning System
A system installed on the AHV and the Installation / removal barge to allow
the accurate placing of the tug and anchors.
Vessel
Weather restricted
operation
Weather
unrestricted
operation
WSD
0031/ND REV 2
Page 10 of 37
4.1
GENERAL
4.1.1
Further information on the approval process appears in DNVGL-SE-0080 - Noble Denton marine
services Marine Warranty Survey, Ref. [8].
4.2
4.2.1
In order to issue a Certificate of Approval for a float-over operation, GL Noble Denton will typically
consider the topics and information listed in Appendix A.
A Certificate of Approval for a float-over operation covers the marine operations involved in the floatover procedure. Float-Over is normally deemed to start at the time when all preparations for float-over
are complete (moorings installed, DP system checks completed, host structure preparations complete,
structure prepared) and a suitable weather forecast is received showing that environmental conditions
are expected to be less than the design allowables for the maximum duration of the operation,
including contingencies.
Surveys required typically include preliminary surveys of the barge, structure and site; attendance at
weighing and load-out operations; surveys of readiness to start float-over and witnessing of float-over
operations.
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.3
LIMITATION OF APPROVAL
4.3.1
See Section 4.7 of DNVGL-SE-0080 - Noble Denton marine services Marine Warranty Survey,
Ref. [8].
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
See Section 5 of 0001/ND General Guidelines for Marine Projects, Ref. [1] for more details.
During the float-over operation there will be a number of simultaneous hazardous activities carried out
in a relatively short period of time. The Surveyor, and all others involved in float-over operations,
should be aware of these hazards and participate in the operational safety briefings. The hazards
include:
Working at height
Hot works
Overside working
0031/ND REV 2
Page 11 of 37
5.1
STRUCTURE LOAD-OUT
5.1.1
Structure load-out shall be generally carried out in accordance with GL Noble Denton Load-Out
guidelines 0013/ND Ref. [2].
5.2
STRUCTURE TRANSPORTATION
5.2.1
Structure transportation shall be generally carried out in accordance with GL Noble Denton Marine
Transportation guidelines 0030/ND Ref. [5].
5.3
IN-FIELD MOORING
5.3.1
In-field mooring of the transportation barge shall generally be carried out in accordance with Section
8.9 to 8.13 of these guidelines and GL Noble Denton Moorings Guidelines 0032/ND, Ref. [6].
0031/ND REV 2
Page 12 of 37
6.1
PRINCIPLES
6.1.1
For each phase of a marine operation / float-over installation / removal, the limiting design criteria
should be defined, consisting of the design wind speed, wave height and period range and current
speed. Directional criteria can be specified. Co-linearity should be assumed unless location data
indicates otherwise.
Final selection of the limiting design environmental conditions should be based on the following:
Structural strength of the barge, structures and the installation / removal components
6.1.2
6.2
6.2.1
Planning and design of the float-over installation / removal shall be based on an operational reference
period equal to the planned duration of the operation plus a contingency period.
The planned duration for the installation / removal shall include, typically:
The time anticipated, after the decision to proceed, preparing for installation / removal or waiting
for the correct tidal conditions
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.3
6.3.1
6.3.2
Section 7.3 of 0001/ND, General Guidelines for Marine Projects, Ref. [1], applies for all weatherrestricted operations.
Unless agreed otherwise with GL Noble Denton, for marine operations the maximum forecast
environmental conditions shall not exceed the design wave heights, wind and current speeds multiplied
by the Alpha Factor from Table 7-3 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
6.4
6.4.1
6.4.2
For operations that could last more than 1 month, please see Table 7-1 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
For other operations, except as allowed in Section 7.3 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1], installations / removals
with an operational reference period greater than 72 hours shall be defined as un-restricted operations
for the complete operation (this may include connection to and disconnection from a mooring system
as applicable). In such cases the design shall be to the 10-year return period monthly extremes, or
any lesser conditions that cause more onerous responses.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 13 of 37
OPERATIONAL FEASIBILITY
6.5.1
0031/ND REV 2
Page 14 of 37
7.1.1
The selected barge (in the event that the proposed barge is being converted from its normal usage)
must satisfy certain criteria to ensure suitability for all phases of the operation, including load-out,
transportation and the float-over operation.
The barge selection process involves several considerations with regard to geometry, other than the
factors relating to the float-over operation. Relative heights of grillage and LSF have to be optimised
so that grillage height suits load-out by fixing the barge elevation at the quayside to match the yard
skidway height, and the combined grillage plus LSF height suits float-over clearances.
Important parameters are:
1.
The barge beam and depth must be appropriate for the host structure slot
2.
Barge depth considering minimum and maximum draught, quayside height and tidal range for
load-out
3.
Grillage minimum height requirement for load spreading considering quayside skidway height.
This fixes barge elevation at quayside during load-out
4.
Combined grillage plus LSF height to achieve required clearances at float-over, also
considering effect on barge stability and minimum draught
5.
Adequate depth and ballast capacity and ballasting rate to achieve minimum and maximum
drafts for the float-over considering tidal variations
6.
Global and local strength to ensure structural adequacy of the barge and attachments for all
stages during the float-over, including any contacts /collisions
7.
Adequate stability for the transportation (see 0030/ND, Ref. [5]) and to meet all Flag State
stability requirements
8.
Adequate freeboard (to avoid green water) and stability at all stages of the operations
9.
Adequate motion characteristics at all stages of the operations.
7.1.2
7.1.3
7.1.4
Submersible barges. Barges that can be totally immersed in the intact condition should be classed
as submersible barges. Submersible barges are normally classed as such by the RCS (Recognized
Classification Society).
0031/ND REV 2
Page 15 of 37
FLOAT-OVER ENGINEERING
8.1
GENERAL
8.1.1
The following sections describe specific requirements which shall be considered as part of the
engineering process.
8.2
8.2.1
A NTE (Not To Exceed) weight shall be defined for the structure and shall be used in the installation
analysis and calculations. Further details can be found in Section 8 of 0001/ND General Guidelines
for Marine Projects, Ref. [1].
If any changes take place after weighing or final weight calculation the effect on the float-over
procedures of any weight changes shall be assessed, and the procedures modified if necessary.
If the float-over method is used for the removal of a structure, a detailed weight history of the structure
is required for review. The maximum anticipated weight shall be stated in addition to the expected
CoG envelope. Contingencies on the weight and CoG position will depend on the likely accuracy of
the weight history and shall be agreed between the structure owner, removal contractor and GL Noble
Denton.
Dimensional control of the height and locations of the structure and substructure mating points shall
allow for any variations due to temperature differences, hog or sag during mating (compared to when
measured) and any horizontal movement of columns during deep submergence. Dimensional control
reports shall allow for fender clearances.
8.2.2
8.2.3
8.2.4
8.3
8.3.1
The barge loading condition for each stage of docking, mating, load-transfer and undocking operation
shall be determined as follows:
Docking and Pre-installation / removal case. The minimum float-over clearance will be
determined based on vessel draught, design of the mating cones and receptacles,
environmental conditions for the installation / removal and possible maximum motion
amplitudes at the mating points.
Mating and load transfer stages from the first contact to 100% transfer. These stages shall
be analysed for the barge at intermediate draughts, to allow for ballasting and fall of tide.
Undocking stages from 100% load transfer to separation. These stages and undocking
stages shall be analysed for the barge at a deep draught, to maximize separation clearances on
a falling tide and under-keel clearance.
8.4
8.4.1
Barge stability shall be shown to be adequate throughout the installation / removal operation.
Particular attention should be paid to:
Stability checks should be carried out for the full range of probable GM values, module weight
and centre of gravity predicted during installation / removal, this must include the effects of
deballasting the barge and jacking the module where applicable.
Any installation / removal with a small metacentric height, where an offset centre of gravity
(structure) may induce a heel or trim during the ballasting / weight transfer i.e. when any
transverse / longitudinal moment ceases to be restrained by the host structure.
Cases where a change of wind velocity or wave direction may cause a significant change of
heel and trim during the installation / removal.
Downflooding points should be above wave crest heights after allowing for run-up.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 16 of 37
8.5.1
Devices to assist or control the safe entry of the installation / removal barge into the host structure slot
shall be provided. These devices can be on the installation / removal barge, the host structure, or
both. The engineering properties (strength, stiffness, damping, hysteresis, elastomeric creep) of all the
components and systems for mating shall have been verified by tests which cover the full range of
conditions (e.g. forces, displacements) anticipated for the installation / removal operation.
Fenders. In most cases a suitable fendering system will be required to reduce stresses in the host
structure and barges in the event of contact by spreading the load and limiting the relative motions.
Fenders on the host structure should be of sufficient depth to ensure that they engage the side of the
barge at all stages of the floatover operation.
Tethers. During the mating operation, the barge may be held in position by tethers connected to the
host structure reacting against the surge fenders (if fitted). Alternatively tethers may operate in both
directions, replacing surge fenders.
No fenders or tethers. In exceptional cases when DP is proposed as the primary method of barge
station keeping, fenders or tethers may not be used but any possible impact between the barge and
the structure shall be demonstrated to have a low probability of occurrence and minimal consequence
by rigorous risk assessments and analysis respectively, and shall be agreed by GL Noble Denton. In
such situations:
a. The requirements in Section 8.14 shall be used to show that, in the proposed operational
environmental conditions, accidental contact between the host structure legs and the barge
will not cause significant damage.
b. Contact velocities and forces shall be determined from a comprehensive range of realistic
scenarios. The damage to the barge, structure and host structure shall be quantified and
assessed against the probability of the incident occurring in order to provide a suitable low
level of risk.
c. Minimum static vertical and horizontal clearances between the host structure and float-off
vessel shall be established. As a guide, minimum static horizontal clearances of 5m between
the extremities of the host structure and the float-off vessel shall be provided if using vessels
with a Class 3 notation and with DP reference systems that meet the Class 3 notation.
8.5.2
8.5.3
8.5.4
8.6
8.6.1
The motions of the transportation barge and associated docking, mooring line and fender loads shall
be analysed in the time domain for docking, load transfer and undocking positions, including non-linear
effects of the stiffness of the host structure / deck / barge, mooring configuration, shock absorbers,
fendering system, etc.
The motions of the barge and associated docking, mooring line and fender loads shall be analysed in
the time domain for several docking and undocking positions such as:
Pre-docking, free floating motions with the barge aligned with the first row of the host structure;
Docking, intermediate stage with the whole barge engaged with the host structure;
Docked, with the barge offset from the pre-mating position, prior to finally tensioning the mating
moorings;
Undocking, with the barge in an offset position, after full transfer of the deck weight to the host
structure and release of the mating moorings.
8.6.2
8.6.3
Mating stages shall be selected and analysed in the time domain to identify associated loadings to all
the interfaces associated in the weight transfer process. As a minimum this shall include barge
docking, load transfer and barge removal:
Pre-mating, with the barge and structure positioned in the host structure, and aligned with but
prior to engaging the stabbing cones or positioning system(s) on the LMUs / host structure;
0031/ND REV 2
Page 17 of 37
8.6.4
8.6.5
8.6.6
8.6.7
8.6.8
8.6.9
8.6.10
Intermediate load transfer, with the structure weight partially transferred from the barge to the
host structure, without any separation or lift off at the support points;
Last contact between the structure and the support point on the barge;
Post-load transfer, with the vessel positioned in the host structure after complete separation
from the host structure.
A Monte Carlo simulation or multiple seed simulation shall be performed to define maximum values.
The simulation period for each stationary stage shall reflect the actual operational period multiplied by
a factor of two to capture a contingency period. The time step to be used shall be selected so as to
achieve results that differ by no more than a few percent when the time step is halved and be
sufficiently small to ensure that the maximum peak motion is identified.
When a Monte Carlo simulation is used the design value shall have a probability of exceedance of not
more than 63% and the number of simulations shall be such that the design values change by no more
than 10% when the number of simulations is doubled.
When a multiple seed simulation is performed, the number of seeds shall be no fewer than 10 and the
average of the maxima shall be used as the design value.
Note: Design values determined from the above are applicable only when the operational metocean
limits are reduced below the design values with the applicable Alpha Factor(s) from 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
The Leg Mating Unit (LMU) design shall be carried out taking into account the loads, stroke and motion
response expected to be applied during load transfer operations. The LMU performance
characteristics shall be included in the mating analysis.
Where a Deck Support Unit (DSU) is included as part of the load transfer system, the design shall be
carried out taking into account the loads, stroke and motion response expected to be applied during
load transfer operations. The DSU performance characteristics shall be included in the mating
analysis. If the DSU is configured without shock absorbers but has a low friction mating surface to
allow the vessel to move freely during the floatover operation, the mass of the topside can be
considered independent from the barge so that the vessels inertia does not add to any significant
horizontal loading to the LMU /top of jacket.
If any other passive or active heave-compensation systems are used to compensate for relative
motions, the specification, capacity and design of these systems shall be stated in the operational
procedures.
An assessment shall be made to consider the speed at which the structure and barge can separate
during installation. As the barge starts to separate from the structure there will be a tendency for recontact at the LSF / structure interface due to the barge motions. Mitigations shall be considered to
avoid damage to structure and LSF / barge. During removal operations the vertical speed before
mating shall be demonstrated.
Where a rapid load transfer is required, a jacking system may be utilised. The jacking system shall be
designed to ensure the stability and restraint of the structure as it is raised above / lowered to its
transportation position. Redundancy shall be provided in the jacking system so that there is no single
point of failure in the system. Detailed HAZIDs will be required of the jacking system if used.
Where float-over operations are conducted in the shelter of a breakwater (e.g. for tanker loading
facilities at coastal locations), the adverse effects of the breakwater on the waves and current should
be considered when determining the environmental loading on the installation / removal barge.
8.7
8.7.1
The maximum draught of the installation / removal barge during float-over shall not exceed the
maximum loadline draught, without a class exemption (but this is not normally needed for semisubmersible heavy lift barges or vessels). For operations involving semi-submersible barges or heavy
lift ships with watertight main decks, wave crests may be allowed to over-top the vessel deck provided
that all hatches and downflooding points are suitably protected and that raised walkways are added to
all areas affected by water on deck where personnel movement is required.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 18 of 37
The minimum freeboard is defined as the minimum distance from the waterline to the watertight deck
level after accounting for static trim and heel. The minimum freeboard shall be sufficient to maintain
the vessels water-plane area and to ensure sufficient stability range to meet the requirements of
Section 8.4.1 at all stages of the operation, the minimum freeboard should usually be at least 1.0m. A
lower minimum freeboard may be acceptable if adequate precautions and procedures are in place to
ensure that the stability of the vessel is maintained. The minimum freeboard used during the operation
shall be confirmed with the barge owner.
8.8
CLEARANCES
8.8.1
Exclusion zones should be defined in the early phase of the project in order to minimise and avoid
clashes during the installation / removal operation.
During approach of the structure for installation, the minimum vertical clearance between the structure
stabbing cone and host structure receptacles / jacket leg / piles shall be 0.5m after accounting for
maximum dynamic vertical motions. The same minimum vertical clearance applies during removal
operations for relevant structures and stabbing aids.
The maximum vertical / horizontal movement of the stabbing cone should not normally exceed +/0.5m during entry and weight transfer unless suitable systems and/or engineering are provided to
compensate for movements in excess of +/- 0.5m.
The as-built clearances between the stabbing cones and the host structure receptacles / jacket legs
shall be checked after the load-out operation for installation and the procedures modified, if necessary.
Similarly for removal operations the relevant measurements shall be checked before operations start.
To allow safe removal of the installation / removal barge the minimum clearance between the keel of
the installation / removal barge and any part of the submerged host structure shall be 1.0m after
accounting for vessel maximum motions at maximum draught.
The minimum vertical clearance between the LSF and the underside of the structure following
completion of load transfer shall be 0.5m after accounting for vessel maximum motions to allow safe
removal of the installation / removal barge.
The as-built levels of the host structure should be verified as they can differ from the nominal values
due to seabed tolerances, especially where dredging operations are carried out.
The minimum clearances shall be calculated based upon the design draught of the vessel. The actual
vessel draughts shall be verified prior to commencing the operation to confirm that they are in
accordance with requirements and that acceptable clearances are achievable. Note that the datum
used for vessel draughts may need to be corrected to account for any parts of the vessel that extend
beneath the datum.
For inshore clearance requirements, reference may be made to DNV-OS-H201, Ref. [7], which
provides specific guidance for operations in sheltered waters.
8.8.2
8.8.3
8.8.4
8.8.5
8.8.6
8.8.7
8.8.8
8.8.9
8.9
8.9.1
Mooring and positioning of the barge into the host structure can be with a barge with a DP system (see
Section 8.14) or by one or more of:
a.
pre-laid mooring lines/anchors (see Sections 8.10 and 8.11),
b.
tethers (see Section 8.12).
c.
anchored tugs or free-running tugs (see Section 8.13).
d.
using the barges propulsion systems with constant thrust against surge fenders.
8.10
8.10.1
A stand-off mooring system shall be provided except for vessels with suitable DP systems, where a DP
Capability analysis shall be provided.
When required, the installation / removal barge mooring system shall be designed to resist the
environmental loads, allowing the barge to maintain position prior to docking. Line integrity and anchor
uplift shall also be verified for operational AND extreme environment standby cases.
8.10.2
0031/ND REV 2
Page 19 of 37
8.10.4
A mooring analysis shall be carried out for the installation / removal barge at the stand-off location and
at the incremental stages that comply with the installation / removal procedural steps. The mooring
analyses shall satisfy the requirements of GL Noble Denton Mooring Guidelines, 0032/ND, Ref. [6].
All installation / removal barge mooring lines and tethers shall be capable of being tensioned by the
use of winches or capstans.
8.11
8.11.1
Clearances around mooring lines and anchors should comply with GL Noble Denton Mooring
Guidelines, 0032/ND, Ref. [6]. Exemptions may need to be made for the final float-over stages when
close to the host structure; these shall be subject to risk assessment and the results agreed with GL
Noble Denton.
All anchor lines shall be pre-installed and pre-tensioned to maximum operating loads with a safety
factor and holding period to be agreed.
8.11.2
8.12
8.12.1
The tethers shall be designed to hold the barge in the mating /de-mating position to ensure that the
barge motions do not exceed the capture radius of the LMUs during the mating /de-mating operation.
The characteristics of the tethers shall be accurately modelled in the analysis.
Temporary mooring tethers shall be designed for the maximum analysed dynamic tensions and sized
based on a factor of safety of 1.67 against the certified break load.
The barge may be also held in position using the barges propulsion systems with constant thrust
against surge fenders.
8.12.2
8.12.3
8.13
8.13.1
A combination of mooring lines and tug(s) can be used for barge positioning. Tugs connected to
prelaid moorings may be used to provide extra control in variable currents, using their tow winches to
adjust the barge position.
8.14
8.14.1
If the barge has dynamic positioning capability (minimum DP Class 2), consideration can be given to
the use of DP in place of barge moorings, subject to review of station keeping analyses and DP
operating procedures. The requirements in Section 13 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1], will apply.
8.15
8.15.1
The host structure will be subject to a variety of loading conditions during the docking and mating
operations. The host structure shall be documented to have adequate global and local strength to
withstand such loading. Accidental loadings shall also be considered. For decommissioning, it may
be possible to accept local host structure damage, provided that nothing falls off the structure, and the
global strength of the host structure shall be demonstrated to show no loss of strength to support the
topside.
Horizontal restraint shall be provided between the barge and the host structure to absorb shock loads
during mating and to prevent lateral movement of the deck after initial engagement of the two parts.
The effects of un-even load distribution during the mating operation shall be calculated and
documented.
In the case whereby a float-over operation is planned to be executed without the use of fenders, the
global and local capacity of the host structure shall be documented for an accidental impact scenario
(see Section 8.5.4).
8.15.2
8.15.3
8.15.4
8.16
8.16.1
Hydrostatic loads on the host structure at the deepest draught can be the governing loadcase. It shall
be demonstrated that a thorough independent check of the calculations covering this loadcase has
been carried out, and that the design and reinforcement details assumed in the calculations concur
with the as-built condition.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 20 of 37
Any limitations on the maximum allowable duration of deep immersion, in relation to the structural
stability of the host structure, should be established and the procedures planned accordingly.
The horizontal restraint between deck and floating host structure after mating / before de-mating shall
be capable of taking the loads resulting from the inclination due to the design storm for the deck mating
/de-mating window, or an inclination of 5 degrees, whichever is the greater, at any applicable draught.
Friction may be taken into consideration, but a safety factor against sliding of at least 3 shall be
documented.
8.17
8.17.1
The stability and reserve buoyancy for a floating host structure shall be agreed on a case by case
basis for intact and damaged conditions. In general it will not be possible to have one compartment
damaged stability at mating / de-mating draught so alternative arrangements must be made to keep
the Risk As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).
Freeboard to the lowest downflooding point on a concrete gravity base host structure shall never be
less than 6 metres, and the stability requirements of 0015/ND, Ref. [3] shall also apply.
The time at the maximum draught, when reserve buoyancy is at a minimum and structural loadings
could be at a maximum, should be as short as possible.
Additional freeboard will be required to allow for the response of the host structure, unless pitch, roll
and heave can be shown to be negligible under the conditions expected.
The substructure without the deck shall be capable of being deballasted to a freeboard at which the
host structure has damage stability within 24 hours. An initial deballasting capability of not less than 2
metres per hour is recommended.
It should be possible to deballast the deck off the barge(s) / ballast the deck onto the barge(s) within
the planned weather window. If this is not practicable then the substructure / deck / barge combination
shall be able to survive the 10 year return period seasonal storm at an intermediate condition.
Provision shall be made for the detection of any likely movements of fresh water (freshets) that could
cause significant draught changes. The host structure shall always be able to deballast to maintain
freeboard.
Before the immersion for deck-mating, a comprehensive commissioning and testing programme shall
be agreed, undertaken and documented to prove the integrity of the host structure (and systems).
Risk management techniques, as outlined in Section 5.4 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1], shall be applied as
appropriate.
8.17.2
8.17.3
8.17.4
8.17.5
8.17.6
8.17.7
8.17.8
8.17.9
8.18
DECK REMOVAL
8.18.1
Where mechanical devices are used to effect load transfer to the removal vessel, the design capacity,
functionality and certification of these systems shall be provided for review. The method of use of
these systems, and testing to ensure that they will function correctly, shall be detailed in the
operational procedures. This should include any:
0031/ND REV 2
Page 21 of 37
STRUCTURAL STRENGTH
9.1
CODES
9.1.1
9.1.2
The primary structure shall be of high quality structural steelwork with full material certification and
NDT inspection certificates showing appropriate levels of inspection. It shall be assessed using the
methodology of a recognised and applicable offshore code including the associated load and
resistance factors for LRFD codes or safety factors for ASD/WSD codes. Further details appear in
Section 9 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
The extent of NDT testing shall be submitted for review.
9.2
SEAFASTENINGS
9.2.1
Resist seafastening forces during the voyage to /from the float-over location (see 0030/ND,
Ref. [5])
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.2.4
9.2.5
Provide restraint after cutting (for installation) or after landing on the barge (for removal)
equivalent to 5% of the structure weight acting horizontally
A design case shall be established for any seafastenings that remain after initial seafastening cutting
with the installation barge in a stand-off position prior to the barge being manoeuvred into the docking
slot.
All cut lines should be clearly marked. If cutting in 2 stages, the two sets of cut lines should preferably
be marked in different colours.
Where a jacking system is used to achieve clearances during the initial docking and subsequent
operations, the jacking system shall be suitable to provide lateral restraint equivalent to 10% of the
structure weight acting horizontally.
Where mechanical seafastening systems are used their capacity to resist design loads shall be
demonstrated.
9.3
9.3.1
The design of the system shall be such that it acts to reduce the motions of the installation / removal
barge, provide protection to the host structure and guidance for barge entry.
Barge fender design loading shall be derived from the mating analysis. The design friction coefficient
shall account for any facings applied to the host structure fenders.
Surge fenders (if applicable) may be fitted to the barge to control the longitudinal position during the
mating operation by making contact with the host structure fenders.
Unless agreed otherwise, sway fenders shall be fitted to the barge sides to reduce the clearance
between the host structure and the barge during the mating /de-mating operation and so improve the
lateral positioning relative to the structure supports. Barge side-shell strength shall be checked for its
capacity to resist the applied fender loads.
To facilitate the docking operation, docking guides (if applicable) shall be provided on either side of the
docking end of the installation / removal barge(s).
9.3.2
9.3.3
9.3.4
9.3.5
0031/ND REV 2
Page 22 of 37
10
10.1
PRINCIPLES
0031/ND REV 2
Page 23 of 37
10.1.3
10.1.4
10.1.5
Table 10-3 as a function of the installation / removal class determined from Section 10.3 for the set of
system conditions given in section 0.
A detailed ballasting procedure shall be developed for each stage of the installation / removal
operation. The ballast calculations shall include the quantity of water in each ballast tank for each
installation / removal stage. The ballast procedure shall consider float-over clearances, keel
clearance, load transfer, tidal range, expected timings and barge freeboard.
Allowances shall be made for the effects of residual ballast water in near-empty tanks and achievable
maximum ballast quantities in full tanks.
The ballast sequence should be developed so that, if possible, separate tanks are used for tidal
compensation and weight compensation.
A risk assessment of the effects of potential errors in ballasting shall be undertaken, documented and
the results accepted by GL Noble Denton.
10.2
10.2.1
10.2.2
The ballasting equipment used for floating concrete gravity structures shall be designed, constructed
and operated in accordance with Section 12 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1].
Before the immersion for deck mating/de-mating, a comprehensive commissioning and testing
programme shall be agreed, undertaken and documented to prove the integrity of the ballast systems
(and structure).
10.3
TIDAL LIMITATIONS
10.3.1
The installation / removal operation will be classed according to the tidal conditions and whether it is a
weather restricted operation or a weather unrestricted operation. Requirements for design, reserves
and redundancy of mechanical systems will vary according to the class of installation / removal. Sub
notations declaring if the installation / removal is to be weather restricted operation or weather
unrestricted operation shall be as per Table 10-2.
Table 10-1
Class
1
2
Tidal Limitations
The tidal range is such that regardless of the pumping capacity provided, it is not possible to
maintain the mating interfaces with the required level throughout the full tidal cycle, and the
float-over must be completed within a defined tidal window.
The tidal range is such that whilst significant pumping capacity is required, it is possible to
maintain the mating interfaces with the required level during the full tidal cycle, and for at
least 24 hours thereafter.
Tidal range is negligible or zero, and there are no practical tidal constraints on the float-over
operation. Pumping is generally required only to compensate for weight changes as the load
transfer proceeds.
This class will also apply for mating over a floating host structure.
Table 10-2
Weather Limitations
10.4
Sub-Notation
Weather Restricted
PUMPING CAPACITY
0031/ND REV 2
Page 24 of 37
Table 10-3, depending on the Class of installation / removal as defined in Table 10-1 and to satisfy
each condition as defined below:
Condition A:
Condition B:
Condition C:
Condition D:
10.4.2
10.4.3
10.4.4
10.4.5
10.4.6
10.4.7
10.4.8
Pump capacity shall be based on the published pump performance curves, taking account of the
maximum head during the operation and pipeline losses.
If the barge pumping system is used as part of the main or back-up pump capacity, then a barge
engineer familiar with the system shall be attendance throughout the operation. The float-over
communication system should include the pumproom.
All pumps and systems shall be tested and shown to be operational before transportation to the
installation / removal site. At the discretion of the GL Noble Denton surveyor, a verification of pump
capacity may be required.
Pumps which require to be reversed in order to be considered as part of the back-up capacity shall be
capable of such reversal within 10 minutes, and adequate resources shall be available to perform this
operation.
Pumps which require to be moved around the barge in order to be considered as part of the back-up
capacity shall be easily transportable, and may only be so considered if free access is provided at all
stages of the float-over between the stations at which they may be required. Adequate resources shall
be available to perform this operation.
Where a compressed air system is used, the time lag needed to pressurise or de-pressurise a tank
should be taken into account, as should any limitations on differential pressure across a bulkhead. It
should be remembered that compressed air systems cannot always fill a tank beyond the external
waterline.
Where drop tanks are used to change vessel trim and draught, the operational features and control of
these tanks as part of the ballasting system shall be documented.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 25 of 37
Condition
1a and 1b
(Tidal window)
A
B
C
D
2a
(Constant deck level >24hrs,
weather restricted)
A
B
C
D
130%
150%
100%
100%
2b
(Constant deck level >24hrs,
weather unrestricted)
A
B
C
D
130%
150%
Contingency procedures see note 2
100%
3a
(Little tide, weather restricted)
A
B
C
D
130%
No requirements
100%
No requirements
3b
(Little tide, weather unrestricted)
A
B
C
D
130%
No requirements
Contingency procedures see note 2
No requirements
Note 1:
10.4.9
Pumping capacity to meet the requirement of the maximum of the following percentages:
150% of the nominal capacity for the condition where the installation / removal
operation at the planned speed and the planned duration including contingencies
is less than the tidal window duration.
200% of the nominal capacity for the condition where the installation / removal
operation at a reduced speed with the combined duration for the reduced speed
plus contingencies equal to the tidal window duration.
Note 2:
The contingency procedure shall contain details covering pump system failure and the
associated actions required to correct the pump system failure.
The following Table 10-3 gives an example for a Class 2a operation that assumes that the worst
single system failure reduces the pumping capacity to 80% of the full capacity (with any consistent
units).
Table 10-4
Condition
Nominal capacity
Factor
Required capacity
1,000
130%
1,300
1,100
150%
1,650
100%
1,250
100%
1,375
Required
0031/ND REV 2
1,650 (Condition B)
Page 26 of 37
10.5.1
The installation / removal barge shall have a permanent ballast system if used offshore, and shall be
capable of ballasting the barge within one tidal cycle (as applicable). The total ballast pump capacity
shall be sufficient to maintain the required pumping rates with failure of any one primary pump or
power source. Control of the pumping systems and ballast valves shall be from a centralised ballast
control room.
The barge shall have a remote tank gauging system capable of continuously monitoring the level of
liquids in all ballast tanks simultaneously. The readout of the tank gauges shall be in the ballast control
room. The ballast tanks shall also be fitted with sounding tubes or ullage access to allow manual
measuring of the tank levels.
10.5.2
0031/ND REV 2
Page 27 of 37
11
MARINE EQUIPMENT
11.1
GENERAL
11.1.1
11.1.2
All the equipment on the installation / removal barge, including ship loose items, shall be properly
fastened to the deck for the tow and installation / removal phases.
The equipment installed on the installation / removal barge (e.g. winches, fairleads, towing and
mooring lines, etc.) shall comply with the requirements of the Marine Warranty Surveyor and have valid
certificates.
11.2
11.2.1
The installation / removal barge shall have electrical, hydraulic and/or pneumatic power plants with an
independent 100% back up to supply all power for installation operations. It shall have sufficient
lighting to illuminate the complete barge deck and other operating areas to allow the float-over
operation to proceed safely on a 24-hour basis.
In particular, all critical systems must be shown to have adequate:
Reserve capacity
Back-up power
11.2.2
11.3
11.3.1
Shock absorbers and leg mating units (LMUs) may be provided at the mating interface between the
structure and the host structure or removal vessel. The LMUs will dampen vertical and horizontal
motions and help to distribute the loads evenly.
A hydraulic jacking system or a rapid ballast system may be used in combination with a mechanism
which allows for rapid transfer of the structure to /from the host structure and establishment of
clearance between the structure and the barge / LSF. The system shall be optimized to reduce both
the risks of weather downtime and the potential for impact damage between the structure, barge and
host structure.
Once the structure weight is fully transferred to/from the host structure, final lowering to achieve
steel/steel contact may be required, often after barge removal.
Deck support units (DSUs) may be provided at the mating interface between the structure and the
support structure on the vessel. The DSUs can be supplied with or without shock absorbers. Where
DSUs are supplied with shock absorbers, this will dampen vertical motions and help to distribute the
loads evenly. Where there are no shock absorbers in the DSU but there is a low friction sliding
surface, the topside can move freely in a horizontal direction thus reducing the horizontal loads into the
LMU or top of jacket. See Section 8.6.6.
11.3.2
11.3.3
11.3.4
11.4
11.4.1
Where DP vessels are planned to be used to execute a float-over operation, the requirements of
Section 8.14 will apply.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 28 of 37
12
12.1.1
A main tug capable of controlling the barge must be provided. This tug should be an AHV or
equivalent.
Additional tugs can be required for the mating operations (anchor handling and barge mating
assistance). When required these shall be highly manoeuvrable tractor tugs with a specification to
meet the needs of the operations. The tugs shall be classed for offshore work (if appropriate) and
crewed for 24 hour operations.
Any AHV used for anchor handling shall be fitted with a Tug Management Positioning System (TMPS)
which is sufficiently accurate to allow anchors to be positioned within 5m of target.
An accommodation / work vessel may be required for offshore personnel and to permit host structure
preparations prior to, during and after the structure float-over. The vessel specification shall be
developed to suit the specific requirements of the project.
A work boat for personnel transfer shall be operated by a competent trained coxswain and have
sufficient crew members to assist during personnel transfers.
12.1.2
12.1.3
12.1.4
12.1.5
0031/ND REV 2
Page 29 of 37
13
13.1
13.1.1
13.1.2
The identity of each leg shall be clearly marked with row and line reference.
Draught mark elevations shall be painted on the host structure legs. After host structure installation, a
survey shall note corrections to be made to the markings for accurate tide measurement. Level
markings shall be floodlit so that they are clearly visible during darkness.
Tide boards can be used in case the painted leg markings in the host structure are not adequate for
the installation / removal purposes.
Design elevations shown on the host structure legs shall relate to the lower edge of the mark, and shall
be clearly visible at a distance of not less than 50m and shall include increments at a maximum of
200mm. Corrections by which these marks may be related to MSL, HAT or LAT shall be known.
Host structure leg access platforms shall be incorporated with safe access from the sea for operation
and inspection of LMUs. These platforms can also be used for host structure to deck leg weld out.
13.1.3
13.1.4
13.1.5
13.2
13.2.1
The following critical factors shall be monitored using an MRU (Motion Reference Unit) for the floatover installation / removal:
The six degrees of freedom motions of the barge in a free-floating mode. This is to ensure that
the motions can be compared with those predicted by the motion analysis. These are usually
presented as motions and accelerations at the system centre of gravity and should be used to
check that the loads and clearances remain at acceptable levels.
The vertical clearance between the leg mating units (LMUs) on the structure, and the docking
cones on the underside of the host structure during the initial entry of the barge into the host
structure, or any other critical vertical clearances during installation or removal operations.
13.2.2
The system shall be calibrated and tested prior to sailaway to the mating / removal site
13.3
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
13.3.1
To confirm that conditions are suitable for the docking and mating operations to proceed.
The secondary function is to predict weather and environmental trends prior to and during the floatover installation / removal.
13.3.2
13.3.3
13.3.4
A tide gauge should be installed in the field, as close to the host structure as is practical, and should be
monitored for at least two tide cycles before installation / removal to allow actual levels and cycle times
to be compared with predictions. During installation / removal corrections derived from this
comparison shall be used in conjunction with visual readings of the level marks on the host structure
legs. A tide gauge may also be fitted to the host structure for reference purposes.
An infield directional wave rider buoy and associated hardware recording wave height, direction, period
and spectral energy shall be considered for use to enhance operability of operations.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 30 of 37
14
14.1
PRINCIPLES
14.1.1
14.1.8
If the marine operations (Load-out, Transportation, Float-over, Float-off) are performed by different
contractors, then the scope split between the contractors must be clearly defined, to ensure that all
parties are aware of their responsibilities, handover points and reporting lines.
The installation / removal procedure shall include detailed step by step procedures and contingency
procedures for each phase of the installation / removal operation including all operational and limiting
environmental conditions e.g. minimum and maximum tidal heights at all stages of the float-over
operation. Required weather windows for critical float-over operations shall be stated, referenced to
detailed hourly installation / removal schedules.
Allowable environmental criteria and barge motions shall be established for each phase of the
installation / removal by analysis. The decision to proceed from one phase of the installation / removal
to the next shall be based on a comparison between the allowable environmental criteria for the next
phase, the data obtained from the environmental monitoring systems, MRU and weather forecasts.
The start of the barge docking procedure may consider a specific period of the tide cycle. However,
after the installation / removal barge is docked in the slot, the installation / removal setup should be
able to ensure the installation / removal can proceed safely for any specified tide.
Criteria for stopping or aborting each stage of the operation, and a critical point of no return for the
float-over installation / removal shall be identified.
The installation crew shall be fully trained on the details of the installation / removal procedures and the
operation of all related equipment.
Detailed installation / removal barge mooring and anchor running procedures shall be developed taking
due account of the AHV and assist tugs being provided.
A readiness meeting shall be held shortly before the start of float-over, attended by all involved parties.
14.2
WEATHER FORECASTING
14.2.1
14.3
14.3.1
A comprehensive Installation / removal Manual shall be written to identify all aspects of the operations
in detail, cover all likely contingencies and specify exactly how the float-over will be conducted.
14.1.2
14.1.3
14.1.4
14.1.5
14.1.6
14.1.7
0031/ND REV 2
Page 31 of 37
Communication procedure
Pre-departure activities
Pre-docking activities
Docking operation
Un-Docking operation
Ballast procedure
Change procedure
Detailed make up drawings and specifications of all mooring lines and tethers
0031/ND REV 2
Page 32 of 37
15
15.1
SAFETY
15.1.1
See Section 5 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1], for information on Health, Safety and Environment.
15.2
15.2.1
See Section 6 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1], for information on Organisation, Planning and Documentation.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 33 of 37
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
0031/ND REV 2
Page 34 of 37
STRUCTURE
A.1.1
Checks on the effect of any weight changes after weighing or final weight calculations on the
float-over operation
A.2
SITE
A.2.1
Site plan, showing host structure position, infield pipelines, flowlines and subsea infrastructure
document by recent reliable surveys.
Drawings showing heights above datum of host structure legs, LMUs, structure support points, barge,
and water levels.
Recent bathymetric survey report of area adjacent to the host structure, related to the same datum as
item A.2.2
A.2.2
A.2.3
A.3
BARGE
A.3.1
A.3.2
A.3.3
A.3.4
A.3.5
A.3.6
A.3.7
A.3.8
A.3.9
A.3.10
A.3.11
A.3.12
A.3.13
A.3.14
A.3.15
A.3.16
A.3.17
A.3.18
0031/ND REV 2
Page 35 of 37
A.4
A.4.1
A.4.2
A.4.3
A.4.4
A.4.5
A.4.6
Jack/winch specification.
Layout of jacking/winching systems including power-packs.
Layout of contingency systems.
Calculations showing friction coefficient and loads on attachment points and safety factors.
Details of LMUs and any heave-compensation equipment
Details of any other load transfer equipment
A.5
BALLAST CALCULATIONS
A.5.1
Planned date, time and duration of float-over, with alternative dates, tidal limitations and operational
windows.
Ballast calculations for each stage showing;
Time,
Tidal level,
Structure position,
Ballast distribution,
A.5.2
A.5.3
Pre-mating,
First contact,
Last contact,
Barge exit.
A.6
MOORINGS
A.6.1
A.6.2
A.6.3
A.6.4
A.6.5
A.7
TUGS
A.7.1
Details of any supporting tugs including bollard pull, thrusters and towing equipment.
A.8
DP SYSTEMS
A.8.1
A.8.2
A.8.3
(see Section 8.14 herein and Section 13.8 of 0001/ND, Ref. [1], for more details)
Detailed DP system description
DP system FMEA.
DP reference system procedures.
0031/ND REV 2
Page 36 of 37
DP capability analysis
DP trials procedures and checklists
A.9
MANAGEMENT
A.9.1
A.9.2
A.9.3
A.9.4
A.9.5
A.9.6
A.9.7
A.9.12
A.9.13
Mobilisation of equipment
Barge/vessel movements
Initial ballasting
Seafastening removal
Seafastening
Barge/vessel removal
Completion activities
Decision points.
Specification of the environmental monitoring system.
Methods of monitoring barge level and trim, and ballast quantities.
Specification of the Motion Reference Unit.
If a computerised ballast control system is to be used, a description of the system, with back-up
arrangements, shall be supplied.
Safety procedures.
Communications procedures and communications equipment.
A.10
CONTINGENCIES
A.10.1
Pump failure
MRU failure
Deteriorating weather
Damaged barge/vessel.
A.9.8
A.9.9
A.9.10
A.9.11
0031/ND REV 2
Page 37 of 37