Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCE
1.1Meaning
Finance is life blood and economic development. The finance is defend as position of
money at the time when it is required the efficient financial system calls for The effective
performance of financial institutions financial instruments and financial market.
Definition of finance:
According To Gotham and Douglas
Business finance can be broadly defined as the actively concerned with planning
,organizing,controlling and administration of the funds used in the business.
Features of finance:
The main characteristics or feature of finance are depicted below
1 Investment opportunity:
In finance, investment can be explained as a utilization of money for profit for or returns
investment can be done by:
a. Creating physical asserts with the money (such as development of land<acquiring
commercial assets etc.)
b. Carrying on Business activities.
c. Acquiring financial securities.
2 profitable opportunity:
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 1
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 2
Page 3
namely
capital funds.
According to Philip patus financial management is concerned with the
managerial decisions that results in the acquisition and financing of start term of long
term credit for the firm
Here the deals with the situations that required selections of specific problem of
size and growth and enterprise.
Here the analysis deals with the respected in flows and outflows of funds and
their effects on management objects
1.5 objectives of financial management
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 4
Part B
Meaning of profit maximization
In economics profit maximization is the short run or long run process by which a firm
determines the price and out put level that returns the greatest profits. There are several
approaches to this Problem . The Total Revenue-total cost perspective is based on the fact
that total profit reaches its maximum point where marginal remove equals marginal cost.
Definition
Profit Maximization refers To the process where by companies focus an maximizing
profit or getting The best possible profit in their particular kinds of business.
Definition of profit maximization
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 5
Page 6
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 7
Profit maximization the marginal approach:To obtain the profit maximizing output quantity, we start by recognizing that profit
is eqal to total revenue (TR) minus total cost (TC) given actable of cost and revenue at
each quantity, we can either compute equation or plot the data directly on graph ,finding
the profit maximizing out put is an smile as finding the out put and at which profit
reaches its maximum that is represented by output Qin the diagram.
There are two graphical ways of determining that Q is optimal. firstly we see that the
profit curve is at its maximum at this point (A) second we see at the point (B) that the
tangent on the total cost curve (TC) is parallel to the total revenue curve (TR). The
surplus of revenue net of cost (BC) is the greatest.
Profit maximization:-
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 8
product.
6) When given data on out put, marginal revenue and marginal cost determine which
7)
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 9
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCH DESIGN
2.1 Introduction
The research has to prepare appropriate design. After formulation of hypothesis so
that hypothesis can be lasted the reaches design guide the researches for collection of
relevant data. with maximum expeditor of effort time and money.
2.2 Research meaning
Research design is conceptual structure with in which
researches would be
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 10
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 11
a) Primary data- the data is collected from first time. It is original information gathered
for a specific purpose and provides up to date accurate and relevant information. It was
collected to the personal interview with the senior officer of the vaishnavi co-co product
industry. It is obtained by face to face interaction.
b) Secondary data: - These data are available for ready and reanalyzed has they were
previously meant for another purpose.
The data was collected by journal , industry profiles, criteria in the field of financial
packages and also bank reports like,
Financial statements
Annual reports
Balance sheets.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 12
CHAPTER :3
A. Industrial profile
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 13
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 14
.
The Philippines are usually used in making main dishes, refreshments and
desserts. Coconut juice is also a popular drink in the country. In the Philippines,
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 15
of coconut is known
Coir picture
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 16
generally spaced 9 meters apart, allowing a tree density of 100- 160 trees per hectare.
It provides employment and perhaps the only source of livelihood to tens of
thousands of people. The importance of the coconut as a source of food is indeed
overwhelming. In India, coconut is consumed in the form of tender nuts raw kernel, copra
, coconut oil and desiccated coconut. Since dish made from the coconut furnish fat protein
and some vitamins, they counter balance some of the deficiencies inherent in the
predominantly starchy foods consumed in the countries concerned. Some of countries
derive substantial revenue from the coconut industry. In India, Coir products exported
abroad earn the much needed foreign exchange.
3.2 Dispersal of the coconut in the world:Having originated at some place in south East Asia, The coconut Would now
appear to have moved eastwards the pacific and further into America. Towards the west it
moved to India and Madagascar over the calm tropical waters the west it moved to India
and Madagascar over the calm tropical waters. Although it is often referred to as an
ocean going nut due to its capacity to float and to germinate even after floating in sea
water for 110 days. The possibility of its dispersal through the agency of water lost their
viability after several days, due to infiltration of salt water in to husk. Therefore, the
agency of man must also have been responsible to a large extent to its introduction and
spread.
This is significant from the fact that the Spaniards introduced it into the West
Indies and in the southern shores if the Caribbean Sea. The Portuguese introduced it into
Bahia and other part of brazil Polynesian seafarers spread it to the different islands of the
pacific, the Arabs disseminated it to the African coast and the Tamils together With the
mariners of the Bengal coast distributed it in to the lands of the Indian ocean Livelihood
to about ten million people in India.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 17
3.3 World scenario: During independence, India ranked 3rd In the World with a production of 3 billion
nuts.
During 70 the position of India dropped to 5th
But the situation improved rapidly after formation of the coconut development
board in 1981.
Our country climed back to the 3rd
Position again mid 80.
Four years back 91995-960 India became the largest producer of coconut in the
World.
Although coconut id grown in more than 80 countries Philippines,
Indonesia and Srilanka contributed About 78 percent of the World production.
At present India Contributes 26.06 percent is the Worlds shares in area.
3.4 progress of coconut production :The production of coconut was 3.28 billion nuts 1950-51.
In the last four and half decades, production of coconut increased four times and
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 18
Coconut leaves are plaited and used for thatching houses for covering retting pits,
making partition.
Walls in separating different lots of husks retted in linear trenches, for making
baskets etc
Plaited leaves are also made into several types of head gear and are worn by poor
Midribs of leaves:The midribs of leaves are utilized for making brooms, baskets, fish traps etc petioles,
bunch stalks, stipulates, etc these are mostly used as fuel.
Trunk;
The trunks of old coconut trees are utilized as timber for house construction.
The equality of the timbers is improved if it is soaked in saline water for some
time
Edible parts;The apple or cotyledon developing during germination and the tender bud are
delicacies.
The tender husks of some varieties are edible and are sometimes pickled.
3.6 Investment Opportunities;
Business Opportunities in coconut;
Establishment of coconut nursery.
Development of coconut farm.
Supply of coconut farming tools, equipments, machineries and other implements.
Establishment of coco-based product processing/production plants.
Establishment of coconut post harvesting facility.
Exportation of coco fiber, peat and other raw coco products. Retailing of coco
based food products.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 19
products.
Adopting measures to get incentive prices for coconut and its products.
Recommending measures for regulating imports and exports of coconut and its
products.
Recommending measures for improving marketing of coconut and its products.
Fixing grades, Specifications and standards for coconut and its products.
Financing suitable schemes to increase the production of coconut and to improve
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 20
Area under coconuts as well as production has been showing a steady incerese
during the last five decades area under coconut was 0.63 million ha during 1950-
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 21
The tremendous increase in area, production and productivity during the period
can be attributed to remunerative price, availability of improved inputs including
quality planting materials and the results of developmental work initiated by the
coconut development board.
One of the leading producers of coconuts in the world processing 13 billion nuts
per annum.
Coconut area distributed in states and 3 union territories under different agro
climatic conditions.
3000 years tradition in coconut cultivation.
Premier coir manufacturing country in the world.
producer of best grade milling copra in the world yielding high grade coconut oil
marketing.
Government agencies such as kerafed state trading corporation, kerala state
marketing federation in manufacturing and marketing of branded coconut oil
small packs.
Hundreds of reputed and established private firms in manufacturing and marketing
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 22
such as
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 23
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 24
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 25
Domestication
Hugh C. Harries has done the most extensive work tracing the probable trajectory
of cultivation for cocos nucifera. He notes that the usual trend for cultivated plants
human selection increasing the number or size of the edible parts- makes little sense for
coconuts, Which are already large fruited. Instead size, but for thinner husks and
increased volume of endosperm, the soild meat or liquid water that provides the fruit
its food value. Although these modifications for domestication would reduce the fruits
ability to float, this ability would be irrelevant to a cultivated population. Among modern
C. nucifera, notes two major types or variants; a thick- husked, angular fruit which he
calls niu kafa, after its Polynesian name, and a thin-husked, spherical fruit with a higher
proportion of endosperm, called niu vai.
Harriers suggest that these two variants reflect a
trend of cultivation in C.
nucifera: the first coconuts were of the niu kafa type, with thick husks to protect the seed,
an angular, highly ridged shape to promote buoyancy during ocean dispersal, and a
pointed base that allowed fruits to dig into the sand, preventing them from being washed
away during germination on a new island. As early human communities began to harvest
coconut for eating and planting, they (perhaps unintentionally) selected for a larger
endosperm to husk ratio and a broader, spherical base, which rendered the fruit usefull as
a cup or bowl, the creating the viu vai type.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 26
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 27
Natural habitat
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 28
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 29
Mean daily temperature above 12-13 c (53.6-55.4 F) every day of the year
Mean annual rainfall above 1000 mm (39.37in)
No or very little overhead canopy, since even small trees require direct sun
The main limiting factor for most locations which satisfy the rainfall and
temperature requirements is canopy growth, except those locations near coastlines , where
the sandy soil and salt spray limit the growth of most other trees.
recently selected cultivar, the Maypan , has been bred for resistance to this disease.
Pests:The coconut palm is damaged by the larvae of many Lepidoptera (butterfly and moth)
species which feed on it, including Batrachedra spp: B arenosella, B ariloqua( feeds
exclusively on C. nucifera), B. mathesoni (feeds exclusively on C. nucifera), and B.
nuciferae. Brontispa longissima (coconut leaf beetle) feeds on young leaves, and damages
a seedling and mature coconut palms. In 2007, the Philippines imposed a quarantine in
metro manila and 26 provinces to stop the spread of the pest and protect the$ 800 million
Philippine coconut industry. The fruit may also be damaged by eriophyid coconut mites
(Eriophyes guerreonis). This mite infests coconut plantations, and is devastating : it can
destroy up to 90% of coconut production. The immature seeds are infested and desapped
by larvae staying in the portion covered by the perianth of the immature seed; the seeds
then drop off or survive deformed. Spraying with wettable sulfur 0.4% or with neembased pesticides can give some relief, but is cumbersome and labor intensive.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 30
Cultivation
Country
Production
Philippines
19,500,000
Indonesia
15,540,000
India
10,824,100
Brazil
2,759,044
Sri Lanka
2,200,000
Thailand
1,721,640
Mexico
1,246,400
Vietnam
1,086,000
677,000
Malaysia
555,120
Tanzania
370,000
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 31
PART B
COMPANY PROFILE
1)
2)
3)
4)
5) Nature of activity
Introduction
M/s. vaishnavi coco products situated by no. 9/2 A Annapura post.
Tiptur taluk, Tumkur district. The main object is to promote the industry by intending
to food processing desiccated coco powder. Fast moving consumable products. The
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 32
Promoters backgrounds:
H. R Hemachandra
The promoter of this unit SRI H. R. Hemachandra . he is having a 20 years
good experience in trading in coconut copra. He has worked with the agriculturist and
various establishment of other field.
He started now desiccated coconut industry in sy no.9/2 A Annapura post .
Tiptur taluk, Tumkur district.
The promoter is also engaged in social activities having good relationship with
public.
He has got wide network with local market are and outside area send to the products.
And earned good profit from the business.
He has established his name his name in the field of industry.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 33
manager
Accountan
t
Accounta
n
Accounta
nt
Accountant
supervisor
100 labour
SL
particular
Quantity
Amount
no
1
Chan dryer
1 num
23,26,120.00
10,44,480.00
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 34
Working
manager
3,40,500.00
box Associated
Fabricators.
Karungal palyam
4
1 set
1,42,800.00
4,90,060.00
1,50,000.00
Associated
fabricators,
Karugal
palyam.
Total
46,86,360.0
Assumptions :The assumption in the preparation of profitability and fund flow statement are:
1. 1)Cost as wastage due to unavailable reason is also included in the cost of Raw
material.
2. 2)Conversion cost includes electric city, labor, fiel etc.
3. The term loan disbursement is envisaged at rs.2.23lakes each quarter with holiday
period of six months.
4. The interest on term loan and working capital assumed at 13.5% P A on redusing
daily balance method.
5. Cost of packing are included marketing expenses.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 35
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 36
CHAPTER:4
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 Current ratio:This ratio is most commonly used to perform the short term financial analysis. Also
known as the working capital ratio this ratio matches the current assets of the firm to its
current liabilities.
FORMULA:Current ration = Current asset
Current liability
TABLE-4.1
THE TABLE SHOWING CURRENT RATIO
YEARS
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIO
2010-11
20,629,541.22
10,237,512.8
2.01
2011-12
1,11,958,358.27
18,386,531.2
6.09
2012-13
75,021,206.00
34,602,182.52
2.17
2013-14
1,09,822,768.27
41,224,452.96
2.66
2014-15
1,14,036,490.74
39,116,637.49
2.92
Analysis:
the table 4.1 represents that mthe ncurrent ratio of the vaishnavi co-coproducts
industry. in the 2010-11 the the current ratio was 2.01 and again it was increased to
6.09 in the year 2011-12 and in the year 2012-13 it was decreased to 2.17 compare
to previous year and again it was increased to 2.66 in the year 2013-14 and again it
was increased to 2.92 in the year 2014-15
Graph: 4.1
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 37
3
2
2.01
1
0
2.17
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2.66
2.92
2013-14
2014-15
Ratio
Interpretation
The graph 4.12 indicates that the current ratio of the company. it was variation
from the year to year and more than the standard ratio of 2:1. the current asset double the
current liabilities is considered to be satisfactory
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 38
Table -2
QUICK RATIO
.
FORMULA:
ratio=
liquid asset
Current liability
TEAR
LIQUID ASSETS
CURRENT
QUICK RATIO
LIABILITIES
2010-11
8,998,100.76
10,237,512.8
0.87
2011-12
87,638,879.5
18,386,531.2
4.77
2012-13
43,952,703.65
34,602,182.52
1.27
2013-14
51,417,745.60
41,224,452.96
1.25
2014-15
79,923,304.95
39,116,637.49
2.04
ANALYSIS:the table 4.2 says that the quick ratio of the company. in the year2010-11 yhe quick ratio
was 0.87 and in the year2011-12 it was increased to 4.77 compare to previous year and it
was decreased to 1.27 in the year2012-13 and again it was decreased to 1.25 in the year
2013-14. but in the year 2014-15 it was increased to2.04 compare to previous year
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 39
Graph 4.2
The graph quick ratio
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
4.77
2.5
2
1.5
2.04
1
0.5
0
1.27
0.87
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
1.25
2013-14
2014-15
ratio
Interpretation:
From the graph 4.2 we can interpret that the quick ratio was fluctuation from tear to year .
in the year 2010-11,2011-12,2012-13,2013-14,2014-15was more than standard ratio was
satisfactory.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 40
4.3
TABLE 4.3
ABSOLUTE LIQUID RATIO
Year
2010-11
18,25,183.93
10,237,512.8
0.17
2011-12
55,94,166.95
18,386,531.2
0.30
2012-13
90,83,428.43
34,602,182.52
0.26
2013-14
16,49,675.47
41,224,452.96
0.04
2014-15
82,23,997.25
39,116,637.49
0.21
Analysis
The table 4.3 clears that the absolute liquid ratio for the five financial year of the
vaishnavi co-co products industry.in the 2010-11 the absolute liquied was 0.17 and it was
increased to 0.30 in the year 2011-12 and in the year 2012-13 it was decreased to 0.26
compare to previous year and again it was decreased to 0.04 in the year 2013-14. But in
the year 2014-15 slowly increased to 0.21 compare to 2013-14.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 41
Graph4.3
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.3
0.26
0.21
0.17
0.05
0
0.04
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Ratio
INTERPRETATION:
the grahp 4.3 explains the absolute liquied ratio of the industry. the cash position of the
vary from2010-11 to 2014-15 and it was less than the rule of thumb i.e .0.5
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 42
TABLE 4.4
CURRENT ASSET MOVEMENT OR EFFICIENCY OR ACTIVITY RATIOS:
debtors turn over ratio=
credit sales
average debtors
year
credit sales
average debtors
2010-11
9,16,90,369.24
4063051.72
22.57
2011-12
44,12,71,845.11
74500918.32
5.92
2012-13
49,73,14,516.82
25299458
19.66
2013-14
49,59,76,218.77
40342396
12.29
2014-15
82,63,88,853.9
49937851.5
16.54
ANALYSIS
The table 4.4 describes that the debtor turnover ratio of the industry. in the vyear
2010-11 was 22.57 times, it was decreased to 5.92 times in the year 2011-12 and in the
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 43
RATIO
25
20
RATIO
15
10
5
0
2010-11
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
2011-12
2012-13
Page 44
2013-14
2014-15
INTERPRETATION
from the the graph 4.4 show that the debtors turnover ratio, in the year 2010-11
was higher than four years, because of average debtor was less than other four years.
365
Debtors turnover ratio
Year
365days
2010-11
365
22.57
16.17
2011-12
365
5.92
61.56
2012-13
365
19.66
18.57
2013-14
365
12.29
29.69
2014-15
365
16.54
22.07
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 45
ratio
70
61.56
60
50
ratio
40
29.69
30
20
22.07
18.57
16.17
10
0
2010-11
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
2011-12
2012-13
Page 46
2013-14
2014-15
INTERPRETATION:
The graph4.5 depicts that average collection period in the year 2011-12 the debt
collection period was 61.65 days and it was the more than the other years. But in the year
2010-11 was less collection period compare to all the year.
TABLE4.6
WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO
Working capital ratio=
sales
Net working capital
Year 2010-11
sales
ratio
2010-11
91,69,03,369.24
1,03,92,028.42
8.82
2011-12
44,12,71,845.11
9,35,71,827.07
4.71
2012-13
49,73,14,516.82
4,04,19,023.48
12.30
2013-14
49,59,76,218.77
6,85,98,315.31
7.23
2014-15
82,63,88,853.9
7,49,19,853.25
11.03
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 47
Analysis
The table 4.6 indicates that the working capital turnover ratio of the company in
the year 2010-11 was 8.82 times, it was decreased to 4.71 times in the year 2011-12 and
in the year 2012-13 it was increased to 12.30 times, it was decreased to 7.23 times yn the
year 2013-14 compare to previous year and in the year 2014-15 it was increased 11.03
times compare to previous year.
14
12
10
8
Column2
12.3
11.03
6
8.82
7.23
4
4.71
2
0
2010-11
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
2011-12
2012-13
Page 48
2013-14
2014-15
Interpretation:
The graph 4.6 says that the working capital ratio, in the year 2012-13 was the
utilization working capital was good, production and sales was higher compare to other
years.
sales
fixed asset
year
sales
fixed asset
2010-11
9,16,90,369.24
4,33,18,531.31
2.12
2011-12
44,12,71,845.11
5,26,09,503.59
8.39
2012-13
49,73,14,516.82
5,31,61,955.54
9.35
2013-14
49,59,76,218.77
6,68,17,832.35
7.42
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 49
2014-15
82,63,88,853.9
6,29,53,411.45
13.12
analysis:
the table4.7 explains that the fixed assets turnover ratio of the company in the tear
2010-11 was 2.12 times, it was increased to 8.39 times in the 2011-12 and in the year
2012-13 it was increased to 9.35 times, it was decreased to 7.42 times in the year 2013-14
compare to previous year and in the year 2014-15 it was increased 13.12 times compare
to previous year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 50
25
20
15
20.12
10
13.12
5
0
2010-11
8.39
9.35
2011-12
2012-13
7.42
2013-14
2014-15
RATIO
INTERPRETATION
the graph 4.7 represents that the fixed asset turnratio in the year 2014-15
was13.12 times and sales was more than all the year. the companmy fixed assets are
effectively utilized.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 51
shareholders fund
total assets
TABLE 4.8
YEAR
SHAREHOLDERS
TOTAL ASSET
EQUITY RATIO
FUND
2010-11
1,24,34,428
5,38,39,294.98
0.23
2011-12
2,25,70,703.74
14,62,12,456.67
0.15
2012-13
3,06,29,048
9,36,20,982.84
0.32
2013-14
43,86,674
13,54,46,147.66
0.33
2014-15
4,56,37,602.77
13,78,93,264.71
0.55
ANALYSIS
The table 4.8 clarifies that the proprietary ratio for the five financial year of the
company. in the year 2010-11 the equity ratio was the 0.23 and in the year 2011-12
decreased to 0.15 compare to previous year. but in the year 2012-13 it was increased 0.32
compare to previous year and again it was increased to 0.33 in the year2013-14 and it was
increased to 0.55 in the year 2014-15 compare to previous year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 52
4.8GRAPH:
LONG TERM FINANCIAL POSITION OR TEST OF SOLVENCY
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
Column2
0.55
0.2
0.1
0.32
0.33
2012-13
2013-14
0.23
0.15
2010-11
2011-12
2014-15
INTERPRETATION
the graph 4.8 clarifies that the proprietary ratio of the company. the ratio
represents the relationship of owners fund to total assets, the amount of share capital
increase from year to year, but decreased in percentage of share capital in total assets.
proprietary ratio was increased in the 2014-15 was 0.55 compare to all the year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 53
TABLE 4.9
DEBT EQUITY RATIO
debt equity ratio=
year
shareholders fund
2010-11
4,14,04,866
1,24,34,428
3.33
2011-12
12,17,27,901
2,25,70,703.74
5.39
2012-13
6,15,31,319
3,06,29,048
2.00
2013-14
8,92,39,968.63
43,86,674
2.03
2014-15
5,96,39,711.15
7,56,37,602.77
0.78
ANALYSIS:
The table 4.9 describe that the debt equity ratio of the company in the year 201011was 3.33, it was increased to 5.39 in the year 2011-12 and in the year 2012-13 it was
decreased to 2.00 and in the year 2013-14, it was increased to 2.03 compare to 2012-13
and it was decreased to 0.78 in the year 2014-15 compare to previous year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 54
5.39
6
5
4
3.33
2.03
2
0.78
1
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
The graph 4.9 explains that the debt equity ratio of the company and it was
fluctuation from year by year. in the 2014.15 debt equity ratio was 5.39 and it was more
than all the years.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 55
TABLE:4.10
FIXED ASSET TO NET WORTH
fixed asset to net worth=
fixed asset
100
year
fixed asset
Networth
ratios
in
percentages
2010-11
4,33,18,531.31
1,24,34,428
348.37
2011-12
5,26,09,503.59
2,25,70,703.74
233.09
2012-13
5,31,61,955.54
3,06,29,048
173.57
2013-14
6,68,17,832.35
43,86,674
152.33
2014-15
6,29,53,411.45
7,56,37,602.77
83.23
ANALYSIS:
the table 4.10 shows that the fixed assets to net worth for five financial. year of
the company. in the year 2010-11 the proprietory ratio was 348.37% and it was decreased
233.09% in the year 2011-12 compare to previous year and again it was decreased nto
173.57% in the year 2012-13, it was decreased to 152.33% in the 2013-14 compare to
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 56
350
300
250
200
348.37
150
233.09
173.57
100
152.33
83.23
50
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
RATIO
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 57
2013-14
2014-15
INTERPRETATION:
the graph 4.10 clears that the fixed asset to net worth ratio. in the year 2010-11to
2014-15 the proprietory ratio was the decreasing nature and in the year2013-14 the
company was highly depend on the outsiders for the its financial requirements.
TABLE:4.11
FIXED ASSETS TO TOTAL LONG TERM FUNDS
fixed assewts to total long term fund=
fixed assets
100
YEAR
FIXED ASSET
TOTAL
LONG
TERM FUNDS IN
%
2010-11
4,33,18,531.31
4,14,04,866
104.62
2011-12
5,26,09,503.59
12,17,27,901
43.22
2012-13
5,31,61,955.54
61,531,319
86.40
2013-14
6,68,17,832.35
8,92,39,968.63
74.87
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 58
2014-15
6,29,53,411.45
5,96,39,711.15
105.56
ANALYSIS:
the table 4.11 says that the fixed assets to total long term funds ratio of the
company in the year 2010-11 was 104.62%, it was decreased to 43.22% in the year 201112, it was increased to 86.40% in the year 2012-13 and it was decreased to 74.87% in the
year 2013-14 compare to previous year and it was increased to 105.56% in the year 201415 cfompare to previous year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 59
104.62
100
86.4
74.87
80
60
43.22
40
20
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
the graph 4.11 depicts that the fixed assets to total long term funds ratio of the
company and it was variation from year to year . in the year 2013-14 was the fixed assets
to total long term funds ratio was 100.56% and it was more than all the years.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 60
100
YEARS
CURENT ASSETS
PROPRIETOR
RATIO IN %
FUNDS
2010-11
2,06,29,541.22
1,24,34,428
165.91
2011-12
11,19,58,358.27
2,25,70,703.74
496.03
2012-13
7,50,21,206.00
3,06,29,048
244.93
2013-14
10,98,22,768.27
43,86,674
250.37
2014-15
11,40,36,490.74
7,56,37,602.77
150.77
ANALYSIS
from the table 4.12 represents that the current assts to proprietors funds for five
years financial years of the vaishnavi co- co products industry. in the year 2010-11 the
current assets to proprietors funds ratio was 165.91% and it was increased 496.03% in
the year 2011-12 compare to previous year and in the year 2012-13 it was decreased to
244.93% compare to previous year, it was increased to 250.37% in the year 2013-14 and
it was decreased to 150.77% in the year 2014-15 compare to previous year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 61
600
496.03
500
400
300
200
244.93
250.37
165.91
150.77
100
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
the graph 4.12 clarifies that current asset to proprietrs funds ratio , the company
was share capital are more invited in the current assets.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 62
TABLE 4.13
CURRENT ASSETS TO TOTAL ASSET RATIO
current assets to total assets=
current assets
total assets
years
current assets
total assets
ratios in number of
time
2010-11
2,06,29,541.22
5,38,39,294.98
0.38
2011-12
11,19,58,358.27
14,62,12,456.67
0.76
2012-13
7,50,21,206.00
9,36,20,982.84
0.80
2013-14
10,98,22,768.27
13,54,46,147.66
0.81
2014-15
11,40,36,490.74
13,78,93,264.71
0.83
ANALYSIS:
The table 4.13 says that the current assets to total assets ratio for five financial
years of the vaishnavi co-co products industry. in the year 2010-11 the current assets to
total assets ratio was 0.38 times, it was increased 0.76
compare to previous year and again it was increased to 0.80 times in the year 2012-13
compare to previous year, it was increased to 0.81 times in the year 2013-14 and again it
was increased to 0.83 times in the year 2014-15 compare previous year.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 63
0.9
0.76
0.8
0.8
0.81
0.83
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.38
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2010-11
2011-12
RATIO
INTERPRETATION:
The graph 4.13 explains that the current assets to total assets ratio, it was the
increasing nature and the current assets also increase from year to year . the company was
more amounts invested in the current assets.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 64
GROSS PROFIT
100
Net sales
Year
Gross profit
Net sales
Ratio in%
2010-11
2,52,42,917.52
9,16,90,369.24
27.53
2011-12
1,50,80,746.94
44,12,71,845.11
3.42
2012-13
82,36,949.85
49,73,14,516.82
1.66
2013-14
2,02,16,679.52
49,59,76,218.77
4.07
2014-15
4,77,70,736.9
82,63,88,853.9
5.78
Analysis:
The table 4.14 indicates that the gross profit ratio of the company in the year
2010-11 the gross profit ratio was 27.53%, it was decreased to 3.42% in the year 2011-12
and again it was decreased to 1.66% in the year 2011-12 compare to previous year but in
the 2012-13 it was slowly incresead to 4.07 and again it was increased to 5.78% in the
year 2014-15.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 65
Ratio
30
27.53
25
20
Ratio
15
10
5
0
3.42
2010-11
2011-12
4.07
5.78
1.66
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Interpretation:
The graph 4.14 shows that the gross profit ratio of the company, it was the
fluctuating nature and also the company gross profit percentage was very low.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 66
years
net profit
Net sales
2010-11
1,20,89,479.52
9,16,90,369.24
13.18
2011-12
1,01,36,274.76
44,12,71,845.11
2.29
2012-13
55,58,344.34
49,73,14,516.82
1.12
2013-14
18,36,40,448.08
49,59,76,218.77
3.70
2014-15
3,14,53,784.9
82,63,88,853.9
3.80
ANALYSIS:
the table 4.15 indicates that the net profit ratio of the company, in the year 201011 the net profit ratio was 13.18%, it was decreased to 2.29% in the year 2012-13 and
again it was decreased to 1.12% in the year 2012-13 compare to previous year. but in the
2013-14 it was slowly increased to 3.70% and again it was increased to 3.80% in the year
2014-15.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 67
14
13.18
12
10
8
6
3.7
2.29
1.12
2
0
3.8
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
PERCENTAGES
INTERPRETATION:
the graph 4.15 says that the net profit ratio of the company, it was the variatio
from year to year and also the company net profit percentage was very low.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 68
TABLE 4.16
net worth =
net profit
100
Year
Netprofit
return on share
holders investment
ratios in%
2010-11
1,20,89,479.52
1,24,34,428
97.22
2011-12
1,01,36,274.76
2,25,70,703.74
44.91
2012-13
55,58,344.34
3,06,29,048
18.15
2013-14
1,83,64,048.08
43,86,674
41.87
2014-15
3,14,53,784.9
7,56,37,602.77
41.58
ANALYSIS
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 69
20
41.87
41.58
2013-14
2014-15
18.15
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
PERCENTAGE
INTERPRETATION
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 70
100
equity capital
year
equity capital
return on equity
capital ratio in %
2010-11
1,20,89,479.52
97,65,000
123.80
2011-12
1,01,36,274.76
97,65,000
103.8
2012-13
55,58,344.34
97,65,000
56.92
2013-14
1,83,64,048.08
97,65,000
188.05
2014-15
3,14,53,784.9
1,95,30,000
161.05
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 71
GRAPH 4.17
RETURN ON EQUITY CAPITAL:
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 72
200
180
160
140
120
188.05
100
80
161.05
123.8
103.8
60
40
56.92
20
0
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
PERCENTAGE
INTERPRETATION:
The graph 4.17 give the details that the return on equity capital of the company it
was more than 100% in every year except 2012-13. But in 2014-15 was decreased to
161.05% compare to previous year.
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, SUGGESTION & CONCLUSION
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 73
SUGGESTION
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 74
constantly.
The company has to take measure to decrease the operating expenses.
CONCLUSION
The main objectives are to promote the industry by intending to food processing
desiccated coco powder.
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 75
BIBLOGRAPHY
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 76
NAME
OF
THE
AUTHOR
SHASHI
TITLE
OF
THE
EDITION
PUBLISHERS
BOOK
GUPTA,
NEETI GUPTA
FINANCE
MARKETS
AND REVISED
SERVICE
ACCOUNTING
EDITION
3RD EDITION
O.R BUSINESS
KRISHNASWAMY
RESEARCH
PUBLISHING
METHOODS
HOUSE
2ND EDITION
PANDEY FINANCIAL
SHASHI GUPTA
MANAGEMENT
ANNEXTURE
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
HIMALAYA
Page 77
KALYANI
PUBLISHERS
PARTICULARS
AMOUNT
1. source of fund
1) share holders fund
a) share capital
9765000
2669428
12434428
2) LOANS FUNDS:
a) secured loan
10250112.00
b) Unsecured loan
31154754.00
41404866
0.000
Total)1+2+3)
53839294.98
891549.00
Less: depriciation
373855.00
b)Net block
517693.00
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 78
42800838.07
43318530.31
2)Investment
66483.25
1825183.93
20629541
9335607.80
b) provision
901905.00
10237513
10392028.42
4)
a)Miscellaneous expenditure to the
extent not written offer adjusted
62252.00
62252.00
Total
53839294.98
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 79
purticular
amount
1. source of fund:
1) share holderss fund
a) share capital
9765000.00
12805703.74
22570704
2)Loans funds:
a) secured loan
70803876.00
b) unsecured loan
50924025.00
121727901
1913851.93
Total(1+2+3)
146212456.67
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 80
11)Application of funds
1)Fixed assets
a)gross block
54467199.52
less: depreciation
6014102.57
b) Net block
48453096.95
4156406.64
2) Investment
00000
24319478.77
b)sundry debtors74500918.32
c) cash & bank balances 5594166.96
d) current assets, loan &
advances7543794.23
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
111958358.28
7687820.20
b) provision
10698711.00
18386531.20
93571827.08
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 81
4)
a) mislenious expenditure to the extent
31126.00
31126.00
Total (1+2+3)
146212456.67
particular
amount
1. source of fund:
1) share holders funds
a) share capital
9765000
20864048.00
30629048
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 82
2) loans funds:
a) secured loan
9128090.00
b)unsecured loan
52403229.00
TOTAL FUNDS
61531319
1440615.00
Total (1+2+3)
93620982.84
11)Application of funds
1) Fixed assets
a) gross block
61570147.49
less: depreciation
12824598.00
b) NET BLOCK
48745548.98
C) CAPITAL WORK-IN-PROGESS
4416406.64
2) INVESTMENT
0.000
31068502.35
b) sundry debtors
25299458.00
9083428.43
9569817.253
75021206.00
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 83
25904087.52
b)provisions
8698095.19
34602177.71
&PROVISIONS
NET CURRENT ASSETS
40419028.30
4)
A) MISCELLANEOUS
EXPENDITURE TO THE EXTENT
NOT WRITTEN OFFER ADJUSTED
40000.00
40000.00
Total(1+2+3)
93620982.84
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 84
PARTICULAR
AMOUNT
1. SOURCE OF FUNDS:
1) SHARE HOLDERS FUNDS
a) share capital
9765000.00
34098674.79
43863675
2) LOANS FUNDS:
a) secured loan
31153344.63
b) Unsecured loan
58086624.00
89239969
2342504.23
Total(1+2+3)
135446147.66
81752919.32
less: depriciation
20694626.61
b) Net block
61058292.71
c) capital work-in-progress
5759539.64
2)Investment
000
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
58405022.60
Page 85
b) sundry debtors
40342396.00
1649674.47
9425675.20
109822768.27
35124452.96
b) provision
6100000.00
412244521.96
68598315.31
4)
a) miscellaneous expenditure to the
extent not written offer adjusted
30000.00
30000.00
Total (1+2+3)
135446147.66
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 86
particular
Amount
1. source of funds:
1) share holders funds
a) share capital
19530000.00
56107602.77
75637603
2)loans funds:
a) Secured loan
3489481.15
b) Unsecured loan
56150230.00
59639711
2615950.79
Total(1+2+3)
137893264.71
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 87
1) Fixed assets
a) Gross block
850001100.32
less: depreciation
2698315.51
b) Net block
58017004.81
4936406.64
2) Investment
00.00
34113185.79
49937851.50
8223997.25
21761456.20
114036491
22916637.49
b) provisions
16200000.00
39116637
74919854
4)
a) Miscellaneous expenditure to the
extent not written offer adjusted
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
20000
Page 88
20000
Total( 1+2+3)
137893264.7
P.A.A.C. TIPTUR
Page 89