Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
energy
spin
parity
lifetime/width ( = )
1 ps == 0.7 meV
magnetic moment,
quadrupole moment, Q
General behaviour:
Initially sparse level density as a
function of energy, increasing to a
very high density, then reach
ionisation/separation.
Very similar behaviour!
rr
-
+
L Y lm ,=l l1 Y lm ,
L z Y lm ,=m Y lm ,
where l=0,1,2,3,4...
The different possibilities for m are sometimes called the magnetic substates, since they can be
observed by putting the system in a magnetic field. They describe the orientation of the angular
momentum vector with respect to the z axis.
The parity of the angular momentum wavefunction is given by (-1)l.
Energy
Angular momentum
Parity
Lifetime
Magnetic moment
Quadrupole
moment
We wish to understand
how to derive these
properties for specific
nuclei.
But, the level structure of nuclei changes markedly from one to the next.
182
Why?
Ta, 178Os and 120Te are examples of nucleon collective behaviour (a few lectures away....).
25
Al, 209Bi and 40K are examples of nucleon single-particle behaviour, described by the Shell Model
Another example: Changes in nuclear radii relative to the standard R=1.2 A1/3 estimate. The
similarity of this plot with the atomic radii on p7 is particularly striking.
A wealth of empirical observation suggests that there are so-called magic numbers of protons
and neutrons that are especially stable, similar to the noble gases in atomic physics. These
magic numbers are:
Z or N = 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126
Compare this to the noble gases which have: Z = 2, 10, 18, 36, 54, 86
Why the difference?
Spin-Orbit Coupling
Nucleons have intrinsic spin and we need to consider the coupling of the intrinsic spin, s, to the
orbital angular momentum, l, to give the total angular momentum j. These are vector quantities
and s = 1/2, hence j can equal l+1/2 or l-1/2.
Note also, that we typically do not write the value of l, but instead use the spectroscopic notation:
s
0
+
l
parity
p
1
-
d
2
+
f
3
-
g
4
+
h
5
-
i
6
+
j
7
-
Empirically, it is found that nucleons exhibit a spin-orbit interaction that depends on the vector
dot product l.s. Note that j =l s and we can derive the expectation value for l.s by looking
at the expectation value of j 2 :
j 2 =lsls=l 2 s2 2 l.s
1 2
2
2
l.s = j l s
2
2
l.s= j j1l l1s s1
2
l.s =
2 l /2 for j=l1/2
2
l 1/ 2 for j =l 1/ 2
23
Na
11 protons
12 neutrons
23
Mg
12 protons
11 neutrons
The similarity of the nuclei implies the equality of neutron-neutron, proton-proton and neutronproton forces, when the nucleons are coupled to the same angular momentum state.
10 protons
12 neutrons
11 protons
11 neutrons
12 protons
10 neutrons
The charge independence is only for the strong component of the force between nucleons. There
is still a difference between proton-proton and the proton-neutron or neutron-neutron forces due
to the Coulomb force. Also, proton-neutron angular momentum couplings are not limited by the
Pauli principle.
Coulomb Forces
Out of the mirror pair 13C and 13N, the latter is less
bound due to the Coulomb force (nitrogen has 7
protons compared to 6 in carbon).
We can evaluate this Coulomb energy difference
using the SEMF.
Exercise: Show that this energy difference depends on the value of R0 (from R=R0 A1/3) and the
parameter A2/3. The A2/3 dependence can be seen in the graph at top right. Use the slope of the
line to show that R0=1.22 fm.
Single-particle wavefunction
206
205
Tl has one proton less, meaning there is a hole in the first level below the Z=82 shell gap. This is
a s1/2 proton level.
The theoretical wavefunction for the s1/2 orbital is shown above at left. The difference in charge
density between 206Pb and 205Tl as measured through electron scattering experiments is shown
above at right. There is a remarkable agreement.
The Pauli principle means that the nucleons can move freely in a mean field potential despite
the strong nuclear force.
Drawing these level occupation diagrams will really help your understanding.
Single-particle nucleus
Extra proton outside Z=82
Exercise: Draw the level occupation diagrams for each of these states.
Low-lying levels in
209
p3/2.
The difference reflects the fact that in real calculations the nuclear
potential needs to be tuned for a particular region of nuclei.
Rather than calculate the levels directly from a potential, an alternative
method is to deduce the particle levels and energies from experimental
observations, an approach known as the Empirical Shell Model.
A simple vector model does not preclude coupling to produce odd values of the angular
momentum.
The absence of odd values is a quantum mechanical effect, in fact it is a manifestation of the Pauli
principle, as shown over the next couple of pages.
JM = j 1 m1 j 2 m2 JM j 1 m1 j 2 m2
m1 m2
j j J j j
1
M =m 1m 2
m2
J=4
+5/2
+5/2
+3/2
+1/2
4
3
4
3
+5/2
+5/2
-1/2
-3/2
2
1
2
1
+5/2
+3/2
-5/2
+1/2
0
2
+3/2
+3/2
-1/2
-3/2
1
0
+3/2
+1/2
-5/2
-1/2
-1
0
+1/2
+1/2
-3/2
-5/2
-1
-2
-1/2
-1/2
-3/2
-5/2
-2
-3
-3
-3/2
-5/2
-4
-4
J=2
J=0
2
1
0
-1
0
-1
-2
-2
In 18O and 18Ne the two d5/2 nucleons have similar character (two neutrons and two protons
respectively) and couple to give 0+, 2+ and 4+ states.
In 18F the d5/2 neutron and d5/2 proton can couple to give 0+, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+ and 5+ states since the
Pauli principle does not limit the possible m substate populations.
J=0
Overlap high
Energy favoured
J intermediate
Small overlap
J maximum
Small overlap
Energy unfavoured
Pauli principle prevents particles being fully aligned. Jmax = 2j -1. (E.g. (d5/2)2 => Jmax=4)
The energy being favoured is due to the attractive nature of the nucleon-nucleon interaction.
J=0
Overlap high
Energy favoured
J intermediate
Small overlap
J maximum
Overlap high
Energy favoured
Since the vectors can be parallel in the case of non-identical particles, the high J coupling can be
favoured like the low-J coupling. Note that if the two orbitals are not the same, e.g. an h9/2
proton and an i11/2 neutron, then the radii of the orbits are not necessarily the same and the
overlaps are non-obvious. But there is a general favouring of both the low-J and high-J couplings.
Triangles:
(h9/2)2
Squares:
(g9/2)2
These empirical interactions have been tabulated (see references on next slide). They can also be
deduced from the overlap of the theoretical quantum mechanical orbits of the particles (again,
see references on the next slide). The slide after next shows selected empirical values for protonneutron interactions (deduced from 210Bi) compared to two different theoretical calculations.
i j