Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
from an economically impoverished school system with limited resource. However, it is necessary
break the traditional paradigm that states the relationship among teacher-student where teacher is
the principal nexus to start the learning. Students in the borderland should be the key to awake the
learning with the instruction by teacher only as facilitator and not dependable on their knowledge.
But the hard part could be to break the white paradigm and move to one inclusive.
Creating Curriculum that Reflects Diversity
The crucial issue in cultural diversity and learning is the relationship between the minority
cultures and the American mainstream culture. He think that multiculturalism in education should
go beyond comprehension and understanding of minorities groups. Teachers should be help
students to develop their ethnic identity either competency in both cultures. He pointed that
school is a bridge between students from minorities groups and the Americans. Also, school and
teachers be carefully when apply curriculum to this specific students. It is a complex thing because
for one side educators are trying to teach minorities groups the dominant culture. On the other
hand, teachers are responsibly to maintain and conserve the native culture of minorities groups.
Communication is one of the best way to make relationships in education. Language
acquisition is part of communication. If our schools avoid the primary language of minority
groups it could to damage the identity and inheritance of them. Furthermore, the way to engage
the new culture from a Latino perspective could be: fight to fit into this society. Most of the
minority groups will nothing without origin language. They lost the foundation to interactive with
people surrounding them. It include a sociological and linguistic issues that will need discussed
and addressed within classroom. Moreover, politicians and administrators avoid the resources as
technology, innovative ways of learning, and critical pedagogy because they need to control the
minorities in the country.
Critical Pedagogy beyond Boundaries
Border cities increased population as El Paso with an almost 70% of total people are
Hispanic from Mexico and other Spanish speaking countries. If you live in border cities not only
find the most diverse population, also you find a collision of cultures where past, present, and
future are mixed with identities and/or belief systems from both sides as Mexican/American
(Kazanjian, 2011). Border city is a unique place to learn about multiculturalism and
Multilanguage. Educators become cultural workers and they are involved beyond merely
knowledge (Giroux, 2005). Following this thought, it is necessary to innovate the learning
through border pedagogy beyond the boundaries.
Critical pedagogy in the border claim that teacher and students have an understanding of
boundaries of their knowledge and the relationship with their language (Giroux, 2005). It involved
redefine the knowledge and identity. In this sense, a border pedagogy without boundaries is when
teacher create a new perspective for historical and social apparatuses of the border. In other
words, students and teachers learned their limitations and qualifications. They are able to create a
connection between social relations and political institutions.
Teachers would be listened and observed carefully the needs of students living in both
sides of border. Curriculum should be relate to their identity and help them to build a
multiculturalism world. The only way to integrate other language and culture into the classroom is
when teacher understand that humankind have the power to determine their future. Education is
about allow students work with their spirit, mind, and body; is a way to integrate through
experimental method, democracy and free thinking. School with liberty and justice for all!
References
Anyon, Jean. Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from the
World Wide Web: https://lib.utep.edu/articles/2219167.1446/1.PDF
Banks,J.A.,&Banks,C.M.(2009).Multiculturaleducation:Issuesandperspectives.
Indianapolis,IN:Wiley.
Conklin,W.,&Frei,S.(2007).Differentiatingthecurriculumforgiftedlearners.Huntington
Beach,CA:ShellEducation.
Echevarria,J.,&Graves,A.(2010).Shelteredcontentinstruction:TeachingEnglishlanguage
learnerswithdiverseabilities.Boston:AllynandBacon.
Giroux, Henry A. (2005). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New
York, NY: Routledge.
Gregory,G.H.,&Chapman,C.M.(2006).Differentiatedinstructionalstrategies:Onesize
doesn'tfitall.ThousandOaks,CA:Corwin.
Kazanjian, Christopher J. (2011). The border pedagogy revisited. In Kazanjian (Ed.).
Intercultural Education. Vol. 22, No. 5. (pp. 371-380). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ogbu, John U. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher,
Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 5-14.
Pugach, Marleen C. (1989). On the Border of Opportunity. Education, Community, and
Language at the U. S. Mexico Line. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,
Publishers.
Tomlinson,C.(2004).Howtodifferentiateinstructioninmixedabilityclassrooms.Alexandria,
VA:ASCD.