Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Authors:
Brooke Buikema
Stephen Gabbadon
Hwok-Chuen Lee
Michael Workman
Date Submitted:
Executive Summary
Team Oil from [the] Soil is comprised of four Calvin College senior engineering students in the chemical
concentration who are proposing an alternative source for biodiesel production. This alternative entails
converting the oil found in the seeds from the Jatropha Curcas plant into biodiesel. Team Oil from [the]
Soil has designed and optimized a chemical process to produce biodiesel from the Jatropha Curcas plant.
With the use of UniSim design software, the team has simulated a chemical plant which produces two
million gallons of Jatropha Curcas biodiesel annually. Using Jatropha Curcas seed oil to produce
biodiesel was concluded to be a feasible alternative because:
The yield of biodiesel per hectare for Jatropha is more than four times as much fuel per hectare
as soybean, and up to ten times that of corn.
Jatropha is a non-food plant and does not consume any food stock.
The Jatropha plant can be grown in harsh, arid conditions, making it suitable for growth in a
variety of different locations and difficult environments.
Jatropha plantations have the potential to improve the economy of lesser-developed nations with
vast wastelands.
The production of biodiesel from Jatropha Curcas seeds is comprised of three major steps:
1. Extraction of seed oil: A solvent extraction method is used to extract the oil from crushed
Jatropha seed flakes.
2. Treatment of seed oil: The free fatty acid content in the seed oil is reduced by acid-catalyzed
transesterification to give a higher biodiesel yield product in the third and final step.
3. Conversion of seed oil to biodiesel: This step utilizes base- catalyzed transesterification process
which effectively produces biodiesel from the treated Jatropha Curcas seed oil.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ____________________________________________________________ i
Table of Contents _____________________________________________________________ ii
List of Figures _______________________________________________________________ iv
List of Tables ________________________________________________________________ iv
1. Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 1
2. Background _______________________________________________________________ 1
2.1. Jatropha Curcas History ________________________________________________________ 1
2.2. Jatropha Curcas Life Cycle and Harvest ___________________________________________ 2
2.3. Jatropha Biodiesel for Retail _____________________________________________________ 3
2.3. Potential for Farmers and Developing Nations ______________________________________ 3
4.4. Area 300: Treatment and Conversion of Seed Oil to Biodiesel ________________________ 12
4.4.1. Section X-300
4.4.2. Section V-310
4.4.3. Section X-301
4.4.4. Section V-311
_____________________________________________________________________ 13
_____________________________________________________________________ 14
_____________________________________________________________________ 14
_____________________________________________________________________ 14
__________________________________________________________________ 18
__________________________________________________________________ 18
__________________________________________________________________ 18
__________________________________________________________________ 18
12. Acknowledgments_________________________________________________________ 30
APPENDIX ________________________________________________________________ 31
Appendix A: Hand Calculations ____________________________________________________ 32
Appendix B: Infrared Spectroscopy Results for Untreated Oil ___________________________ 41
Appendix C: Infrared Spectroscopy Results for Treated Oil _____________________________ 42
Appendix D: Infrared Spectroscopy Results for Glycerol Byproduct ______________________ 43
Appendix E: Gas Chromatography Results for Untreated Jatropha Oil ___________________ 44
Appendix F: Gas Chromatography Results for Treated Jatropha Oil______________________ 48
Appendix G: Bibliography _________________________________________________________ 52
Appendix H: Full Process Flow Diagram _____________________________________________ 53
Appendix I: Material Safety Data Sheets _____________________________________________ 55
Appendix J: UniSim Design Summary _______________________________________________ 78
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 - Mature Jatropha Curcas Plant ________________________________________ 2
Figure 2.2 - Ripe Fruit of the Jatropha Curcas Plant ________________________________ 3
Figure 3.1 - Free Fatty Acid Treatment with Methanol_______________________________ 5
Figure 3.2 - Transesterification of a Triglyceride (JCO) with Methanol _________________ 6
Figure 4.1 - Equipment design for Hexane Solvent Extraction and Recycle, Area 100______ 9
Figure 4.2 - Hexane Recovery System, Area 200 ___________________________________ 11
Figure 4.3 - Treatment and Conversion, Area 300__________________________________ 13
Figure 4.4 - Methanol Recovery and Biodiesel Wash, Area 400 _______________________ 15
List of Tables
Table 3.1 - Fuel Properties of Jatropha Biodiesel ___________________________________ 6
Table 4.1 - Industry Standards for Corrosion Control _______________________________ 20
Table 6.1 - Free Fatty Acid Content of the Untreated Oil ____________________________ 21
Table 6.2 - Free Fatty Acid Content of the Treated Oil ______________________________ 22
iv
1. Introduction
With a promise of energy independence and decreased environmental impact, the popularity, production,
and use of biodiesel has seen great increase in recent years. Not only has biodiesel been proved as safe
and biodegradable, it also aids in the reduction of harmful air pollutants released during the combustion of
conventional fuels. Biodiesel is a combination of medium to long chain esters that are stable at ambient
temperatures, burn cleanly, and have low sulfur content in comparison to petroleum diesel. Blends of
20% biodiesel with 80% petroleum (B20) diesel are generally acceptable for use in readily-available
diesel engines currently sold in several popular vehicle models.
The primary objectives of this project were to design and optimize a chemical process for the production
of biodiesel from the seed oil of the Jatropha Curcas plant. A simulation of the chosen process was then
devised using UniSim design software and a basis of two million gallons of annual biodiesel production.
This volume of fuel is approximately equivalent to 2.8x1011 Btu. The optimized simulation incorporates
industrial equipment and design for a continuous operation involving seed oil extraction, treatment, and
conversion to biodiesel.
To prove the effectiveness of the process design, bench-scale laboratory experiments were performed.
Intermediate and final products of these lab trials were collected and analyzed with gas chromatography
and infrared spectroscopy.
2. Background
2.1. Jatropha Curcas History
Originating in the Caribbean and in Central America, the Jatropha genus includes over 100 plants,
shrubs, and trees. The genus has also become neutralized to many tropical and subtropical areas,
including India and North America, being spread to Africa and Asia through its trade as a valuable hedge
plant.
Since Jatropha was introduced into the subcontinents over 500 years ago, hundreds of sub-species have
developed through cross-fertilization and adaptation to the subcontinents with varied climatic conditions.
As a result, the yields and growing characteristics of Jatropha oil vary between each region. Research
concerning the qualities and characteristics of Jatropha varieties that flourish in different locations has
been performed, with studies focusing especially on the micro-propagation of seedlings exhibiting the
necessary characteristics for mass plantings in a variety of locales.1
Figure 2-2 depicts the ripe fruit of the Jatropha plant, with each fruit containing two seeds. The Jatropha
plant yields more than four times as much fuel per hectare as soybean crops, and more than ten times that
of corn. One hectare of Jatropha produces approximately 1,900 liters of biofuel.4
1,2
The average resale value of biodiesel varies between states but is currently $4.20/gallon nationally, an
attractive price for potential producers. Its cost depends greatly on the market price for Jatropha Curcas
seed oil and the overall efficiency of the production process. In general, a 20% biodiesel-petroleum blend
costs $0.20/gallon more than unblended diesel. However, by increasing the efficiency of production and
decreasing the overhead costs of Jatropha plantations, the price of Jatropha-based biodiesel can be
reduced to a more competitive rate.7
<http://www.thewoodexplorer.com/maindata/Picts/Jatropha1.jpg>
ASTM Approves New Biodiesel Blend Specifications, Including B20. Green Car Congress, 2008. 12 Nov. 2008
<http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/astm-approves-n.html>.
7
Dehue, Bart, and Willem Hettinga. GHG Performance Jatropha Biodiesel. Www.d1plc.com. 2 June 2008. Ecofys. 10 May 2009
<http://www.d1plc.com/pdf/GHG%20Performance%20of%20Jatropha%20Biodiesel.pdf>.
6
Nations that choose to pursue Jatropha farming can utilize large areas of marginal and degraded land that
have fallen out of production or become unsuitable for agriculture. As mentioned, Jatropha crops can
potentially create millions of rural jobs, increasing farm-based incomes and also enabling developing
countries to obtain supplies of local biodiesel. These actions reduce lesser-developed nations
dependence on expensive imports of mineral diesel while producing surpluses of refined biodiesel for
export.
3. Chemistry Overview
The production of biodiesel from Jatropha Curcas has been designed using three main steps:
1. Extraction of seed oil via hexane solvent extraction
2. Treatment of seed oil via acid-catalyzed transesterification
3. Conversion of the seed oil to biodiesel via base-catalyzed transesterification
The following outlines the background information and chemistry occurring in each step of the process.
Material safety data sheets (MSDS) for each relevant compound are available at the conclusion of the
Appendix.
To increase the efficiency of this step of the overall process, remaining hexane is stripped from the
hexane-seed husk slurry, recovered, and recycled to the extraction process. Care is to be taken to prevent
any emission of hexane from the closed system due to concerns of its toxicity and flammability, as well as
increased raw material costs.
biodiesel product. Freshly-extracted Jatropha Curcas seed oil contains between 10-20% FFAs by weight,
depending on both the age of the plant when harvested as well as its growing conditions. To reduce the
FFA content of the solution, the seed oil is treated using sulfuric acid in an acid-catalyzed
transesterification reaction, which proceeds as follows:
Methanol
Water
The FFAs are reacted with methanol in the presence of a sulfuric acid (H2SO4) catalyst and heat,
producing water and methyl esters.
NaOH (catalyst)
Methanol
Triglyceride
Glycerol
Each transesterification reaction takes place in one of two batch reactors. Upon creation, the final
biodiesel product is passed through a water wash to remove reaction byproducts and any unreacted
reagents.
Density at 15 C
Viscocity at 15 C
Flash point
Pour point
Water content
Ash content
Carbon residue
Acid value
Calorific value
Unit
Jatropha Oil
Jatropha biodiesel
Diesel
Biodiesel standards
ASTM D 6751-02
DIN EN 14214
kg m -3
2 -1
mm s
C
C
%
%
%
940
880
850
860-900
24.5
225
4
1.4
0.8
1
4.8
135
2
0.025
0.012
0.2
2.6
68
-20
0.02
0.01
0.17
1.9-6.0
> 130
< 0.03
< 0.02
-
3.5-5.0
>120
< 0.05
< 0.02
< 0.30
mg KOH g-1
MJ kg-1
28
0.4
< 0.8
< 0.50
38.65
39.23
42
Using the chemical procedures outlined in this report, an overall biodiesel yield of 99% can be expected
from the seed oil of the Jatropha Curcas plant.
Gubitz, G. M, M Mittelbach, and M Trabi. Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha Curcas L. Vol. 67. Oxford:
Elsevier Science, 1999.
9
Kumar Tiwari, Alok; Kumar, Akhilesh; Raheman, Hifjur. Biodiesel production from jatropha oil (Jatropha curcas)
with high free fatty acids: An optimized process. Biomass and Bioenergy (2007), 31(8), 569-575.
4. Process Description
As previously mentioned the proposed method for biodiesel production requires three main steps. These
steps include hexane solvent extraction, acid-catalyzed transesterification, and base-catalyzed
transesterification, each of which is well-known and widely-utilized in todays biodiesel industry. These
steps also allow for a high yield of the final biodiesel product, the primary goal of process optimization,
and each has been classified into one of four areas of the resulting simulation. Extraction of seed oil via
hexane solvent extraction takes place in Area 100, treatment and conversion via transesterification occurs
in Area 300, and biodiesel treatment and methanol recovery take place in Area 400. Hexane recovery,
another important step, occurs in Area 200. Simulation of this process was based on an annual biodiesel
production of two million gallons. However, finalizing the choice of mechanisms and methods for each
step required all possible choices and alternatives to be proposed, researched, and discussed.
The chosen method, solvent extraction, utilizes a solvent to extract oil from the seed husks. Many
chemicals can serve as the solvent for this process, including hydrocarbon solvents like hexane,
halogenated solvents like trichloroethylene, and supercritical solvents such as supercritical CO2. Hexane
was chosen as the best solvent for this process due to two favorable characteristicsan extraction grade
of 48-98% and a narrow distillation range.
8,9
Thijs, Adriaans . Suitability of solvent extraction for Jatropha Curcas. FACT Foundation, 2006. 20 Nov.
2008 <http://www.fact-fuels.org/media_en/FACT_(2006)_Suitability_of_solvent_extraction_for_jatropha_curcas.pdf>
4.1.2. Treatment of Seed Oil and Conversion of Seed Oil to Biodiesel Alternatives
Various transesterification mechanisms were researched and considered, including ultra-shear inline and
ultra-sonic methods, as well as the use of supercritical methanol or microwave reactors. Each seeks either
to maximize the contact between the two immiscible liquids within the reactor or to increase localized
heat found at their interface.
However, each alternative was eliminated due to unsatisfactory characteristics. The use of supercritical
methanol includes several risks associated with running at high-pressure, high-temperature conditions.
Unfortunately, ultrasonic reactors have very little reference in literature. Despite potential for future
development, microwave reactors remain an unproven technology. Additionally, ultra-shear reactors are
not economically feasible of this project. Thus, transesterification through the use of methanol and
catalyst reaction emerged as the method of choice.
First, raw Jatropha Curcas seeds are crushed in a grinder. The Jatropha Curcas oil (JCO) is then
removed from the seed flakes using hexane solvent extraction. The hexane solvent extraction and recycle
system is comprised of a rotocel extractor, a stripper column, a rotary dryer, and a decanter. The recycle
system effectively separates the hexane from both the extracted flakes and the hexane-JCO mixture, also
known as the miscella.
This extraction system consists of the equipment required to separate the hexane from the miscella and
wet seed cake, as shown in Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1 - Equipment design for Hexane Solvent Extraction and Recycle, Area 100
Hexane found in the miscella exiting the rotocel extractor is recovered by stripping it from the JCO. This
takes place in the steam-fed stripping column, and hexane is recovered from the hexane-wet flake slurry
by evaporating it with steam in the rotary dryer. The water-hexane mixtures are condensed and sent to the
decanter, where the water is separated and the hexane is recycled. Hand calculations performed for the
sizing of relevant equipment is included in Appendix A.
This process is highly-effective, removing approximately 99.99% of the hexane from the JCO. The
resulting hexane-steam mixture is condensed and sent to the decanter, and the JCO is pumped to the
appropriate storage tank. All condensed hexane-water mixture is collected into the decanter where,
because of a difference in densities, the hexane and water separate. This solution is then heated to remove
the hexane, and the water is discharged to the sewer. The vaporized hexane is recycled and directed back
to the rotocel extractor.
12,13
Seader, J. D., and Ernest J. Henley. Separation Process Principles. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2005.
10
Figure 4.2 shows the oil absorption system for hexane recovery. Cold mineral oil is used to absorb
hexane in the absorber column, and steam is used in the stripping tower to remove the absorbed hexane
from the mineral oil.
11
The vapor streams flow counter current to a stream of cooled mineral oil. Because hexane and mineral oil
are both non-polar liquids, they are miscible. The cooler the mineral oil, the higher is hexanes affinity to
dissolve into it. The vapor, now free of hexane, exits the top of the column and is safely discharged into
the surrounding atmosphere. The mineral oil absorbs the hexane and collects in the bottom of the
column. After exiting the bottom of the column, the solution is pumped through a heater, and sent to the
stripper column.
In this column, the heated mineral oil-hexane mixture flows counter current to the steam stream, stripping
the hexane from the mineral oil. The hot mineral oil, now free of hexane, is pumped through the oil
cooler. The hexane vapor and steam from the top of the column are condensed in the vent condenser and
the hexane-water mixture is sent to the decanter V110, where hexane and water are separated and hexane
is recycled.
12
occurs in the second batch reactor. Following each batch tank is a decanter which allows the reactor
effluents to settle and separate before continuing on to the next step in the process.
Figure 4.3 shows the basic layout for Area 300, where the treatment and conversion of the crude JCO
takes place. The specified size of each reactor tank is directly proportional to the optimized time required
for the respective reactions to reach completion.
This reaction has been optimized to run for 88 minutes at a temperature of 60C. The optimized reaction
time for each batch is 88 minutes. A head space of approximately 10% of the overall volume was
13
specified for this reactor, and the size of the reactor tank will be 10500 L. The exit stream contains 9174
L, consisting of 33% treated JCO and 60% biodiesel; the remainder is comprised of methanol, sulfuric
acid, FFAs, and water.
14
Distillation
Column
(T-400)
Glycerol
Storage Tank
(V-410)
Water
Biodiesel
Storage Tank
(V-411)
Spray
Column
(T-401)
This column operates with a pressure of 101.3 kPa. Crude glycerol enters at a flow rate of 88.3 L/hr.
The column contains 10 stages, with the feed entering in the 6th stage. The specified diameter is six
inches and its height is 15 feet, with an optimized reflux ratio of 1.34. The distillate is comprised of 70
mol% glycerol, 12.8 mol% water, and a remainder of Na2SO4 salts.
15
Washing the biodiesel is extremely important because contaminates such as unreacted methanol and
catalyst will damage equipment and burn poorly in diesel engines. This is reflected in the ASTM D6751
biodiesel standards which require the removal of glycerin, catalyst, alcohols, and FFAs. In order to wash
the biodiesel, water is sprayed into the tower as the dispersed phase. As it travels through the crude
biodiesel, the water collects methanol, dissolved salts, and unused catalyst found in the diesel. The total
volume of water suggested for washing biodiesel is a standard 2:1 volumetric ratio of water to biodiesel.
The column operates with a pressure of 101.3 kPa. Crude biodiesel enters the column at a rate of 897
L/hr. The column contains 10 stages, with the feed entering in the 6th stage. The diameter is six inches
and its height is 15 feet, with an optimized reflux ratio of 1.34. The distillate is comprised of 96.2mol%
Jatropha-based biodiesel, 1.78 mol% water, and a remainder of methanol.
16
a series of trays. As such, the process for designing these columns was based on the same design
principles, including:
a. Number of equilibrium stages
b. Tray diameter
c. Overall plate efficiency
d. Column height
e. Type of trays
f.
The optimal number of equilibrium stages was determined using the Kremser algebraic method for single
section cascades.14 T-120, which strips hexane from JCO, was designed to have an efficiency of 99.99%,
the highest physically possible. This is a reasonable target since hexane can be stripped from JCO with
low-pressure steam, due to a large difference in respective boiling points. The boiling point of JCO is
approximately 870C, while the boiling point of hexane is approximately 69C. T-210 was designed to
have an absorption rate for hexane of 99.999%. This was a necessary target since the discharge from T210 is released into the atmosphere and must have as little hexane present as possible. T-211 was
designed to have an efficiency of 99.99% to strip a high amount of hexane from the mineral oil,
increasing the overall volume of recycled hexane.
Diameter, plate efficiency, and column height for each column were based on the determination of the
number of equilibrium stages. Each column was designed to have four feet above the top tray for
removal of entrained liquid, and 10 feet below the bottom tray for bottoms surge capacity.15 All columns
were specified to use valve trays. This offers flexibility in the case where flooding or weeping occurs in
the column due to excessive entrainment of liquid droplets in the vapor, or when vapor pulsation becomes
excessive. The valve trays pressure drops were based on the previously-mentioned factors, which
combined form the overall operational efficiency of these columns.
Seader, J. D., and Ernest J. Henley. Separation Process Principles. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2005.
17
placement are essential for properly functioning controls. With this in mind, the control designs for each
area are as follows.
18
sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). Though found only in trace amounts, the presence of sodium sulfate in both the
biodiesel and glycerol exiting X-301 must be accounted for and monitored to reduce any resulting safety
or corrosive issues.
Treatment in Area 400 allows for sodium sulfate found in the biodiesel to be stripped away and combined
with the glycerol stream. A specified amount of sulfates are allowed in commercial-grade glycerol. If the
sodium sulfate content in the glycerol is low enough, no need exists for the removal of the sodium sulfate
from the glycerol. If the sodium sulfate content in the glycerol exceeds the maximum allowed, the
sodium sulfate in the glycerol must be removed before the glycerol can be sold. Another option would be
to sell the raw glycerol to a purchaser who wishes to purify it off-site. Off-site purification would greatly
reduce the selling price of the glycerol.
For this particular process, pure sulfuric acid poses the greatest risk of equipment and pipe damage due to
corrosion. However, there are several adequate solutions for handling sulfuric acid during each phase of
the process. It is suggested that storage tanks be constructed from carbon steel and utilize anodic
16
Openshaw, Keith Openshaw. "A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise." Biomass
Bioenergy 19 (2000): 1-15.
17
Dillon, C. P. Corrosion Control in the Chemical Process Industries. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1986. Print.
19
protection and drying vents. Desiccating vents are an essential feature for the storage of sulfuric acid.
Contact between the acid and any atmospheric moisture may otherwise result in dilution and attack.
Storage tanks containing sulfuric acid are also subject to the following industry references18.
Title
Description
NACE Standard
RP0294,
NACE Standard RP0391
"Design, Fabrication and Inspection of Tanks for the Storage of Concentrated Sulphuric
Acid and Oleum at Ambient Temperatures"
"Materials for the Handling and Storage of Concentrated (90 to100%) Sulfuric Acid at
Ambient Temperatures"
"Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage"
"Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, And Reconstruction"
"Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Rerating of In-Service Piping Systems"
"Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping"
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Div I.
Handbook of Sulphuric Acid Manufacturing,
"Materials Selector for Hazardous Chemicals. Vol 1: Concentrated Sulphuric Acid and
Oleum"
"Carbon Steel Sulphuric Acid Storage Tank - Inspection Guidelines"
API-650
API-653
API-570
ASME B31.3,
---------
Valves, piping, and pumps are also susceptible to acid corrosion. All piping must be made only of ductile
cast iron. The use of any other form of iron will result in several undesirable incidents, including
excessive internal corrosion of the graphite flakes. Other forms of iron pipes also pose the risk of
explosion, due to the gaseous products created from internal corrosion. Non-throttling valves should be
constructed of stainless steel, specifically CF3M to protect from turbulent flow conditions. CN7M
stainless steel is recommended for use with throttling valves as well as for all pumps.
5. Process Operation
5.1. Site Design
Most biofuel production plants are located within 150 miles of the resource being used as the primary
process source. As previously mentioned, the Jatropha Curcas plant thrives in areas with abundant
sunlight. Therefore, the plantation and the biodiesel production plant designed for this process should be
located in sunny regions. For a plant producing two million gallons of Jatropha-based biodiesel annually,
a plantation size of 4.2 square miles is required.
18
20
The proposed process makes use of solvent extraction. Because solvent extraction is a complex system
which poses specific hazards, the location of a Jatropha biodiesel plant should be a sufficient distance
from residential and commercial areas.
Gas chromatography was performed for the untreated oil as well as the treated oil, in order to determine
the effectiveness of the acid-catalyzed transesterification step. As previously mentioned, this step is
intended to increase the overall efficiency of the process by decreasing the amount of free fatty acids in
the intermediate products. The plotted results of this analysis are included in Appendices E and F. In
summary, the acid-transesterification step was found to be sufficiently effective at reducing the free fatty
acid content, as summarized in the tables below.
Compound
6.69
1.266
Methyl Palmitoleate
Molecular weight
(g/mol)
268
6.85
19.765
Methyl Palmate
270
7.14
1.116
Palmitic Acid
256
8.67
33.477
Methyl Linoleate
294
8.75
36.551
Methyl Oleate
296
9.01
6.368
Methyl Stearate
298
9.14
0.177
Linoleic Acid
280
9.18
1.179
Oleic Acid
282
9.5
0.1
Stearic Acid
284
Totals:
97.427
% METHYL ESTERS
2.572
% FREE ACIDS
21
Compound
6.69
0.944
Methyl Palmitoleate
Molecular weight
(g/mol)
268
6.85
16.271
Methyl Palmate
270
7.13
0.369
Palmitic Acid
256
8.7
32.709
Methyl Linoleate
294
8.79
39.543
Methyl Oleate
296
9.04
9.391
Methyl Stearate
298
9.15
0.131
Linoleic Acid
280
9.18
0.603
Oleic Acid
282
9.51
0.037
Stearic Acid
284
Totals:
98.858
% METHYL ESTERS
1.140
% FREE ACIDS
7. Safety
A high level of sophistication is required to maintain and operate a biodiesel production plant and to
utilize the chemicals specified for this process. In addition to following general safety precautions, the
safe handling and storage of all chemicals involved in the Jatropha extraction and treatment processes
must be considered. The dangers of explosions make adequate regulatory procedures necessary.
19
23
8. Market Analysis
The following outlines the market conditions and factors which justify the feasibility of a Jatropha-based
biodiesel production plant.
20
24
Best Case
Scenario, Without
Incineration
536
Best Case
Scenario, With
Incineration
536
Worst Case
Scenario, Without
Incineration
536
Worst Case
Scenario, With
Incineration
536
Work, Input
190
190
190
190
Cooling, Input
695
695
695
695
Material, Inputs
1211
1211
1211
1211
Steam
152
152
152
152
9771
7322
Fuel, Output
10135
10135
9998
9998
Total Input
2783
2783
2783
2783
Total Output
10135
19906
9998
17320
EROI
3.64
7.15
3.59
6.22
Description
Unit
Quantity
Hexane
Sodium
Hydroxide
per 55 gallons
per 2.5 kg
1.73
81.9
$
$
601.50
55.55
$
$
1,040
4,552
Sulfuric Acid
per 16 liters
24.1
62.50
1,507
Methanol
Mineral Oil
per 20 gallons
per 55 gallons
87.7
$
0.00189
$
Total daily costs
120.08
859.20
21
Price/Unit
Cost
$ 10,537
$
2
$ 17,637
22
25
Description
Extraction of seed oil with hexane
Removes hexane from wet seed cake
Incinerates dry seed cake
Base-catalyzed transesterification reaction
Acid-catalyzed transesterification reaction
Recovers methanol for reuse
Storage of glycerol
Washing of biodiesel
Storage of biodiesel
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Cost
13,000
7,000
25,000
70,000
80,000
42,000
12,000
24,000
35,000
$ 308,000
Imperium Renewables, a Seattle-based biodiesel production company, stated that biodiesel will be able to
compete with crude oil as long as the price of crude oil remains above $43 a barrel. If JCO were to
replace soybean oil as the most common source used in biodiesel production, the price of biodiesel would
likely drop, as Jatropha-based biodiesel has no direct effect on food prices. As long as Jatropha-based
biodiesel can match the price of conventional diesel, it would present a good prospect for biodiesel
production. If a price of $4.20 were presently used for pure biodiesel, production plants could expect an
approximate return of $8,600,000 from annual biodiesel sales. The cost of biodiesel production through
this process is estimated at $2.80/gallon.
26
205,000 gallons of glycerol each year. This equates to about $110,000 in revenue for the production
plant.
If the production of biodiesel increases, the supply of glycerol will also increase. This will likely cause
the price of glycerol to drop, significantly impacting the feasibility of selling the glycerol byproduct.
Additionally, finding proper disposal sites may also become difficult if the market becomes saturated with
glycerol byproducts. One option is to purify the crude-grade glycerol to raise its purity and price, though
this would also raise the cost for equipment and operations. Another option is to incinerate the glycerol.
Research is currently being conducted concerning the production of ethanol through the fermentation of
glycerin. Preliminary results indicate that this process is actually more efficient than producing ethanol
from corn.
The rotocel extractor was treated as a simple solid separator, and the rotary dryer was treated as a
separator. These simplifications were made due to the lack of support in UniSim for these specific types
of equipment. The efficiencies for the rotocel extractor and rotary dryer were based on their efficiency
for separations in industry.
The vent condenser, absorber, and stripper units in Area 200 were simulated as separator units. UniSim
does not simulate vent condensers, a specific type of condenser with multiple inputs and outputs.
Each piece of equipment would also required additional specifications to provide greater design details.
Sizing of the continuously stirred tank reactors require that rate laws and rate kinetics are properly
defined. This would require a large amount of laboratory work to determine the reaction rates of each
transesterification process. Kinetic models for the distillation column, strippers, and absorber could be
developed and then used to optimize the sections of the plant. The equipment cost estimates included are
only educated estimates, based on the price of similarly specified equipment currently used in industry.
The scope for the sizing and optimization of the process equipment would need to be widened to
incorporate pumps and heat exchangers. The focus of this project remained on the columns and reactors
required to carry out the main separation and transesterification processes. The rotocel extractor and
rotary dryer are two pieces of industrial equipment that would need to be sized by manufacturers, as based
on operational parameters. The three decantersV-100, V-300 and V-301would also need to be
specified from a manufacturer, as based on the inputs and required separations.
The cost for purchasing and maintaining Jatropha plantations or purchasing the Jatropha seeds will need
to be considered to prove the feasibility of the entire process. Cost analysis would need to be conducted
on the plant as a whole. Equipment specifications and operational parameters for the incineration and
boiler processes were outside the scope of this project. The cost for piping and land would also need to
be incorporated into the capital costs. The direct costs, indirect costs, and working capital would combine
to the total cost for using this process on a large scale.
fall to pursue a masters degree in public policy, with hopes of becoming a Michigan policymaker who
specializes in the areas of science, health, and manufacturing.
Although Brooke assisted in UniSim troubleshooting and experimental trials, she served primarily as the
teams lead for communications. Much of her time was spent compiling presentation materials,
researching a variety of report topics, and revising all submitted deliverables. Brooke also saw that the
teams odds and ends were completed, including tasks such as writing thank you cards and sending
team schedule update emails.
After spending the majority of the fall semester researching alternative methods to the standard biodiesel
production procedure, Stephen performed laboratory experiments and test reactions in the spring semester
for converting Jatropha Curcas seed oil into biodiesel. Stephen worked on the design of the hexane
solvent extraction, recycle, and recovery for the UniSim simulation, and calculated the sizing and
optimization parameters for the process columns and reactors.
29
For this project, Michael researched common practices for biodiesel production and oil extraction, and
assisted in the bench-scale laboratory experiments. He assisted with the UniSim simulation of various
pieces of equipment, including decanters, absorption columns, extraction columns, and general
troubleshooting. Michael also created the process flow diagrams utilized in this report.
12. Acknowledgments
Team Oil from [the] Soil wishes to acknowledge the important contributions made to this project by
several individuals:
Professor J. Aubrey Sykes faculty advisor
Dr. David Dornbos industrial consultant
Professor Wayne Wentzheimer UniSim consultant
Rich Huisman laboratory equipment & supplies
Michigan State University experimental analysis equipment
30
APPENDIX
31
Valve Trays
Number of Stages
Operating Conditions: Stripping hexane from JCO stream using steam with a desired efficiency of 99.999%
JCO + hexane: In stream
130
Teamperature =
160
Average MW* =
18.02
flowrate =
1707
Teamperature =
34.22
kg/h
C
kg/kmol
Average MW* =
123.3
kg/kmol
kg/h
Equations:
Fraction of hexane stripped =
(Si^(N+1) - Si)/(Si^(N+1) - 1)
Si = KiV/L
Pressure of Vessel =
101.3
Temp of Vessel =
160
V=
7.214
13.844
L=
K(hexane)=
S(hexane)=
4.168771664
Fraction
stripped
Number of Stages, N
kPa
C
kmol/h
kmol/h
Percent Stripped,
%
0.80653
80.65
0.95565
95.565
0.98947
98.947
0.99748
99.748
0.99940
99.940
0.99986
99.986
0.99997
99.997
0.99999
99.999
1.00000
100.000
10
1.00000
100.000
11
1.00000
100.000
32
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
0
4
6
8
Number of Equilibrium stages
Number of Stages =
10
12
8.0000
Equations:
DT = [4V(Mv)/(f(Uf)pi(1-((Ad)/A))pv]^0.5
Conditions:
Pressure of Vessel
=
Temp of Vessel =
V=
7.214
kmol/h
L=
13.844
kmol/h
12.0000
Ff - Friction factor =
1.0000
- surface tension =
60.0000
f -fraction flooding =
0.8000
inches
dynes/cm
33
101.3
160
kPa
C
Calculated Parameters:
ML =
123.3000
Mv =
18.0200
pL =
731.5000
kg/m^3
pv =
0.5097
kg/m^3
FLv =
0.3466
For the known tray spacing, From fig 6.24 (Separation Process Principles) we obtain Cf
Cf =
0.1700
Fst =
1.4310
ft/s
0.1274
Fha =
1.0000
C=
0.2433
ft/s
Uf =
9.2125
ft/s
Tray diameter Dt =
0.2145
8.446
inches
123.3000
g/mol
pL =
731.5000
kg/m^3
L =
0.4817
K=
Overall stage efficiency E =
cP
8
20.04
Height of trays =
ft
ft
10
ft
22
ft
Column Height
34
lb/lbmol
45.67
lb/ft^3
Checked by HL
Absorer T-210
Operating Conditions: Absorbing remaining hexane from vent streams using mineral oil with a desired efficiency of 99.99%
Type of Trays:
Valve Trays
Hexane and Water: In stream
40
kg/h
Teamperature =
20
flowrate =
Teamperature
=
Average MW =
212
kg/kmol
Average MW =
Equations:
Fraction of hexane Absorbed =
(Ai^(N+1) - Ai)/(Ai^(N+1) - 1)
Ai = L/KiV
Pressure of Vessel
172
Temp of Vessel =
45
V=
0.444096134
0.188679245
L=
K(hexane)=
0.15
A(hexane)=
2.832408435
Number of Stages, N
Fraction Absorbed
kPa
C
kmol/h
kmol/h
Percent Absorbed
0.7391
73.91
0.9156
91.56
0.9711
97.11
0.9899
98.99
0.9964
99.64
0.9987
99.87
0.9996
99.96
0.9998
99.98
0.9999
99.99
16
1.0000
100.00
35
17
110
38.28
kg/h
C
kg/kmol
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
0
10
15
Number of Equilbrium Stages
Number of Stages =
20
Equations:
Conditions:
DT = [4V(Mv)/(f(Uf)pi(1-((Ad)/A))pv]^0.5
Pressure of Vessel
Temp of Vessel =
V=
0.444096134
kmol/h
L=
0.188679245
kmol/h
12.00
Ff - Friction factor =
1.00
- surface tension =
60.00
f -fraction flooding =
0.80
inches
dynes/cm
36
172
45
kPa
C
Calculated Parameters:
ML =
212.4
Mv =
55.92
pL =
3.622
kg/m^3
pv =
0.435
kg/m^3
FLv =
0.559248584
For the known tray spacing, From fig 6.24 (Separation Process Principles) we obtain Cf
Cf =
0.200
Fst =
1.431
ft/s
0.151
Fha =
1.000
C=
0.286
ft/s
Uf =
0.775
ft/s
Tray diameter Dt =
0.354836825
13.970
inches
212.4000
g/mol
=
=
pL =
3.6220
kg/m^3
L =
0.4817
cP
K=
Overall stage efficiency E =
0.15
46.90
Height of trays =
ft
ft
10
ft
14
ft
Column Height
37
lb/lbmol
45.67
lb/ft^3
Checked by HL
Stripper T-211
Type of Trays:
Valve Trays
Number of Stages
Operating Conditions: Stripping hexane from JCO stream using steam with a desired efficiency of 99.999%
Rich oil (Mineral Oil + Hexane): In stream
Teamperature =
160
Average MW =
18.02
54.9
kg/h
flowrate =
Teamperature
=
130
kg/kmol
Average MW =
123.3
kg/h
Equations:
Fraction of hexane stripped =
(Si^(N+1) - Si)/(Si^(N+1) - 1)
Si = KiV/L
Pressure of Vessel =
101.3
Temp of Vessel =
140
V=
0.277
0.445
L=
K(hexane)=
S(hexane)=
3.739014938
Number of Stages, N
Fraction
stripped
kPa
C
kmol/h
kmol/h
Percent Stripped, %
0.78899
78.90
0.94658
94.658
0.98591
98.591
0.99625
99.625
0.99900
99.900
0.99973
99.973
0.99993
99.993
0.99998
99.998
0.99999
99.999
10
1.00000
100.000
11
1.00000
100.000
38
kg/kmol
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
0
4
6
8
10
Number of Equilibrium stages
Number of Stages =
12
9.0000
Equations:
Conditions:
DT = [4V(Mv)/(f(Uf)pi(1-((Ad)/A))pv]^0.5
Pressure of Vessel =
Temp of Vessel =
V=
0.277
kmol/h
L=
0.445
kmol/h
12.0000
Ff - Friction factor =
1.0000
- surface tension =
60.0000
f -fraction flooding =
0.8000
inches
dynes/cm
39
101.3
140
kPa
C
Calculated Parameters:
ML =
123.3000
Mv =
18.0200
pL =
731.5000
kg/m^3
pv =
0.5097
kg/m^3
FLv =
0.2898
For the known tray spacing, From fig 6.24 (Separation Process Principles) we obtain Cf
Cf =
0.1700
Fst =
1.4310
ft/s
0.1211
Fha =
1.0000
C=
0.2433
ft/s
Uf =
9.2125
ft/s
Tray diameter Dt =
0.0419
1.650
inches
123.3000
g/mol
pL =
731.5000
kg/m^3
L =
0.4817
K=
Overall stage efficiency E =
cP
6
22.29
Height of trays =
ft
ft
10
ft
23
ft
Column Height
40
lb/lbmol
45.67
lb/ft^3
0.7
0.6
A
b
s
0.5
o
r
b
a
0.4
n
c
e
0.3
0.2
0.1
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
Wavenumbers
41
1500
1000
500
1.5
A
b
s
o
r
1.0
b
a
n
c
e
0.5
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Wavenumbers
s1 Tue Apr 28 11:35:20:31 2009
3465.4119
80
2857.8812, 5.6445
20
1743.3356, 4.5740
2926.4108, 1.3785
4000
3500
3000
1187.1803
1464.5513
3007.6614
1362.5601
T
r
a
n
s
m
i40
t
t
a
n
c
e
2500
723.3765
1056.0647
60
%
2000
Wavenumbers
42
1500
1000
500
3353.4270, 2.2683
2921.3983, 2.1559
1034.4206, 2.0970
1742.8433
924.7162
855.2226
676.2418
1112.0594
1568.3989
A
1.5
b
s
o
r
b
a
n
c
1.0
e
1456.9735
1407.7436
2856.6433
2.0
0.5
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
Wavenumbers
s3c Tue Apr 28 12:29:38:59 2009
70
60
%
50
T
r
a
n
s40
924.7162
1742.8433
m
i
t
t
30
a
n
c
e
20
1568.3989, 8.5100
676.2418, 12.5911
10
1456.9735, 6.7644
2856.6433, 1.8457
1407.7436, 5.8635
2921.3983, 0.6982
3335.7632, 0.5736
0
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
Wavenumbers
43
1112.0594, 5.9282
1034.4206, 0.7997
1000
500
500
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Appendix G: Bibliography
ASTM Approves New Biodiesel Blend Specifications, Including B20. Green Car Congress, 2008. 12
Nov. 2008 <http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/astm-approves-n.html>.
Fitzgerald, Michael. Indias Big Plans for Biodiesel. Technology Review; Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. 2007. 3 May. <http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/17940/>.
Gubitz, G. M, M Mittelbach, and M Trabi. Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha Curcas L.
Vol. 67. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1999.
International Bio-fuels Conference. HGCA.
<http://www.hgca.com/content.output/2369/2369/Markets/Analysis/International%20Biofuel%20
Conference.mspx. Retrieved on 2008-04-15.
Kumar Tiwari, Alok; Kumar, Akhilesh; Raheman, Hifjur. Biodiesel production from jatropha oil
(Jatropha curcas) with high free fatty acids: An optimized process. Biomass and Bioenergy (2007),
31(8), 569-575.
Lele, Satish. Biodiesel and Jatropha Cultivation. India: Agrobios, 2006. India. n.d. 5 Dec. 2008
<http://www.d1plc.com/globalIndia.php>.
M. Wrgetter, Local and Innovative Biodiesel. Final report No 4.1030/C/02-022. ALTENER, 2006
National Biodiesel Board, 1 Dec. 2008 <http://www.biodiesel.org/pdf_files/Envi&Safetyinfo.pdf>.
Openshaw, Keith Openshaw. "A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise." Biomass
Bioenergy 19 (2000): 1-15.
Peters, Max S., and Klaus D. Timmerhaus. Plant Design And Economics For Chemical Engineerings.
4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1991.
Seader, J. D., and Ernest J. Henley. Separation Process Principles. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2005.
"The World is Green." Word Press. <http://worldisgreen.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/toil-Jatrophamay2007.jpg>.
The World Explorer. <http://www.thewoodexplorer.com/maindata/Picts/Jatropha1.jpg>
Thijs, Adriaans . Jatropha Handbook, Chapter 4 & 5. FACT Foundation, 2006.
< http://www.blt.bmlfuw.gv.at/vero/veroeff/0964_LIB_Forschungsbericht47.pdf>
Thijs , Adriaans . Suitability of solvent extraction for Jatropha Curcas. FACT Foundation, 2006. 20 Nov.
2008 <http://www.fact-fuels.org/media_en/FACT_(2006)_Suitability_of_solvent_extraction_for_
Jatropha_Curcas.pdf>.
Ulrich, Gael D., and Palligarnai T. Vasudevan. Chemical Engineering Process Design And Economics: A
Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Durham, New Hampshire: Process Publishing, 2004.
52
AREA 100
AREA 300
AREA 200
AREA 400
53
EINECS/ELINCS
497-19-8
CAS#
Sodium carbonate
Chemical Name
<3
207-838-8
1310-73-2
Sodium hydroxide
95-100
215-185-5
Hazard Symbols: C
Risk Phrases: 35
54
rash (in milder cases), and cold and clammy skin with cyanosis or pale color.
Ingestion: May cause severe and permanent damage to the digestive tract. Causes
gastrointestinal tract burns. May cause perforation of the digestive tract. Causes severe
pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and shock. May cause corrosion and permanent tissue
destruction of the esophagus and digestive tract. May cause systemic effects.
Inhalation: Irritation may lead to chemical pneumonitis and pulmonary edema. Causes
severe irritation of upper respiratory tract with coughing, burns, breathing difficulty, and
possible coma. Causes chemical burns to the respiratory tract.
Chronic: Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause dermatitis. Effects may be delayed.
56
Handling: Wash thoroughly after handling. Do not allow water to get into the container
because of violent reaction. Minimize dust generation and accumulation. Do not get in eyes,
on skin, or on clothing. Keep container tightly closed. Avoid ingestion and inhalation.
Discard contaminated shoes. Use only with adequate ventilation.
Storage: Store in a tightly closed container. Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away
from incompatible substances. Keep away from metals. Corrosives area. Keep away from
acids. Store protected from moisture. Containers must be tightly closed to prevent the
conversion of NaOH to sodium carbonate by the CO2 in air.
ACGIH
NIOSH
Sodium carbonate
none listed
none listed
none listed
Sodium hydroxide
C 2 mg/m3
10 mg/m3 IDLH
2 mg/m3 TWA
OSHA Vacated PELs: Sodium carbonate: No OSHA Vacated PELs are listed for this
chemical. Sodium hydroxide: C 2 mg/m3
Personal Protective Equipment
Eyes: Wear chemical goggles.
Skin: Wear appropriate protective gloves to prevent skin exposure.
Clothing: Wear appropriate protective clothing to prevent skin exposure.
Respirators: A respiratory protection program that meets OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.134 and
ANSI Z88.2 requirements or European Standard EN 149 must be followed whenever
workplace conditions warrant a respirator's use.
57
Carcinogenicity:
CAS# 497-19-8: Not listed by ACGIH, IARC, NIOSH, NTP, or OSHA. CAS# 1310-73-2: Not
listed by ACGIH, IARC, NIOSH, NTP, or OSHA.
Epidemiology: No information available.
Teratogenicity: No information available.
Reproductive Effects: No information available.
Neurotoxicity: No information available.
Mutagenicity: No information available.
Other Studies: See actual entry in RTECS for complete information.
No information available.
IATA
RID/ADR
IMO
SODIUM
Shipping Name: HYDROXIDE,
SOLID
Hazard Class:
UN Number:
Canada
TDG
SODIUM
HYDROXIDE
8(9.2)
UN1823
UN1823
Packing Group: II
II
59
This material does not contain any hazardous air pollutants. This material does not contain
any Class 1 Ozone depletors. This material does not contain any Class 2 Ozone depletors.
Clean Water Act:
CAS# 1310-73-2 is listed as a Hazardous Substance under the CWA. None of the chemicals
in this product are listed as Priority Pollutants under the CWA. None of the chemicals in this
product are listed as Toxic Pollutants under the CWA.
OSHA:
None of the chemicals in this product are considered highly hazardous by OSHA.
STATE
CAS# 497-19-8 is not present on state lists from CA, PA, MN, MA, FL, or NJ.
CAS# 1310-73-2 can be found on the following state right to know lists: California, New
Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Massachusetts.
California No Significant Risk Level: None of the chemicals in this product are listed.
European/International Regulations
European Labeling in Accordance with EC Directives
Hazard Symbols:
C
Risk Phrases:
R 35 Causes severe burns.
Safety Phrases:
S 26 In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately
with plenty of water and seek medical advice.
S 37/39 Wear suitable gloves and eye/face
protection.
S 45 In case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek
medical advice immediately (show the label where
possible).
WGK (Water Danger/Protection)
CAS# 497-19-8: 1
CAS# 1310-73-2: 1
Canada
CAS# 497-19-8 is listed on Canada's DSL List. CAS# 497-19-8 is listed on Canada's DSL
List. CAS# 1310-73-2 is listed on Canada's DSL List. CAS# 1310-73-2 is listed on Canada's
DSL List.
This product has a WHMIS classification of E.
CAS# 497-19-8 is listed on Canada's Ingredient Disclosure List.
CAS# 1310-73-2 is listed on Canada's Ingredient Disclosure List.
Exposure Limits
CAS# 1310-73-2: OEL-AUSTRALIA:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-BELGIUM:STEL 2 mg/m3
OEL-DENMARK:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-FINLAND:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-FRANCE:TWA 2 mg
/m3 OEL-GERMANY:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-JAPAN:STEL 2 mg/m3 OEL-THE NETHERLA
NDS:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-THE PHILIPPINES:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-SWEDEN:TWA 2 mg/
m3 OEL-SWITZERLAND:TWA 2 mg/m3;STEL 4 mg/m3 OEL-THAILAND:TWA 2 mg/m3
OEL-TURKEY:TWA 2 mg/m3 OEL-UNITED KINGDOM:TWA 2 mg/m3;STEL 2 mg/m3
OEL IN BULGARIA, COLOMBIA, JORDAN, KOREA check ACGIH TLV OEL IN NEW
ZEALAND, SINGAPORE, VIETNAM check ACGI TLV
60
The information above is believed to be accurate and represents the best information currently available to us. However,
we make no warranty of merchantability or any other warranty, express or implied, with respect to such information, and
we assume no liability resulting from its use. Users should make their own investigations to determine the suitability of the
information for their particular purposes. In no event shall Fisher be liable for any claims, losses, or damages of any third
party or for lost profits or any special, indirect, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if
Fisher has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
61
Chemical Name
Percent
EINECS/ELINCS
99+
200-659-6
Methyl alcohol
Hazard Symbols: T F
Risk Phrases: 11 23/24/25 39/23/24/25
62
unconsciousness, coma and possible death due to respiratory failure. May cause
cardiopulmonary system effects.
Inhalation: Harmful if inhaled. May cause adverse central nervous system effects including
headache, convulsions, and possible death. May cause visual impairment and possible
permanent blindness. Causes irritation of the mucous membrane.
Chronic: Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause dermatitis. Chronic inhalation and
ingestion may cause effects similar to those of acute inhalation and ingestion. Chronic
exposure may cause reproductive disorders and teratogenic effects. Laboratory experiments
have resulted in mutagenic effects. Prolonged exposure may cause liver, kidney, and heart
damage.
63
Spills/Leaks: Scoop up with a nonsparking tool, then place into a suitable container for
disposal. Use water spray to disperse the gas/vapor. Remove all sources of ignition. Absorb
spill using an absorbent, non-combustible material such as earth, sand, or vermiculite. Do
not use combustible materials such as saw dust. Provide ventilation. A vapor suppressing
foam may be used to reduce vapors. Water spray may reduce vapor but may not prevent
ignition in closed spaces.
ACGIH
NIOSH
OSHA Vacated PELs: Methyl alcohol: 200 ppm TWA; 260 mg/m3 TWA; 250 ppm STEL;
325 mg/m3 STEL
Personal Protective Equipment
Eyes: Wear chemical goggles.
Skin: Wear appropriate protective gloves to prevent skin exposure.
Clothing: Wear appropriate protective clothing to prevent skin exposure.
Respirators: A respiratory protection program that meets OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.134 and
ANSI Z88.2 requirements or European Standard EN 149 must be followed whenever
workplace conditions warrant a respirator's use.
64
65
66
IATA
RID/ADR
IMO
Canada
TDG
METHANOL
3(6.1)
UN1230
UN1230
Packing Group: II
II
FLASHPOINT
11 C
Additional Info:
67
STATE
CAS# 67-56-1 can be found on the following state right to know lists: California, New
Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Massachusetts.
California No Significant Risk Level: None of the chemicals in this product are listed.
European/International Regulations
68
The information above is believed to be accurate and represents the best information currently available to us. However,
we make no warranty of merchantability or any other warranty, express or implied, with respect to such information, and
we assume no liability resulting from its use. Users should make their own investigations to determine the suitability of the
information for their particular purposes. In no event shall Fisher be liable for any claims, losses, or damages of any third
party or for lost profits or any special, indirect, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if
Fisher has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
69
ACC# 10951
Chemical Name
Percent
EINECS/ELINCS
4.2
unlisted
9.7
202-503-2
86.1
203-777-6
Various Methylpentanes
Methylcyclopentane
Hexane
Hazard Symbols: XN F N
Risk Phrases: 11 38 48/20 62 51/53 65 67
70
and conjunctivitis.
Skin: Prolonged and/or repeated contact may cause defatting of the skin and dermatitis.
Causes irritation with burning pain, itching, and redness. Absorbed through the skin.
Ingestion: Aspiration hazard. May cause gastrointestinal irritation with nausea, vomiting
and diarrhea. Aspiration of material into the lungs may cause chemical pneumonitis, which
may be fatal. May cause central nervous system effects. Aspiration can cause asphyxia,
brain damage, and cardiac arrest.
Inhalation: Causes respiratory tract irritation. Exposure produces central nervous system
depression. Aspiration may cause respiratory swelling and pneumonitis. Inhalation of high
concentrations may cause narcotic effects. Vapors may cause dizziness or suffocation.
Exposure may cause vertigo, hallucinations, fatigue, muscle weakness, visual disturbances,
nervous system disturbances, coughing, chest pains, difficulty in breathing, lung irritation,
gastrointestinal disturbances, and edema which may be fatal.
Chronic: Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause defatting and dermatitis. Prolonged
or repeated exposure may cause adverse reproductive effects. May cause fetal effects.
Chronic exposure may cause visual disturbances. Laboratory experiments have resulted in
mutagenic effects. Peripheral neuropathy symptoms include: muscular weakness,
paresthesia, numbing of the hands, feet, legs and arms, unsteadiness, and difficulty in
walking and standing. Repeated exposure may cause nervous system abnormalities with
muscle weakness and damage, motor incoordination, and sensation disturbances. Chronic
exposure produces peripheral neuropathy.
71
flash back. Vapors can spread along the ground and collect in low or confined areas.
Extinguishing Media: For small fires, use dry chemical, carbon dioxide, water spray or
alcohol-resistant foam. Water may be ineffective. Water may spread fire. If water is the only
media available, use in flooding amounts. For large fires, use water spray, fog or alcoholresistant foam. Do NOT use straight streams of water. Contact professional fire-fighters
immediately. Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out.
ACGIH
NIOSH
none listed
none listed
none listed
none listed
none listed
50 ppm TWA; skin potential for cutaneous
absorption
OSHA Vacated PELs: Various Methylpentanes: No OSHA Vacated PELs are listed for this
chemical. Methylcyclopentane: No OSHA Vacated PELs are listed for this chemical. Hexane:
50 ppm TWA; 180 mg/m3 TWA
Personal Protective Equipment
72
73
LD50/LC50:
Not available.
Not available.
CAS# 110-54-3:
Draize test, rabbit, eye: 10 mg Mild;
Inhalation, rat: LC50 = 48000 ppm/4H;
Oral, rat: LD50 = 25 gm/kg;
Carcinogenicity:
CAS# 0-01-1: Not listed by ACGIH, IARC, NIOSH, NTP, or OSHA. CAS# 96-37-7: Not listed
by ACGIH, IARC, NIOSH, NTP, or OSHA. CAS# 110-54-3: Not listed by ACGIH, IARC,
NIOSH, NTP, or OSHA.
Epidemiology: No data available.
Teratogenicity: Effects on Newborn - behavioral: Inhaltion, rat: TCLo = 10000 ppm/7H
(female 15 days pre-mating and female 1-18 days after conception).; Effects on Embryo or
Fetus - fetotoxicity: Inhalation, rat: TCLo = 5000 ppm/20 H (female 6-19 days after
conception).
Reproductive Effects: No data available.
Neurotoxicity: No data available.
Mutagenicity: Sex Chromosome Loss and Nondisjunction: Saccharomyces cerevisiae = 132
mmol/L.; Cytogenetic Anaylsis: Hamster fibroblast = 500 mg/L.
Other Studies: No data available.
IATA
RID/ADR
74
IMO
Canada
TDG
Shipping Name: HEXANES
Hazard Class:
UN Number:
HEXANES
UN1208
UN1208
Packing Group: II
II
FLASHPOINT
-22C
Additional Info:
75
European/International Regulations
European Labeling in Accordance with EC Directives
Hazard Symbols:
XN F N
Risk Phrases:
R 11 Highly flammable.
R 38 Irritating to skin.
R 48/20 Harmful : danger of serious damage to health
by prolonged exposure through inhalation.
R 62 Possible risk of impaired fertility.
R 51/53 Toxic to aquatic organisms; may cause
long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.
R 65 Harmful: may cause lung damage if swallowed.
R 67 Vapors may cause drowsiness and dizziness.
Safety Phrases:
S 16 Keep away from sources of ignition - No
smoking.
S 29 Do not empty into drains.
S 33 Take precautionary measures against static
discharges.
S 36/37 Wear suitable protective clothing and
gloves.
S 9 Keep container in a well-ventilated place.
S 61 Avoid release to the environment. Refer to
special instructions/Safety data sheets.
S 62 If swallowed, do not induce vomiting: seek
medical advice immediately and show this container or
label.
WGK (Water Danger/Protection)
CAS# 0-01-1: No information available.
CAS# 96-37-7: 1
CAS# 110-54-3: 1
Canada
Canada
CAS# 96-37-7 is listed on Canada's DSL List. CAS# 96-37-7 is listed on Canada's DSL List.
CAS# 110-54-3 is listed on Canada's DSL List. CAS# 110-54-3 is listed on Canada's DSL
List.
This product has a WHMIS classification of B2, D2A.
CAS# 0-01-1 is not listed on Canada's Ingredient Disclosure List.
CAS# 96-37-7 is not listed on Canada's Ingredient Disclosure List.
CAS# 110-54-3 is listed on Canada's Ingredient Disclosure List.
Exposure Limits
CAS# 110-54-3: OEL-AUSTRALIA:TWA 50 ppm (180 mg/m3) OEL-BELGIUM:TWA
50 ppm (176 mg/m3) OEL-DENMARK:TWA 50 ppm (180 mg/m3) OEL-FINLAND:T
WA 50 ppm (180 mg/m3);STEL 150 ppm (530 mg/m3) OEL-FRANCE:TWA 50 ppm
(170 mg/m3) OEL-GERMANY:TWA 50 ppm (180 mg/m3) OEL-HUNGARY:TWA 100 m
g/m3;STEL 200 mg/m3;Skin OEL-JAPAN:TWA 40 ppm (140 mg/m3);Skin OEL-T
76
The information above is believed to be accurate and represents the best information currently available to us. However,
we make no warranty of merchantability or any other warranty, express or implied, with respect to such information, and
we assume no liability resulting from its use. Users should make their own investigations to determine the suitability of the
information for their particular purposes. In no event shall Fisher be liable for any claims, losses, or damages of any third
party or for lost profits or any special, indirect, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even if
Fisher has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
77
78