Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2015
Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES)
ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print), 2222-3045 (Online)
http://www.innspub.net
Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 161-174, 2015
REVIEW PAPER
OPEN ACCESS
the market
place are
supreme
in
creating
an
Fly Ash
particulate
inorganic
matter collected
through
for the disposal of fly ash (Das et al., 2012) and its
considerable
reducing
disposal
cost
environmental
(Hwang,
benefits,
1997).
About
the
given in Table 1.
Class C
References
20 % of lime.
20 % of lime.
higher in class C.
Murty and
higher in Class F.
lower in Class C.
Narasimha, 1999
Murty and
Narasimha, 1999
Shetty, 2005
Obla, 2008
properties.
Furnace
Superheater
Reheater
Economizer
Electrostatic precipitator
Fly ash
flue gas path and finally all fly ash is collected into the
1975). Extra than 70% of the As, Se, Mo, Zn, Cd, W, V,
the form of ash slurry into the ash pond by the help of
pump.
burnt
including
combustion
as As, B, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Ti
1985).
trace
elements.
During
(Rollings
and
Rollings,
1996).
Due
to
fly ash with greater levels of the elements (As, Cd, Hg,
Gayathri, 2014).
Pb,
determined by
spectrometry
V,
Zn,
inductively
Mo
and
Cd) were
coupled-plasma
mass
range of 0.5747-0.5845
m2/cm3.
Range
Ahmad and Mahanwar, 2010
Gray
0.15 - 0.45
6.00 10.0
2
1.26
45 - 55
1.66 2.55
45- 60
Spherical/Irregular
passes
plastic limit values do not arise for fly ash (Sahu and
Gayathri, 2014).
Table 3.
Pal, 2014).
through
material
(Recycle
Materials
for an Indian fly ash demonstrates that all the fly ash
Parameters
Grain Size Distribution
% of Gravel
% of Sand
% of silt + Clay
Coefficient of Uniformity Cu
Coefficient of Curvature Cc
Direct shear Test
Cohesion
Angle of shear Resistance
Proctors Density
Optimum Moisture Content
Maximum Dry Density
Permeability Tests
Coefficient of Permeability
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Mitash,
2007
Muhardi et
al., 2010
2.5
-
3.1-10.7
-
0
42.01 - 46.61
53.41 - 58.03
1.35 1.50
1.04 1.18
Negligible
-
3.34Kpa
-
0.34 Kg/cm20.3
Kg/cm2
1.65 g/cm3
38.7%
-
0.910-5
cm/s
(3.5-3.7)
10-6 m/sec
40.89 %
Non plastic
16.8
33% - 34 %
1.10 (gm/cc) 1.14
(gm/cc)
4.8710-7
cm/s
-
Al2O3
29.03
21.27
25.70
30.90
27.73
20.8
24.80
27.00
23.55
7.63
32.077
Fe2O3
7.67
4.29
5.3
5.38
8.83
15.3
8.01
10.2
4.91
0.13
5.908
CaO
5.51
9.82
5.6
1.88
1.11
16.6
2.44
6.2
18.67
5.30
0.626
MgO
2.35
2.62
2.1
1.93
0.84
1.5
1.94
1.4
1.54
6.09
0.819
SO3
1.4
0.78
0.24
2.6
0.23
0.22
1.47
3.00
0.039
(Sahu
and
Gayathri,
2014).
From
the
X-ray
significant
SEM
1980).
quantity
is
confirmed
by
2008).
shell
is
formed
from
easy-to-melt
inorganic
components
(Fenelonov
et
al.,
2010).
Discussion
alkaline
for
in
nature;
hence,
its
application
other
lightweight
sound
absorbing
structural
Conclusion
The fly ash generated from the coal based thermal
1978) and the low bulk density makes these fly ashes
land use,
of disposal.
DE,
Essington
biosolid
mixtures
in
ME,
mine
Mullen
spoil
reclamation:
properties
of
Fly
Ash
Filled
High
Density
Akinyeye
RO,
Petrik
LF.
2012.
An
manufactured
www.acaausa.org>.
with
cenospheres
Cement
and
Bada
SO,
Potgieter
-Vermaak
S.
L,
Jiang
D.
2011.
Geochemistry
of
2008.
materials
T.
2005.
Geopolymeric
1173 1186.
Cockrell CF, Leonard JW. 1970. Characterization
Bayat O. 1998. Characterisation of Turkish fly ashes.
dependence
of
concentration
on
particle
size.
Mixtures.
International
Journal
of
Engineering
Hansen
LD,
Fisher
GL.
1980.
Elemental
Annual
report.
2002.
140
(www.eskom.co.za/annreport).
Hansen LD, Silberman D, Fisher GL. 1981.
Excise Duty on Fly Ash - c-farm.org.
Crystalline components of stack-collected, sizefractionated coal fly ash, Environmental Science &
The
properties
of
cenospheres
and
the
Peterson
G,
Trimble
AS.
1999.
Petrology,
2003.
collected
from
electrostatic
precipitators:
materials
University.
processing.
Michigan
Technological
vegetation.
Kutchko
for
improving
crop
production
review.
Global
BG,
Journal
Kim
of
AG.
Environmental
2006.
Fly
ash
Influence
of
trace
metal
distribution
on
its
2013.
Relationships
between
trace
element
Lawasami MH,
1990.
Geochemical
factors
controlling
the
temperatures.
Cement
and
Concrete
Mishra DP, Das SK. 2010. A study of physicochemical and mineralogical properties of Talcher coal
Tech
Rourkela, Orissa.
Pandian
thesis,
National
NS,
Institute
of
Balasubramonian
Technology,
S.
2000.
Dhanbad, India.
Pandian NS. 2004. Fly ash characterization with
Mitash N. 2007. Utility bonanza from dust. Parisara
kar.nic.in/11.Fly%20ash%202007-01.pdf
[accessed
18/6/2011]).
processes,
characteristics
of
European
pulverized
coal
Conf-760429.
Springfield,
VA:
US
2010. Engineering
for
Value
Added
Products.
NML,
08/06/2010.
<http://www.
recycled
materials. org/Resources/CD/userguide/index.htm>.
Naik H. 2013. Evaluation of flow and in- place
strength
materials.
characteristics
PhD
of
thesis,
fly
ash
National
composite
Institute
of
Sahu
V,
Gayathri
V.
2014.
Geotechnical
their
potential
for
enhanced
utilization.
Civil
Journal (CiVEJ) 1.
Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA. 2002. Utilisation of
Salunkhe TV, Mandal JN. 2014. Behaviur of Fly
fly
ash
in
geopolymeric
material.
Applied
ET) 2.
R.
2003.
Effect
of
fine
aggregate
of
concrete.
Cement
and
mineral
matter
2002, Kinetics of
transformation
during
coal
Concrete
177 234.
Agro-based
Industries
in
Eastern
India.
IIT,
Kharagpur, India.
2268- 2277.