Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
109
editor@iaeme.com
1. INTRODUCTION
What is of interest for logistics activities is its inclusion of forward flow of materials
in the supply chain. Yet, as reverse logistics picks reverse flow which commences
with the users as its topic of interest, its aim is to ensure the re-usability of products.
With environmental issues becoming more important lately, the concept of reverse
logistics is becoming a focus of attraction. As a result of the damage on and the
depletion of natural resources and with the growing interest on environmentconsciousness, today, demand for reverse logistics-related matters and recyclable
manufacturing systems is also on the rise.
In the process of reverse logistics, the importance of the supply chain will be
revealed more clearly with the return and recycle of products carried out in a more
planned fashion. In other words, reverse logistics that concerns issues of effective and
efficient re-collection and processing of wastes can be handled differently from waste
management.
With the growing importance of environment-related issues, the concept of
reverse-logistics, and as a result the issue of recycling are making it to the top of
agendas. On the other hand, businesses' aspiration to have the competitive upper hand
is another important factor in recycling practices. Forward flow of materials in the
supply chain is considered among logistics activities whereas the reverse flow that
starts from the consumers' end so that the products can be reused concerns reverse
logistics. Recycling systems and issues pertaining to reverse logistics will naturally
become further points of interest as natural sources are damaged and depleted and
environment-awareness increased. As a result, logistics structures to allow product
flow must be set up [Nakbolu, G., (2007); Yldz, D.,(2013) ]. As it is known, issues
such as product return, re-production, reuse, disposal, repair come under reverse
logistics. Product returns account for a considerable portion of organizational costs. In
order for an organization to have the competitive advantage, it will have to reduce
costs in product returns and related transportation and storage activities. And for that,
determination of appropriate recycling locations is important for reverse logistics
networks [Glsn, B., et al., (2008)].
Benefits of reverse logistics, generally, for businesses can be summarized as
follows [Dyckhoff, H., et al., (ed)., (2004 ); Nakbolu, G., (2007) ; Yldz, D.,(2013)
].
Recovery of value: This concerns the recovery of the product, with added value
during its production, that would perish if not reused.
Maximization of profit: This when raw material, labor, energy etc. costs are reduced
thanks to the recovery of the product.
Performance of environmental obligations: All liabilities that are also legally defined
are such as waste recycling, management of hazardous materials, etc.
Improvement of management of customer relations: In order to improve customer
relations, one must work on issues such as post-sale services and on the provision of
customers with return guarantee, etc.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
110
editor@iaeme.com
In order for products to be recovered and used as input in the economy, there are
three processes that reverse logistics focus on and which also relates closely to waste
management. These are: reuse, reproduction and recycling [ Setaputra, R., (2005)].
2. REASONS FOR RECYCLING OF PRODUCTS AND REVERSE
LOGISTICS
As stated in the respective literature, there are many reasons behind the inclusion of
products that are subject to reverse logistics, in the reverse logistics network. These
reasons are grouped, generally, on the basis of the source that returns the product (on
the basis of the supply chain hierarchy comprising of the producer, distributor and the
consumer). According to this grouping, returns that take place during production are
referred to as production returns, distributor returns if the return takes place during
the distribution of the product to the consumer and returns by the consumers that are
the users of the final product are referred to as consumer returns. In addition to such
grouping, there is also producers' recall of the products in cases when an problem
with the product is encountered or when the product is being replaced and also
functional returns arising from the re-usability feature of the product [Rogers, D.S.,
Tibben-Lembke, R., (2001) ; Brito, M.P., et al., ( 2002); Brito, M.P., Dekker, R., (
2002); Subramaniam, U., et al., (2004)]. Moreover, reasons for the return of products
that are subject to reverse logistics are provided in further detail, below:
a. Production Returns
Within this scope, issues such as the product being raw material surplus or being
production surplus are specified.
b. Distributor Returns
Here, four sub-headings that a have been specified, namely as wrong or damaged
delivery, products that have expired, stock surplus or unsold products and seasonal
fluctuations, stock adjustments.
c. Consumer Returns
Reasons in relation to this topic can be listed as return under guarantee, reuse of
products after repair, value gains (scrap value and consideration of other recovery
options), returns from after-use (such as second hand sales), returns at the end of lifecycle, legal regulations concerning hazardous materials or the customer considering
the product as damaged/deficient.
e. Functional Returns
Packaging materials that are of reusable quality, containers, pallets, packages, boxes
are under this title.
Increased practice of reverse logistics also benefits from businesses' becoming
aware of the benefits of product returns in addition to product returns, customer
satisfaction or legal conditions mentioned above. As stated in the existing literature,
these benefits are listed as better relations with customers and partners in the supply
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
111
editor@iaeme.com
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
112
editor@iaeme.com
Prevention of wastes
Reduction of wastes
Re-use
Recovery/Recycling
Pre-process (including incineration)
Final disposal
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
113
editor@iaeme.com
4.3. Implementation
In this study, an assessment has been carried out to determine the district that would
be the most appropriate for the establishment of a package waste recycling center in
the province of zmir has been carried out with a consideration for the AHP method.
There are 30 districts within the remit of the zmir metropolitan municipality and
these districts have been compared and contrasted against different criteria that have
been determined in order to decide on the most appropriate location. Accordingly, in
line with the solid waste master plan, the province of zmir has been handled as two
regions (North and South - Table 1) and then an aggregation has been performed to
evaluate alternative provinces [Waste management Action Plan, (2008 2012)].
Izmir
South
Izmir
North
Balova
Bayrakl
Bergama
Buca
ili
Dikili
Foa
Gzelbahe Karabalar Karyaka Knk
Menemen Narldere
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
114
Bornova
Gaziemir
Konak
editor@iaeme.com
75 627 384
2 950
63 743 047
2 950
63 743 047
2 894
63 105 474
83
99
25 845
1.12
14 615
72
1.14
11 229
68
1.09
1 107
8 217
448
15 484
155
105
33
94
202
64
54
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
115
editor@iaeme.com
Amount of solids
collected by
Municipalies and
others
(ton/yr)
Amount of
solid waste
collected
per person
Total
municipal
population
Waste
Total
management
environmental
service
expenditures
expenditures
(kg/personday)
(thousand)
(mio TRY)
(mio TRY)
Aliaa
Balova
Bayndr
Bayrakl
100
100
100
100
28 706
49 870
9 460
115 650
1,38
1,76
1,11
1,03
77
78
41
309
4,4
6,4
1,7
12,2
Bergama
Beyda
Bornova
Buca
eme
ili
Dikili
Foa
100
100
100
100
97
100
100
100
23 278
4 743
152 685
160 346
37 022
38 930
19 448
12 251
0,93
2,28
1,01
1,05
3,52
0,68
2,43
0,83
101
13
423
446
35
169
35
32
2,1
0,45
15,8
14
3
15
0,8
0,47
Gaziemir
Gzelbahe
Karabalar
Karaburun
Karyaka
Kemalpaa
Knk
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
43 276
10 345
256 276
10 360
102 180
45 990
14 843
0,91
1,23
1,53
4,77
0,9
1,76
2,13
128
28
466
9
315
95
28
4,2
0,61
17,8
1,7
18
2,8
1,7
Kiraz
Konak
Menderes
Menemen
Narldere
demi
Seferihisar
Seluk
100
100
100
95
100
100
100
95
2 981
226 865
53 600
62 554
17 155
38 850
15 717
20 941
0,95
1,53
2,65
1,51
0,65
1,12
1,47
2,01
44
391
75
138
63
129
31
35
1,9
17,7
6,5
3,04
4,7
20,6
6,8
4
Tire
Torbal
Urla
100
100
100
33 520
36 500
26 780
1,7
0,86
1,62
80
138
55
7
2,9
4,3
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
116
editor@iaeme.com
Districts
CollectionSegregation
Businesses
Packaging Waste
Recovery Businesses
Non-hazardous
Waste Recovery
Businesses
Metal-Scrap
Processing
Businesses
Recovery
Companies
Aliaa
Bergama
Bornova
Buca
ili
Foa
Gaziemir
Karabalar
1
9
3
3
-
7
4
1
1
-
14
4
2
1
-
3
1
-
143
11
11
5
14
Karyaka
Kemalpaa
Konak
Menderes
Menemen
Torbal
1
3
16
5
37
10
-
5
3
7
6
In this way, criteria that are of importance in the selection of the location of the
center have been determined as environmental factors, technical and economical
factors and socio-cultural factors. With the help of existing data, that the sub-criteria
that have an impact on the main criteria specified have been considered to be
environmental expenditures, land and development status, proximity to main roads,
proximity to existing recovery plants, proximity to transfer/storage facilities, logistics
and service costs, amount of collected waste and the average amount of waste per
population and per capita; and thus 30 provinces in zmir have been compared. It is
known that in order for waste management to be efficient, the amount of waste to be
collected depends on the population. And since administrative, financial and technical
capacities become more important in waste recovery activities, districts with a
population of 50.000 with low amounts of waste have not been taken into
consideration in the selection of the location of the package waste recycling plant [
Waste Management Action Plan ( 2008 - 2012) ]. Districts that have not been
included in the study compose 9% and 8% of the total amount of waste that is
applicable for zmir and the population served, respectively. On the other hand,
districts Bayrakl , Bornova , Buca , Karabalar , Karyaka and Konak comprise 60%
and 59% of the total amount of waste that is applicable for zmir and the population
served, respectively. For this reason, in the study concerning the determination of the
package waste recycling plant, districts Bayndr , Beyda , eme , Dikili , Foa ,
Gzelbahe , Karaburun , Knk , Kiraz , Seferihisar and Seluk have been excluded
from among the alternatives and the selection has been made from among the
remaining 19 districts.
The objective, main criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives have been demonstrated
in Table 5. Within this framework, Expert Choice 11 package program was used to
establish the hierarchical structure.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
117
editor@iaeme.com
Alternatives
Socio-cultural Factors
Amount of Waste
Collected
Population
Average Amount of
Waste per Capita
Aliaa,Balova , Bayrakl
,
Bergama , Bornova , Buca
ili , Gaziemir ,
Karabalar
Karyaka , Kemalpaa ,
Konak
Menderes , Menemen
Narldere , demi , Tire
Torbal , Urla
Diagram 1 The Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Structure Used in the Study
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
118
editor@iaeme.com
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
119
editor@iaeme.com
As it can be seen in Diagram 3, Bornova and Karabalar are respectively the first
and the second most appropriate districts in terms of selection of the location of the
packaging waste recycling plant in zmir; and Narldere the third.
120
editor@iaeme.com
is for this reason that the rate of segregation of domestic wastes at the source as well
as the number of collection/segregation plants must be increased.
In this study, three main criteria (environmental factors, technical and economic
factors and socio-cultural factors) have been determined to solve the issue pertaining
to the selection of the location of the package waste recycling plant. Following an
assessment of existing data and deliberations with and opinions and data collected
from authorities at the licensed waste recycling plant operators in the province of
zmir and also at respective departments of the zmir Metropolitan Municipality, the
sub criteria that impact the criteria set forth have been considered as environmental
expenditures, land and development status, proximity to main roads, proximity to
existing recycling plants, proximity to transfer/storage facilities, logistics and service
costs, amount of waste collected, average amount of waste per population and per
capita. These have been determined with a consideration for 19 districts among the
30 located in the province of zmir. The hierarchical structure thus established has
been broken broken down using the Expert Choice 11 package program and Bornova,
Karabalar and Narldere districts were seen to be the most appropriate three districts
according to the study-related diagrams, respectively.
Municipalities have to champion the efficient use of all resources, observance of
waste hierarchy so as to ensure the generation of the least possible amount of wastes
and their segregation and also raising public awareness on issues pertaining to
recycling of wastes. In order for the development of the packaging wastes recycling
sector, waste management strategies have to be scaled up in a way to incentivize and
encourage the private sector. Researchers to work on similar topics can identify
further criteria and extend the scope of the study by reaching out to decision-making
authorities.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
121
editor@iaeme.com
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
Kemirtlek, A., (2007), Entegre Kat Atk Ynetimi , sta A.., stanbul, s. 1-15.
Li, R.C, Tee, T.J.C., (2012), A Reverse Logistics Model for Recovery Options of
E-Waste Considering the Integration of the Formal and Informal Waste Sector,
Procedia-Social and Informal Waste Sectors, V.40, pp. 788-816.
Nakbolu, G,(2007), Tersine Lojistik: nemi ve Dnyadaki Uygulamalar, Gazi
niversitesi ktisadi ve dari Bilimler Fakltesi Dergisi 9/2 , s. 181-196.
Rogers, D.S., Tibben-Lembke, R., (2001), an Examination of Reverse Logistics
Practices, Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), pp. 129-148.
Rogers.,D.S., Tibben-Lembke, R.S., (1998), Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics
Trends and Practices, University of Nevada, Reno Center for Logistics
Management .
Saaty, T.L,(2008), The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement
Processes: Applications to Decisions Under Risk, European Journal of Pure and
Applied Mathematics, Vol 1, No 1, pp. 122-196.
Salvarl, S.,(2015), Srdrlebilir Kalknma iin Tersine Lojistikte Ambalaj Atk
Geri Dnm Merkezlerinin nemi Ve Merkez Seimine likin AHP
Yntemiyle Bir Deerlendirme, Yksek Lisans Tezi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstits,
Celal Bayar niversitesi, Manisa
Setaputra, R., (2005), Role of Return Policy in Reverse Logistics: Issues and
Optimum Policies, The Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, The University of
Wisconsin.
Subramaniam, U., Bhadury, J., Peng, H.S., (2004), Reverse Logistcs Stratagies
and Implementation: A Pedagogical Survey, Journal of the Academy of Business
and Economics, 4, 1, March, 2004.
Mwafak M. Shakoor. Selection of Retail Store in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Management,
6(3), 2015, pp. 08-15.
White, P.R., Frankie, M., Hindle,P., (1995), Integrated Solid Waste Management,
A Lifecycle Inventory, An Aspen Publication, New York.
Yldz, D., (2013), Tersine Lojistik Ynetiminde Ambalaj Atklarnn Geri
Dnm: Eskiehir linde Baz Mahallelerde Bir Aratrma, AS 2013, 25-27
Eyll 2013, s. 917-927.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
122
editor@iaeme.com