Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Department of Education
Division of Quezon
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEAC HER I
Name of Employee: CARLO TROY ACELOTT T. MANALO
Name of Rater: _______________________________
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER I
Position: _____________________________________
Review Period: JUNE 2015 - MARCH 2016
Date of Review: _______________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - DIVISION OF QUEZON, QUEZON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major Final
Output
(MFOs)
Basic Education
Services
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
A. TeachingLearning
Process
Objectives
Timeline
Weight
per KRA
daily
40%
Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5 - Prepared at least 120-145
daily lesson logs that had the
most following competency,
related activities, references
used for teacher and learners,
number of students with
mastery and those who need
remediation/reinforcements.
4 - Prepared at least 100-119
daily lesson logs that had the
following competency, related
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Actual Ratin Scor
Result
g
e
s
weekly
3. Construct appropriate,
adequate and student-centered
assessment including activity,
short quizzes and unit tests
within quarter. (8%)
quarterly
weekly
Major Final
Output
Key Result
Areas
Objectives
twice a week
4 Facilitated learning and
awareness on current issues and
concerns by integrating those
things in the lesson at least once
a week
3 - Facilitated learning and
awareness on current issues and
concerns by integrating those
things in the lesson at once in 2
weeks
2 - Facilitated learning and
awareness on current issues and
concerns by integrating those
things in the lesson at least once
in 3 weeks
1 - Facilitated learning and
awareness on current issues and
concerns by integrating those
things in the lesson at least once
a month.
5 - Attendance checking was
100% and above systematically
carried out.
4 - Attendance checking was
85-99% systematically carried
out.
3 - Attendance checking was 7584% systematically carried
2 - Attendance checking was 6574% systematically carried out.
1 - Attendance was 64% and
below.
throughout
the school
year
Timeline
Weight
per KRA
Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Actual
Result
Ratin
g
Sco
re
(MFOs)
Basic Education
Services
(KRAs)
B. Students
Outcomes
quarterly
quarterly
30%
Timeliness)
5 - Evidences showed that the
teacher purposely plans
assessment and varies
assessment choices to match
the different student needs
,abilities and learning styles.
4 - The teacher explained the
various uses and limitations of
the different kind of
assessments /tests. Evidences
showed that student needs and
avenues for growth were clearly
identified.
3 - There is evidence of more
than one measure of student
performance but there is
difficulty in analyzing data to
inform instructional planning
and delivery.
2 - The teacher planned
instruction without analyzing
student learning data.
1 - No evidence of student
monitoring or evaluation of
student progress.
5 - Class record reflected the
bases of 100% and above of
pupils ratings in the subject
handled.
4 - Class record reflected the
bases of 85-99% of pupils
ratings in the subject handled.
3 - Class record reflected the
bases of 70-84% of pupils
ratings in the subject handled.
2 - Class record reflected the
bases of 51-69% of pupils
ratings in the subject handled.
Major Final
Output
(MFOs)
Basic Education
Services
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
C.
Community
Involvement
Objectives
throughout
the school
year
Timeline
Weight
per KRA
throughout
the school
year
10%
Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5
Conducted
meetings
regularly supported with full
documentation and
100% accomplishment and set
agreements were met.
4
Conducted
meetings
regularly supported by minutes
of the meeting and attendance
sheet
and
only
85-99%
accomplishment
and
set
agreements were met.
3 - Conducted meetings at least
3 times within school year and
Actual
Result
s
Ratin
g
Sco
re
throughout
the school
year
Major Final
Output
(MFOs)
Basic Education
Services
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
D.
Professional
Growth and
Development
throughout
the school
year
Objectives
Timeline
Weight
per KRA
1. Improved Instructional
competence through
participation in seminars
mandated and conducted by the
Dep Ed and other institution.
(3%)
throughout
the rating
period
10%
2. Participated in co-curricular/
throughout
Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5 Participated in national
seminar
4 Participated in regional
seminar
3 - Participated in division
seminar
2 - Participated in district
seminar
1 - Participated in school-based
seminar
5 Participated at least 2 co
Actual
Result
s
Ratin
g
Sco
re
Major Final
Output
(MFOs)
Basic Education
Services
Key Result
Areas
(KRAs)
E. Special
tasksAssignment
the school
year
year-round
Objectives
1. Acts as a trainer/resource
speaker in a seminar. (4%)
Timeline
Weight
per KRA
year-round
10%
Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5
Acted
as
resource
speaker/trainer in any academic
institution for at least 2 times in
a school year with positive
participants
4
Acted
as
resource
speaker/trainer in any academic
institution for at least ones in a
school
year
with
positive
Actual
Result
s
Ratin
g
Sco
re
year-round
year-round
participants
3
Acted
as
resource
speaker/trainer in any academic
institution for at least once in a
school
year
with
mixed
feedbacks.
2
Acted
as
resource
speaker/trainer in any academic
institution for at least once in a
school
year
with
negative
feedbacks.
1 - Did not act as a resource
speaker/trainer in any teachers
training.
5 - Take part in Division-based
activity through a committee.
4 - Take part in District-based
activity through a committee.
3 - Take part in School-based
activity through a committee.
2 - Take part in Departmentbased or Curriculum year-based
activity through a committee.
1 - Participated in activity by
attending.
5 - 100%and above of the
students with behavioral
problems were counseled.
4 - 85-99% of the students with
behavioral problems were
counselled.
3 - 65-84% students with
behavioral problems were
counseled.
2 - Students with behavioral
problems were 50-64%.
1 - Never counseled students
with behavioral problems.
Total
Descrip
tion
Rater:
Ratee:
Approving Authority
ESPERANZA FE A. PADILLO
Secondary School Head Teacher VI Social Studies
CAROLINA T. ZARACENA
Principal IV