Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A B O L FA Z L A M A N O L L A H N E J A D K A L K H O U R A N ,
SITI ZALEHA ABDUL RASID,
SAUDAH SOFIAN,
and B A H A R E H H O S S E I N N E Z H A D N E D A E I
Otley (1980) found that there is no one best management control system for all companies; rather,
an organizations systems should be contingent
on the circumstances it faces. Such a contingencytheory approach can be used to shed light on the
application of strategic management accounting
practices in SMEs. Accounting research based on
contingency theory has shown that various organizational attributes and circumstances, such as size,
environment, and technology, can affect business
leaders choice of the management accounting
techniques they use (Abdel-Kader & Luther, 2008;
Hoque & James, 2000; Luther & Longden, 2001;
OConnor, Chow & Wu, 2004). The contingency
factors that should be considered for SMEs differ
significantly, however (Flacke & Segbers, 2005).
Few studies regarding SMEs have considered such
factors as external environment and technology
(Ahmad, 2012; Collis& Jarvis, 2002; Jnkl, 2007;
ORegan & Sims, 2008).
In its application of upper echelons theory, this
study considers both perceived environmental
uncer
tainty and advanced manufacturing technology. Since the decision-making process in SMEs
is typically highly centralized and chief executive
officers (CEOs) strongly influence determinations
on whether to adopt certain practices (Ahn, Mortara, & Minshall, 2014), executive behavior also
will be taken into consideration. According to upper
echelons theory, executives experiences, values, and
personalities greatly influence their interpretations
45
46
N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b er 2015
The fundamental concept of this theory is well captured by the subheading of Mason and Hambricks
(1984) seminal study of the upper echelons perspective: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. The theory acknowledges that top managers
heavily influence organizational performance by the
choices they make, which in turn are affected by the
managers characteristics. In other words, the main
principle in upper echelons theory has two interrelated parts:
Novem ber/Decemb e r 2 0 1 5
47
three contingency factorsperceived environmental uncertainty, advanced manufacturing technology, and CEO characteristicsand their impact
on strategic management accounting techniques
and performance. Strategic management accounting techniques and their use are at the heart of the
model, and in keeping with previous related contingency-based research (Chenhall & Langfield-Smith,
1998; Cravens & Guilding, 2001; Gerdin, 2005;
Guilding, 1999; Hoque & James, 2000), strategic
management accounting is presented as an endogenous construct in the model. The dependent factor in this model is firm performance. The basic
principle of contingency theory holds that firm performance depends on the suitable fit between the
structure (use of strategic management accounting)
and context (contingency variables). Therefore, the
firms performance indicates whether structure and
context are well matched (Gerdin & Greve, 2004;
Ittner & Larcker, 2001). The suggested framework
is illustrated in Exhibit 1.
Perceived environmental uncertainty reflects managers inability to correctly forecast their external environment (Tymon, Stout, & Shaw, 1998).
Studies have shown that administrators respond
48
N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b er 2015
Traditional difficulties that business face in investment appraisal, cost allocation, performance evaluation, and overhead apportionment have been
complicated by advances in manufacturing technology. Therefore, business administrators and
accounting professionals have developed several
new accounting practices to deal with them (Hoque
& James, 2000; Bhimani & Bromwich, 1992).
For instance, some firms that have adopted advanced
manufacturing technology have altered their management accounting and control systems in order
to remain competitive while responding to changes
in information needs and operations brought on
by the new technology (Johnson & Kaplan, 1987).
New management accounting and control systems,
such as activity-based costing (ABC), can improve
the relevance and quality of information that management needs to keep the organization running
smoothly. When the business environment changes
and reliance on advanced manufacturing technology intensifies, executives tend to make greater use
of management accounting information in their
daily decision-making (Isa & Foong, 2005). Generally, the fundamental objectives of management
accounting in an advanced manufacturing technology environment are to cost products, value
inventory, measure performance, and make investment decisions (Jeans & Morrow, 1989).
Numerous studies have examined the influence of
advanced manufacturing technology on the design
of management accounting systems. For example,
Otley, Broadbent, and Berry (1995) found a positive
relationship between automation in manufacturing
and budget formality. On the other hand, Isa and
Foong (2005) argued that advanced manufacturing
technology leads to new costing techniques, such as
ABC, and a greater emphasis on nonfinancial performance measurement indicators.
Abdel-Maksoud, Dugdale, and Luther (2005) found
that advanced management accounting practices exist
in firms that have made significant investments in
total quality management (TQM), just-in-time (JIT)
initiatives, and advanced manufacturing technology.
Their findings were strengthened by Al-Omiri and
Drury (2007), who found that highly sophisticated
cost systems are positively related to lean production techniques and the degree of JIT implementation. According to Abdel-Kader and Luther (2008),
the level of management accounting sophistication is
influenced by the organizations use of TQM, JIT, and
advanced manufacturing technology systems. Thus:
H2There is a positive relationship between
advanced manufacturing technology and the extent
to which strategic management accounting techniques are adopted in SMEs.
CEO Characteristics and Strategic Management
Accounting
Novem ber/Decemb e r 2 0 1 5
49
50
The relationship between the adoption of management accounting practices and performance
has been the subject of broad empirical research.
Most studies support the view that the adoption of
management accounting practices that offer information that is broad in scope is positively related
to performance (Baines & Langfield-Smith, 2003;
Cravens & Guilding, 2001; Hoque & James, 2000;
Mahama, 2006).
N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b er 2015
unique practices best tailored to their special circumstances. Along with the hypotheses presented above,
the framework highlights three factors that have a
significant effect on the use of advanced management
accounting principles in SMEs: perceived environmental uncertainty, advanced manufacturing technology, and CEO characteristics. The conceptual
framework taps both contingency theory and upper
echelon theory to explain the relationships between
CEO characteristics and adoption of strategic management accounting. Looking ahead, empirical testing is needed to determine whether the hypothesized
relationships hold up in practice and to what extent
any associations might be most meaningful.
With its focus on strategic management accounting,
this study contributes to broadening the literature
on improving organizational effectiveness. Subsequent research would do well to expand this line
of inquiry to include such contingency factors as
organizational culture and structure and additional
CEO characteristics, including executive turnover,
in assessing the adoption of strategic management
accounting practices in SMEs.
References
Abdel-Kader, M. & Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm
characteristics on management accounting practices: A UKbased empirical analyses. The British Accounting Review,
40(1), 227.
Abdel-Maksoud, A., Dugdale, D. & Luther, R. (2005). Non
financial performance measurement in manufacturing companies. The British Accounting Review, 37(3), 261297.
Abernethy, M. and Bouwens, J. (2005). Determinants of
accounting innovation implementation. Abacus, 41(3),
217240.
Ahmad, K. (2012). Factors explaining the extent of use of
management accounting practices in Malaysian medium
firms. Paper presented at the ASEAN Entrepreneurship Conference 2012 (AEC), 5-6 November 2012, Kuala Lumpur,
Retrieved from http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3350/
Ahmad, K. (2013). The adoption of management accounting
practices in Malaysian small and medium-sized enterprises.
Asian Social Science, 10(2), 236249.
Novem ber/Decemb e r 2 0 1 5
51
52
N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b er 2015
Luft, J., & Shields, M., 2003. Mapping management accounting: Graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical
research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3),
169249.
Luther, R. G., & Longden, S. (2001). Management accounting in companies adapting to structural change and volatility
in transition economies: A South African study. Management
Accounting Research, 12(3), 299320.
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2014). Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research. Journal of Management Control, 24(3), 223240.
Hoque, Z., & James, W. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard
measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting
Research, 12(1), 117.
Isa, C. R., & Foong, S. A. (2005). Adoption of advanced manufacturing technology and management accounting practices:
The case of manufacturing firms in Malaysia. World Review of
Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 3548.
Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). Assessing empirical
research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 32
(1-3), 349410.
Jnkl, S. (2007). Management control systems (MCS) in
the small business context. Universitatis Ouluensis, G 30.
Dissertation, University of Oulu, Finland.
Jeans, M., & Morrow, M. (1989). Management accounting in AMT environments: Product costing. Management
Accounting, April, 2930.
Johnson H. T., & Kaplan R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The
rise and fall of management accounting. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
Jorissen, A., Laveren, E., Martens, R., & Reheul, A., (2002).
The relationship between management accounting systems,
firm strategy, perceived environmental uncertainty, networking, CEO characteristics and performance in SMEs. Project
number G.0186.00N.
Jorissen, A., Laveren, E., Martens, R., & Reheul, A. (2008).
The role of perceived environmental uncertainty and strategy
in the planning process of independent SMEs. Project number G.0186.00N.
Novem ber/Decemb e r 2 0 1 5
53
Otley, D. T., & Wilkinson, C. (1988). Organizational behavior: Strategy, structure, environment and technology. In K. R.
Ferris (Ed.), Behavioral accounting research: A critical analysis (pp. 147170). New York: Century Publications Co.
Santini, F. (2013). Strategic management accounting and
financial performance in the small and medium sized Italian manufacturing enterprises. Management Control, 1(1),
77107.
Selto, F. H., Renner, C. J., and Young, S. M. (1995). Assessing the organizational fit of a just-in-time manufacturing
system: Testing selection, interaction and systems models of
contingency theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society,
20(7/8), 665684.
Sener, R., & Dirlik, S. (2012). Stratejik ynetim kapsamnda
stratejik ynetim muhasebesi aralarnn kullanm dzeyi
zerine ampirik bir arastrma [An empirical research on the
usage level of strategic administration accounting tools in the
scope of strategic management]. Proceedings from 31st Turkey
Accounting Training Symposium, April 2529, 2012, Mugla.
Simmonds, K. (1981). Strategic management accounting.
Management Accounting, 59(4), 2629.
Sorooshian, S., Norzima, Z., Yusof, I. and Rosnah, M. Y.
(2010). Structural modeling on entrepreneurs effectiveness.
World Applied Sciences Journal, 10(8), 923929.
Strauss, E. R., & Zecher, C. (2013). Management control
systems: A review. Journal of Management Control, 23(4),
233268.
Tymon, W. G., Stout, D. E., & Shaw, K. N. (1998). Critical analysis and recommendations regarding the role of perceived environmental uncertainty in behavioral accounting
research. Behavioral Accounting Research, 10, 2346.
54
N o v e m b e r / D e c e m b er 2015
Abolfazl Amanollah Nejad Kalkhouran, MBA, is a PhD candidate in the Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty
of Management, at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia in Johor
Bahru. His research interests are in management accounting,
performance measurement, and risk management. He can
be reached at ankabolfazl3@live.utm.my or abolfazlaman@
gmail.com.
Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid, PhD, MBA, is an associate professor in management accounting at Universiti Teknologi
Malaysias International Business School in Kuala Lumpur
and an associate member of the Malaysian Institute of
Accountants. Dr. Rasids research interests are in management accounting, risk management, and corporate governance. She can be reached at szaleha@ibs.utm.my or
sitizaleha.utm@gmail.com.
Saudah Sofian, PhD, MBA, is an associate professor in management accounting at the Department of Accounting and
Finance, Faculty of Management, at Universiti Teknologi
Malaysia in Johor Bahru. Dr. Sofian has more than 25 years
of experience in the academic field, and her research interests
include management accounting, intellectual capital, performance management, and corporate social responsibility. She
can be reached at saudah@utm.my.
Bahareh Hossein Nezhad Nedaei, MBA, is a PhD candidate in the Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty
of Management, at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia in Johor
Bahru. Her research interests are in enterprise risk management, management control systems, and management
accounting. She can be reached at bahar6484@gmail.com or
hnnbahareh2@live.utm.my.