Table 5 shows that under 16 year old, the item no.

14 we allow

expressing idea and opinion and item no. 18 we have a unity to helping
each other got the highest computed mean of 4.27 which is interpreted as
high cooperative learning .on the other hand ,the item no. 10, we review
the entire lesson that we had tackled, got the lowest computed mean of
3.41 which is interpreted as high cooperative learning.
On the other hand, the student under 17 years old, the item no. 1 I
enjoy being with my classmate got the highest computed mean of

4.46

which interpreted as very high cooperative learning, while the item no. 11
we have a time for tutor each other got the lowest computed mean of 3.20
which interpreted as average cooperative learning
Under the age of 18, the item no. 1 I enjoy being with my classmate
got the highest computed mean of 4.52 which is interpreted as very high
cooperative learning. While the lowest computed mean of 3.42 which we
found on the item no. 11 we have a time to tutor each other which is
interpreted as high cooperative learning.
On the other hand, the student that under the age of 19, the item no. 1
I enjoy being with my classmate got the highest computed mean 4.3 which
is interpreted as very high cooperative learning. While the lowest computed
mean of 2.47 which found on the item no. 20 we have a time to discuss our
knowledge and review all necessity things which is interpreted as low
cooperative learning.
Under the age of 20 above, the item no. 1 I enjoy being with my
classmate got the highest computed mean of 4.5 which is interpreted as
very high cooperative learning, while the lowest computed mean of

3.67

which is found in the item no. 15 me and my co m ember has equal and
balance participation which is interpreted as high cooperative learning .

Generally , the cooperative learning of teacher education students as

according to their age the overall mean, the item no. 1 I enjoy being with
my classmate got the highest computed mean of 4.45 which is interpreted
as very high cooperative learning. While the lowest computed overall mean
of 3.45 in item no.11 we have a time for tutor each other which is
interpreted as high cooperative learning.
Cooperative learning has been demonstrated to be an especially
effective method of teaching in settings characterized by such diversity.
Cooperative learning can be done at almost any age and often with teachers
existing

instructional

materials.

It

helps

improve

achievement

from

elementary through graduate schoo.

It could be gleaned from table 5 that the respondents who under 16
years old have computed weighted arithmetic mean of 3.93 which has an
interpretation of high cooperative learning, while the respondents that under
17 years old have computed weighted arithmetic mean of 3.82 which has
an interpretation of high cooperative learning. And those respondents that
under the age of 18 years old have computed weighted arithmetic of

4.03

which has an interpretation of high cooperative learning. On the other hand,

the respondents that under the age of 19 years old have computed weighted
arithmetic mean of 3.61 which has an interpretation of high cooperative
learning. Otherwise, the respondents who under of 20 years old above have
a computed weighted arithmetic mean of 4.07 which has an interpretation of
high cooperative learning.

Table 6 shows the cooperative learning level of the teacher education

students with regards to their family income.