Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Network Faults
Nilanga Jayawarna
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
University of Manchester, Manchester, MI 7AB, UK
Catherine Jones
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
University of Manchester, Manchester, MI 7AB, UK
C.jon (mncbester.ac.uk
Mike Barnes
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
University of Manchester, Manchester, MI 7AB, UK
Nick Jenkins
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil
N.Jayawarnagmancbester.ac.uk
M.Bamnes(~manchester.ac.uk
Introduction
Engineering
University of Manchester, Manchester, MI 7AB, UK
N
Jchester.ac.uk
representing
not
3
-,ln
Laboratory
Supply
Coupling
Inductance, X-CG
Microgridside
Inverter (MSI)
Drve
MGI12kW
M
12kW
Dump
ResistorS
Flywheel
passive
load
ContIoI
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Syichror saton
f4 Vcontdhuh
VariacMosrdMcgd
Onverge-et
gI
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
a
SW
zo
l9Rwnw1
j
larolS
vbniveZ
Med Mins
VqRe
s to
COCIVe
Mea D
voltageIS*Fn
s
Mea
red X
RSt
Grid
Connected
conrol
Control
' ignal
DC Link F0
Voltag
Cont rol
Control
Signal
_
DC Link
Connection to the
Microgrid
microgrid-side
lnverter
490:
Fl w eel
Drive
DC Link FIywh~~~el
Voltage
Low
Low
PasLvl
Filter
Voltage
Le
Limiter
Voltae
Pro iler
Generation
Generato
of Control
Signals
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
flywheel
Drive
test
560 /-
are
not____
!558
here
Tv
552
-------
----
LikVoltage [V
540
a--n-grid
__-__n ga r- d
here----- ---------_
h e re
568
6.2
6.4
535
53
6.
Tme [s]
7.2
7.4
------
Time [s]
UVdcLink
DC LinkVoltaae
56
e
5520
5500
556
54&0
--------
556 --
------
--
546.0
252I
tilfl
9360
KO
94140
94.80
95.20
~~~~~~~~~~~~Agreement
Figre
. olagerepone, =.
C
lnk
558.....................0....................................
556.0
552.0
550.0
54& 0
(epeimet)
ow ers
th is
differen ce
is
sign
ificant.
he
steady
-state
however depends not only on the FWD and MSI but also
the
MicroGrid response. To a very significant extent the
~~~' 554.0 ~~~~~~~~~difference
is due to limitations of the MG set model, which
apred very sensitive to the variation between nominal
typical control parameters. This will be discussed
~~~~~~~~~~and
further in section 7.
Fault Study
CB 2
CB 6
14W5
20
-201
5o
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
#1 :1
#1 :3
#1 :2
C45 2
Phase A
Phase B
-#1:1#1:3
14~5
UIaF~M
Phase C
30B5
124g'<8
Fault
creation
Flyvheel system
Micro-source
50
"IbMG
nIcMG
p....ase.......an........neu....
2S.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.
4............
50.0
-30|_~ ~ ain:Grphjs.
7.2
2000
#1:2
40
20
15000X
10
20
15
25
60
5000o
#1_ 1:3
-I2
10000
-5000
10
15
01
20
25
1.0
is
~~
300
35.0
40.0
12
#:
-10000
-20000
LI
g
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~h
Qe01
O.h
EiFVA
IbF.
IcFV
60 .............
a,
O S I S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PFVVP1.
ISOOk "O
power/VA)
rnet1
PMQmoe Pr
12 5k-III
25.0
Q~~~_JF___VA
P and Q (bottom graph) from the flywheel inverter (xaxes, time/s, y-axes: top - current/A, bottom graph
-1
20000
o#0
time[01
-20-..
- 40
I 0000 si;
I~
1:2
45.0
*O>FWAr)II
50.0
10.0
4
12.0
14.0
16.0
16.0
20.0
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
N.