Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TZEDEK
> >>>>
3
Judaism weaves the ideal of justice into the very fabric of creation.
Like all ideals however, justice has value only when it is lived out in
daily life. In many cases the pursuit of justice comes at a price, and
each individual needs to determine whether he or she will pay that
price. Classical Jewish sources have provided Jews with guidance on
such matters throughout the generations. In this chapter and those
which follow, we will probe the meaning of some of these texts.
The Hebrew word tzedek is usually
translated as justice, yet, like
many translations, this one is not
completely satisfactory. There
are nuances of meaning that
are important to understand
as Hebrew has several words
that are related to the concept
of justice. In this section we
will use the word tzedek in its
Hebrew form and use a variety
of texts to explore the richness of
the concept without restricting it into
a single English word.
The framing exercise and six texts presented below explore Jewish
perspectives on the idea of justice.
TEXT 1: Betrothal (Hosea, Ch. 2)
TEXT 2: These are the Mishpatim (Exodus, Ch. 21)
TEXT 3: Liability (Mishna, Bava Kama 8:1)
TEXT 4: When Breaking the Law is Keeping the Law (Babylonian Talmud,
Sanhedrin 46a)
TEXT 5: Beyond the Letter of the Law (Babylonian Talmud, Bava Mitzia 83a)
TEXT 6: Right of Way (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 32b)
28
www.justaction.org
EXERCISE
Mishpat/Tzedek
>
Framing
> Who is responsible for justice? Preserving it? Defining it? Enforcing it?
> Ask the participants to talk about the last time they were involved in an act
of justice.
You may get answers which anticipate the paragraph below, indicating the two
different forms of justice: tzedek and mishpat. If not, acknowledge the answers
you get, and then ask the participants to keep their minds open for an addittional way to understand the concept of justice.
Text Exploration
TEXT 1
Betrothal
- :
.
,
; ,
.
- , ; ,
I betroth you to me forever; I betroth you to me in tzedek (righteousness)
and in mishpat (justice) and in chesed (kindness) and in rachamim (mercy).
I betroth you to me with emunah (faith); and you shall know God.
Hosea 2:21-22
t Why, of all the concepts and sentiments and values that could claim a
place in this pledge of Jewish commitment, do you think our tradition
places the concept of justice at the center?
S E C T I O N I Torah/Study
29
Why do you think they were chosen? Are there others that you would
add if you were rewriting the text?
s Do you have anything that you say daily or as part of a routine? What
is it? Why do you say it so often, so regularly? What does it do for
you? If the recitation is said by others at the same time, how does
that affect the group?
Participants can imagine the pledge of allegiance, singing the national
anthem before ball games, a team cheer or chant, an honor pledge before
a test, ha-motzi (the blessing before eating bread) and the like. Explore
with them the impact of saying something by rote in a prescribed moment.
What impact might such an affirmation have on a person when regularly
recited? While participants answers will vary, you may want to tease
out the idea that this type of ritual can serve as a behavioral compass,
reminding individuals of the core values which they would like their lives to
represent. Regular affirmation of an idea is likely to have that idea become
part of a persons internal belief structure. Whereas individuals may agree
with a statement on an intellectual level, the idea takes on deeper signnificance if it is regularly expressed, especially if done in a public forum.
Be prepared for a student to offer the legitamate challenge that making
something routine or reciting something by rote actually strips it of meaniing. You may choose to address this type of response by probing further,
exploring how routine actions and deep intentionality can coexist.
TEXT 2
Lets look at an idea called mishpat. The word mishpat is drawn from the
same root as the word to judge []. The following text, found in the
book of Exodus, is from the first body of legislation presented in the Torah.
- ,- , ,
. , ...
, , ,
. , --
, -
-
... , --
, ; , -
-
--
: --
-
, - .
... ,
, , . , --
, -
, , , . ,
.
30
www.justaction.org
These are the mishpatim that you shall set before them He who fatally
strikes a man shall be put to death. If he did not do it by design, but it
came about by an act of God, I will assign you a place to which he can
flee. When a man schemes against another and kills him treacherously,
you shall take him from My very altar to be put to death
When men quarrel and one strikes the other with stone or fist, and he
does not die but has to take to his bedif he then gets up and walks
outdoors upon his staff, the assailant shall go unpunished, except that he
must pay for his idleness and his cure
If damage ensues, the penalty shall be life for life, eye for eye, tooth for
tooth, hand for hand, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
Mishpat/Tzedek
S E C T I O N I Torah/Study
31
TEXT 3
Liability
The rabbis of the Mishna, relate their own understanding of the value of
mishpat:
: ,
, , , : -
. ,
,
, ,
?
. ,
, () -
,
- .
, - , ;
; -
, -
- . -
,
. - .
Whoever wounds his fellow is liable for five things: for damage, for pain, for
healing, for loss of time, and for shame.
For damage, how? If one blinded anothers eye, cut off his hand, broke
his foot, we consider him as if he were a slave sold in the market, and we
appraise how much he was worth [before the injury], and how much he is
now worth [after he was injured].
Pain? If someone burned him with a spit, or with a [white-hot] nail, even
on his fingernail, a place where it produces no wound, we assess how much
a person in his situation would be willing to accept to undergo such pain
[Alternatively, how much would someone pay to avoid this type of pain as a
punishment].
Healing? If one struck another, he is obligated to heal him. If swelling
appeared on it from a result of the blow, he is liable; [if swelling appeared]
not as a result of the blow, he is exempt. If [the wound] healed and opened
again, he is obligated to cure him [a second time].
Loss of time? We consider him as if he [had an easy job, like] the caretaker
of a cucumber field, since he has already paid him compensation for his
hand and compensation for his foot.
Shame? Everything is in accordance with the person causing the indignity
and the insulted party. If one insults a naked person, if one insults a blind
person, or if one insults a sleeping person, he is liable, and if a sleeping persf
son caused the indignity, he is exempt. If one fell from a roof and injured and
shamed [someone], he is liable for the injury and is exempt for the shame, as
it is written, And she puts forth her hand, and takes him by the secret part
(Deuteronomy 25:11) he is not liable for shame unless he intended.
Mishna, Bava Kama 8:1
32
www.justaction.org
t What is the benefit of having the laws determine how a wrong can
be righted?
The rabbis of the Mishna refuse to read Exodus 21 literally: they choose to
understand, an eye for an eye, as a formula for monetary compensation.
The rabbis realized that a law which enforces a literal interpretation of meassure for measure does nothing to improve society or increase the amount
of good in the world. They also boldly articulate five dimensions of injury for
which one must be compensatedextending the scope of ones responsibbility far beyond what is evident from a simple reading of the biblical text.
s Did someone ever wrong you and then try to make up for it? Did you
feel satisfied at the end?
have reflected upon if your behavior and the behavior of others was
strictly governed by these principles? Is this ideal? Is it realistic?
TEXT 4
) , ( -
:
. ,
Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov said: I have heard that the court may pronf
nounce sentences even where not [warranted] by the Torah; yet not with
the intention of disregarding the Torah but [on the contrary] in order to
safeguard it.
Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 46a
S E C T I O N I Torah/Study
33
t What is the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit
of the law?
t Can you imagine a legal system which does not allow such lenienct
cies? What would that be like?
s How do you know when the spirit of the law should override the
letter of the law?
TEXT 5
Consider the following text which explores the practical application of taking
liberties with respect to specific social regulations in order to live according
to societys core values.
) , ( -
.
.
:
:
. ,
, :
?
.
.
:
. , , , :
, :
.
- ? :
- .
Some porters broke a barrel of wine belonging to Rabbah Bar Bar
Hanna. Rabbah seized the porters garments [in payment for his loss
incurred by them]. The porters went and complained to Rav. Rav told
Rabbah: Return their garments. Rabbah said: Is that the law? Rav
responded: No. But follow the good way (Proverbs 2:20). The garmf
ments were returned, but the porters observed, We are poor men. We
worked all day and we were not paid. Are we to get nothing for our
labors? Rav ordered Rabbah to pay the porters. Rabbah asked: Is that
the law? Rav replied, No. But be sure to walk on the paths of righteousnf
ness. (Proverbs 2:20b)
Babylonian Talmud, Bava Metzia 83a
34
www.justaction.org
t Who is right?
3
Mishpat/Tzedek
t Why does Rav rule the way he does? Upon what basis?
t Who is on the side of mishpat here, and who is on the side of tzedek?
t Do the porters deserve the kindness of Rav? Is that important?
t Is Rav referring to two different standards when he instructs Rabbah?
Why? Which one do you find more compelling?
Right of Way
) , ( - -
?
. :
,
,
-
-
.
.
- ,
-
,
. - ?
-
,
.
. ,
-
Rav Ashi expounded upon the verse, Tzedek, tzedek you shall pursue
(Deuteronomy 16:20): The first [mention of tzedek] refers to a decision
based on strict law; the second, to a compromise. How so? For example:
Where two boats sailing on a river meet, if both attempt to pass simultf
taneously, both will sink; whereas, if one makes way for the other, both
can pass [without mishap]. Likewise, if two camels meet each other while
on the ascent to Beth-Horon; if they both ascend [at the same time]
both may tumble down [into the valley]; but if [they ascend] after each
other, both can go up [safely]. How then should they act? If one is laden
and the other unladen, the latter should give way to the former. If one is
nearer [to its destination] than the other, the former should give way to
the latter. If both are [equally] near or far [from their destination], make
a compromise between them, the one [which is to go forward] compensf
sating the other [which has to give way].
Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 32b
S E C T I O N I Torah/Study
35
t What is the right thing to do in these situations? Who has the right
of way?
t Why should the one boat or camel cede to the other if they have the
same right as the other?
36
www.justaction.org
This organization almost awarded cost of living increases but has decided
it cant do that for the year ahead. One person suggests that everyone be
given a 2% raise that year, half of the 4% standard federal-recommended
cost of living increase (COLA). That seems the right way to gotreating
everyone the same.
Another person said that is not fair: management will be the winners, for
2% of their salaries is much larger than 2% of maintenance staff and
secretary salaries. The person who proposed the 2% raise argued that
nonetheless, each household has its share of on-going expenses. That
is, those with larger incomes have lifestyles that incur larger expenses
and those with smaller incomes have lifestyles that accommodate lesser
expenses. A 2% increase in relation to each household is therefore a fair
and just way to go.
Case Study
Mishpat/Tzedek
S E C T I O N I Torah/Study
37
Case Study
In many states today, local schools are funded by local property taxes.
(That is, each home owner pays a tax based on the value of his or her
property. That money gets funneled back into the local school district.)
This means each household can choose the quality of education that the
children receive by choosing where to live. It also means that the more
prosperous the neighborhood, the better funded is its school. School districts in wealthier neighborhoods often spend thousands of dollars more
per child than school districts in economically depressed neighborhoods.
Is this a fair system? Why or why not? Would you define fairness
differently if you lived in a wealthy neighborhood than if you lived in a
poor one?
In the past twenty-five years, at least 2/3 of the states in this country
have determined that this system is unfair, and have struggled to fix it.
One solution was to pool all the states property taxes in one pot and
dole out an equal amount of dollars per student throughout the state.
That sounds good because it makes everyone equal.
Is this mishpat, tzedek or neither?
Read the following paragraph:
I am not convinced that spending the same amount on each child is the
fairest approach to school funding. The truth is that parents spend considerably different amounts on their childrens educationwhether in public
or private schoolsdepending on income. Providing the same amount
of state and local aid to the child of wealthy parents as to poor parents
simply exacerbates the gaps and ignores the fact that one child is likely
to have more unmet needs than the other. I am more in favor of providing whatever level of funding is adequate for each child to meet his or
her needs and to attain high standards than I am to providing the same
amount to each child, rich or poor.
(Mr. Michael Casserly of the Council of Great City Schools)
Is this mishpat, tzedek or neither?
38
www.justaction.org
TZ E D E K, TZ E DAKAH,
& CHESED
> >>>>
4
introduction
We explored two kinds of justice in a previous section. Mishpat is
even-handed or retributive justice, that is, justice by the book. Tzedek
is situational or distributive justice, that is, justice that is tailored to
respond to the particular circumstances of a particular situation, especially those that lead to social, economic and political inequities.
>> Although it is
often translated as
charity, tzedakah is
not equivalent to
charity. <<
S E C T I O N I Torah/Study
39