Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
350x40%
RMM
RMM
213
62
140
353
FV of NA on DOA:
OSC
RP
300
200
38
Other reserves
FV adjustment
___8
7
(350)
___4
214
GW/(BP)
X 30%
___3
(2.2)
(b)
W1 Computation for Gain or Loss on Second Acquisition
Dew Bhd (subsidiary)
RMM
CT
79
FV of NA on DOA:
OSC
RP
Other reserves
FV adjustment
(64.2)
300
85
4
_8
397
X 20%
(79.4)
__0.4
W2
Computation for Retained profit and NCI
GRP
RMM
NCI
RMM
RMM
140
61
Profit FTY
25
Pre RP
(3)
Post RP
83
(1.2)
81.8
x 30%
24.54
Bargain purchase
2.2
26.74
26.74
85
Pre RP
(38)
Post RP
47
28.2
60%
40%
18.8
15
12
80%
20%
(79.4)
W1
82.4
W3
100
Profit FTY
12
URP machine
(5)
0.5
4.8
1.2
0.4
W1
180.84
W2
CSOFP
300
100
4
8
412 x 20% = 82.4
146
1.2
2
1033.34
600
180.84
40.9
821.74
82.4
OSC
GRP
Other reserves 40 + [(10 7) x 30% ]
NCI
Current liabilities (52 + 58)
Ord div payable to NCI
Ord div payable to members
(B)i.
W2
W3
110
1.2
18
1033.34
With reference to FRS 127, the presence of control determines whether a parentsubsidiary relationship exists. Ownership of more than 50% is not the only indicator
of existence of control. An investee may be deemed as a subsidiary even if the
percentage of voting rights held by the investor is less than 50%.
In the case of investment in Rainbow, Hazel is deemed to have control over Rainbow
since it is able to appoint the majority member of the BOD although its interest is only
45%.
Hence Rainbow is a subsidiary of Hazel. Therefore the financial results of Rainbow
must be consolidated for group reporting purposes.
ii.
The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable is to
be considered when assessing whether an entity has the power to control.
In the case of the investment in Cashew, Hazel has control over Cashew because the
potential voting rights can be considered since the call options are exercisable at any
time.
Hence Cashew is a subsidiary of Hazel. Therefore the financial results of Cashew
must be consolidated for group reporting purposes.
SOLUTION 2
3
a.
Matahari Bhd Group
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31/12/2011
RMmill
Turnover [(120 + 65) + (40 x6/12) + (30 x 1/3) (3 x 1/3]
214
Cost of Sales [(50+ 25 ) + (20x6/12) + (15x1/3)]- (3 x 1/3) + (0.3 x 1/3)
(89.1)
Gross profit
124.9
Expenses [(20+10) + (9x6/12) + (6 X1/3) + 0.5 - 0.04
(36.96)
Impairment of goodwill (0.2 X 20%)
(0.04)
Bargain purchase
0.1
Profit before taxation
88
Taxation [(16.8 + 8.95) + (3.3x6/12) + (2.52 X 1/3)]
(28.24)
Profit after tax
59.76
Profit after tax attributable to:
Equity holders of parent
NCI
W1
51.102
8.658
59.76
RMmill
25
(0.2)
0.04
(0.5)
Ordinary dividend
Preference dividend
(3.75)
(4) @ 80% = 3.2
16.59 @20% = 3.318
6.518
Melati Bhd
PAT (7.7 x 6/12)
Preference dividend
3.85
(1) @ 100% = 1
2.85 @ 40% = 1.14
2.14
8.658
b.
Matahari Bhd Group
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for
the year ended 31 December 2011
RP
NCI
RM million
RM million
Balance b/f
(W2) 34
(W3) 47.50
Acquisition during the year
27.14
Profit for the year
51.102
8.658
Ordinary dividend
(12)
(W4) (3.55)
Preference dividend
(5)
(W5) (4.2)
68.102
75.548
RM000
W2: RP b/f
Matahari Bhd b/f
Kenanga Bhd b/f
Less: Pre acq pft
Depreciation: Plant
32
15
(12)
(0.5)
2.5 @ 80%
RM000
2
34
50 x 20%
10 x 20%
(15-0.5) x 20%
3 x 20%
40 x 80%
10
2
2.9
0.6
32
47.5
30 x 40%
9 x 40%
(7.7 x 6/12) x 40%
10 x 100%
12
3.6
1.54
10
27.14
11.5 x 20%
5 x 25%
2.3
1.25
3.55
4 x 80%
1 x 100%
3.2
1
4.2
c. Melati Bhd is a subsidiary of Kenanga Bhd and a sub-subsidiary of Matahari Bhd from 1
July 2011. Hence, if the machine was sold to Melati Bhd on 1 April 2011, the gain on
machinery has to be recognised in CSOCI as it is a transaction with parties outside the
group. In other words, the gain on machinery cannot be eliminated as intra-group
transactions.
5
RMmillion
88.8
12.5
(1.25)
1.5
(7.54)
94.01
(16.5)
2.1
2.45
__6.8
88.86
(1.5)
(2)
(70.1)
2.9
(47.28)
(70)
7.54
1.08
85.36
(175.86)
Opening.
Balance
32
(5)
27
Bank
Bank overdraft
Short term investment
6
120
(13.5)
(5)
101.5
11*
27
38
Closing
Balance
38
(10)
10
38
Changes
6
(5)
10
11
Investment in Associate
26.5 Div. rec *
1.25 c/d
c/d
Tax paid *
c/d
1.08
26.67
OSC
b/d
Acq - Selesa
650 Issue
450
100
100
Tax payable
2 b/d
Acq-Selesa
2.55 I/S- tax exp
1.5
0.25
2.8
b/d
Acq-Selesa
Acquisition *
PPE
714.9 I/S- Deprn
200
70.1 c/d
12.5
972.5
Sh Premium
b/d
Acq - Selesa
83 Issue
c/d
33
30
20
NCI
5 b/d
Acq-Selesa
157 Pft
Div paid *
c/d
50
90
22
SOLUTION 4
a)
RMmill
(2 x RM3.90)
(10.6 x 30% )
Consideration transferred
NCI
Fair value of net asset
Ordinary shares (4 m shares x RM2)
Retained profit
Share premium
ARR
RMmill
7.8
3.18
10.98
8
2.2
0.3
0.1
(10.6)
Goodwill
Impairment
Remaining
0.38
(0.1)
0.28
Dispose 60% of interest. Status of the investee changed from a subsidiary (70%) to an
associated company (28%).
Proceed
Carrying value of investment
7.8 x 60%
1.12 x RM 3.30
RMmill
Orchid
5.88
(4.68)
RMmill
Group
5.88
3.696
9.576
______
1.2
(8.54)
(0.28)
0.756
b) The investment in Daisy would be treated as an associate since the percentage interest
was decreased to 28% and would be accounted for using the equity method .
The composition of Orchid Bhds interest in Daisy Bhd;
Bal of remaining investment at FV
Share of post profit
(4.5 3.3) x 7/12 x 28%
Bal c/d
3.892
c) Consolidate in the statement of comprehensive income of the operation till 31 May 2011
and subsequent to that date equity account