Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2.1
(2.1)
(2.2)
(2.3)
(2.4)
Q : x + dx = i (x) + di ei
(2.5)
and deformed
29
30
Q
dx
Q
P
dx
P
x
x
e3
e1
e2
(2.6)
Expressing the dierentials di in terms of the partial derivatives of the functions i (xj ej ):
d1 =
1
1
1
dx1 +
dx2 +
dx3 ,
x1
x2
x3
(2.7)
i
dxj
xj
(2.8)
(2.9)
(2.10)
We now try to compute the change in length of the segment P Q which deformed into segment
(2.11)
i
i
dxj
dxk
xj
xk
(2.12)
31
The change in length of segment P Q is then given by the dierence between equations (2.12)
and (2.11):
(ds )2 ds2 =
i
i
dxj
dxk dxi dxi
xj
xk
(2.13)
We want to extract as common factor the dierentials. To this end we observe that:
dxi dxi = dxj dxk jk
(2.14)
Then:
i
i
dxj
dxk dxj dxk jk
xj
xk
i
i
=
jk dxj dxk
x x
j k
2jk : Green-Lagrange strain tensor
(ds )2 ds2 =
(2.15)
(2.16)
ij =
1 ui uj um um
+
+
2 xj
xi
xi xj
(2.17)
(2.18)
(2.19)
When the absolute values of the derivatives of the displacement eld are much smaller than
1, their products (nonlinear part of the strain) are even smaller and well neglect them. We
will make this assumption throughout this course (See accompanying Mathematica notebook
evaluating the limits of this assumption). Mathematically:
um um
0
(2.20)
1
xj
xi xj
We will dene the linear part of the Green-Lagrange strain tensor as the small strain tensor :
1 ui uj
+
ij =
2 xj
xi
(2.21)
32
x
)
c
+
x
2
1
1
2
2
la =
.
c1 + (3c22+c3 ) x22 2c3 x2 (1 x1 )
On the other hand, the Equation 2.22 allows us to calculate the nonlinear (nl) strain
tensor for the eld (ua1 , ua2 )
nl nl
12
nl
,
a = 11
nl
12 nl
22
where
2
1
c1 + c3 x22 x1 (2 x1 ) ,
2
2
1
= 2c3 x2 (1 x1 ) [1 + c3 x2 (1 x1 )] + c1 + 3c2 x22 + x1 (2 x1 ) ,
2
(3c2 + c3 ) 2
x2
= c1 +
2
+x2 (1 x1 ) x1 (2 x1 )(1 + c3 ) + c1 (1 + c3 ) + (3c2 c23 )x22 .
nl
11 = 2x2 (1 x1 ) [1 + x2 (1 x1 )] +
nl
22
nl
12
33
The linear (l) strain tensor for the displacement eld (ub1 , ub2 ) is
2
1 3
x1 + 32 c1 c22 x1 3c1 x1 x22
3x1 x2 + 2c1 c32 + 3c1 c22 x2 c1 x32
l
2
.
b =
1 3
x + 32 c1 c22 x1 3c1 x1 x22
3c1 x21 x2 + x32 3c22 x2 2c32
2 1
2.2
(2.25)
(2.26)
(2.27)
(2.28)
(2.29)
(2.30)
and take the derivative of the reverse transformation of the components of the position vector
x:
x = xj ej = xk
ek
e k ei )
xj (ej ei ) = xk (
e k ei )
xj ji = xk (
e k ei )
xi = xk (
(2.31)
(2.32)
(2.33)
(2.34)
xi
xk
=
(
ek ei ) = kj (
ek ei ) = (
e j ei )
xj
xj
(2.35)
(2.36)
34
1 ul
ul
(el
ei )(
e j ek ) +
(el
ej )(
ei ek )
2 xk
xk
(2.37)
ij =
(2.38)
Or, nally:
ij = lk (el
ei )(
ej ek )
(2.39)
11 =
22
Solution: First, let us recall the following trigonometric relations between the
vectors of ei and
ek :
e1
e1 =
e2 =
e2
cos
cos
e1
e2 = sin
e2
e1 = sin
35
11 =
=
22 =
=
22 =
+
The expresssions given in the remark can be derived from these using the following trigonometric relations:
1 + cos 2
1 cos 2
sin2 =
cos2 =
2
2
Concept Question 2.2.2. Principal strains and maximum shear strain in 2d.
Using the relations introduced in Problem 2.2.1, show that given the components ij of
a 2d strain tensor in a basis ei :
1. The principal strains can be computed as follows:
2
11 22
11 + 22
+ 212
1,2 =
2
2
and the principal directions of strain for angles with respect to e1 satisfy:
tan 2p =
212
11 22
11 22
.
212
Conclude that the direction of maximum shear is always oriented at an angle equal to
45o with respect to the principal directions of strain.
36
+ 212
1,2 =
2
2
To nd the angle p formed by the principal directions and the basis vecto e1 , use the fact
that the shear strains vanish in principal directions:
0=
11 22
sin 2p + 12 cos 2p
2
tan 2p =
212
11 22
Maximum shear strain: The maximum shear strain can be found by simply nding the
value of the argument in the expression for transforming the shear strain component which
makes the derivative of 12 with respect to vanish:
11 22
max
=
sin 2s + 12 cos 2s
12
2
12
11 22
s
s
= 2
cos 2 + 12 sin 2 = 0
2
By taking the square of the two previous equations and summing them, it is easy to show
that:
2
11 22
max 2
+ 212
12 =
2
The second equation leads directly to the angular relation:
22 11
tan 2s =
212
From the trigonometric relation: tan ( + 2 ) = tan1 it is also easy to see that:
1
11 22
=
tan 2 p +
=
= tan 2s
4
tan 2p
212
Thus, proving that s = p + 4 .
Since the square has its edge of unit length, the changes in length in the directions e1 and
e2 are directly equal to 11 and 22 , respectively. The shear strain 12 is equal to half of the
decrease in angle in A (for innitesimal angles).
e2
37
e2
212
ea2
22
ea1
1
30o
1
A
e1
11
e1
A
(a) Deformed unit square
Figure 2.2: Deformed unit square and oriented new initial conguration.
e2
e2
212
ea2
22
ea1
1
30o
1
A
11
e1
A
e1
Figure 2.3: Deformed unit square and oriented new initial conguration.
38
11 22
= 1.15 104
2
Orientation at an angle = 30o : The value of the strain tensor in the basis eai are as
follows:
a11 =
=
a22 =
=
a12 =
=
3
1
4
4
5
= 3.6 104
2.25 10 + 1.15 10 + 9.0 10
2
2
11 + 22 22 11
+
cos 2 12 sin 2
2
2
3
1
4
4
5
= 9.0 105
2.25 10 1.15 10 + 9.0 10
2
2
11 22
sin 2 + 12 cos 2
3
1
4
+ 9.0 105 = 5.5 105
1.15 10
2
2
1,2 =
= 8.0 105 : 2
2
2
and their respective direction can be computed as:
212
tan 2 =
11 22
b
1b 19o
2b 109o
In order to nd which of the two angles solution of the equation above is associated with
which value of principal strain, one can test these values of b in the expression of 11 given in
Problem 2.2.1. Figure 2.4(b) shows the deformed conguration corresponding to this case.
Maximum shear strain: Following the relations introduced in Problem 2.2.2, we can
compute the absolute value of the maximal shear strain as:
2
11 22
max
2
12 =
+ 12 = (1.15 104 )2 + (9.0 105 )2 = 1.46 104 .
2
39
Using the fact that the maximum shear direction is oriented at an angle of 45o to one of the
principal strain direction, let us consider the case of maximum shear obtained for an angle
c = 19o + 45o = 64o starting from e1 . We obtain 12 (c ) = max
and contend that for
12
this angle the maximum negative shear strain is obtained. Figure 2.4(c) shows the deformed
conguration corresponding to this case.
e2
2a12
ea2
a22
ea1
30o
a11
e1
c22
e2
eb2
e2
ec1
b22
2c12
ec2
b11
c11
eb1
19o
65o
e1
e1
2.3
Compatibility of strains
Readings: BC 1.8
Given displacement eld u, expression (2.21) allows to compute the strains components
ij . How does one answer the reverse question? Note analogy with potential-gradient eld. In
this section, we will restrain ourselves to small perturbation theory where the displacements
and the rotations of a deformable solid are innitesimal. Let us rst restrict the analysis to
40
two dimensions. The small strain tensor is dened as the symmetric part of the displacement
ui
gradient x
:
j
1
ij =
2
We dene the skew-symmetric part of
ui
xj
1
ij :=
2
ui uj
+
xj
xi
(2.40)
as:
ui
uj
xj
xi
(2.41)
ji =
2 xi
xj
2 xj
xi
ui
xj
1
ij + ij =
2
Solution:
Solution:
ui uj
+
xj
xi
1
+
2
ui
uj
xj
xi
2 x2 x1
ui
xj
(2.42)
We have seen in a previous section of this module, that ij describes the change of length
of a vector dx due to deformation. We will now see that ij represents the innitesimal
rotation of the vector dx from the initial to the deformed conguration. ij is thus named
the innitesimal rotation tensor.
dx
Q
Q
41
(2.43)
(2.44)
x1
2 x2 x1
2
u1
1
+
=
2 x2 x1
11 12
=
x2
x1
2 u2
x21
2
2 u1
u2
2 u1
+
x2 x1
x21
x2 x1
(2.45)
(2.46)
(2.47)
x1 x2
x2 2
x1 x2
(2.48)
x2
x2
x1
which dierentiated with respect to x1 gives:
2 12
2 12
2 22
=
x2 x1
x2 x1
x1 2
(2.49)
(2.50)
2 12
2 11 2 22
=
+
x1 x2
x22
x21
(2.51)
The following concept question generalizes this result to obtain all of the equations of
strain compatibility in three dimensions.
42
xj xl xi xl
xj xk xi xk
(2.52)
2. How many relations are dened by (2.52) and how many strain compatibility equations
are required in order to ensure that a unique displacement may be computed from a
given small strain tensor?
3. Notice that for i = j or l = k, (2.52) is automatically veried. How many non-trivial
relations can be derived from (2.52)? Are all these relation independant?
Solution: Let us remind rst that the small rotation tensor is dened as:
1
ij = (ui,j uj,i )
2
Thus, the gradient of small rotation reads:
1
(ui,jk uj,ik )
2
By adding and substracting uk,ij form the right-hand side of the previous relation, it is to
express the gradient of small rotation only in terms of the derivatives of the componenent
of the small strain tensor:
1
1
ui,jk + uk,ij (uj,ik uk,ij ) = ik,j jk,i
ij,k =
2
2
ij,k =
2ik,j
2jk,i
Thus, the mixed derivatives: ij,kl and ij,lk of the small rotation tensor have the following
expressions:
1
ij,kl =
ik,jl jk,il
2
1
il,jk jl,ik
ij,lk =
2
The equality of mixed partials implies:
ik,jl jk,il = il,jk jl,ik
Since i, j, k, l can take any value in {1, 2, 3} respectively, (2.52) comprises 34 = 81 relations.
It is easy to verify that the only non-trivial relations from (2.52) can be obtained for i = j
and k = l.
43
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
k =
1
2
2
1
2
3
l
2
3
1
3
1
2
=
=
=
=
=
=
212,12
223,23
231,31
22,31 + 31,22
33,12 + 12,33
11,23 + 23,11
These six relations are linearly dependent and it is possible to show that if only three are
them are verifed then the remaining three are.