0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
54 просмотров1 страница
For this writing sample, I was playing the role of a team leader at Anders Consulting. My boss, Mr. Anders, asked me to evaluate Kyle Houston and his performance. His performance was to be rated in three areas: contributing, listening, and group problem solving. I was asked to write this report and get back to Mr. Inez with my findings.
For this writing sample, I was playing the role of a team leader at Anders Consulting. My boss, Mr. Anders, asked me to evaluate Kyle Houston and his performance. His performance was to be rated in three areas: contributing, listening, and group problem solving. I was asked to write this report and get back to Mr. Inez with my findings.
For this writing sample, I was playing the role of a team leader at Anders Consulting. My boss, Mr. Anders, asked me to evaluate Kyle Houston and his performance. His performance was to be rated in three areas: contributing, listening, and group problem solving. I was asked to write this report and get back to Mr. Inez with my findings.
Date: 3/4/2016 Subject: Kyle Houstons Performance Evaluation Inez, After giving much thought and reviewing evaluations about Kyle Houstons work at Anders Consulting, I do not believe he would be the right fit for the position of Team Leader at this time. I came to this decision by reviewing 15 peer evaluations as well as my own observations over the last six months as his supervisor. The three main performance categories which Kyle has been evaluated on include: contributing, listening, and facilitating group problem solving. Kyle has shown excellent attendance at meetings and has shown attention to deadlines. In the category of Contributing Kyle scored 2.83 out of 3, showing that this is a strong point for him. In addition to his attendance and meeting deadlines, he has been excellent in providing ideas and offering suggestions when brainstorming. This quality shows that Kyle works well in a group setting and could eventually be promoted to team leader. One area that Kyle could improve on is the Listening category, which he scored the lowest. On a scale from 0 to 3, Kyle scored a 1.96, placing him below the average rating. Group members noticed that Kyle often struggles with letting other members of the group contribute to the conversation and often tries to control the group. Because he often doesnt effectively listen to others, he struggles to summarize or clarify others ideas. He received a score of 0 in this area, which is of great concern to me. Once Kyle learns to listen to his peers more often, I believe he could be a successful leader. The final category of the evaluation is facilitating group problem solving. Kyle scored better in this category than the previous listening category, but could still use some improvement, scoring a 2.18 in this category. Kyle has shown valuable skills while asking questions to organize the discussion and keeping the group on task. However, at times, Kyle has been criticized by group members for only discussing topics that he sees as valuable, while ignoring other solutions. Overall, Kyle scored a 2.42 out of a possible 3 on his evaluation. Even though this is an above-average score, I still see some areas of concern. Kyle works well on a team and possess a variety of strong qualities such as attendance and attention to deadlines mentioned earlier. I believe if we give Kyle some additional projects to focus on, he could greater develop his skills and be ready for the next promotion. At our evaluation meeting, I discussed my concerns with Kyle, and we were able to develop a plan for him to better succeed in the future. I appreciate your trust in me to provide this recommendation, if you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jessica Feltner, Team Leader Anders Consulting
Unit-4object Segmentation Regression Vs Segmentation Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Tree Building Regression Classification Overfitting Pruning and Complexity Multiple Decision Trees