Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 August 2014
Received in revised form 28 September 2014
Accepted 26 October 2014
Available online 11 March 2015
Keywords:
Epichlorohydrin
Dichloropropanol
Microchemical system
Synthesis
Process decoupling
a b s t r a c t
Synthesizing epichlorohydrin (ECH) from dichloropropanol (DCP) is a complicated reaction due to the partial
decomposition of ECH under harsh conditions. A microchemical system can provide a feasible platform for
improving this process by conducting a separation once full conversion has been achieved. In this work, referring
to a common DCP feed used in industry, the reaction performance of mixed DCP isomers with NaOH in the
microchemical system on various time scales was investigated. The operating window for achieving high conversion and selectivity was on a time scale of seconds, while the side reactions normally occurred on a time scale of
minutes. Plenty of Cl ions together with a high temperature were proved to be critical factors for ECH hydrolysis.
A kinetic study of alkaline mediated ECH hydrolysis was performed and the requirements for an improved ECH
synthesis were proposed by combining quantitative analysis using a simplied reaction model with experimental results on the time scale of minutes. Compared with the conventional distillation process, this new strategy for
ECH synthesis exploited microchemical system and decoupled the reaction and separation with potentials of
higher productivity and better reliability in scaling up.
2015 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Epichlorohydrin (ECH) is an important intermediate in the production of epoxide resins, chlorohydrin rubbers and other organic products
[13]. There have been several industrial manufacturing processes to
produce ECH such as propylene chlorination and glycerol chlorination
[47]. One of the most common routes for the synthesis of ECH is
through the elimination of hydrogen chloride from dichloropropanol
(DCP). Fig. 1 illustrates this process, in which the desired ring closure is
generally followed with hydrolysis as the major side reaction [8]. The
immediate removal of ECH is necessary for limiting further hydrolysis.
Dichloropropanol has two isomers: 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol (1,3DCP) and 2,3-dichloro-1-propanol (2,3-DCP). A 1:2 ratio is normally
obtained from the chlorohydrination of allyl chloride. Due to inductive
effects and steric hindrance, the reaction rate of the elimination of
hydrogen chloride from 1,3-DCP was reported to be 20 times faster
than that from 2,3-DCP [8,9]. Industrial ECH synthesis aims to convert
2,3-DCP sufciently while avoiding subsequent hydrolysis. In this regard, the reactive distillation column is conventionally used for ECH synthesis, in which ECH can be stripped with steam once being produced.
Carr et al. [8,9] determined the reaction kinetics for a complete description of ECH production process using lime milk as alkaline and provided
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21036002, 21176136)
and the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (2011BAC06B01).
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: luyc@tsinghua.edu.cn (Y. Lu).
a model for simulating a multistage unit coupling reaction with distillation. Ma et al. [10] investigated the apparent kinetics of ring closure and
hydrolysis using sodium hydroxide solution as alkaline. They indicated
that raising the temperature favored the desired reaction pathway if
the residence time of ECH was sufciently short. All of the analyses or
simulations in these studies were based on the assumptions of ideal
feed mixing and ow as well as instantaneous ECH separation. However,
actual reaction output in production was frequently different from the
expected results for several reasons. First, the apparent kinetic parameters determined in a conventional reactor are usually case-dependent
(Ma et al. [9] even obtained two different kinetic equations according
to different temperature ranges). Second, in a cascade reactive distillation column, it is impossible to realize exact idealities in mixing, twophase counter-ow or instantaneous phase equilibrium [1113]. Thus,
it is still a challenge to control and enhance DCP conversion effectively.
In recent years, microreactors have shown numerous advantages
over traditional reactors, such as enhanced mixing and mass transport,
controlled hydrodynamic ow and good inherent safety [1416]. They
have been used as effective tools for intensifying fast reactions dependent on careful controls. Examples included rapid precipitation for
nanoparticle preparation [17,18], and fast and strongly exothermic reactions for chemical intermediates synthesis [1921]. Microreactors
have the potential to carry out an improved ECH synthesis.
In our previous work, the kinetic parameters of dehydrochlorination
of 1,2-DCP were determined in a microchemical system consisting of a
micromixer, a delay loop and a microneutralizer [22]. However, an
industrial case using microchemical system as the core unit may need
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2014.10.021
1004-9541/ 2015 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.
1124
Fig. 1. Synthesis of ECH. (a) Desired reaction; (b) a typical following side reaction.
Xinzhi), in which phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.0) delivered by another metering pump was introduced into the reaction system through
Microreactor 2. Due to the sudden decrease of temperature and concentration of hydroxyl ions, all the reactions were assumed to be quenched
during the sample processing and analysis. In this microchemical system,
the nominal reaction time was dependent on the length of the delay loop.
2.3. Analysis
The sample collected from the outlet of Microreator 2 was diluted
with ethanol, and then 0.5 l of sample was injected into a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu GC-2014). The GC analysis used AB-InoWax
(30 m 0.25 mm 0.25 m) for the column and polyethylene glycol
for the stationary phase. The GC conditions included: carrier gas, N2;
injection temperature, 220 C; column temperature, 70 C to 200 C
(30 Cmin1); and detector, ame ionization detector (FID) at
280 C. The quantitative analysis by GC was based on the internal
standard method. 1-Octanol was used as the internal standard. The
dichloropropanol conversion (X) and selectivity (S) are calculated
with the following equations.
X 1
W DCP Mpro
F DCP
W ECH M pro
F DCP W DCP M pro
where WDCP and WECH are the mass fraction of DCP and ECH in the sample, respectively. Mpro (g) is the sampling mass, and FDCP (g) the feeding
mass of DCP during sampling. The determination errors of WDCP and
WECH were about 0.5% and 2.4%, respectively.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Reaction performance on the time scale of seconds
A microchemical system can provide a resolution of residence time
in the sub-second range. For a reaction which nears completion within
seconds, this is quite a valuable characteristic for process control. Our
previous research showed that the dehydrochlorination of 2,3-DCP,
Feed 3
Feed 2
Feed 1
Delay loop
Microreactor 1
Microreactor 2
Thermostat 1
Thermostat 2
Sampling
1; 3DCP0 0
d2; 3DCP
25 156000
2
1:61 10 e RT 2; 3DCP NaOH
dt
reaction is taken as 156 kJmol-1. The lines in Fig. 3 represent the calculated values. They match with the experimental data well, indicating the
assumptions are reasonable and the chemical process within the
microchemical system can be well predicted or designed.
Besides of the conversion of DCP, the selectivity of DCP to ECH is another concern. Fig. 4 gives selectivities at relatively high temperatures
(77 C and 85 C) within 15 s. As seen, all the dots are around 1.0, almost
independent of the temperature, DCP initial concentration and residence time. This indicates that an operating window exists for achieving
high conversion and high selectivity simultaneously in a microchemical
system.
1.0
0.8
selectivity
although much slower than that of 1,3-DCP, was a fast reaction. Therefore, the reaction performance of mixed DCP isomers in a microchemical
system on the time scale of seconds was rst investigated. Typical ow
rates were determined to be 10 mlmin1 of Feed 1 and 3 mlmin1 of
Feed 2 in preliminary experiments, over which the time prole of
conversion was almost consistent since the mixing performance in the
microchemical system was high enough.
1125
0.6
o
77 C
o
85 C
0.4
0.2
0.0
10
15
t/s
Fig. 4. Selectivities of ECH from DCP under various reaction conditions. Feed 1: [DCP]10 =
3.0% (by mass) (solid points) or 5.0% (by mass) (hollow points), 10 mlmin1. Feed 2:
[NaOH]20 = 3.16% (by mass) (solid points) or 5.2% (by mass) (hollow points),
3 mlmin1.
1.0
1.0
conversoin
conversion
0.8
0.6
0.4
50 C
o
60 C
o
70 C
0.2
0.0
10
t/s
(a)
15
20
0.9
0.8
0.7
77 C
o
85 C
0
10
15
20
t/s
(b)
Fig. 3. Time proles of DCP conversion under various reaction conditions. Feed 1: [DCP]10 = 3.0% (by mass) (solid points) or 5.0% (by mass) (hollow points), 10 mlmin1. Feed 2:
[NaOH]20 = 3.16% (by mass) (solid points) or 5.2% (by mass) (hollow points), 3 mlmin1.
1126
0.9
NaOH:DCP=0.9
NaOH:DCP=1.1
NaOH:DCP=1.2
0.8
0.7
selectivity
conversion
1.00
10
0.95
0.90
0.85
NaOH:DCP=0.9
NaOH:DCP=1.1
NaOH:DCP=1.2
0.80
0
15
10
t/s
t/s
(a)
(b)
15
Fig. 5. Effects of the molar ratio of NaOH to DCP on ECH synthesis at 85 C. (a) Conversion; (b) selectivity. Feed 1: [DCP]10 = 5.0% (by mass), 10 mlmin1; Feed 2: [NaOH]20 = 5.2%
(by mass); the owrate of Feed 2 is varied according to the molar ratio of NaOH to DCP; the lines represent the calculated values.
1.0
1.0
selectivity
conversion
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.7
10
15
0.0
10
t/s
t/s
(a)
(b)
15
Fig. 6. Effects of the extra chloride ions on ECH synthesis from DCP at 85 C. (a) Conversion; (b) selectivity. Feed 1, [DCP]10 = 5.0% (by mass), 10 mlmin1; Feed 2, [NaOH]20 = 5.2%
(by mass), 3 mlmin1; hollow points in (a) are of experiments without NaCl pre-addition for reference.
~10 s
5 min
~10 s
10 min
5 min
10 min
1.0
selectivity
conversion
1.0
1127
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.7
1.0
1.1
0.2
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.2
mole ratio
mole ratio
(a)
(b)
Fig. 7. Changing of conversion (a) and selectivity (b) on the time scale of minutes. T = 85 C, [DCP]10 = 5.0% (by mass), [NaOH]20 = 5.2% (by mass); NaOH and NaCl are approximately
equimolar.
r kECH NaOH
1.0
0.8
XNaOH
Fig. 8. Perhaps hydrolysis routes of ECH in neutral aqueous solution containing Cl.
0.6
0.4
0.0
0
10
15
20
25
t/min
(a)
0.0
-0.5
ln(1-XNaOH )
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
[ECH]0=5.00%,by mass
[ECH]0=5.83%,by mass
-2.5
0
12
16
t/min
(b)
0.15
PH
6.98
C
B
k[ECH]0
0.12
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
[ECH]0 /molL
0.5
0.6
0.7
-1
(c)
Fig. 9. Set up for hydrolysis reaction kinetics determination. A heat carrier inlet; B heat
carrier outlet; C pH electrode; D magnetic stirred rod; E pH meter.
Fig. 10. Time prole of the sodium hydroxide mediated hydrolysis reaction at 50 C
[NaOH]0 = 1.2% (by mass); ECH is absolutely excessive.
1128
where [ECH] and [NaOH] represent the concentration of ECH and NaOH
after mixing, respectively. Since ECH is in extreme excess during the
reaction, [ECH] is taken as [ECH]0 approximately.
If the order of NaOH is rst, we derive
ln 1X NaOH kECH0 t
k k0 e
where k is the rate constant, k0 is pre-exponential factor, E is the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant (8.314 Jmol1K1) and T
is the absolute temperature. k0 and E can be obtained by linearity calibration of lnk vs. 1/T, as shown in Fig. 11(c). Finally, the following kinetic
equation for the sodium hydroxide mediated hydrolysis reaction is
obtained
11 87305
RT
r 3:42 10 e
ECHNaOH:
1.0
0.0
0.8
ln(1-XNaOH)
-0.5
XNaOH
0.6
0
40 C
0.4
50 C
0
0.2
16
24
32
50 C
o
60 C
o
70 C
-2.5
0.0
8
40 C
-1.5
-2.0
60 C
0
70 C
0
-1.0
40
t/min
t/min
(a)
(b)
10
-3
-4
lnk
-5
-6
-7
-8
0.0029
0.0030
0.0031
0.0032
1/T
(c)
Fig. 11. Effects of temperature on the sodium hydroxide mediated hydrolysis reaction. [ECH]0 = 6% (by mass), [NaOH]0 = 1.2% (by mass); ECH is absolutely excessive.
-1
1 0 00 0
(R e f 1 )
1129
10000
-1
85 C (Ref 1)
o
90 C
o
95 C
1 00 0
1000
10 0
100
r1/r2
r1 /r 2
-1
10
10
0 .1
0 .0
0.1
0 .2
0 .9 2
0 .96
0 .9 8
0.1
0.0
1.0 0
10000
Ref 1
Ref 2
1000
r1/r2
100
100
10
10
0.2
(b)
Ref1
1 % excess
2 % excess
0.1
0.2
(a)
1000
0.1
0.0
0.1
10000
r1/r2
0.9 4
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
(c)
(d)
Fig. 12. Prediction on the rate ratio of desired reaction to sodium hydroxide mediated hydrolysis reaction. Ref 1: T = 85 C, [DCP]0 = [NaOH]0 = 0.2 molL1; Ref 2: T = 95 C, [DCP]0 =
0.51 molL1, [NaOH]0 = 0.5 molL1; the curves in each subgure are calculated by using the same parameters with the exception of (a) initial concentrations, (b) temperature, or
(c) excessive amount of DCP.
DCP
NaOH
Microreactor
ECH-riched stream
Delay loop
Flash Flash
separation
separation
ECH-leaned stream
Time line
0s
15s
30s
45s
60s
1130
References
[1] J.W. Bijsterbosch, A. Das, F.P.J.M. Kerkhof, Clean technology in the production of
epichlorohydrin, J. Clean. Prod. 2 (1994) 181184.
[2] K. Weissermel, H.J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim and
New York, 1997.
[3] M. Wang, Y.B. She, X.T. Zhou, H.B. Ji, Efcient solvent-free synthesis of
chloropropene carbonate from the coupling reaction of CO2 and epichlorohydrin
catalyzed by magnesium porphyrins as chlorophyll-like catalysts, Chin. J. Chem.
Eng. 19 (2011) 446451.
[4] N., Nagato, H., Mori, K., Maki, R., Ishioka, Process for production of epichlorohydrin,
US Patent 4,634,784 (1987).
[5] E. Santacesaria, R. Tesser, M. Di Serio, L. Casale, D. Verde, New process for producing
epichlorohydrin via glycerol chlorination, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010) 964970.
[6] S.M. Danov, A.V. Sulimov, A.V. Ovcharova, Modeling of the vaporliquid equilibrium
in the system formed by the epichlorohydrin synthesis products, Theor. Found.
Chem. Eng. 46 (2012) 3143.
[7] L.L. Wang, Y.M. Liu, W. Xie, H.J. Zhang, H.H. Wu, Y.W. Jiang, M.Y. He, P. Wu, Highly
efcient and selective production of epichlorohydrin through epoxidation of allyl
chloride with hydrogen peroxide over Ti-MWW catalysts, J. Catal. 246 (2007)
205214.
[8] S. Carr, E. Santacesaria, M. Morbidelli, P. Schwarz, C. Divo, Synthesis of epichlorohydrin by elimination of hydrogen chloride from chlorohydrins. 1. Kinetic aspects of
the process, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 18 (1979) 424427.
[9] S. Carr, E. Santacesaria, M. Morbidelli, P. Schwarz, C. Divo, Synthesis of epichlorohydrin by elimination of hydrogen chloride from chlorohydrins. 2. Simulation of the
reaction unit, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 18 (1979) 428433.
[10] L. Ma, J. Zhu, X. Yuan, Q. Yue, Synthesis of epichlorohydrin from dichloropropanols:
Kinetic aspects of the process, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 85 (2007) 15801585.
[11] F. Bezzo, A. Bertucco, A. Forlin, M. Barolo, Steady-state analysis of an industrial
reactive distillation column, Sep. Purif. Technol. 16 (1999) 251260.
[12] R. Taylor, R. Krishna, Modelling reactive distillation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 (2000)
51835229.