Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
UJ
SE
Stellite Deposits
o
>
UJ
Q
I
O
cr
<
BY M. D. MATHEW, S. L M A N N A N A N D S. K. GUPTA
to
UJ
cc
a.
o
o
cr
<
UJ
c/>
UJ
cr
*-*
i-
UJ
CL
_l
UJ
>
O
cr
<
UJ
to
PREPARATION
OF CYLINDERS
Q.
O
STELLITING BY
OXY-ACETYLENE
PROCESS
PRE HEAT
150C
PRE HEAT
300C
PRE HEAT
600C
o
cr
<
PRE HEAT
900 C
UJ
CO
UJ
cr
CL
M AC H INING
MICROPROBE
STUDIES
o
_i
UJ
>
Introduction
Austenitic stainless steels have been
chosen for various structural compoM. D. MATHEW and S. L. MANNAN are
with the Metallurgy Programme and S. K.
GUPTA is with the FBTR Construction
Group, Reactor Research Center, Kalpakkam Tamil Nadu, India.
METALLURGICAL
EVALUATION
HARDNESS
MEASUREMENTS
x
o
cr
<
UJ
CO
UJ
METALLOGRAPHY
W E L D I N G RESEARCH S U P P L E M E N T I 213-s
cr
CB)
8S3iSi$P%
:
Rockwell C
A
B
C
D
45-50
47-49
46-47
47-52
' ''
Sill
K P ?
Fig. 3Micrographs showing typical Stellite (i.e., AWS RCoCr-A) deposits prepared by
employing preheat temperatures of: A-150C (302F); B-300"C (572"F); C-600 (1112"F);
D-90VC (1652 F)
HISS-
- -
_ -
j :*Ly&t~.*'
'
''.*' 3'
V /
..,."
fi
';:'$
%y"M
*%tV-'*
# 3
r
__\
can lead to the cracking of the deposits by high shrinkage stresses developed during welding. Preheating reduces shrinkage stresses and eliminates cracking and distortion, provided the preheating is uniform. In
addition, preheating to high temperatures leads to greater dilution of the
deposit w i t h the base metal imparting
some gradient in its mechanical properties and consequent resistance to
shock, though at the cost of wear
resistance. The results of the present
investigation indicate that it is essential to preheat the base metal to higher
temperatures ~ 900C (1652F) followed by slow cooling in order to
produce sound deposits w i t h the
desired properties.
Experimental Procedure
Figure 1 shows the block diagram of
the experimental program.
Preparation of the Deposits
The component of CRDM was
machined from a 55 mm (2.17 in.)
diameter round as shown in Fig. 2, and
dye-penetrant inspected. It was then
thoroughly cleaned to remove oil,
grease, etc., before welding. For the
150C (302 F) preheat deposit Type
1
:
Table 2-Chemical Composition of AWS RCoCr -A Type Depostis and Bare Rod, WC-%
Element
Bare Rod
Cobalt
Chromium
Tungsten
Carbon
Silicon
Iron
63.90
26.59
6.02
1.22
1.01
0.80
Deposit
A
Deposit
B
Deposit
C
Deposit
D
63.25
28.98
4.13
1.62
0.87
63.80
26.96
5.02
1.57
1.04
1.03
62.67
27.56
5.52
1.64
1.09
0.80
62.53
26.00
6.13
1.64
0.65
2.36
Metallography.
Metallographic investigations were carried out on transverse sections removed from various
locations of the Stellited rounds. A
mixture of 25 ml glycerine, 25 ml HCI
and 10 ml H N O , was used as the
etchant for microstructural examination. The entire surface of the sample
was examined to assess the quality of
the deposit. Micrographs were taken
of important features of the deposit
and also of typical areas of Stellite for
each deposit.
Electron Microprobe
and
Microhardness Examination. Small samples
suitable for microprobe analysis were
sectioned from the metallographic
samples. These were again polished
and given a light etch w i t h a mixture of
20 ml HCI, 20 ml H , 0 , 1 0 ml H N O , and
0.5g FeCI, before microprobe analysis.
Samples were analyzed for cobalt,
chromium, iron, tungsten and nickel
to study the extent of dilution using a
CAMECA MS-46 Electron Microprobe
Analyser. Microprobe runs were made
Metallurgical Tests
The metallurgical evaluation of the
AWS RCoCr-A deposits included metallographic study of the deposits,
microprobe scans across the overlays
and
microhardness
measurements
along the microprobe traverses.
^^TJ>^-a^r^-e
50
I00
150
200
250
300
350
iOO
i50
500
( MICRONS)
DISTANCE
FROM
STELLITE
TO B A S E
50
100
150
DISTANCE
MATERIAL
200
FROM
250
STELLITE
300
TO B A S E
350
iOO
1
" "
i 5 0 ( MsCRONS )
MATERIAL
Too
(I MICRONS )
ASE
MATERIAL
( MICRONS)
DISTANCE
FROM
STELUTE
TO
BASE
MATERIAL
W E L D I N G RESEARCH S U P P L E M E N T I 215-s