Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
A 200-233-359
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
DOWtL
t1JVL)
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Guendelsberger, John
Userteam: Docket
A 200-233-359
Date of this notice: 3/31/2016
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision in the above-referenced case. This copy is being
provided to you as a courtesy. Your attorney or representative has been served with this
decision pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1292.S(a). If the attached decision orders that you be
removed from the United States or affirms an Immigration Judge's decision ordering that you
be removed, any petition for review of the attached decision must be filed with and received
by the appropriate court of appeals within 30 days of the date of the decision.
Sincerely,
DorutL Ca..,vu
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Guendelsberger, John
Userteam:
Cite as: Alexander Alvarez-Medina, A200 233 359 (BIA March 31, 2016)
ALVAREZ-MEDINA, ALEXANDER
A200-233-359
WORCESTER COUNTY JAIL
5022 JOYNER ROAD
SNOW HILL, MD 21863
Date:
In re: ALEXANDERALVAREZ-MEDINA
MAR 3 1 2016
MOTION
ON BEHALF OF RESPON DENT: Timothy William Davis, Esquire
This case was last before us on December 1, 2015, at which time we dismissed the
respondent's appeal from the Immigration Judge's April 8, 2015, decision. The respondent has
now filed a timely motion to reopen on February 29, 2016. The Department of H omeland
Security has not responded to the motion, which will be granted.
With his motion, the respondent has submitted evidence that a Form 1-130 visa petition has
been filed on his behalf by his lawful permanent resident spouse, and he has also submitted
various family documents (including evidence that the couple has a child) to prove the bona fide
nature of the marriage. G iven the evidence submitted and the lack of DHS opposition, we
conclude that reopening is warranted; in so ruling, however, we express no opinion on the
ultimate outcome of the remanded proceedings. Accordingly, the motion will be granted, and the
record will be remanded for further proceedings.
ORDER: The motion is granted, and the record is remanded to the Immigration Court for
further proceedings consistent with the foregoing decision.
Cite as: Alexander Alvarez-Medina, A200 233 359 (BIA March 31, 2016)
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS