Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

I have read and understood the rules on cheating, plagiarism and appropriate

referencing as outlined in the module assessment requirements guidelines document


and I declare that the work contained in this assignment is my own, unless otherwise
acknowledged.
No substantial part of the work submitted here has also been submitted by me in other
assessments for my degree course, and I acknowledge that if this has been done an
appropriate reduction in the mark I might otherwise have received will be made.

Signed: ...................................................................... (please type name here)

MODULE TITLE:

System Modelling and Simulation


WM053-15 01JL 15/16

COURSE DATE:

29th Feb 4th March 2016

NAME: ...........................................................
STUDENT ID: .

POST MODULE ASSESSMENT


System Modelling and Simulation
29th Feb 4th March 2016
You are required to answer both Part A and Part B
Part 1: Modelling, simulation and analysis of a vehicle quarter car suspension (20 Marks)
The two system outputs are the displacements of the vehicle body and the wheel mass (z1 and z2).
The input (z0) can be modelled as an impulse of magnitude 0.1m and duration of 1 second.
Model parameter values:

M b 250 kg,

M w 20 kg,

K S 22 kN/m,

CS 1kNs/m,

K t 140 kN/m

Z0
Figure 1: Quarter car model
(a)

Derive the 4 ODEs that describe the dynamics of both the wheel mass and the vehicle sprung
mass. Using the mathematical blocks provided within Simulink (integrators, gain, addition
etc.), construct a simulation model of the quarter car shown in Figure 1.
[8 marks]

(b)

Using the Simulink state-space block, verify the model constructed in (a) against the matrix
form of the system model given above.
[3 marks]

(c)

What are the body and the wheel natural frequencies for the vehicle?
[2 marks]

(d)

Amend the model in (a) replacing the damping term Cs with a non-linear suspension damper
that generates a different bounce and rebound force defined by Table 1. The damping force
generated saturates at a relative velocity +/-1.5ms-1. How does the vehicle response differ?
Relative
velocity (ms-1)
Damping Force
(N)

-1.5

1.5

-2900

1200

Table 1 Non-linear damper characteristic


[3 marks]

(e)

Export the data from Simulink into MATLAB as a Structure with Time and write an M-file that
plots the response of both the linear and non-linear systems on a single graph. Ensure the
figure is properly annotated to include: different line-types/colours, legend, axis labels etc.
[4 marks]

Part 2: Critically Review the 1-D Modelling strategy employed within JLR relating to the complete life-cycle
of the model development process (definition, creation, validation, model use). Using academic literature to
support your argument, suggest ways in which the organisation may improve. This part of the assessment
should be completed within 1000 - 1200 words, it is suggested that you focus on one stage or facet of the
complete life-cycle. Example topics may include, but are not constrained too:
The justification employed for creating models and how models are shared / archived within the
company
How models are created and shared within the JLR supply chain
How models are validated and verified before their use
How the 1-D modelling strategy is aligned with the broader virtual design strategy employed within the
company
How models are employed within the broader product development process
How models are designed using multiple simulation platforms and tools
Irrespective of which topic is chosen it is important that you clearly define: (1) current practice within the
company; (2) the perceived problem or shortcoming that can be improved; (3) best-practice derived from the
literature and finally (4) how JLR may adopt these improvements.
Note:
You are expected to provide evidence to support the recommendations that you make. These must come from
academic sources, e.g. Conference or Journal papers (e.g. SAE, IEEE, IMEchE etc.). You should aim for at
least 10-15 references that are properly cited using recognised methods, e.g. the Harvard style.
[20 Marks]

Part 3: Systems Modelling and Simulation within Jaguar Land Rover (30 Marks)
Choose a system or vehicle function from a current or legacy vehicle programme in your functional area or
within the broader organisation. Using the approaches taught during the module develop a model of the chosen
system. It is important that you select a problem that is of sufficient complexity that you can
demonstrate your attainment of the Intended Learning Outcomes.
You are expected to use a systematic approach to model development, working through:
Part
(a)
(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Assignment Area
Marks
Provide justification for the need to produce a model, including the
2
identification of use case (s) for the model and modelling tools employed.
Define the model requirements, including:
3
Model structure (i.e. linear vs. non-linear)
Model components (i.e. required frequency range)
The physical laws and their interconnection
The data requirements both for model parameterisation and validation
Construct simulation model(s) with the chosen modelling tool(s): Simulation diagrams and
10
model code should be included in the assignment Annex and
marks will be allocated for structure and clarity.
Verify the simulation model(s) in terms of correct implementation in the
5
chosen modelling tool (i.e. steady-state analysis using fundamental physical
laws).
Validate the simulation model (if possible) in terms of how representative it
is of reality.
If validation is not possible clearly identify the main areas of uncertainty and
define a validation strategy highlighting key areas, i.e. the inclusion of
additional tests to verify a subset of the model behaviour.
With reference back to the model requirements and justification (Part a), carry out
simulation experiments which must include a series of what if to clearly
demonstrate the use and value of the model
Demonstrate the application of JLR standards to the derivation and simulation of the
model.

Access to Matlab, Dymola and possibly other tools are available through JLR network licenses.
If you are unsure as to what constitutes a suitable project for Parts 2 or 3 please contact the Module
Tutor (James Marco) and/or the JLR Module Champion (James Chapman) who will be able to direct
you to key individuals within JLR that may be able to provide real-world problems for you to base your
assignment on.
Intended Learning Outcomes Mapping module intended learning outcomes to module assignment
Module ILO
Model Definition
Model Creation
Model Implementation
Model Verification / Validation
Model Application

1a
X
X

1b

1c

1d
X
X

1e

X
X
X

2
X
X
X
X
X

3a
X

3b

3c

3d

3e

3f

3g
X
X
X

X
X

COMPLETION DATE Your assignment is to be submitted electronically to


Nicola Kirkwood (SubmitTAS@wmg.warwick.ac.uk) (as one document only) not later
than 5pm Monday 23rd May 2016

Please Note
Your attention is particularly drawn to items 2 and 3 below
regarding the need to submit assignments on time.
1. Academic Guidelines
The module you are attending is accredited towards an academic award. As a
consequence the module is operated within defined academic guidelines and the
assignment following the module must comply with requirements covering breadth
and depth and be submitted within a specific time scale.
2. PMA Lateness Penalties
Post Module Assignment (PMA) that does not reach WMG by the due date will be
considered to be late. Academic penalties for lateness will be applied at the rate of
3% per working day after the due date. Penalties are applied up to a maximum of
14 days after which time the work will be recorded as a non-submission. Late
scripts are still assessed and, subject to achieving an acceptable mark, will enable
the module to be counted as an attendance credit to the award for which the
participant is registered.
3. PMA Submission timing
For the purposes of clarity:
For submission dates which fall on Monday Thursday, PMA must be
received by WMG no later than 17.00.
For submission dates which fall on a Friday, PMA must be received no later
than 16.00
PMA received after these times will be stamped and recorded as having
arrived on the next working day.
It is the participants responsibility to get the PMA to WMG by the required deadline.
The post office delay mail which carries insufficient postage. You are advised to get
proof of postage.
4. Extensions to PMA Submission Date
The University requires that all participants registered for an award should, wherever
possible, be treated equally being neither advantaged nor disadvantaged compared
to others. Thus, if you believe that you are disadvantaged compared to others, it is
possible to apply for an extension to the PMA submission date. Holidays and
workload are not normally accepted as justification for an extension. Extended work
assignments away from base, illness and bereavement of a close family member
would normally be considered as justifying a reschedule of PMA submission dates.
In such situations contact Nicola Kirkwood at TAS@wmg.warwick.ac.uk as soon as
you are able to. Retrospective extensions are not normally granted. Supporting
information from a Line Manager or a Doctor may be requested.

Вам также может понравиться