Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Department of Civil Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
*Corresponding author
ABSTRACT
This research determined the geotechnical properties of lateritic soil modified with sugarcane
straw ash with a view to obtaining a cheaper and effective replacement for the conventional soil
stabilizers. Preliminary tests were performed on three samples, A, B and C for identification and
classification purposes followed by the consistency limit tests. Geotechnical strength tests
(compaction, California bearing ratio (CBR), unconfined compression test and triaxial) were also
performed on the samples, both at the stabilized and unstabilized states (adding 2, 4, 6, and 8%
sugarcane straw ash). The results showed that sugarcane straw ash improved the geotechnical
properties of the soil samples. Optimum moisture content increased from 19.0 to 20.5%, 13.3 to
15.7% and 11.7 to 17.0%, CBR increased from 6.31 to 23.3%, 6.24 to 14.88% and 6.24 to
24.88% and unconfined compression strength increased from 79.64 to 284.66kN/m2, 204.86 to
350.10kN/m2 and 240.4 to 564.6kN/m2 in samples A, B and C respectively. Sugarcane straw ash
was therefore found as an effective stabilizer for lateritic soils.
Keywords: geotechnical property, sugarcane straw ash, stabilization, lateritic soil
INTRODUCTION
The needs for adequate provisions of transportation
facilities are enormously increasing with increase in
population and also the maintenance of the existing
one. Highway engineers are faced with the problems
of providing very suitable materials for the Highway
construction. Owning to this fact, continuous
researches have been carried and still being carried
out by individual, firms and institutions on ways to
improve the engineering properties of soils. The most
available soils do not have adequate engineering
properties to really bear the expected wheel load. So
improvisations have to be made to make these soils
better. These lead to the concept called soil
stabilization which is any treatment (including,
technically, compaction) applied to a soil to improve
its strength and reduce is vulnerability to water, if the
treated soil is able to withstand the stresses imposed
on it by traffic under all weather conditions without
excessive deformation, then it is generally regarded
as stable.
Several highways pavement in Nigeria roads are
failing due to lack of use of soil with adequate
engineering strength. So the need for improvement of
the engineering properties of soil has been a
paramount concern to the transportation engineers.
The ability to blend the naturally abundant lateritic
soil with some chemical reagent to give it better
engineering properties in both strength and
324
800 C
70.20
1.93
2.09
12.20
10000C
70.99
2.08
2.25
12.44
Mg0
1.95
2.01
K2O
3.05
3.10
Na2O
0.50
0.56
TiO2
0.02
0.02
P2O5
1.40
1.37
SO3
4.10
4.35
LI2O
1.81
(Source Frias and Concrete Research, 2005)
0.52
325
326
Sample
Natural
Moisture
Content (%)
Specific
Gravity
Liquid
Limit (%)
Plastic
Limit (%)
Plastic
Index (%)
AASTHO
classification
Soil Type
10.71
2.42
41.60
30.95
10.60
A-2-7(0)
Silty
14.91
2.58
43.30
25.41
17.89
A-2-7(0)
Silty
14.69
2.68
59.40
38.74
20.66
A-2-7(0)
Silty
327
Percentage stabilization
0% SCSA
2% SCSA
4% SCSA
6% SCSA
8% SCSA
0% SCSA
Maximum
Density(kg/m3)
2020
1960
1990
1985
1890
2010
2% SCSA
14.5
1915
4% SCSA
14.3
1880
6% SCSA
15.7
1880
8% SCSA
15.0
1890
0% SCSA
11.7
1860
2% SCSA
16.3
1805
4% SCSA
16.0
1790
6% SCSA
16.7
1775
8% SCSA
17.0
1750
328
Dry
Sample
Percentage stabilization
Unconfined
compression
2
strength (qu) kN/m
0% SCSA
2% SCSA
4% SCSA
6% SCSA
8% SCSA
79.64
179.18
209.98
284.66
179.18
0% SCSA
2% SCSA
4% SCSA
6% SCSA
8% SCSA
204.86
165.44
227.04
350.10
325.01
0% SCSA
2% SCSA
4% SCSA
6% SCSA
8% SCSA
240.4
355.1
472.3
564.6
521.0
329
330
Fig 4. Variation of Shear strength of sample A, B and C with application of sugarcane straw ash
Moxie-intl (2006). Definition of pozzolan.
CONCLUSION
Based on the summary of results discussed above, it
was concluded that sugarcane straw ash was an
effective stabilizer for improving the geotechnical
properties of lateritic soil samples.
<http://www.moxieintl.com/glossary.htm>
31th
March,
2008.
OFlaherty, C.A (2002). Highways: The location, design and
maintenance of road pavements. 4th ed. Butterworth
Heinemenn, Jordan Hill Oxford.
Paya, J., Monzo, J., Borrachero, M.V., Daz, P. and
Ordon ez, L.M (2002). Sugarcane bagasse ash
(SCBA): Studies on its properties for reusing in
concrete production. Journal of Chemical Technology
and Biotechnology. 77: 321325.
Villar-Cocin a, E., Valencia-Morales, E., GonzalezRodrguez, R. and Hernandez-Ruz, J (2003).
Kinetics of the pozzolanic reaction between lime and
sugar cane straw ash by electrical conductivity
measurement: A kineticdiffusive model. Cement
Concrete Research. 33:517524.
rd
Whitlow, R (1995). Basic Soil Mechanics. 3 ed. Addison
Wesley Longman Limited, Edinburgh Gate.
Wikipedia
(2007).
About
lateritic
soil.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laterite> 29th March,
2008.
Wikipedia
(2007b).
About
Sugar
cane.
<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugarcane> 22th May,
2008.
REFERENCES
Das, B.M (2000). Fundamental of Geotechnical
Engineering. 4th ed. Thomson Learning, USA. Fras,
M. and Cement and Concrete Research (2005). Sugar
cane straw ash.
<http://www.ietcc.csic.es/fileadmin/Ficheros_IETcc/Departa
mentos/Sintesis/documentos/publicaciones/publicacio
nes_2007/WM_27_2007__SCStraw.pdf>.
Martirena, J.F., Middendorf, B. and Budelman, H (1998).
Use of wastes of the sugar industry as pozzolan in
lime-pozzolan binders: Study of the reaction. Cement
Concrete Research. 28: 15251536.
Middendorf, B., Mickley, J., Martirena, J.F. and Day, R.L
(2003). Masonry wall materials prepared by using
agriculture waste, lime and burnt clay. In: Masonry:
Opportunities for the 21st Century. eds. Throop D. and
R. Klingner. ASTM STP 1432, West Conshohocken,
PA, pp. 274-283.
331