Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Advanced Routing
Course Code
CIN4006
Date
Submission Date
May 1, 2016
May 1, 2016
Percentage of Final
Grade.
15%
Student Name
College
FMC
Student ID
Student Section
09B7CIN01
Maximum Marks
75
Question No.
CLO1
CLO2
1,15
2-14
CLO3
CLO4
CLO5
CLO6
The entire project/case study/poster is designed and developed by me (and my team members).
The proper citation has been used when I (and my team members) used other sources.
No part of this project has been designed, developed or written for me (and my team members) by a third
party.
I have a copy of this project in case the submitted copy is lost or damaged.
None of the music/graphics/animation/video/images used in this project have violated the Copy
Right/Patent/Intellectual Property rights of an individual, company or an Institution.
I have the written permission from people who are featuring in this project.
Student Signature:
Date:
10
11
12
13
14
15
Total
Marks Allocated
75
Marks Obtained
Total Marks:
April 2016
Page 1 of 4
Case Study
Topology
Objectives
Plan, design, and implement the International Travel Agency core network.
Verify that all implementations are operational and functional according to the guidelines.
Background
The International Travel Agency (ITA) needs both its core network and its Travel Data Providers
(TDP) network set up. Configure each network to run EIGRP, and use BGP to advertise routes
between the two.
Required Resources
4 routers
1 switch
April 2016
Page 2 of 4
Requirements
5 marks
3 marks
2 marks
2 marks
5. Configure the ITA network to be in BGP AS 65001, and the TDP network to be in BGP AS
65002.
6 marks
6. Advertise the 192.16.14.0/30 and 192.16.34.0/30 networks in both EIGRP autonomous
systems.
5 marks
7. Configure the interfaces on the border routers between the two EIGRP autonomous
systems, so they do not send EIGRP packets.
6 marks
8. All routers will be participating in BGP. Configure all routers for a full mesh of IBGP peers
in each system.
8 marks
9. Peer R1 and R2 using loopback addresses, not their directly connected interfaces.
6 marks
10. Advertise all loopback interfaces into the BGP process, except on R2, where the only
loopback advertised should be loopback 2.
6 marks
11. On R2, create a static summary route for the rest of its loopback interfaces and advertise
this static route in BGP.
6 marks
12. R4 should send a summary route to ITA representing all the R4 loopback interfaces.
4 marks
13. R4 should prefer the path to ITA networks via the Ethernet link between R1 and R4.
Accomplish this by modifying the MED advertised to TDP.
6 marks
14. Routers in the ITA AS should prefer the path to TDP networks via the Ethernet link
between R1 and R4. Accomplish this by modifying the local preference of routes being
advertised in from TDP.
6 marks
15. Tcl Script Verification
4 marks
All pings to the below addresses should be successful for routers R1, R2, and R3.
April 2016
Page 3 of 4
tclsh
foreach address {
11.1.1.1
11.2.2.2
22.44.0.1
22.44.1.1
22.44.2.1
22.44.3.1
11.3.3.3
172.16.0.1
172.16.4.1
172.16.8.1
172.16.12.1
10.1.102.1
10.1.102.2
10.1.103.1
10.1.103.3
10.1.203.2
10.1.203.3
192.16.14.1
192.16.14.2
192.16.34.1
192.16.34.2
} {
ping $address source Loopback0}
April 2016
Page 4 of 4